[Bug 481412] XorgLogOld.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292125/XorgLogOld.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] XorgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292122/XorgLog.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] GconfGnomeSession.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeSession.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292120/GconfGnomeSession.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292119/GconfGnomeScreensaver.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] GconfGnomePowerManager.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomePowerManager.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292118/GconfGnomePowerManager.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] GconfGnomeLockdown.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "GconfGnomeLockdown.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292114/GconfGnomeLockdown.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51292112/Dependencies.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] Re: "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic
Dear Pedro, First of all, thanks for your reply. I'm currently in up-to-date lucid (will apport-collect later), and the "Pictures Folder" screensaver is identical. I haven't yet supplied a mockup or pseudocode, although, IMHO, it could be interesting. ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver If the "Pictures Folder" screensaver is selected, an endless loop of images appear in exactly the same way: centered and resized, while keeping the original aspect ratio. The background, in case the images don't fit the screen, is a constant black. Furthermore, the fading animation seems a tad too fast. It would be nice to have a slightly more complex pictures screensaver. For example, images could appear inside a subtle frame. Additionally, a random number generator could be used to display either 1 or 2 pictures at the same time. Two images would appear in opposite corners, and one of them could have a small rotation. As a background, one could use a matte tiled pattern, or something resembling a photo book, or a papyrus. I'll try to supply a mockup. There's also a possibility of F-spot themed integration: if ratings are easily retrievable, there could be one main big image (chosen amongst the best rated, with some key word) and put a small picture (same folder, with a lower ranking) on a corner, in a stamp like fashion. This could have another name, instead of "Pictures Folders", it could be named "Photo Showroom". Furthermore, and following gnome interface guidelines, no configuration should be needed: the current values for transition are OK, although a slower fading could be nice. BTW: This is inspired by the Windows Live Photo Gallery screensaver. Once you have a decent collection of photos, looking at the screensaver with pictures of your girlfriend or holidays can be highly addictive. This is clearly a wishlist, although I'm not sure I should directly mark it so in the bug description. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 12 17:23:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 2.28.0-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, user) LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic x86_64 + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No + GnomeSessionInhibitors: None + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) + Package: gnome-screensaver 2.30.0-0ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=es_ES.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 + Tags: lucid + Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers + WindowManager: gnome-wm -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 138343] Re: evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM)
In order to check the current evince behaviour, I opened again the pdf linked by Rebecca Palmer. The maximum memory usage I saw using system monitor was 55 Mb, when scrolling through pages 21-22. As soon as I passed those two gnuplot graphs, memory usage dropped to about 30 Mb. Bear in mind that the initial memory usage is 20 Mb. This is on a fully updated 64bit lucid install. Can anyone post a link to a file triggering the events? The heaviest file I probably have is a paper from Review of Modern Physics, Rev Mod Phys 62, 1045 (1992). It is made of 53 scanned pages, and is 11 Mb. The biggest memory usage I've seen when torturing evince is 144.5 Mb, and I will recover memory when I stop scrolling like crazy. In comparison, acroread has a maximum memory usage of 46 Mb... but the scrolling there plainly sucks. -- evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 512196] Re: "Show rhythmbox" an "Quit rhythmbox" are too close together in the indicator menu
I just subscribed to this bug, after killing rhythmbox when I actually wanted to show it. Do you guys miss the old functionality? In older versions rhythmbox reappeared when you left-clicked on the icon. -- "Show rhythmbox" an "Quit rhythmbox" are too close together in the indicator menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 494168] Re: Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular
Here is the screenshot I took using okular. Note the green underline as well as the blue ellipse. These don't appear in either evince or acroread. ** Attachment added: "okular-intro.jpeg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36635983/okular-intro.jpeg -- Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 494168] Re: Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular
Thanks for your answer, Pedro. The comment you mentioned was included by my advisor. What I did was add more comments via Okular (because it's supported there) to remember which changes were already applied. I'll include a screenshot of Okular as soon as possible. -- Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 494168] Re: Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular
** Attachment added: "intro.pdf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36599321/intro.pdf ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36599322/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "KernLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36599323/KernLog.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36599324/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36599325/XsessionErrors.txt -- Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 494168] [NEW] Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Steps taken: 1) Add "green" annotations with okular and close the pdf (apparently it autosaves) 2) open the same file with evince Expected result: The green markings also show in evince Actual result: No annotations are shown, and many error messages spawn ~/.xsession-errors I have been checking some of the annotations made by my advisor on an old pdf file, and added "green" annotations with okular (in up to date Kubuntu Karmic). I rebooted into ubuntu later, to see whether the annotations would be displayed, and got an error in xsession-errors encouraging me to report the bug. I'll also attach the offending pdf. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Dec 8 20:50:49 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, user) LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.52-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Evince does not support "green" annotations made with Okular https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192629] Re: "Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately?" on NTFS / VFAT partitions
touristguy, If you read your own bug report, you will see that you can actually delete files from an NTFS or VFAT partition without issues. -- "Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately?" on NTFS / VFAT partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] Re: "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35580996/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35580997/XsessionErrors.txt -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481412] [NEW] "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver If the "Pictures Folder" screensaver is selected, an endless loop of images appear in exactly the same way: centered and resized, while keeping the original aspect ratio. The background, in case the images don't fit the screen, is a constant black. Furthermore, the fading animation seems a tad too fast. It would be nice to have a slightly more complex pictures screensaver. For example, images could appear inside a subtle frame. Additionally, a random number generator could be used to display either 1 or 2 pictures at the same time. Two images would appear in opposite corners, and one of them could have a small rotation. As a background, one could use a matte tiled pattern, or something resembling a photo book, or a papyrus. I'll try to supply a mockup. There's also a possibility of F-spot themed integration: if ratings are easily retrievable, there could be one main big image (chosen amongst the best rated, with some key word) and put a small picture (same folder, with a lower ranking) on a corner, in a stamp like fashion. This could have another name, instead of "Pictures Folders", it could be named "Photo Showroom". Furthermore, and following gnome interface guidelines, no configuration should be needed: the current values for transition are OK, although a slower fading could be nice. BTW: This is inspired by the Windows Live Photo Gallery screensaver. Once you have a decent collection of photos, looking at the screensaver with pictures of your girlfriend or holidays can be highly addictive. This is clearly a wishlist, although I'm not sure I should directly mark it so in the bug description. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 12 17:23:15 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 2.28.0-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, user) LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- "Pictures Folder" screensaver should be more dynamic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 447923] Re: gnome-appearance-properties shows only 3 wallpapers per row
** Attachment added: "3wallpapers.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33401290/3wallpapers.jpg ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33401291/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33401292/XsessionErrors.txt -- gnome-appearance-properties shows only 3 wallpapers per row https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 447923] [NEW] gnome-appearance-properties shows only 3 wallpapers per row
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center Probably due to the incorporation of animated backgrounds in gnome 2.28, the "Background" tab in gnome-appearance-properties only shows 3 wallpapers per row (used to be 4). However, the window size has not changed, and with an increase of about 10 pixels of window width, 4 wallpapers per row are recovered. This also means that a lot of space is not wasted anymore. An example screenshot of gnome-appearance-properties is shown. I know this item is of the lowest priority, but it's a shame that after all the effort put into gnome 2.28 to reduce wasted space we get almost 25% of a window empty. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Oct 10 12:55:35 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.28.0-0ubuntu4 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.43-generic SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- gnome-appearance-properties shows only 3 wallpapers per row https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 434035] Re: F-Spot opens wrong JPG thumbnail for NEF files
OK, I'm attaching a NEF edited with ViewNX. Let's see if launchpad allows uploading a 10Mb file. Please excuse my photographic abilities. Note again that the correct image can be extracted with the command dcraw -e DSC_5013.NEF ** Attachment added: "DSC_5013.NEF" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32852473/DSC_5013.NEF -- F-Spot opens wrong JPG thumbnail for NEF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 434035] [NEW] F-Spot opens wrong JPG thumbnail for NEF files
Public bug reported: This bug is 100% reproducible. - Expected behaviour Using F-Spot to open a NEF file, the correct 10 MPixels picture taken with a Nikon D60 is shown. - Observed behaviour If the NEF file has been edited with TransferNX, a small 320x214 thumbnail is shown [More details] NEF files are raw data files created by Nikon dSLR cameras, and other than the image data (sensor, white balance, colour profile,...) there is also an embedded jpg that acts as a preview. This jpg is full resolution and has a quality of about 85~90. Being processed exactly as specified by the camera settings, this jpg is used by several programs to display NEF files. Opening a NEF file in Ubuntu defaults to F-Spot, and works OK in Jaunty and Intrepid. Once a NEF file (Nikon RAW file) has been "developed" with any Nikon software, the thumbnail is updated with a high quality jpg to reflect the changes made (white balance, exposure, lateral chromatic aberration,...). F-Spot opens successfully NEF files edited with CaptureNX 2 (the $180 retouching package sold by Nikon). However, if a file is edited with the freeware TransferNX, F-Spot no longer displays the correct thumbnail. On the other hand, a 320x214 thumbnail is shown. Furthermore, the colours are all off, although GQview is able to display the colours OK. It must be noted that the full thumbnail is still there, since dcraw is still able to extract the full resolution jpg. I have tested this only with NEF files created with a Nikon D60 and with TransferNX 1.3 and 1.4 running on Windows (there is a Mac OS X version). I can provide two sample NEF files (original and edited), but one file is about 10 Mb. ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- F-Spot opens wrong JPG thumbnail for NEF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136329] Re: [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot
I'm just commenting, but not reopening anything: on my new laptop (Thinkpad T400) and with a fresh install of Intrepid (x86_64), there are two gdm processes too, but only one X: $ ps aux | grep gdm root 5544 0.0 0.1 118496 2116 ?Ss 09:48 0:00 /usr/sbin/gdm root 5547 0.0 0.1 139516 3724 ?S09:48 0:00 /usr/sbin/gdm root 5552 4.1 1.2 105720 25044 tty7 Ss+ 09:48 0:06 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -br -audit 0 -auth /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt7 miguel6287 0.0 0.0 7472 976 pts/0S+ 09:51 0:00 grep --color=auto gdm This is after explicitly disabling the ATi card in the BIOS and running with an Intel card and the default xorg.conf. -- [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 138343] Re: evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM)
Is there really any chance of backporting poppler from Intrepid? I've done a quick search in synaptic (I admit I don't know how to search for dependencies via aptitude) and default ubuntu packages that depend on poppler (and might need to be recompiled and put into backports) are evince (obviously), cups, gimp and tracker. Other important packages depending on poppler are inkscape, kpdf, krita and texlive-base-bin. On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:02:36 - Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > right bugs are closed when they are fixed in the current unstable > ubuntu version, then backport tasks can be opened if required > -- evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 138343] Re: evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM)
I've just added the following comment in the upstream bug: "Does the bugfix just require to update poppler to 0.8.4 (current as of today)? Or does it also need patches presented here? It's a shame if a full poppler 0.8 is required, since this will probably leave Ubuntu Hardy users in the dust. Oh, well, there's always xpdf." Does anybody here if hardy users will be able to enjoy this bugfix? As a sidenote, since the gutsy kernel ubuntu has sucked quite a bit during high IO processing. Hardy is somewhat better but high IO really kills gutsy, while 100% CPU usage has never been an issue. Joakim might want to have a look at bug #131094 -- evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 32737] Re: Trashapplet shows wrongly wrapped message [cosmetic]
Well, this has been marked as invalid, but is still an issue in Hardy. Gnome bugzilla marks obsolescence as the reason why this became invalid, so if there is any more to do, please tell me. I also have a gnome bugzilla account, if that helps. -- Trashapplet shows wrongly wrapped message [cosmetic] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32737 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 197673] Re: gnome-display-properties should revert change automatically if not acknowledged
Heh, I should have read this bug before spamming the ubuntu-x mailing list. Long story short: as acknowledged here, I managed to screw my only monitor (my laptop screen) via gnome-display-properties. It was even more serious, since I've just discovered that the offending file is .gnome2/montiors.xml (I somehow expected this to be in .gconf/) By the way, a reinstall might *not* solve the problem. If you have a separate /home partition, and the user you create during the install is the same (same name, uid and gid) you had before (very likely in a home computer), you will still have the borked monitors.xml when you boot after install. -- gnome-display-properties should revert change automatically if not acknowledged https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 138343] Re: evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM)
In my laptop, evince crawls every time I open a scanned Physical Review paper (i.e. older than 1995). However, xpdf works flawlessly. A lot of examples can be found in the Physical Review Letters milestone papers, which I think anyone can access: http://prl.aps.org/50years/milestones I must say that I've seen this happen on my laptop (ATi card + free radeon driver) and on a Debian Testing PC (Intel), but a Core Duo laptop with nVidia graphics and running Xubuntu Gutsy opened a "dangerous" pdf fine. Can this be related to the graphics card or the driver? I'll try fglrx to see if that changes anything. -- evince consumes a lot of memory (1.5 GB VM) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition
Dear Sebastien, First of all, I felt it was wrong because deleting files to trashcan has been the default behaviour from Warty to Gutsy. You've got a point that I, as a user, don't have exclusive rights to that drive. Another point is that most vfat partitions mounted in ubuntu are probably USB flash memories, where a user might not want to leave residual files by default. In this case, however, this is a hard drive partition, using the default mount options from a Gutsy pre-release live CD. I expected files deleted on the local hard drive going to the trashcan. Seeing that you hinted that default behaviour now is directly deleting files to which you don't have exclusive access, I've performed a couple of tests chowning miguel:users back and forth. The results were: -A file inside $HOME goes to the trashcan as usual. It doesn't depend on the group owning the file. -If we put the sample file in /home/$USER/wherever and chown -R $user:users ~/wherever the results are still the same -If we have full access to a source directory (i.e. /usr/local/src/XCrySDen), we get similar behaviour to that seen in the vfat partition. This happens even if the file is owned by miguel:miguel and even if the directory containing the file is also owned by miguel:miguel. So the bug seems to be more like "cannot send files lying outside of $HOME to trashcan". In any case, I'm no longer sure what is the correct behaviour. I feel that if you own `pwd` you should be able to send the file to the trashcan, although you have a good point on the plugdev mount. Finally, thanks for the suggestions on bug titles. PS: /fat32 is a partition in my laptop's HD used to share data between windows XP and linux. Even though ntfs-3g has made the partition somewhat redundant, I'd still rather have it. -- Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192629] Re: [hardy] Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition
Trashcan error in spanish (es_ES.UTF-8) ** Attachment added: "trashcan-error.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12048246/trashcan-error.png -- [hardy] Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192629] [NEW] [hardy] Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition
Public bug reported: Trying to delete files with nautilus from a vfat partition "fails". Well, the file can be deleted OK, but it seems gvfs can't send the file to the trashcan, so only permanent delete is available. Furthermore, the name of the file appears in little boxes, similar to viewing a chinese site using Latin-1 encoding (will attach screenshot). Distro: Hardy up to date (17-february 2008) Steps to reproduce: Copy a file to an vfat partition. Select it and delete using nautilus. A message error will appear: "Can't move file to trashcan. Do you want to delete it inmediately?" "File <>cannot be moved to trashcan" Versions: Nautilus 1:2.21.91-0ubuntu2 gvfs 0.1.7-0ubuntu4 /etc/fstab for the vfat partition: UUID=9445-A956 /fat32 vfatdefaults,utf8,umask=007,gid=46 0 1 ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [hardy] Cannot send files to thrascan from a vfat partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 188702] Re: hardy: multimedia keys no longer work
I also have this issue. This seems a regression caused by the fix to bug #182704 (shortcuts don't work when NumLock is on). -- hardy: multimedia keys no longer work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 188734] Re: hardy: weird behaviour in nautilus when trying to delete a file from a protected removable SD card
The same behaviour here. -- hardy: weird behaviour in nautilus when trying to delete a file from a protected removable SD card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 182704] Re: Multimedia Keys Don't Work
Dear folks, Since the last gnome-control-centre update (version 2.21.90-0ubuntu1), I can lower and rise the volume even when NumLock is on. The calculator and tracker shortcuts are also working for me. Is it also working for everybody else? If so, one of us can get extra karma points by closing the bug ;-) hyperair escribió: > Hmm, hopefully. > -- Multimedia Keys Don't Work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 182704] Re: Multimedia Keys Don't Work
I wouldn't really worry. If this bug is indeed in gnome-control-center (and I have absolutely no reason to doubt Sebastien), it will be fixed as soon as the latest upstream gnome packages hit ubuntu. Given that most 2.21.90 packages (from beta1?) are hitting the repositories about now, I suppose that this week should see the end of this bug. -- Multimedia Keys Don't Work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 26891] Re: fileselector should use a combo list for the filetype
In any case it matters, I no longer have the extra-long dialog in up-to- date Hardy, as seen in the attachment. ** Attachment added: "new_save-as-PNG.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11439829/new_save-as-PNG.png -- fileselector should use a combo list for the filetype https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182704] Re: Multimedia Keys Don't Work
I have some further info, which I'll post in case it's helpful to somebody. I've done some toying with the shortcut keys and I was wrong, all I've tried fail when NumLock is on, save "Run in Terminal". I've tried * single key shortcuts (such as F1 for help) * Fn+F10 for ejecting CD's * My laptop's brightness controls * Ctrl+Alt+T for other task (calculator) * Previously non-working combinatios for "Run in Terminal" Since the brightness controls work as soon as the BIOS is loaded, they still obviously work, regardless of NumLock. Single key shortcuts also fail with Numlock on. Finally, there's no magic key combination. Ctrl+Alt+T will fail when set other shortcuts, while any shortcut set for launching a terminal will work. Hyperair noted that the terminal shortcut might have been set up for compiz. Although I don't usually have compiz running, I did set it up via gconf so that there was a way to launch a terminal. I can't think of any other difference. By the way, is this a bug in metacity, in the kernel or in the gnome- control-center? -- Multimedia Keys Don't Work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182641] Re: [Hardy] None of the keyboard shortcuts are working.
Hyperair, I think you are actually seeing a duplicate of bug #182704 and this could be checked by disabling NumLock. Do your volume keys work now? If so, it's 182704. I'm still not marking this as a duplicate, since for me Ctrl+Alt+Whatever works even with NumLock enabled. In any case, this bug seems related to gnome-control-center, which I am changing. -- [Hardy] None of the keyboard shortcuts are working. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182641] Re: [Hardy] None of the keyboard shortcuts are working.
Setting the package and reverting to incomplete. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => gnome-control-center Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- [Hardy] None of the keyboard shortcuts are working. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182704] Re: Multimedia Keys Don't Work
I'm changing the affected package, although it could be nautilus' fault. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => gnome-control-center -- Multimedia Keys Don't Work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 174191] Re: screensavers cause high CPU usage
I first wanted to say that I've also seen that behaviour. Now, I'd also like to point out that the second part of your bug isn't strictly true. I believe that the default settings blank out the screen after a certain amount of time (I think it's either 30 minutes or an hour), so after that time the screensaver will stop draining CPU. However, having high CPU usage during idle time is not something desirable on laptops, so it might be interesting to modify the default blank out time if a laptop is detected. Finally, three possible workarounds if you want to have screensavers and still have low CPU usage: 1) Select a specific non-draining screensaver/blank screen (doh!) 2) Substitute gnome-screensaver with xscreensaver. The added configurability might also help (doh! number one revisited) 3) Uninstall rss-glx. This will remove the 3D screensavers, which are usually the life-draining ones. (doh! This Miguel guy doesn't look really bright) -- screensavers cause high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 156487] Re: Sudoku Forgets Generated Puzzles and Highscores
This is probably useless and I admit I haven't looked at the source but might this be related by trying to write the new puzzles and the high scores to the developer's $HOME/.gnome2/ instead of the user's $HOME/.gnome2??? I personally haven't noticed issues with the generation of puzzles, but high-scores are indeed lost. -- Sudoku Forgets Generated Puzzles and Highscores https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 156537] Re: Mines graphics annoying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 48371 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48371 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 48371 uncleared mine tiles same color as cleared tiles -- Mines graphics annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156537 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131266] Re: [gutsy] Places->Recent documents does not reflect the content of $HOME/.recently-used.xbel
That's a huge list of changes. Thanks for the upload, the issue seems to be corrected (I've only tested for a few minutes) -- [gutsy] Places->Recent documents does not reflect the content of $HOME/.recently-used.xbel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136329] Re: [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot
> gdm uses multi processus, why do you consider that as a bug? Another user has explained me that /etc/init.d/gdm is written so that both a daemon and itself are up and running so the first two lines in top don't really surprise me (I admit I haven't looked at the boot script, though). In any case,having a single-processor single-core Pentium-M 735 I find it strange having two /usr/bin/X lines spawning at tty7 (please, tell me if I'm using wrong terminology), even more so since a Pentium4 HT (enabled) PC I have running Debian Testing only shows one /usr/bin/X. Basically this is as hexion said, I just found it weird, and if this is not a bug but a feature that let's say benefits multi-core users, we're all OK with it. -- [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136329] Re: [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot
I wanted to add that I have only one screen on my xorg.conf (I am attaching it too). My system is a Dell Inspiron 8600c laptop with no external monitors attached. My xserver-xorg-core is 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg- 12ubuntu3 a version by Bryce Harrington with fixes backported from 1.3.99. This happens with both fglrx and the free ati driver. Thanks for your attention. ** Attachment added: "xorg.conf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9073734/xorg.conf -- [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 136329] [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm On an up-to-date gutsy, ps shows two different processes related to gdm right after boot. It can be reproduced easily: -Reboot -Log into gnome -Fire a terminal and see the output of "ps aux | grep gdm". I see the following: $ ps aux | grep gdm root 4925 0.0 0.3 13572 1772 ?Ss 11:12 0:00 /usr/sbin/gdm root 4937 0.0 0.5 14012 3056 ?S11:12 0:00 /usr/sbin/gdm root 4963 2.5 7.1 48152 36940 tty7 SLs+ 11:12 2:01 /usr/bin/X :0 -auth /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt7 root 5277 0.0 7.1 48152 36940 tty7 SL+ 11:12 0:00 /usr/bin/X :0 -auth /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt7 miguel8553 0.0 0.1 2992 764 pts/3R+ 12:32 0:00 grep gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [gutsy] Two instances of gdm running after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 61082] Re: File-roller don't use mime type, also context menu "open with" seems duplicate "view" function.
I'm changing the status to fix released, since file-roller 2.19.4 did indeed deliver that fix. I've tried renaming a png before archiving, so that file-roller calls the needed application by mime type rather than by extension and it worked. I've currently tried png's, jpg's, txt's, eps's, pdf's, perl scripts, FORTRAN sources and text files without extension. All this has been tested in both file-roller 2.19.4 and 2.19.90 in Gutsy. ** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- File-roller don't use mime type, also context menu "open with" seems duplicate "view" function. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131266] [gutsy] Places->Recent documents does not reflect the content of $HOME/.recently-used.xbel
Public bug reported: Symptom: Places->Recent documents does not update even though one opens several files of different MIME types. This means that if one clears recent documents, it will reman grayed out. Reproducibility: Near 100% on my system, in various languages, although not everybody suffers this bug: Possible causes: As $HOME/.recently-used.xbel is being updated all the time, it is possible that gnome-panel (I'm not sure it's this package) is not reading or parsing properly $HOME/.recently-used.xbel. What has been attempted: I've deleted a remnant .recently-used on my $HOME to see if this was the culprit, but it seems it wasn't. I've also installed more language packs to see if this was a language pack issue. So far I've seen the same in Spanish (Spain), Basque (Spain), English (US) and English (UK). I've also made a symlink called .recently-used pointing to .recently-used.xbel to see if the issue was that gnome-panel was reading the old .recently-used instead of the updated .xbel one. It seems it didn't help. I'm now trying to see if the issue lies with the existance of two .recently* files. ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [gutsy] Places->Recent documents does not reflect the content of $HOME/.recently-used.xbel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 129697] Re: Crash in Chess after program start
In gnome-bugs #459740 they mention (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459740#c35) that the issue should have been resolved with the gtk2 2.11.6 (IIRC). Aptitude shows that is the version of gtk2 installed on my gutsy system, but glchess still crashes on startup. Any ideas? -- Crash in Chess after program start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 61082] Re: File-roller don't use mime type, also context menu "open with" seems duplicate "view" function.
Hi Sebastien, I just read on the Gnome 2.19.6 release notes and found this (link http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/desktop/2.19/2.19.6/NEWS): NEWS: file-roller-2.19.4 version 2.19.4 -- * Get the mime type from the file content to find out the default application to use when viewing a file. This might close the bug, although I'm not currently on my Ubuntu Gutsy box to check package versions and if file-roller really uses MIME types correctly now. -- File-roller don't use mime type, also context menu "open with" seems duplicate "view" function. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
