[Bug 1309605] Re: OSD (skip, pause) take full window (and fullscreen) height

2014-04-22 Thread Robin Roth
Let me be a bit more precise (no pun intended).
In Window mode, it I resize the window while the OSD is shown, it is rescaled 
to the window size. When switching to full screen while an OSD is there, it is 
also resized.
So a temporary workaround is to resize the window to a minimal size while 
forcing an OSD and then never again resize when an OSD is shown.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309605

Title:
  OSD (skip, pause) take full window (and fullscreen) height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1309605/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1309605] [NEW] OSD (skip, pause) take full window (and fullscreen) height

2014-04-18 Thread Robin Roth
Public bug reported:

The  OSD icons for forward/backward skip and pause have the wrong heigt.
They take the full (sometimes even more) height on the player window and
also full height in fullscreen mode.

This appeared after the upgrade to trusty (totem 3.10.1)

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309605

Title:
  OSD (skip, pause) take full window (and fullscreen) height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1309605/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 448234] Re: epiphany-browser assert failure: epiphany-browser: /build/buildd/nspluginwrapper-1.2.2/src/npw-rpc.c:1225: do_recv_NPObject: Assertion `npobj != ((void *)0)' failed.

2011-11-23 Thread Robin Roth
still not fixed, is it?
Even if it's some kind of annoying flash-issue, there should be at least some 
kind of more specific error message and epiphany should not crash at all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448234

Title:
  epiphany-browser assert failure: epiphany-browser:
  /build/buildd/nspluginwrapper-1.2.2/src/npw-rpc.c:1225:
  do_recv_NPObject: Assertion `npobj != ((void *)0)' failed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epiphany-browser/+bug/448234/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 448234] Re: epiphany-browser assert failure: epiphany-browser: /build/buildd/nspluginwrapper-1.2.2/src/npw-rpc.c:1225: do_recv_NPObject: Assertion `npobj != ((void *)0)' failed.

2011-05-27 Thread Robin Roth
Got the same bug on my machine with epiphany (but not firefox). This
showed up only recently, but it might be it's because I usually don't
use flash websites. See crash log attached.

Using epiphany 2.30.2 on ubuntu maverick

** Attachment added: "Crash log of epiphany"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/448234/+attachment/2145040/+files/crash.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448234

Title:
  epiphany-browser assert failure: epiphany-browser:
  /build/buildd/nspluginwrapper-1.2.2/src/npw-rpc.c:1225:
  do_recv_NPObject: Assertion `npobj != ((void *)0)' failed.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 666846] Re: Keyring unlock asks for password twice despite auto-unlock via pam_gnome_keyring

2010-10-28 Thread Robin Roth
Found that the libpam-gnome-keyring only unlocks the "login" keyring on purpuse.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeKeyring/Pam

So this is not really a bug-report but more a feature-request/wishlist
thing.

** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Opinion

-- 
Keyring unlock asks for password twice despite auto-unlock via pam_gnome_keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 666846] [NEW] Keyring unlock asks for password twice despite auto-unlock via pam_gnome_keyring

2010-10-26 Thread Robin Roth
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-keyring

I'm running ubuntu 10.10, with all updates as of today, especially
gnome-keyring 2.92.92.is.2.31.91-0ubuntu4

I have two keyrings: default and login, which were automatically created
and filled with passwords by applications (empathy, networkmanager,
etc). After changing my password some time ago, I had the problem that
the keyring passwords were not changed, so I did that manually to make
sure they are the same as the login password.

When I now login using gdm, the "login" keyring gets unlocked, but the 
"default" keyring does not. I'm asked twice to enter it's password, before 
networkmanager is able to use it.
I tried apt-get install --reinstall --purge gnome-keyring libpam-gnome-keyring, 
but didn't solve it.

Because it worked in the past I assumed that the auto-unlock should try 
unlocking all keyrings. 
- If it should unlock all keyrings: Why does it not? Which logs should I 
attach? 
- If it's only supposed so unlock the "login" keyring: Can this be changed? Why 
then do programs use two different keyrings at all?

Thanks a lot

** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Keyring unlock asks for password twice despite auto-unlock via pam_gnome_keyring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 484429] Re: Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking device: cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device already exists

2010-01-17 Thread Robin Roth
The problem is only partially solved by making "Disk Utility" close the
luks device.

In fact all other situations in which a device is not closed correctly also 
lead to this error. 
I use an encrypted external harddrive. Whenever I shutdown the drive before 
unmounting or suspend the pc, then disconnect the drive and resume the pc, the 
luks device is not closed cleanly. Such situations can happen and should be 
handeled correctly, by making nautilus (or the gvfs backend, I'm not an expert 
here) close a luks drive automatically, when it is no longer accessible.

Steps to reproduce:
1) mount an luks-encrypted external harddrive
2) suspend the system
3) disconnect the drive
4) resume the system
5) connect the drive
6) try to mount the encryptet partition (happens automatically by default when 
inserted)

I would be happy to give further details when helpful and will test a
patch if available.

-- 
Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking device: 
cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device already exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484429
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs