[Bug 762918] Re: Natty Screensaver freezes system after some period of inactivity
Similar issue where screensaver hangs machine when running for a while. 11.04 with INTEL GMA4500 chipset. Some screensavers also seem sluggish as mentioned by others. CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE to restart X solves the problem, but a bit drastic as a sustainable fix :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762918 Title: Natty Screensaver freezes system after some period of inactivity -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467427] [NEW] F-spot cannot connect to Canon A70 camera when Nautilus is set to automatically open F-spot for photos
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot My Canon A70 would not connect in F-spot to allow import and gave an error (Bad parameters) when plugged into the computer. I changed my Nautilus configuration so instead of automatically opening F-spot, Nautilus would ask me what I wanted to do for Photos (Edit | Preferences | Media tab). This solved what I assume is a race condition where F-spot and the Nautilus tried to get hold of the camera, and it all works properly. (Karmic 9.10, F-spot 0.6.1.3). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 31 20:48:23 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: f-spot 0.6.1.3-2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: f-spot Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- F-spot cannot connect to Canon A70 camera when Nautilus is set to automatically open F-spot for photos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467427] Re: F-spot cannot connect to Canon A70 camera when Nautilus is set to automatically open F-spot for photos
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34809324/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34809325/XsessionErrors.txt -- F-spot cannot connect to Canon A70 camera when Nautilus is set to automatically open F-spot for photos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 258083] Re: F-Spot - Error connecting to camera. "Could not lock the device"
I had this issue. My Canon A70 would not connect and gave an error (Bad parameters). I changed my Nautilus configuration so instead of automatically opening F-spot, Nautilus would ask me what I wanted to do (Edit | Preferences | Media tab). This solved the race condition where F-spot and the Nautilus tried to get hold of the camera, and it all works properly. (Karmic 9.10, F-spot 0.6.1.3). -- F-Spot - Error connecting to camera. "Could not lock the device" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354264] Re: Imports all photos to the root of the home directory
Apologies but I've read through and not sure if this fix will be released for Jaunty or whether we should apply the patch in the thread. Please can you confirm. Thanks, Russ. -- Imports all photos to the root of the home directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to f-spot in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 267051] Re: Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU
I have opened at bugzilla.gnome.org here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551275 Thanks for your help, Russ. -- Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 267051] Re: Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU
Machine is Sempron 3000+, 2GB RAM, generally runs at a decent speed. Takes 30s - many minutes to return from search. Regards, Russ. -- Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 267051] [NEW] Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Using the search dialog in Rhythmbox results in very slow response (sometimes complete hang), and 100% CPU utilisation. I have approx 9000 tracks (60GB) of mp3 registered. The problem is the same whether you search by All, Artists or Albums. I am using Hardy (8.04) fully patched to latest level. ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Rhythmbox search very slow - 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 246499] [NEW] Hardy- Nautilus slow to enumerate large directories
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libnautilus-extension-dev Using terminal I list my Music directory containing 396 folders at the top level and it is nearly instantaneous (too fast to measure and less than 1 second). I open the same folder using Nautilus and the same operation takes 22 seconds at 100% CPU. The machine has a SATA-II 300 hard disk, and AMD 3000+ Sempron with 2GB RAM. This is much slower than Feisty on the same machine, and seems a little sub optimal :-) This problem is even more acute (30-40seconds) if I try to browse and save a file from Firefox (although possibly not related of course). Please advise if you need more information. Thanks, Russ. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Hardy- Nautilus slow to enumerate large directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 9953] Re: Directories with large numbers of items block file requester.
Regarding the previous post- Perhaps I am writing junk- rereading this bug suggests that this issue is from way back and probably completely unrelated to the BSD link I added. Nevertheless the issue remains on Hardy for me. Cheers, Russ. -- Directories with large numbers of items block file requester. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 9953] Re: Directories with large numbers of items block file requester.
I have this issue (8.04). I did not have it in previous releases 7.10, 7.04. CPU goes very high. Very noticable with dirs of 1000+ entries. Affects Rhythmbox, Firefox and Nautilus to a lesser extent. Please re-open and fix. This is a serious issue. Is it related to the 25 year old BSD bug? http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/11/1339228&from=rss Cheers, Russ. -- Directories with large numbers of items block file requester. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 192930] Re: Numeric keypad no longer works in Hardy
Thanks- this fixed my problem. LED light is correct for me also. Russ. -- Numeric keypad no longer works in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
