[Bug 201393] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
Appeared again today in 14.04 2014-04-06 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201393 Title: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/201393/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1193522] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name()
May one ask when this will be done, and by whom? Has this been brought to the attention of the dropbox developers? Or does the user have to do this him/herself? Meanwhile, if it helps anyone sort this out, here is the output in the terminal after starting nautilus and then trying to open the dropbox folder: (nautilus:16785): Gtk-WARNING **: Refusing to add non-unique action 'NautilusDropbox::browse' to action group 'DirExtensionsMenuGroup' Segmentation fault (core dumped) HTH -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193522 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1193522/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1200452] [NEW] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name()
Public bug reported: Trying to open a folder in the Dropbox folder crashes nautilus. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.10.0-2.11-generic 3.10.0 Uname: Linux 3.10.0-2-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.10.2-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Thu Jul 11 18:52:24 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'geometry' b'893x802+57+24' b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'158' InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-21 (263 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: nautilus -n ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7f7a3bcf1d66 gtk_action_get_name+22: cmp %rax,(%rdx) PC (0x7f7a3bcf1d66) ok source %rax ok destination (%rdx) (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing unknown VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: gtk_action_get_name () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0 ?? () ?? () ?? () ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash need-amd64-retrace saucy ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200452 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_action_get_name() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1200452/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1050358] Re: emesene crashed with SIGSEGV in tupledealloc.24592()
I reported a related crash in bug#1069163. Checking today I find the same behavior reported there; no mention of tupledealloc in the stacktrace. What is new is a stacktrace reported when I start emesene from a terminal, which I didn't see before it crashed originally. Now it says: ~$ emesene Exception in thread Thread-3: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py, line 552, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File /usr/share/emesene/emesene/e3/base/Logger.py, line 881, in run self.logger = Logger(self.path, self.db_name) File /usr/share/emesene/emesene/e3/base/Logger.py, line 363, in __init__ self._load_events() File /usr/share/emesene/emesene/e3/base/Logger.py, line 395, in _load_events self.execute(Logger.SELECT_EVENTS) File /usr/share/emesene/emesene/e3/base/Logger.py, line 597, in execute self.cursor.execute(query, args) OperationalError: no such table: d_event Segmentation fault (core dumped) Hope that helps, if only to establish that the two reports are or are not related! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050358 Title: emesene crashed with SIGSEGV in tupledealloc.24592() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emesene/+bug/1050358/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1024133] [NEW] Startup Applications entry removed from menu
Public bug reported: The latest update to gnome-session removed the Startup Applications menu item, apparently as a policy decision. This leaves a QQ ubuntu session without an entry point to the gnome- session-properties GUI that allows adding or editing autostart entries, unless one just knows to type gnome-session-properties in a terminal. The gnome-session-properties program cannot be found through the Dash; the only logical place for the entry point would seem to be the Session menu. Please can we have it back, or an alternative? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gnome-session 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-4.4-generic 3.5.0-rc6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-4-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.3-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jul 12 15:30:31 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Alpha amd64 (20120527) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-session UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024133 Title: Startup Applications entry removed from menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1024133/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1024133] Re: Startup Applications entry removed from menu
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024133 Title: Startup Applications entry removed from menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1024133/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 937096] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937096 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/937096/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 931041] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931041 Title: gnome-terminal crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/931041/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 910845] Re: Message Cannot change the priority of process is displayed with a normal user selects a high priority process
Confirming this occurs reliably on 64-bit systems too. It is NOT 32-bit specific. In addition, if you dismiss the warning message the priority of pulse- audio' CAN BE CHANGED by a user with normal privileges, to NOrmal. After that, the priority cannot be changed back to Very High by such a user. That sounds like a functionality error, not just a usability problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910845 Title: Message Cannot change the priority of process is displayed with a normal user selects a high priority process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/910845/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 816166] Re: sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf()
Anyone noticed that this seems to have gone away? No updates, no notices on this bug report, but suddenly it doesn't happen any more -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816166 Title: sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/816166/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 822061] Re: sol crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Trying to start aisleriot solitaire in LXTERM gives the following response: sc@OOlubu:~$ sol ** ERROR:window.c:2429:aisleriot_window_init: code should not be reached Aborted (core dumped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822061 Title: sol crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/822061/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 822061] Re: sol crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822061 Title: sol crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/822061/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 816166] Re: sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-games in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816166 Title: sol crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_set_render_icon_pixbuf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-games/+bug/816166/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 814724] Re: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy-xcb-reply_data' failed.
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814724 Title: gnome-settings-daemon assert failure: gnome-settings-daemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:515: _XReply: Assertion `!dpy-xcb-reply_data' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/814724/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 714088] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
This is happening again with Oneiric fully-updated from alpha2. It happens at start-up, but does not prevent system from opening desktop with Unity-2d. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714088 Title: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/714088/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 510059] Re: Gvfs keeps asking for password when trying to mount Samba share
Well, I hope that this is now correctly identified as a gvfs problem; it has been most disheartening to see it pushed aside repeatedly and always rated as low importance (see the original bug report, #490201 - not a samba bug, must be nautilus, send it upstream, gnome accepts it as one of three hundred low-importance nautilus bugs, so it disappears into a heap of stuff that will never be fixed.) All the symptoms are clear and reproducible, so when can we have this fixed? It is NOT of low importance - if you are using networking between computers this is a clear and compelling reason not to use Ubuntu. -- Gvfs keeps asking for password when trying to mount Samba share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490201] Re: [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
Thanks garvinrick4; that doesn't help me. I still get the failure message in trying to open Network in Nautilus; 'Nautilus cannot handle network locations' -- [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490201] Re: [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
I am now getting an error when trying to open Nautilus using Places | Network. The error box claims that Nautilus cannot handle network locations. I have reinstalled Nautilus, nautilus-share and nautilus- send-to, without success. Samba, on the other hand, is working as a server, and other machines can see the share on the Lucid box. The same share is accessible from the Lucid box using smbclient //sc-laptop/Public. This asks for a password, but accepts either the normal password for the user or a NULL password. -- [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490201] Re: [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
OK - running sudo smbpasswd -n [USER] does not change the behavior. The transition from WORKGROUP to the list of connected machines still requires a password, which is unknown to me. Yes, I logged out and in again -- [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490201] Re: [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
Hmm - I haven't tried that yet - I'll look at it when I get home tonight. Which command does that? I haven't really penetrated beyond the GUI yet -- [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 490201] Re: [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup
Yes, the same error results from gvfs-mount smb://sc-laptop/Public - Repeated requests for a password, and no share is mounted, even after entering the user's password. Also, there is the problem that system-config-samba is not accepting changes in the password, or empty password to remove password protection. I agree that this is not confined to nautilus, but is a samba regression. As far as my experience goes, it could have arisen before karmic was released - this lucid is derived from karmic alpha4, as far as I remember. -- [lucid] Nautilus asks password when accessing workgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
Sorry to keep asking, but is the built-in screensaver in X the same as/using xscreensaver? Because I can prevent the behavior by removing xscreensaver, but not the -gl and -data packages, which are required for gnome-screensaver. If there is another layer as well I would like to know so that I can understand my system better. As for not wanting a screensaver, I don't have my machine in an environment where I worry about other people seeing what's on the screen, whereas that swirling eye-catching stuff is distracting and inappropriate in a working environment. I have no objections to other people having the ability to use a screensaver, so long as I have the ability to NOT use one. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
Good idea! No sign of gnome-screensaver in the ps aux listing. The gnome-powermanager might be the culprit - that's there. Nevertheless, the screensavers appear after 5 minutes, set on Random as far as I can see, although I have the settings Blank Screen, and Activate unset. This happens if gnome-screensaver is installed, not if it is not. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
Checked settings in gconf2; apps/gnome-screensaver/idle_activation_enabled is False, /idle_delay is 10, /theme is screensavers-ubuntu_theme. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
As far as I know, the only way to stop the screensavers activating (after a delay) is to uninstall gnome-screensaver. I don't see gnome-screensaver in the ps aux list, which means it's not running as a background process, and i am not invoking it knowingly. If I do invoke it from the terminal it appears in the ps aux list, but the unexpected screensaver activation seems to be independent of this. I'll wait for a while and see if the screensaver cuts in with g-ss running -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
OK, that makes sense, in a way. With gnome-screensaver running (invoked from the terminal), I got no screensaver after idle for over an hour. The sudden change still puzzles me; I certainly didn't trigger it by disabling gnome-screensaver in Startup recently, so maybe the updated version didn't get set up correctly. Or maybe I had removed it long ago and the X screensaver only just started working yesterday. It's also strange that uninstalling gnome-screensaver prevents the other (X) screensaver from activating. Or is that because removing gnome- screensaver also removes xscreensaver? Anyway, thanks for the help; I'll figure out how to get things set up so that I don't have to have gnome-screensaver running just to prevent X screensaver from taking over. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
This happened to me (screensaver becoming active despite preferences setting) after update in Lucid on 2009-12-02. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 467285] Re: screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box
AMD64, Lucid kernel 2.6.32-6, fully updated on 2009-12-02. -- screensaver preferences ignores my unchecked box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Thanks for the update, Sebastian. And thanks to the GNOME devs for fixing this.. @sim909 - Sorry I didn't reveal how I fixed the compiling problem - it seemed so obvious after a moment, that I had to start in the appropriate folder. Glad you found the way too. Anyway, the 2.23 version for lucid fixes the problem for me, and installing (just libglib2.0-0_2.23.0-1ubuntu1) in karmic fixes the problem in karmic. I hope everyone else will get a backport soon. At last - a fix! -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Thanks Emanuele, I tried that - first time I've ever tried building a package at home, by the way. The dpkg-buildpackage failed with the error tail: cannot open `debian/changelog' for reading: No such file or directory dpkg-buildpackage: error: tail of debian/changelog gave error exit status 1 I'm sure it's something trivial I just don't know about - any hints as to how to get past this? -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
OK - sorted. All compiled and installed (just libglib2.0-0, as you suggested should work). It does - symlink positions are correct after a reboot. -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Fix committed just means that a change has been made that hasn't yet made it into the repos - when it is the status should change to Fix released. What is unclear, in the absence of ANY comment from any devs in the last several weeks (since Chris Coulson on 10-04-09) is WHY the committed fix has not been released yet. There have been several updates to glib2.0 since the fix was supposedly committed, and none of them have included the fix. The similar bug #401446 has been marked Fix released for some time, which may account for the lack of interest from the devs. The fact of the matter is that for some of us, using amd64 Ubuntu 9.10 (or Lucid), the desktop positions of symlinks to folders on other partitions are NOT being restored on re-start or re-boot. This regression happened when a fairly major change was made in Nautilus, as I remember, and it may be that the fix adopted (in Gnome) missed this particular case. In any case, it's annoying that the regression has persisted so long. -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
I notice that this is still marked Fix Committed, rather than Fix Released. I am also noticing people reporting the same bug in released Karmic. I also believe this is the same bug as 401446, which would be the original report, but was marked Fixed erroneously Is there any chance that this nasty little bug can be finally disposed of? -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 449042] Re: yelp assert failure: Yelp:ERROR:yelp-document.c:275:yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document))
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435149 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435149 That's fine - but I am refused access to the duplicate bug report. Is it marked as private? Even so, should I not now be marked as a subscriber through the duplicate? -- yelp assert failure: Yelp:ERROR:yelp-document.c:275:yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 449042] Re: yelp assert failure: Yelp:ERROR:yelp-document.c:275:yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document))
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462393/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462394/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462395/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462396/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462397/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462398/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462399/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462400/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33462401/XsessionErrors.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- yelp assert failure: Yelp:ERROR:yelp-document.c:275:yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Thanks Chris - that makes it clearer. I was worried because some folk were reporting that the behavior was now correct, and mine was still not. -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Jan - that file is not apparently present in my system. ~/.nautilus is empty. There is no file called Desktop.xml anywhere as far as I can see Thanks anyway! -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Stranger and stranger the aberrant behavior just got fixed. I did some upgrades this morning, and my symlinks are now re-positioned correctly. The most likely candidate would seem to be libgnomeui-0, which went from 2.24.1-1 to 2.24.2-1. I'll test this with another karmic install - just upgrade libgnomeui-0 and see what happens... -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Checking in another karmic install (dist-upgrade from jaunty before alpha1), I found that it DOES have the .nautilus/metafiles folder, with .xml files holding metadata. But they haven't been updated since July 17th, when nautilus was upgraded to the new version. Maybe the old file is still over-writing new paradigms if it is still there. I've removed it (file:...Desktop.xml). But that didn't immediately solve the problem. Neither did upgrading libgnomeui-0, or anything else that might have done the trick on my first karmic install (Upgrade from a clean alpha4 iso). -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Jan - which packages got upgraded for you? As I pointed out in #4 above, glib2.0 isn't so much a package as a cluster of packages. I seem to only have libglib2.0-0 installed; libglib2.0-cil is also installed but not upgraded. There are another half-dozen packages which I don't have installed, including libglib2.0-data; some of them have also been upgraded to 2.22.1, so I wonder if I need one of them to get the problem fixed. -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Thanks - I have the same packages and still have the error, so something else is going on. Symlinks are STILL being shifted from their original positions on restart/reboot/relogin. I noticed that the gnome bug report was addressed by the gvfs maintainer, so here are my current gvfs and glib packages: s...@sc-laptop:~$ dpkg -l gvfs* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii gvfs 1.4.0-0ubuntu1 userspace virtual filesystem - server ii gvfs-backends 1.4.0-0ubuntu1 userspace virtual filesystem - backends ii gvfs-bin 1.4.0-0ubuntu1 userspace virtual filesystem - binaries ii gvfs-fuse 1.4.0-0ubuntu1 userspace virtual filesystem - fuse server s...@sc-laptop:~$ dpkg -l *glib2* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.1-0ubuntu The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil 2.12.9-1 CLI binding for the GLib utility library 2.1 ii libglib2.0-dat 2.22.1-0ubuntu Common files for GLib library ii libnm-glib20.8~a~git.2009 network management framework (GLib shared li -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 401446] Re: Gnome lost icons position on the desktop
The same problem has been affecting me; it is NOT fixed using gvfs 1.4.0-0ubuntu1 and libgnomevfs* 1:2.24.1-4ubuntu1. Is there a newer version that fixes it? -- Gnome lost icons position on the desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
Sorry - don't quite follow. As far as I can see, there is no such package (glib2.0) - the repos contain libglib2.0, etc, but these are still stuck at 2.22.0-1ubuntu1, not 2.22.1. -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
libglib2.0-0 has been upgraded to 2.22.1, but no effect on the symlinks. They are still not being restored to the original positions. Is there another package that needs to be included, such as libglib2.0-data? -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 411322] Re: desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored
The gnome-bugs report has a similar observation - the developer reports the problem as fixed in 2.22.1, but it isn't (as of 10/02/09). -- desktop icon position of symbolic links are not restored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395861] Re: gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename
I can confirm that the contents of /etc/gdm/custom.conf are IGNORED and the contents of /etc/gdm/gdm.conf-custom over-ride the settings in /etc/gdm/gdm.schemas, contrary to the documentation. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gdm 2.26 custom configuration file: wrong filename https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 395591] Re: Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager
I have checked that an invalid or empty default-display-manager file is not changed when I run sudo dpkg-reconfigure gdm - confirming the original bug report. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Installing GDM 2.26 doesn't update /etc/X11/default-display-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 393069] Re: Mounting USB drive fails after devicekit-disks update
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393051 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393051 Ah, but the previous version of devicekit-disks (004-1) was removed from the repository five hours ago - can't go and get it anymore! -- Mounting USB drive fails after devicekit-disks update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu (via bug 393051). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252023] Re: configure display applet crashes X in intrepid
Thanks - I understand the position. In retrospect I could have saved the relevant log files after the crash and been more helpful, but that didn't happen. From my position, that could have been avoided if the delay in asking for the files had been shorter - two months (09-01 to 11-12) is a long time to keep crash logs, especially as I had moved on and simply decided not to use the buggy applet again. -- configure display applet crashes X in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 252023] Re: configure display applet crashes X in intrepid
Sorry, don't have them any more. I haven't used the applet again, and don't want to. The applet appeared, I tried it, it failed as described above. Many changes have happened since, and I have a happily running Intrepid system. -- configure display applet crashes X in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
All my reports have concerned Intrepid Ibex. I have never had this problem with Hardy, even with Proposed enabled. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
This bug seems to be fixed, probably by the gvfs updates today (Sep 16th 2008). Shares on a Windows Vista server now open correctly in Nautilus. Thank you all for the fix - whoever it was that finally fixed it! -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
Nice try - doesn't work for me. The script runs and leaves me with a mounted share icon, but doesn't open Nautilus. Trying to open the share by double-clicking the desktop share icon leads to the original error message - already mounted. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
My apologies! After some messing around it DOES work for me. At first running the script gave me the mount, but not the Nautilus window. I put in two extra lines to 'echo $SMB' and 'echo $DIR', and it worked. Then I commented out (#) the two extra lines and it still worked Then I removed the extra lines and it still works.! I suspect timing - the gvfs-mount call may not generate the $HOME/.gvfs/share on server entry fast enough, so that Nautilus fails (silently) because the directory given doesn't appear to exist. But that's another bug.. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
I get this on un-secured shares. I am puzzled that samba has been updated today (August 18th) without any apparent change in the situation. It seems that this is not a samba bug, at any rate. Is this a gvfs bug? Is it a seahorse bug (as suggested above by fishor)? Or is it something else? It is certainly, for me at least, unique to Intrepid - the same machines connect just fine using hardy. zoidberg - that's right - you need to run gvfs-mount smb://server/share to get the folder to appear in ~/.gvfs Once it is there you can cd into it and see, and copy, files. It still won't open using nautilus, though there is an icon on the desktop. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 255554] Re: mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
I get the error during start-up of the gnome-session. There are several errors in the .xsession-errors, but nothing that appears to relate to mixer-applet2 explicitly. The error occurs each time I start a session. I haven't used the mixer-applet deliberately. -- mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 255554] Re: mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
Trying to use the mixer-applet to reset volume, it crashed with a GPF. Here is the syslog entry for this crash. ** Attachment added: syslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16659701/syslog.txt -- mixer_applet2 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
since the recent updates to gvfs (Intrepid, 64-bit) the Windows shares are now shown in Nautilus, but attempting to open them in Nautilus apparently fails, bringing up the password dialog twice; clicking OK the second time gives the dbus error message as above. gvfs-ls smb://server/ lists the shares correctly, but sudo gvfs-mount smb://server/share returns the message: Error mounting location: volume doesn't implement mount. After this, gvfs-ls smb://server/share reports Error: the specified location is not mounted. The share on server entry does not appear in ~/.gvfs/ After attempting (and apparently failing) to mount using Nautilus, the share on server folder DOES appear in ~/.gvfs, and gvfs-ls smb://server/share lists the contents of the share correctly. Hope this helps someone to track this down... -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince?
As the original submitter I can confirm that the memory problems are no longer apparent in Intrepid - evince 2.23.5, libpoppler 0.8.4 (cairo). Large page-scanned documents open and page fine, as far as I can see, without eating memory to any noticeable extent. Thanks everyone for getting this fixed! -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
Since Intrepid alpha3 (at least) none of the three methods works to mount a windows share: Nautilus sees the server, but no shares; smbclient sees no shares; gvfs-ls sees no shares. gvfs-mount says that volume doesn't implement mount. smbtree sees the Windows server, but times out waiting for details. nmblookup -S workgroup reports the (two - local and remote) members correctly, with the correct IP addresses. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 241139 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 Thanks, Gianfranco - you're right. It is the same bug. I'll mark as a duplicate.. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 241139 Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 241139] Re: Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location
There is a duplicate bug #249733, which I have marked as a dup of this one. The error seems to be independent of nautilus, as it occurs when using gvfs-mount and not invoking nautilus at all. The use of gvfs-mount smb://server/share appears to mount the share - it appears in the nautilus mount list, and an icon is placed on the desktop. However, attempts to access the share fail both using nautilus and using gvfs-ls, showing that this is an error in gvfs, which is not allowing the mounted share to be accessed. The share is accessible using ~/.gvfs/share on server Hope this additional information helps squash this very annoying bug in Intrepid, running on an HP Pavilion laptop, not in a virtual machine. Everything works correctly in Hardy on the same machine, btw. This is new to Intrepid. -- Intrepid Ibex: Cannot access samba share Unable to mount location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216104 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216104 As a user, I would challenge the Duplicate status as reported by Sebastian. I have read the comments on the so-called duplicate (#216104) and do not see any reason to call this a duplicate. It may well derive from the same underlying problem(s) in Nautilus and/or GVS, but it differs crucially in the following ways: 1) This bug is reported in Intrepid. For me at least, it is NEW to Intrepid; Hardy works fine at opening Windows shares through nautilus. 2) This bug is about the actual process of opening a share; #216104 is a failure to setup a share in advance of connecting. Please re-open this bug, or give Intrepid-testers some assurance that it is actually being worked on. -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
Yes, this is an Intrepid bug. There was a conversation on the Intrepid
testing forum, and the bug report came out of that, as I understand.
I am running Intrepid up-to-date on an HP laptop, with a Windows Vista
machine on the same network. Samba connection is fine using Hardy, shows
the symptoms specified in the original bug report (exactly) under
Intrepid.
The Windows server opens up in nautilus (Places Network [server]),
but trying to open a specific share gives the dbus error
{DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.InvalidArgs: Mountpoint Already
registered}
though an icon appears on the desktop. Either clicking on that, or
trying again in nautilus generates the same error message.
--
can't open windows share icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
Thanks for getting onto this, Sebastian! Yes, smbtree sees the share, and smbclient browses it - dir then lists the contents correctly. I am told I don't have gvfs-mount installed - will fix that and get back to you. -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
Now I have gvfs-mount available: fails the first time, saying that the Mountpoint is already registered (that's the one on the desktop, set up through Nautilus). Unmounting that (Right-click, Unmount) allows me to re-mount it using gvfs-mount. The desktop icon reappears. BUT trying to open it gives the identical dbus error message. This suggests to me that it is a gvfs error, since I am not (consciously) invoking nautilus in this sequence. -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
You're right, of course - double click an icon on the desktop probably does invoke nautilus. How do I use gvfs-ls - never used it before, and there is no man entry? BTW, don't know about mattismyname, but I'm running 64-bit on an AMD cpu. -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
Thanks. There is an error message using gvfs-ls, saying the specified location is not mounted. I began with the share icon on the desktop; gvfs-ls gave the error message. I right-clicked the icon and chose Unmount to remove it from the desktop. gvfs-ls gave the same error message. I used gvfs-mount to mount the location again; the icon reappeared on the desktop. gvfs-ls gave the same error message. So samba sees the share (smbtree, smbclient) and smbclient can browse inside it, but gvfs-ls cannot, getting an error message that it is not mounted. As mattismyname said, I can browse the contents of the share using the location ~/.gvfs/share on server. Hope that helps to track this down -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 249733] Re: can't open windows share icon
More testing with gvfs-ls: I can browse the server using gvfs-ls smb://server That shows the expected list of shares, including Public, which the one I have been trying to connect to, and another one called Amazon. Amazon has not been touched - I haven't tried to connect using nautilus OR gvfs, or even samba, today. I did note that the shares were given initial capitals, so i checked Public as opposed to public, but still the same error. The last test was to try to connect to Amazon using gvfs-mount (which does NOT return an error) and gvfs-ls, which does. So it looks as if there is some failure in gvfs to properly mount a share that results in it i) appearing to be mounted, and ii) being inaccessible to gvfs-ls. -- can't open windows share icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236360] Re: evolution requires spamassassin
Thanks Michael - quick work! BUT - the latest update to apt is not installable. It requires removal of a whole mess of apps, including aptitude and synaptic, plus various other stuff.. I don't know if you can fix this as fast - but it would sure be nice. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- evolution requires spamassassin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236360] Re: evolution requires spamassassin
Sebastian, Thanks for the explanation - glad to know that it was an intentional change between Hardy and Intrepid. However, I am afraid there is still a problem. Having been using the package system for over a year now, I do expect it itself to remain stable and reliable, and I have found out various ways to get out of dependency problems. This one has me stumped, though. Here's the problem, in a nutshell: evolution can be removed; evolution- dataserver-common cannot, as gnome-panel and gnome-applets depend on it. In between there is evolution-dataserver, and that's where I have problems. I can remove it, and remove spamassassin and spamc, gnome- pilot and gnome-pilot-conduits. Syanptic allows this; nothing else is removed; there are no warnings, nothing breaks. BUT as soon as (any of) those five packages are removed, update-manager flashes on a notification that they have to be re-installed. I've tried updating, upgrading, removing, in various orders. Nothing leaves me in a stable state without those five packages. Somewhere the update-manager system knows that they HAVE to be installed. THAT is what I'm concerned about, and what I would like fixed if at all possible. I've tried looking at the dependencies of all five packages, without seeing any logical reason why they all have to be installed. I suspect it's a fairly deep inverse dependency problem, where a system library like libc6 has been marked as depending on them, rather than the other way round. -- evolution requires spamassassin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236360] Re: evolution requires spamassassin
Hoping this change back to New status will ensure someone reads my last comment I'm still not convinced that there is no problem. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- evolution requires spamassassin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236360] Re: evolution requires spamassassin
I have at last tracked down the glitch. It seems that yet another package designed to work with evolution, nautilus-sendto, has evolution as a recommends, and evolution has spamassassin and gnome-pilot as recommends, so the update-manager sees the 2-step connection and keeps flagging spamassassin as needed, plus the other packages I took Sebastian's hint and used one of the more advanced aptitude commands - aptitude why spamassassin. So now I have removed nautilus-sendto my system no longer demands spamassassin. -- evolution requires spamassassin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236360] [NEW] evolution requires spamassassin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Evolution (which I don't use) is installed as part of the Intrepid package; it now requires spamassassin and gnome-pilot. These were NOT required in 8.04. Can this change of policy be re-considered, please? I don't want un-necessary daemons (spamd) running in my machine. It is also extremely difficult to convince update-manager to let go of the idea that these packages are required. Once they have been auto- installed they continue to show up in the update-manager list, even after evolution, evolution-data-server and evolution-plugins have been removed, AND spamassassin and spamc, gnome-pilot and gnome-pilot- conduits, and so on... I am getting the feeling that I am no longer free to decide what packages I shall run in my machine. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution requires spamassassin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 198170] Re: gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372941/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372942/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372943/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372944/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372945/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372946/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372947/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12372948/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 198170] [NEW] gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs after the 03/03/2008 update to nautilus in Hardy 32-bit, trying to open $HOME and Desktop from Places menu was successful, but trying to open Network from Places menu crashed gvfsd-network. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Mar 3 14:41:07 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-network NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom Package: gvfs-backends 0.1.8svn20080303-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-network --spawner :1.15 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gvfs StacktraceTop: ?? () ?? () ?? () ?? () ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Title: gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV Uname: Linux 2.6.24-11-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev pulse pulse-access pulse-rt sambashare usernameanner video ** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash apport-failed-retrace -- gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
as of March 3rd firefox 3.0 beta 3 on Hardy 64-bit no longer shows this bug. Don't know if it was a libcairo2 update that fixed it - I have 1.5.8-0ubuntu1, I believe. I have checked with the msnbc news page and several of the pages others have reported as showing errors. Still using fglrx and an ATI Radeon Xpress 200M card. There was also an xorg-xserver-fglrx update recently, so it could be that fixed it. Anyway, thanks for the fix - now I can use firefox 3 as my default browser. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 198170] Re: gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV
I checked after re-booting - not sure what you mean by using a new account. The Network window opened up correctly, but showed no networks. I do have a working network, with a workgroup called WORKGROUP, connected to another computer, as confirmed by nmblookup -S workgroup No crash, as you say. Looks as if I had an incomplete or inconsistent machine state until I rebooted. -- gvfsd-network crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
(furthur to my report that it is no longer apparent in Hardy 64-bit) but in Hardy 32-bit, upgrading Firefox to Firefox 3 beta 3 still gives me the incorrect rendering on the msnbc news page. The libcairo2 version is the new one, updated and re-installed today. The major difference is that this install is using the open-source radeon driver instead of fglrx.. Same ATI Radeon Xpress 200M card, with drivers from the DRI 300 Project. So, still not fixed for the open-source driver package...back to Firefox 2 for the 32-bit Hardy. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
This bug makes it difficult for me (and others, I'm sure) to use Firefox 3.0 beta 3 in Hardy. But there seems to be no acknowledgment that it affects Firefox 3 - can that be added to the list of affected packages? I confirmed a report of the bug as affecting Firefox, but it was marked a duplicate of this bug and doesn't seem to connect from bugs affecting Firefox. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
for me it occurs in Hardy 32-bit or Hardy 64-bit with Firefox 3.0 beta 3, but not in Gutsy 32-bit with Firefox 3.0 b3pre. It's interesting that Paul mentions Compiz - I have Compiz enabled in Gutsy 32-bit, using fglrx and xgl, but not in hardy. Compiz won't run for me in Hardy either with open-source or proprietary drivers for my ATI Radeon Xpress 200M (5955) card. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
RE: [Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince?
XAANoOffscreenPixmaps? Yes, I did. It seemed to help a little, but the huge swings in memory usage were still there, the cpu utilization was still going very high. The major difference was that the memory usage came down more quickly, so the freezing behavior was not so persistent. There is still something that isn't right, even with XAANoOffscreenPixmaps set on. It makes a difference, but doesn't approach the way evince behaves with the same file in Feisty. Can I get a copy of evince 0.8 for gutsy? That might be the next thing to try.Stephen Cradock From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:05:24 + Subject: [Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince? did you try the workaround suggested in the other bug? -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. _ Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more….then map the best route! http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20theatercp=42.358996~-71.056691style=rlvl=13tilt=-90dir=0alt=-1000scene=950607encType=1FORM=MGAC01 -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
RE: [Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince?
Thanks for the response. I have an ATI Radeon Express 200M 5955 card, and I'm using the latest fglrx driver in Gutsy. Restricted Drivers Manager downloaded and installed it automatically for me after the last kernel upgrade - much less hassle than in Feisty. I use the restricted driver because I like GoogleEarth, which hangs on initialize with the Mesa driver (or the wrong ATI driver, for that matter).If that could be the problem, I'll try going back to the Mesa driver and see if it eliminates the evince glitch. I'll let you know.Stephen Cradock From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:25:42 + Subject: [Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince? Thank you for your bug. What videocard and driver do you use? Could be a duplicate of bug #122786 ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop BugsStatus: New = Incomplete -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. _ Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more….then map the best route! http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20theatercp=42.358996~-71.056691style=rlvl=13tilt=-90dir=0alt=-1000scene=950607encType=1FORM=MGAC01 -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
RE: [Bug 132612] Re: memory leak in evince?
OK, following Sebastian's question about the video card and driver I checked with the Mesa driver for my ATI Radeon Express 200M card. The glitch continues in evince with very large pdf files, even without the proprietary fglrx driver. Stephen Cradock memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. _ See what you’re getting into…before you go there http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507 -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 132612] memory leak in evince?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince I'm running Gutsy, all up to date, and finding evince very slow and erratic with large (100s of pages, 30-50MB) PDF files. Machine triple-boots Feisty/Gutsy/WinXP; HP Pavilion with 512 MB RAM, Athlon 64 3200+ single processor. In Feisty evince loads large PDFs fine, changes pages smoothly. System Monitor shows evince process uses 50-100MB with a 50MB file open and static; this bounces up by another 2 to 50 MB when I change to a new page, but then drops back to the same level as before. In Gutsy (2.6.22-9-generic kernel) same file loads more slowly, system freezes for ages before recovering. System Monitor shows evince using 250 or more MB when the 50MB file is open and static, bouncing up to 350-400 MB when I change to another page. Then the memory usage stay high (~100%) for much longer, probably until some is paged out to swap. The effect is that the system has no (or very little) free user memory most of the time, which makes it very hard to use .. Acrobat reader in WinXP behaves much more like Feisty/evince, though the % memory used rises slowly as more pages are added to the looked at stack. It never jumps to anywhere near 100%. Both Ubuntu installs use the same swap partition, 1.4 GB; both actually use it, according to System Monitor. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- memory leak in evince? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
