[Bug 675919] need your advice
A very unpleasant situation happened to me several days ago , I need your advice . Please read more over it here http://www.fennodrok.com/baygx.php?UE82NzU5MTlAYnVncy5sYXVuY2hwYWQubmV0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] ☯that's something interesting
Yo! Here are some interesting facts that may be ideal for you, I believe these details could be helpful, read it here http://www.x-met.ch/pulse.php?UE82NzU5MTlAYnVncy5sYXVuY2hwYWQubmV0 Typos courtesy of my iPhone, Bill Ladner -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] ☀Re: yay amazing people and place
Hey, I just wished to inform you of a lovely place I've been to recently, I fulfilled a lot of amazing people there. please reading more about it here http://www.luch18.ru/assets/plugins/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/advhr/langs/crash.php?UE82NzU5MTlAYnVncy5sYXVuY2hwYWQubmV0 My Best, Sarah Kidd From: Bug 675919 [mailto:675...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 5:58 AM To: steub...@yahoo.com Subject: Thanks man, I hope so Both of those teams were very good. One played in their conference championship game. Boise state was a good win. They just beat a team that beat oregon and played in their conference championship game. WVU was no slouch. They just lacked consistency. There were just as many, if not more, respectable OOC wins in the SEC than other conferences. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "862345489957E08E.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919/+attachment/4951675/+files/862345489957E08E.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] ☯holiday camp
Dear, Where are, you going for yours holidays this year? I've found a nice holiday camp, just take a look http://ceienergia.it/activist.php?d4d5 Good wishes, Benjamin Britt From: Bug 675919 [mailto:675...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 2:44 AM To: steub...@yahoo.com Subject: No. Period. Im assuming your talking about harpie harpist. Its ok, not that amazing IMHO, iv'e been running 1 on my dev pro build and its ok. Ive seen other people use it to completely turn the deck into a rank 4 tool box. Its pretty good for that, if thats your thing. What the deck really needed was a card that made it so people couldn't respond to hunting ground, or a new super hunting ground. Honestly, I think heros would be better just because darklaw is so good. And he can do very well against the current top 3. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "E7DBDCE23D4ACC3A.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919/+attachment/4924182/+files/E7DBDCE23D4ACC3A.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] ☁Fw: How to choose the best digital camera for you
Hello friend, In this guide, we'll outline the different types of digital camera you can choose, how much you http://tinhnguyensongma.org/sinkx.php?0405 My best to you, Ronnie Layton From: Bug 675919 [mailto:675...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 9:57 PM To: steub...@yahoo.com Subject: 8 more than me Nice try Braveheart, but your *erste nacht* law would be unconstitutional, violating the fourth amendment protections, and probably others. Your city council would be quickly smacked down by the hammer of justice based on existing, superseding law. In your hypothetical example, the cops would be pursuing the city council to rescue Murron, and your protesters would be the ones obstructing the cops because they don't have an (unnecessary) warrant to search the council gang bang chamber. In the real example, the cops were well within their authority to pursue the fleeing suspect. In general, the law is very well thought out, and deliberated over by a lot of intelligent people with a lot of experience. The exigent circumstance exceptions are a limited set of circumstances that give limited extended authority when it is needed. It's not a bullshit law that allows "the man" the bang your girlfriend. ** Attachment added: "1A367E64BFFFE7A7D87F7CFBE01A5E36.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919/+attachment/4915851/+files/1A367E64BFFFE7A7D87F7CFBE01A5E36.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] nice book
Hi! Have you already read this book? I'm impressed! You have to read it definitely, you may find it here https://clck.ru/BGcUY Yours truly, steubens Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "B002162A834F65DE13C27A26F74BF09E.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919/+attachment/4894622/+files/B002162A834F65DE13C27A26F74BF09E.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] ☑Fw: cast your mind back
Hello, I want you to cast your mind back to the first time we met, take a look at the it here http://clarksferry.leafprecision.com Typos courtesy of my iPhone, steubens -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] Re: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons)
** Attachment added: "image001.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919/+attachment/4722695/+files/image001.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 675919] amazing day
Hello, We've had an amazing day today and we just wanted to share some information about places we've visited, just take a look <http://post.millpondsparetreat.info/aefhbh> Faithfully, steubens -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675919 Title: F2/Renaming fonction in Nautilus : General behavior is different between the 3 views (list, compact or icons) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/675919/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 528897] Re: main track list/view is very obtrusive when files are being added/removed
yes it still happens; it's due to the murrine theme and the maintainer of rhythmbox doesn't even really acknowledge it as a problem (there was a similar cpu usage problem with transmission, ubuntu has had patches in the past for it and iirc still does in 11.04) ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528897 Title: main track list/view is very obtrusive when files are being added/removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/528897/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 802276] Re: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #655534 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655534 ** Also affects: gnome-power via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655534 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802276 Title: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/802276/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 802276] Re: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys
- Key 233 mapped to key brightness-up TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-button.c FN:gpm_button_emit_type,81 - emitting button-pressed : brightness-up TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-manager.c FN:gpm_manager_button_pressed_cb,922 - Button press event type=brightness-up TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-backlight.c FN:gpm_backlight_button_pressed_cb,451 - Button press event type=brightness-up TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_trust_cache,565 - using cache for value 50 (probably okay) TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_screen,537 - using resource 0xda5070 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 1 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_output_up,393 - hard value=6, min=0, max=10 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 2 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 3 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 4 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 5 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 6 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_screen,537 - using resource 0xda5070 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 1 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_output_get_percentage,333 - hard value=7, min=0, max=10 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_output_get_percentage,335 - percentage 70 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 2 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 3 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 4 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 5 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-brightness.c FN:gpm_brightness_foreach_resource,491 - resource 6 of 6 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-backlight.c FN:gpm_backlight_button_pressed_cb,480 - emitting brightness-changed : 70 TI:12:30:20 TH:0xce80a0 FI:gpm-backlight-kbd.c FN:gpm_backlight_kbd_button_pressed_cb,367 - Button press event type=brightness-up i'm not sure why it shows 6, then 7 for the same adjustment -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802276 Title: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/802276/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 706436] Re: Safely remove drive is not safe for SD card readers
specifically, http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/udisks/udisks.7.html setting ID_DRIVE_DETACHABLE to 0 and all the properties for ID_DRIVE_FLASH_SD (and friends) a helper could probably be put together like the other helpers in udev to do this automatically based on the vendor, and detecting the media format -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706436 Title: Safely remove drive is not safe for SD card readers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/706436/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 718873] Re: "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed
how do i make this bug move; it actually caused some data loss this afternoon (well, i did; but it said it was safe!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718873 Title: "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/718873/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 706436] Re: Safely remove drive is not safe for SD card readers
it's very easy to tell udev this, but you have to do it manually; i do the same to tell it what format the card reader can read, you'd need some list of major/minor versions and what they are to do this automatically, at least that's the conclusion i came to when i tried to figure out how to automate it the key word here is udev though, that is where the properties are assigned -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706436 Title: Safely remove drive is not safe for SD card readers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/706436/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 711429] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
i figured out a way to reproduce this crash! :D (and the crash you still get with the bodge) it happens when you select one of the files you just deleted, before they've left the view. to help do this i copied 30-40 mp3 albums into a separate folder, entered that folder, then picked the top 8 or so; held shift and pressed delete immediately after hitting enter to dismiss the warning dialogue i hit the down arrow key a bunch of times; if you succeed the focus will change to one of the files in the selection, with the wrong icon, and it will immediately crash thereafter turns out this is what i was doing every time i triggered the crash ;] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711429 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/711429/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 711429] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
quoting the "workaround" commit: "Prevent a crash in nautilus_file_peek_display_name() on invalid NautilusFile This is more a workaround only, expect assert failures at other places when something bad happens. There's a race condition somewhere, this patch only prevents immediate crash." i haven't had it happen in a while, but when it does it happens in the manner of #9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711429 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/711429/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around
will there be a natty backport? (please! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (38795). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258 Title: Battery life estimation never comes around To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit-power/+bug/629258/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686130] Re: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation
this still happens, but when i reported it; i did so believing that it was a change from past behaviour, and i can't remember now if it was i've "worked around" it by just picking folders one level up from the one i'm interested in; doesn't work for /, but so far i've never extracted anything there with file-roller ;] feel free to mark this one invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686130 Title: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/686130/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686156] Re: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar
it still occurs on natty ** Attachment added: "picture of same on natty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/686156/+attachment/2198058/+files/shutdown%20conflict%20natty.png ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686156 Title: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/686156/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 802276] Re: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys
oh and from my investigation of g-p-m (and g-p-m --verbose) it's only setting it once on the output, and it's using xrandr to do it consider me extra confused -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802276 Title: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/802276/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 802276] Re: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802276 Title: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/802276/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 802276] [NEW] brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys
Public bug reported: the brightness adjusts in 3 steps, i thought it was annoying but adjustable in gconf; finally investigated and saw it wasn't :] if i echo 0 > /sys/module/video/parameters/brightness_switch_enabled it reduces one of the extra steps if i killall gnome-power-manager i get no backlight adjustment, from my understanding its solely responsible, but i can't find the extra brightness event input, acpi_listen shows the video adjustment, as does input-events 4 (the video device) X opens the video event device as an input but i don't know if that means g-p-m will see it as another event hoping someone can tell me more about g-p-m and where it gathers events so i can finish investigating, or solve the bug outright :] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-power-manager 2.32.0-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44~lp793796b5-generic 2.6.38.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 26 14:12:11 2011 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: Yes GnomeSessionInhibitors: 1: AppId = Power Manager Inhibit Applet, Flags = 15, Reason = Manual inhibit GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-10-generic root=UUID=d332acb1-e554-4637-84fe-731b5e39212b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (101 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/15/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: F.65 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 3612 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: 09.67 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.65:bd12/15/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnCompaqPresarioCQ60NotebookPC:pvrPCID:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn3612:rvr09.67:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC dmi.product.version: PCID dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802276 Title: brightness adjust 3 steps from hard (Fn) keys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/802276/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 651931] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
this fix works for the set of steps i was using to reproduce the bug, thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/651931/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697358] Re: Regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior
lores: you might try and file another bug for that, this one is already pretty messy and that's a separate thing, the original problem (though the title has been changed) is attributed to compiz and does appear to be fixed here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libwnck in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697358 Title: Regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/697358/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697358] Re: Regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior
still dunno why this is targeting libwnck; it's a change in drag behaviour with the wm, dragging stuff onto quick launch icons are also broken when this behaviour is observed, try it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to libwnck in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697358 Title: Regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/697358/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 788382] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive
i couldn't figure out how to get nautilus to keep from spawning, i copied the autostart .desktop to .local/share/applications and changed it to not autostart but apparently that didn't override the main one; i also tried nautilus -q, and searching for whatever gconf keys are restarting it, to no avail; pedro, if you know or know where i can ask someone (i already asked on #nautilus on gimpnet, not many people around) i'd appreciate it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788382 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 788382] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive
it may take quite some time to catch it, but i'll try, stymied a bit at the sheer number of related crashes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788382 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682726] Re: nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories
yes it still happens; you can reproduce it easily if you change "Folders - Count number of items" to never in the options, preview tab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682726 Title: nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 788382] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788382 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 788382] [NEW] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus i've gotten various crashes ejecting and deleting files, i don't expect this one to be any more enlightening, but maybe ... who knows it does not happen regularly, it happens semi regularly and so far i haven't been able to prompt a crash; it just happens during regular use ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-3.9-generic 2.6.39 Uname: Linux 2.6.39-3-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 25 16:01:16 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcCmdline: nautilus ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7f8c064732b6 : mov (%rbx),%rdx PC (0x7f8c064732b6) ok source "(%rbx)" (0x2020202020202020) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%rdx" ok Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) SegvReason: reading unknown VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: g_slice_alloc () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 g_slice_alloc0 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 g_checksum_new () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 gnome_desktop_thumbnail_factory_save_thumbnail () from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.17 ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (69 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788382 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() when ejecting drive -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 773726] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list()
yes, but the crash site is usually more like the one in bug #651931, i've just been reporting it every time i trigger it by clicking in the client area, theres probably more than one crasher depending on when you click before it initially paints the window/resizes it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773726 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 658555] Re: rename (F2) doesn't work as expected in list view
this needs an SRU to get it into natty/maverick; if someone knows how to do one -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658555 Title: rename (F2) doesn't work as expected in list view -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697358] Re: regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior
sebastien i love you! but this bug doesn't apply just to wnck-applet, but the entire panel; create a launcher and try dropping a file on it when the window switcher doesn't work, it's the same thing, could the title or the initial message be amended to include this? you've marked the other bugs that actually hilight the problem as a duplicate of this one, which is just one of the symptoms (the one that catches me all the time is dropping things on icons, the window switcher is just a small annoyance) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697358 Title: regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 773726] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773726 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740756] Re: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons no longer works (classic desktop)
i need to learn to be less hyperbolic, i thought someone actually removed the functionality at the time :D but, it has to do with compiz, i don't know how; but, it works for a while, then stops working (like it doesn't know what the cursor is over, aside from the outer window), it works again for a while after compiz --replace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740756 Title: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons no longer works (classic desktop) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 711429] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
i don't think the resolution is correct, and the upstream bug looks unrelated; can someone that knows why apport marked them duplicates manually confirm? or at least tell me how to ... this bug isn't resolved -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711429 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 711429] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
this just happened again with the details i provided on this bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/764874 i deleted 3 files, one disappeared in the ui, with the selection; then it crashed, in the end all of the selection is actually deleted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711429 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 764874] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764874 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 651931] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
this is still happening in natty b2, did it not get updated? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 757409] Re: missing certificate causes error on connect
** Attachment added: "cert error dialogue" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757409/+attachment/2015932/+files/facebook-missing-cert.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757409 Title: missing certificate causes error on connect -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 757409] [NEW] missing certificate causes error on connect
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy i don't know what package the certs are actually in, and this so far only presents in empathy for me ... so here it is ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: empathy 2.34.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 11 04:07:50 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: empathy UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (24 days ago) ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757409 Title: missing certificate causes error on connect -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24329#c2 this here in particular, my battery: battery present: yes rechargeable:yes state: charging energy: 21.492 Wh energy-empty:0 Wh energy-full: 43.1784 Wh energy-full-design: 47.52 Wh energy-rate: 0 W voltage: 11.577 V percentage: 49.7749% capacity:90.8636% technology: lithium-ion and as my comment above, it was apparently from hal, not between dk-p and up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258 Title: Battery life estimation never comes around -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 622639] Re: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 629258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 629258 Battery life estimation never comes around * You can subscribe to bug 629258 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/629258/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622639 Title: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around
this seemed to have broke during the transition from devicekit-power to upower; and looking in gnome-power-statistics confirms that it's not collecting samples for the data it uses to generate the estimate; as upower doesn't provide it for my battery (i don't know for sure if it offers it at all on other batteries, though) where devicekit-power provided _something_ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258 Title: Battery life estimation never comes around -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754261] Re: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..."
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 629258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 629258 Battery life estimation never comes around * You can subscribe to bug 629258 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/629258/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754261 Title: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..." -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 622639] Re: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds
this has affected me since maverick (fresh install) and continues in natty alpha, and now beta ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622639 Title: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 622639] Re: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds
attached picture shows time to empty, but time to full also has no samples i suspect since upower does not provide this information; it hasn't been updated to generate it from the other data sources when it replaced devicekit-power ** Attachment added: "graph with data missing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/622639/+attachment/1998267/+files/time-to-empty.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622639 Title: Power Statistics always shows Time to Full/Empty 0 Seconds -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754261] Re: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..."
oops, forgot to attach image, here it is ** Attachment added: "picture of battery menu" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/754261/+attachment/1998151/+files/gpm-applet-status.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754261 Title: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..." -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754261] Re: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..."
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754261 Title: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..." -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 754261] [NEW] applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..."
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager this worked correctly as far as i can remember in 10.04, showed different symptoms in 10.10 after an upgrade but after a fresh install of 10.10, 2 items in list, and the upgrade to natty alpha, then beta it's remained the same i've discharged the battery several times, hoping to tease some confidence out of the statistics behind the number, but it refuses to offer any information besides "estimating" ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-power-manager 2.32.0-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: cryptd aes_x86_64 aes_generic btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ufs qnx4 hfsplus hfs minix ntfs vfat msdos fat jfs xfs exportfs reiserfs binfmt_misc snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_conexant arc4 ppdev parport_pc snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event ath5k ath snd_seq mac80211 hp_wmi snd_timer sparse_keymap snd_seq_device snd cfg80211 joydev i915 soundcore snd_page_alloc psmouse serio_raw drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video lp parport usb_storage usbhid hid uas ahci r8169 libahci Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Apr 7 20:31:08 2011 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: Yes GnomeSessionInhibitors: 1: AppId = Power Manager Inhibit Applet, Flags = 15, Reason = Manual inhibit GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=UUID=d332acb1-e554-4637-84fe-731b5e39212b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (21 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/15/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: F.65 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 3612 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: 09.67 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.65:bd12/15/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnCompaqPresarioCQ60NotebookPC:pvrPCID:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn3612:rvr09.67:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC dmi.product.version: PCID dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754261 Title: applet apparently shows the status of 2 batteries and status wont change from "estimating ..." -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 753038] Re: high cpu usage when connected to machine goes away
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753038 Title: high cpu usage when connected to machine goes away -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 753038] [NEW] high cpu usage when connected to machine goes away
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vinagre connected to machine on local wifi via avahi discovered server, when the remote machine was closed (suspended) the connecting machines vinagre climbed to 99% cpu usage ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: vinagre 2.30.3-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 6 16:01:48 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: vinagre UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (20 days ago) ** Affects: vinagre (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to vinagre in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753038 Title: high cpu usage when connected to machine goes away -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 697358] Re: regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior
this is fixed for me as of the beta. advise on how to change status -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697358 Title: regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740756] Re: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works
well, that bug covers one of them. the other is dragging stuff onto launcher icons, which no longer works either ** Summary changed: - dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works + dragging files/folders onto launcher icons no longer works (classic desktop) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740756 Title: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons no longer works (classic desktop) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740756] Re: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or taskbar buttons no longer works
** Summary changed: - dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or taskbar buttons no longer works + dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740756 Title: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740756] [NEW] dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel you used to be able to drop files/folders on launcher icons to invoke the application with them as parameters, this no longer works in natty; it adds a launcher instead related, and as equally, excruciatingly annoying, dragging over a taskbar button will not bring that app to the foreground for a drop anymore, and if you drop it on top of the switcher it creates a launcher to the right of it. i can understand why this might be desirable, but i've used launchers in this manner, and dropping on apps for as long as i've used gnome ... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-panel 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.37-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 22 23:40:55 2011 GConfNonDefault: /apps/panel/general/applet_id_list=[applet_6,applet_1,applet_0,clock_screen0,show_desktop_button_screen0,window_list_screen0,workspace_switcher_screen0,trashapplet_screen0,applet_4,applet_12,applet_13,applet_11,applet_14,applet_17] /apps/panel/general/object_id_list=[object_0,menu_bar_screen0,object_1,object_3,object_2] /apps/panel/general/toplevel_id_list=[bottom_panel_screen0,top_panel_screen0] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-panel UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (5 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740756 Title: dragging files/folders onto launcher icons, or over taskbar buttons no longer works -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 739916] Re: gnome-mouse-properties doesn't offer touchpad options for 2 finger clicks
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739916 Title: gnome-mouse-properties doesn't offer touchpad options for 2 finger clicks -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 739916] [NEW] gnome-mouse-properties doesn't offer touchpad options for 2 finger clicks
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center with natty and the newer kernel, the driver for my synaptics touchpad (which does not do multitouch, but has heuristics for some 2 finger gestures) added a 2 finger right click, which is on by default even though the heuristics for it working, along with 2 finger scrolling are very bad. first thing i did was go to the mouse applet to disable it only to find it wasn't there. having heuristics off by default and having ui to turn it on (and adjust the thresholds for the heuristics) might be useful, as it is i can't use 2 finger scroll reliably either, but there is ui to enable it, without the threshold ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.37-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 21 19:38:54 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (4 days ago) ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739916 Title: gnome-mouse-properties doesn't offer touchpad options for 2 finger clicks -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 739872] Re: gsettings-data-convert crashed with SIGABRT
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739872 Title: gsettings-data-convert crashed with SIGABRT -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 738834] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry()
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738834 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 738834] [NEW] rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox as summary, did nothing all that special; though toggling shuffle makes rhythmbox behave very oddly, random tracks playing over other tracks, it's been that way for as long as i can remember, and might have something to do with it ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: rhythmbox 0.13.3-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.36-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 20 11:05:15 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcCmdline: rhythmbox ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7fd2a16f93bb : mov0x80(%rdi),%rax PC (0x7fd2a16f93bb) ok source "0x80(%rdi)" (0x0080) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%rax" ok SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: rhythmbox StacktraceTop: rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry () from /usr/lib/librhythmbox-core.so.3 ?? () from /usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/status-icon/libstatus-icon.so g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry() UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-17 (3 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738834 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in rb_shell_player_get_playing_entry() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 19175] Re: nautilus: "extract here" terminates without giving a reason (no disk space)
commenting because i posted a dup bug in 2011 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19175 Title: nautilus: "extract here" terminates without giving a reason (no disk space) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 724135] Re: no indication of extraction failure on failure (full disk, etc.)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724135 Title: no indication of extraction failure on failure (full disk, etc.) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 724135] [NEW] no indication of extraction failure on failure (full disk, etc.)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller in nautilus right click on a large archive and pick "Extract here" when theres not enough space for said extraction it silently exits leaving a broken file (same for manual extraction, except the exit part) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: file-roller 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.47-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Feb 23 21:57:49 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724135 Title: no indication of extraction failure on failure (full disk, etc.) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 718873] Re: "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718873 Title: "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 718873] [NEW] "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus i suspect this is because this message is shown after a sync, but if you remove it before you see it actually disappear in the list of volumes in nautilus you get various errors about not being able to send scsi sync/flush commands steps to reproduce: 1) plug in drive 2) sync before eject, or leave it idle so theres nothing to write (not required but helps) 3) eject, pull when dialogue says its' ok and before it disappears in nautilus expected: volume already be synced and gone before that dialogue appears actually happened: unplugging the drive will make the "safe to remove" notice disappear, but a few seconds later you get an error box talking about scsi "sense" failures and trying to flush the drive cache i didn't take a screenshot last time, but i'll try to remember to take one ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-26.46-generic 2.6.35.10 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-26-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Feb 14 09:03:17 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718873 Title: "safe to remove" notice shows up before drive is ready to be removed -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 653713] Re: slideshow background left arrow points the wrong direction
here's my own screenshot as well ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New ** Attachment added: "screenshot of defunct arrows" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/653713/+attachment/1840772/+files/appearance-arrow-bug.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653713 Title: slideshow background left arrow points the wrong direction -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
i'm still getting crashes in nautilus; _around_ ejects, and some just while its running, i'll file new bugs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
now if they could only fix https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627110 :] ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #627110 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627110 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
this is still happening with some regularity, i can attach newer dumps if someone tells me how, i have a few at hand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
i use "safely eject drive" as well, and did with the other, similar bug; and it's also happening with another drive -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
ok i sorted out the package snafu that made the proposed version disappear; i'll be looking at getting exact steps for reproduction asap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686156] Re: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar
** Attachment added: "screenshot of inhibit dialogue and taskbar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/686156/+attachment/1757747/+files/shutdown%20inhibit.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686156 Title: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686156] Re: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686156 Title: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686156] [NEW] [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session as in summary, see attached image ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gnome-session 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-8.21-generic 2.6.37-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Dec 6 12:29:37 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-session ** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686156 Title: [COSMETIC] shutdown conflict dialogue shows "Untitled window" in task bar -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686130] Re: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation
** Attachment added: "example image used in bug description" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/686130/+attachment/1757661/+files/Screenshot-Extract.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686130 Title: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686130] Re: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686130 Title: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 686130] [NEW] crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller in the example image the crumb bar shows "ohsix, crap, acm-5.0, dis" if i navigate to dis, then click on acm-5.0, "dis" is put in the location box (it is selected) if i click on crap, acm-5.0 is put in the box and selected. in nautilus this sort of behaviour is desirable because it will put you back where you were in a large folder as you navigate back, but in file- roller if you are trying to extract to the parent, or any directory in the crumb bar, you have to pick the location, then deselect the folder, it is highly desirable that there is nothing selected, and the location bar remains empty from these operations. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: file-roller 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-7.18-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Dec 6 11:27:43 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686130 Title: crumb bar in file dialogue leaves junk in location box after navigation -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
ok, i can no longer test for this bug, as the package version of nautilus from proposed apparently went away (apport said it didn't exist, and sure enough it didn't! now i'm getting the plain old boring crash from the other bug) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
it looks like it may be related to one usb drive i have; and the way that it sleeps, (it's a samsung story 1tb) i don't have this drive with me at the moment, so the window to interleave ejects to reproduce the bug isn't large enough -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
@Dmitry Shachnev, new report and apport stuff here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/683972 checking if it does it every time under stated scenario will have to wait until tomorrow, it is late. posting this here, from apport on other bug only because it is really odd that all the information matches #29 exactly: SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x44c5a6: mov (%rax),%r14 PC (0x0044c5a6) ok source "(%rax)" (0x64657469736976) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%r14" ok SegvReason: reading unknown VMA stack is the same, too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 528897] Re: main track list/view is very obtrusive when files are being added/removed
this is still going on, rhythmbox guys don't care either, most of the time is spent in the video driver; but only because the treeview is updated so often ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528897 Title: main track list/view is very obtrusive when files are being added/removed -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 562147] Re: totem dies with an assertion failure "Apport does not support reporting this type"
well, its not a problem anymore, but not from a gstreamer change; apport still doesn't catch assertion failures and i'm running into them more and more (good software asserts! if you crash you've carried garbage around too long already :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562147 Title: totem dies with an assertion failure "Apport does not support reporting this type" -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 683972] [NEW] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus i was ejecting 2 drives, ejected the second before the very final phase of eject for the first -> crash; currently not at home, will verify if this is reproducible like this then will report on other g_closure_invoke bug i reported earlier, they were waiting for this crash dump ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-7.18-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-7-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Dec 1 18:42:21 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus ProcCmdline: nautilus ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x44c5a6:mov(%rax),%r14 PC (0x0044c5a6) ok source "(%rax)" (0x64657469736976) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%r14" ok SegvReason: reading unknown VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: ?? () g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout disk lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682726] Re: nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-File conflict.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/682726/+attachment/1748878/+files/Screenshot-File%20conflict.png -- nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682726] Re: nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories
-- nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682726] [NEW] nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus the copy is from a fuse mount to a fuse mount (both ntfs) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-6.17-generic 2.6.37-rc3 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-6-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 29 08:07:38 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- nautilus file copy conflict dialogue shows "Size: (null)" for directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
i will, and was planning to; thanks -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
it wont let me change the status, this bug is _not_ fixed -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
read the comments again; i didn't misinterpret them, my comment in #20 stands -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
ah i missed that it was in natty; i will report back if it is still broken for me. -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 661732] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() if clicked after map, but before resize or initial paint
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 651931 evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() -- evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() if clicked after map, but before resize or initial paint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
i thought i should add that i almost always have the extra pane open (F3) when this occurs, the drive being ejected is only in one tab on one pane. i've also noticed with a single pane, it tends to crash every _other_ drive ejection; i can get away with ejecting one, but the second one crashes it. -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 651931] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
i'll try and remember that next time; i figured the people marking bugs would have actually read them, since report quality isn't uniform -- evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 651931] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
in the bug i posted; it had instructions to reproduce it, unfortunately it was marked as a duplicate of this one instead of the other way around (or not at all) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/661732 and by my own instructions, i can still do it on demand, every time. -- evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 661732] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() if clicked after map, but before resize or initial paint
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 651931 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 "just after started up and mapped", mapped is an X term; it is when the window appears, its document area is gray for a small amount of time, before the document is painted in, if you click when it is gray, it will crash. -- evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list() if clicked after map, but before resize or initial paint https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
i'm still getting crashes with the proposed version, 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1 it says something about accessing 0x0001 and segfaulting, i can add another report from apport if anyone will point out how :] -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 651931] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
it's any given pdf, i was able to reproduce it with several; you just need to click before the document area is redrawn/resized heres a handful: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/107/1066954/p1231-mcpherson.pdf?key1=1066954&key2=7358983711&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618 http://vis.cs.ucdavis.edu/~ogawa/apvis07ogawa.pdf http://vis.cs.ucdavis.edu/~shearer/papers/pixelplexing.pdf http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/pdf/SOFA.Sept.2010data.pdf essentially every pdf in my download history; because thats what i verified it with once i realized what did it, i'd had it happen long before that but never figured it was clicking in the client area that did it. the timing in the bug i posted, that was marked duplicate here; that is the key to at least the bug i posted, remains to be seen if its an actual duplicate i guess -- evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
