[Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Happens even without a Nautilus window having been opened in the current session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1039594] Re: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_get_impl()
Same than the above poster: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGFPE in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039594 Title: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_get_impl() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1039594/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
I am not affected by this issue, I have just realized -- the issue that affects me is present only on page printing: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem
I revert what I said just above: this bug report is no duplicate at all. The proportion of space margins take upon printing is just too large -- margins are not intended to be _that_ wide. Anyone else suffering from the same issue, needing to enable "select page size using document page size" ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323 Title: [Printing] White-margins problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1043039] Re: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039 Title: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1043039] [NEW] rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback
Public bug reported: A few minutes after having begun default-radio-stations playback (this has been tested for all of the "Absolute" stations), playback stops; message appears: "Python (v2.7) requires to install plugins to play media files of the following type: text/html decoder" Under every fresh Ubuntu installation I have seen, it happens that way, and Rhythmbox has to be restarted for playback to be started back again, for a sole few minutes before halting the same way as described before. A workaround for this issue is to right-click the radio station, select properties, copy its URL, and then paste it back into a browser, download the playlist file, open it using a text editor, tweak it if desired, then open it using Rhythmbox -- a new radio station will appear, working this time. For Absolute Classic Rock, this is the content of the .pls file to be opened using Rhythmbox: [playlist] Title1=Absolute Classic Rock File1=http://ogg2.as34763.net/vc160.ogg ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 28 21:20:53 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120817.3) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039 Title: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Happened to me under 12.10 (quantal). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
Just to be clear, crop values should be unobtrusively detected and applied, but there would be no need whatsoever, as far as I am seeing it, for the implementation of crop-values-modification capabilities from the totem settings. (The goal merely being to respect the own predefined idiosyncrasies of the projected media file.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1014264] [NEW] totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
Public bug reported: MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them. This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of this bug.) This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current latest build of totem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: totem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
madbiologist: It is a "HP Deskjet F380 All-in-one." I am just curious, also, as to the reason why that option is not ticked in by default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem
Actually, this report may be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323 Title: [Printing] White-margins problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
[11.10] -- I too am suffering from this white-margins, improper-scaling problem. Printing a PDF file through the Evince document viewer may by default add white margins both on top and bottom and on both sides. (I have been able to reproduce this issue using PDF files created through the LibreOffice PDF-file export, for it to be noted.) One method to fix the issue -- and it seems to work for all cases in which a PDF file gets printed with too-wide margins, whether having or not been outputted through LibreOffice -- is to enable "select page size using document page size" by default. That way, it seems to me, PDF files would get printed the way they really were intended to be printed. Should it not, in that case, be best for that parameter to be selected in Evince right out of the box? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
Bug moved to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control- center/+bug/875917 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 875917] Re: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center
** Attachment added: "oneiric-xrandr-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917/+attachment/2551334/+files/oneiric-xrandr-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917 Title: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 875917] [NEW] Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center
Public bug reported: Using a 1680x1050 monitor (in this case, an "Acer AL2216W"), under "System Settings > Displays," the (double-scaling) 840x525 resolution is unavailable, even though it is listed in xrandr (see posted log). That seems to be a regression from natty, as Gnome Control Center previously would be listing that resolution. A workaround to this issue of course is running "xrandr -s 840x525" through the terminal, even though that way it takes some time for the system to switch to that resolution (for it to be noted, there was no such waiting time in natty). I hope all this information to be helpful to you developers in investigating the current issue. If any more information would be needed, do not hesitate to prompt for it; I would then acquiesce in as much as the situation would require. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 16 14:46:16 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 20.0-0ubuntu3 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu1 indicator-datetime 0.3.0-0ubuntu3 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917 Title: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
Alright, I will open a new one with the relevant info -- meet you there! ** Attachment removed: "natty-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
I am no longer using Oneiric, unfortunately. I am currently under natty. Does such a log still matters, then? ** Attachment added: "natty-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
@Sebastien Bacher: yes, it does. Switching to it through "xrandr -s 840x525," though, takes nearly as much as thirty seconds. Same thing for switching back to the native resolution. Switching to available-in-monitor-settings-window resolutions was almost instantaneous, conversely. However, as I previously mentioned, the desired resolution is lacking from that monitor-settings window (it was present in natty). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 574187] Re: Screensaver asks password when the user is in the password-less login group
Would that mean that upon LiveCD installation, one choosing "automatic login" to not be nagged by password-input prompts at every reboot instance also would implicitly be telling the installer "do not ask me for password every time I am leaving my desktop for more than a few minutes and the screensaver springs up?" Because to my mind, both go hand-in-hand. Either an user wants to be protected at his home and wants to be asked about passwords here and there, or he wants not to be nagged by such incessant normal-computer- usage password prompts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574187 Title: Screensaver asks password when the user is in the password-less login group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/574187/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs