[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
gconftools-2 take a lot of cpu time too.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-17 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Public bug reported:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)
   Severity: Normal
   Priority: (none set)
 Status: Unconfirmed

Description:
When I upgrade my system and a postinst script install ou update a gconf
schema using gconftool-2, it seems to take hours to finish. It was a lot
faster under breezy. Ubuntu dapper ppc.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
Thanks for your bug. That's likely due to the switch to a merged tree.
installation is slower but runtime faster. Some investigation to see if
there is some optimization possible would be nice though

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
   Priority: None => Low
   Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher
 Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
 Target: None => ubuntu-6.04

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Lee Revell
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
This problem is really, really bad, if your machine is not screaming
fast, it takes hours to upgrade 30 Gnome related packages.  Upon further
examination with strace, it seems that for *each package*, all the files
in /var/lib/gconf/defaults/ get regenerated 20 or 30 times.  Is it
regenerating ALL the XML files for each file installed or something?

There has GOT to be some potential for optimization here... I'm afraid
to upgrade because pulling in a handful of Gnome packages will make my
machine grind to a crawl for the rest of the afternoon.  I am afraid
"very slow" is a significant understatement of the problem...

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread Trouilliez vincent
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
+1 !

I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
them ! :-/

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-02 Thread John Dong
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
no kidding; I feel it on my Athlon64 also, sometimes the Dapper updates take
30+ minutes to apply when they used to scroll by instantaneously.

On 2/2/06, Trouilliez vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Public bug report changed:
> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744
>
> Comment:
> +1 !
>
> I have got a decently fast (1.5GHz CPU, 768MB of RAM) machine, which
> runs anything just fine/smoothly, but somehow Dapper recently started to
> take hours to install stuff, when it's reasonably fast under Breezy. Now
> it takes a lot more time to install packages, than it takes to download
> them ! :-/
>

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Comment:
That's an issue but not trivial to fix. Sure it's annoying if you run
daily dist-upgrade but that's an unstable distribution, you may want to
keep using the current stable one if you don't want to face any such
inconveniance. Contributions are welcome if somebody wants to spend some
efforts working on that instead of spending them commenting on the users
list about that by example

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

*** Bug 32683 has been marked a duplicate of this bug ***

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 28744] gconftool-2 very slow

2006-03-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/28744

Task: ubuntu gconf2
 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

Comment:
That upload fixes the issue:

 gconf2 (2.13.5-0ubuntu3) dapper; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/gconf-schemas:
 - fix the schemas registration performance issue (Ubuntu: #28744)
 - change by Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for Debian:
   - Complete rewrite, in python.
   - Now run gconftool only once, for better performance (closes: #353986).
   - Improve performance even further by merging files when there are
 several ones.

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs