[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "jitter-file-operations.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450112/jitter-file-operations.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Ah yes, it's DVB-S recorded german SD-TV films, shrinked to h264, moved
from the mythtv recorder to the archive.

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
- RED: No handles to rescale (link XP :-((( )
+ RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
  threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
  -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
  highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s. Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads
- -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect the number of processes that give the
- highest I/O ?
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
+ the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
  GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
  OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequentiall copying file after file.
+ threaded Process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
  Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 Threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
  the number of processes that give the highest I/O ?

** Description changed:

- On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" Dialogue for each longer copy
+ On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
- It is similar to the other Bug I reported that the remaining download
+ It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
- Suggested Fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
+ Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
+ GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
  itself
  
  RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
  
- OFFTopic: one Dual-Core Core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
+ OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
  via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
  about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded Process gives 10

[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly
Here's maybe a better illustration of the problem.

Notice: copy operation on the array is about 25 MB/s (arry runs on
different 2007 hdds, 30-35 should be normal today on hdds, 100+ on good
SDDs), one kernel at 100% without stepping to the max. As one of the
three disks makes about 25 MB/s each, for Raid 5 copy on the same array
this is pretty OK, like copy from hdd1 to hdd2, with the xoring done
without significant impact. I love Linux!

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-15 Thread Grizzly

** Attachment added: "Jitter one-line vs. two line on file ops"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20450460/jitter-file-ops2.png

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
thanks for the report.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)

** Description changed:

  On intrepid, there is a "File Operations" dialogue for each longer copy
  or move operation. That dialogue is not resizable. Depending on the
  estimated duration, its size jitters. See Screenshot. Probably upstream
  prob.
  
  It is similar to the other bug I reported that the remaining download
  time during dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid and from feisty to hardy
  could not be read in languages hitting long words in localisation
  
  Suggested fix: make "File Operations" resizable via "grabbing" the
  corners/edges.
  
- GREEN: Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes
- itself
- 
- RED: No handles to rescale (like XP :-((( )
- 
- OFFtopic: one dual-core core of AMD x2 4400+ can handle approx 10 MB/s
- via SSH to Raid 5 array, the whole onboard 1:1 gigabit ethernet maxes to
- about 25 MB/s. When I copy the 4x1GB files all together, one single-
- threaded process gives 10 MB/s, sequential copying file after file.
- Thus, 2 files seperately start 2 threads -> 20 MB/s. Why not autodetect
- the number of processes that give the highest I/O ? Or something similar
- to the "background copy" option found in "Total Commander" or "WinScp"
- on the Redmond OS?
+ Sometimes it makes a newline, sometimes not, so the box resizes itself

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
this is likely known upstream and the dialog is being worked, upstream
bug is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410 ; was targeted
for 2.24 but is not fixed yet, will ping upstream to see what's going on
there, thanks in advance.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518410
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 308261] Re: "File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter

2008-12-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Unknown => In Progress

-- 
"File Operations" Dialogue is not scalable in Nautilus and causes Jitter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs