[Bug 53527] Re: Custom settings should not be a conffile

2009-07-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The issue is fixed in karmic

** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
Custom settings should not be a conffile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53527
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 53527] Re: Custom settings should not be a conffile

2006-10-06 Thread Sebastien Bacher
nobody said that's not a bug, no need to argue on that. The default
choice on upgrade is to keep the changes though, if an user don't know
what he's doing better to just press enter and use the default setting.
That said patch are welcome if somebody wants to work on that

-- 
Custom settings should not be a conffile
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53527

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 53527] Re: Custom settings should not be a conffile

2006-10-06 Thread Gerv
"The issue is limited though since the default custom conf is a template
and has no useful value so keeping the user version works fine"

That may be so - but how is a normal user going to know that? The "do
you want to use the old file or the new file" prompt is scary, because
neither option is guaranteed safe. "Old file" might break the app
(because it's missing essential config) and "New file" loses your
customisations.

You say that in this case, "old file" is safe - but how is a user to
know that? They aren't told so by the UI.

We need to stop gdm.conf-custom being a conffile. Surely its name
implies the user can customise it, anyway?

-- 
Custom settings should not be a conffile
https://launchpad.net/bugs/53527

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs