Re: Totem branched for GNOME 2.14
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 07:27 -0500, Travis Watkins wrote: On 4/28/06, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Usual gnome-2-14 branch name. Plans for 2.16? Hey Lui^WTravis ;) Not any specific plans I'm afraid. More bug fixing as time permits. -- Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Totem branched for GNOME 2.14
On Sáb, 2006-04-29 at 16:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 07:27 -0500, Travis Watkins wrote: On 4/28/06, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Usual gnome-2-14 branch name. Plans for 2.16? Hey Lui^WTravis ;) Not any specific plans I'm afraid. More bug fixing as time permits. The obvious comment (someone has to say it), You shouldn't need to branch just for bug fixing... -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The universe is always one step beyond logic ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Totem branched for GNOME 2.14
On 4/29/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sáb, 2006-04-29 at 16:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: Not any specific plans I'm afraid. More bug fixing as time permits. The obvious comment (someone has to say it), You shouldn't need to branch just for bug fixing... Depends on whether the bug fixes require changing strings, modifying the UI, actually need new features (e.g. focus stealing prevention and edge resistance in metacity; both looked like new features but were really just part of bigger bug fixes), or are just considered too big to go in on the stable branch. :) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
