[Reminder] Deadline for GUADEC travel assistance applications is due on April 27th
Dear hackers, The deadline for sending your GUADEC travel assistance application is due on April 27th, 19:00 UTC, that is in 14½ hours from now. The instructions are detailed at http://live.gnome.org/Travel Kind regards, -- Germán Póo-Caamaño Concepción - Chile http://www.gnome.org/~gpoo/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
Le lundi 26 avril 2010 à 21:24:19% (+0200), Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals a écrit: > 2010/4/26 Dodji Seketeli : > > It would be interesting to find a way to make these tools -- bugzilla or > > whatever patch review system -- be interoperable with email. > > Launchpad supports answering to merge requests by mail (as well as > managing bugs, etc). I guess It would be useful that GNOME bugzilla supports this too. Dodji ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
2010/4/26 Dodji Seketeli : > It would be interesting to find a way to make these tools -- bugzilla or > whatever patch review system -- be interoperable with email. Launchpad supports answering to merge requests by mail (as well as managing bugs, etc). ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
Le lundi 26 avril 2010 à 17:18:31% (+1000), Andrew Cowie a écrit: > but the whole point of decentralized VCS is disconnected operation > and having to have an active internet connection to get to some > centralized website in order to follow through workflow is a > non-starter for most of us. I agree, FWIW. I prefer dealing with patch review through simple email for that reason. It's so much easier to just do the review offline. It would be interesting to find a way to make these tools -- bugzilla or whatever patch review system -- be interoperable with email. If I could just get patches attached to GNOME bugzilla bugs in my email, reply to those via email and have those properly appear in bugzilla comments, that would be great for me. Dodji ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 13:51 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:52 -0400, Curtis Hovey wrote: > > > > I think you can: > > * use bzr-git to push your Launchpad trunk to GNOME git > > * setup an import of the git branch and make it trunk > > > launchpad just imports git master, right? No. Launchpad import any git/bzr/hg branch Launchpad only import SVN/CVS trunk. -- __C U R T I S C. H O V E Y___ Guilty of stealing everything I am. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:52 -0400, Curtis Hovey wrote: > > I think you can: > * use bzr-git to push your Launchpad trunk to GNOME git > * setup an import of the git branch and make it trunk > launchpad just imports git master, right? ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:01 -0500, Cody Russell wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 22:44 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Curtis Hovey > > wrote: > > > My suggestion is to support the Zeitgeist's community's culture of > > code > > > reviews. GNOME does not have an official code review tool. Neither > > does > > > GitHub, which is why projects that host in GitHub also use Launchpad > > for > > > code reviews. > > > > Actually this is not true. GitHub lets you review any commit and the > > usual workflow is fork → commit → request pull → get review. > > Eh, github's pull requests are not really the same as a code review > system. At least last time I looked at it. You do a pull request and > the person you're requesting basically just gets a message that says, > "Hey dude, check out my awesome code!" There isn't a nice UI for doing > the code review, with diffs that can be commented on and whatever. I cannot say if it is nice but github have since some time option to comment code/diffs. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Cody Russell wrote: > Eh, github's pull requests are not really the same as a code review > system. At least last time I looked at it. You do a pull request and > the person you're requesting basically just gets a message that says, > "Hey dude, check out my awesome code!" There isn't a nice UI for doing > the code review, with diffs that can be commented on and whatever. Uhm, you're supposed to review commits. You get a pull request (or just stumble upon a fork of particular interest) and go to view related commits. Each commit allows you to review each and every line of code. It even seems that's where gitorious got their UI from. -- Patryk Zawadzki ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:01 +0200, Seif Lotfy wrote: > However we do want to keep our development branches in bzr+launchpad. That sounds reasonable. The Java bindings have been using bzr since before GNOME moved to svn. Needless to say we kept using it, and likewise skipped the subsequent move to git. We use Bugzilla, but that again is because a) our usage of it predates Launchpad, and b) we don't use [nor does anyone need to] use Launchpad for branch management [we don't use Bugzilla for patch workflow either; we discuss patches on IRC and on our mailing lists]. I'd be tempted to start using Launchpad for code reviews — they're getting pretty sophisticated — but the whole point of decentralized VCS is disconnected operation and having to have an active internet connection to get to some centralized website in order to follow through workflow is a non-starter for most of us. AfC Sydney signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list