libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Sergey Udaltsov
Hi ppl

With the recent developments related to input methods, libgnomekbd is
effectively redundant. The only useful bit remaining is the layout
preview widget. IMNSHO those bits can be quickly integrated into g-c-c
without breaking things. I am not aware of any other project that
would use libgnomekbd. If you know about such dependency - please
please raise your voice!!!

I discussed that with Rui, he generally agrees but there is valid
concern about dependencies.

The code will say in git (master and 3.4 branch), I just think the
library should not be a part of 3.6 release - and there will be no
further development.

Anyone has any comments? Technically that should be a very cheap operation.

Sergey

PS libxklavier remains to be maintained, I know some people are using it
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hello Sergey,

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 15:12 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
 Hi ppl
 
 With the recent developments related to input methods, libgnomekbd is
 effectively redundant. The only useful bit remaining is the layout
 preview widget. IMNSHO those bits can be quickly integrated into g-c-c
 without breaking things. I am not aware of any other project that
 would use libgnomekbd. If you know about such dependency - please
 please raise your voice!!!
 
 I discussed that with Rui, he generally agrees but there is valid
 concern about dependencies.
 
 The code will say in git (master and 3.4 branch), I just think the
 library should not be a part of 3.6 release - and there will be no
 further development.
 
 Anyone has any comments? Technically that should be a very cheap operation.

I don't want to move such a large amount of code without review or
thorough testing, so I'd like it if libgnomekbd was still shipped in
GNOME 3.6.

We can move the preview widgets, etc. for GNOME 3.8.

Cheers

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Sergey Udaltsov
 I don't want to move such a large amount of code without review or
 thorough testing, so I'd like it if libgnomekbd was still shipped in
 GNOME 3.6.
There is only one .c and one .h file (and one small .ui). Is that a
large amount of code? All other c/h files are dead code. Waste of
builder's time.

Sergey
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Sergey Udaltsov
 Also past UI freeze, and I'm already busy trying to bug fix all the new
 features we added this cycle. That'll do. I'll do the releases if you
 don't want to do them...
The UI freeze would not be broken - it will just be moved from one
module to another.

I can do the release, no problem. I just feel awkward releasing the
library most of the code of which is dead...

Sergey
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Philip Withnall
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 15:26 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
  Also past UI freeze, and I'm already busy trying to bug fix all the new
  features we added this cycle. That'll do. I'll do the releases if you
  don't want to do them...
 The UI freeze would not be broken - it will just be moved from one
 module to another.

Perhaps also relevant: the API freeze started 3 days ago.

Philip


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME 3.6 Blocker Report

2012-08-23 Thread Martyn Russell

On 21/08/12 10:28, Andre Klapper wrote:

A few hours ago UI Freeze, Feature Freeze and API/ABI Freeze for 3.5.x
started. Also the String Change Announcement Period started.

The blocker list below is not necessarily complete.
Feedback, updates, help from packagers, developers, maintainers,
contributors, etc. is welcome. Please do speak up if some important bugs
are not listed here, or if some tickets should not be blockers.

Note: This list also includes open reports that still have a 3.4 target.



Hello all,


===
TRACKER
===
Empty window in LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666749


Sadly this bug isn't something we can easily fix and we currently have a 
bit of a stale mate on it too. See the bug for more details.



libsecret migrations
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679870
Rough unfinished patch available.


Initial patch review from me done. Looks mostly complete. Just needs 
applying and testing. My preference to use async methods instead are not 
a blocking request to get this bug fixed.


Will try to get this bug resolved and a release out ASAP. Might be a few 
days, still on vacation here for a bit.


--
Regards,
Martyn

Founder and CEO of Lanedo GmbH.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
Hey Sergey

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi ppl

 With the recent developments related to input methods, libgnomekbd is
 effectively redundant. The only useful bit remaining is the layout
 preview widget. IMNSHO those bits can be quickly integrated into g-c-c
 without breaking things. I am not aware of any other project that
 would use libgnomekbd. If you know about such dependency - please
 please raise your voice!!!

Thanks for your work on this!

I would ask if the ~/.xmodmap support was not part of this? Or is it
part of gnome-settings-daemon now?

Diego
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: libgnomekbd: dead man walking

2012-08-23 Thread Sergey Udaltsov
 I would ask if the ~/.xmodmap support was not part of this? Or is it
 part of gnome-settings-daemon now?
It was in g-s-d. Now it is in libxklavier. But since g-s-d these days
is not using libxklavier, I do not know about the current state of
.xmodmap support. Perhaps Rui can comment...
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list