Re: GNOME throbber inconsistencies?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Marco Scannadinari > wrote: > >> I think using the very nice throbber by the Tango people would look a >> lot nicer and reduce the work (?) needed to standardise the throbber >> sizes in GNOME. ... > I'm not sure which is the Tango throbber you're referring to... I presume we're talking about the one that is part of gnome-icon-theme [1]. That was quite nice, but it looks a little old fashioned. More than that, it assumes a grey background and wouldn't scale to larger sizes, so it's not a good choice. ... >> Im sure there's a lot I'm missing, but the ideal scenario (for me) is to >> revert to the Tango throbbers and subsequently their DMZ-* cursors as >> well. Not to be rude, but does anyone know why the cursors were forked >> from DMZ? (Apart from it needing to be black, but there is a DMZ-AA / >> DMZ-Black anyway...) I'd be pretty surprised if DMZ has been "forked". Jakub Steiner, who designed DMZ, is one of the current gnome-themes-standard maintainers, and I'm not aware of any changes to the pointer theme. Allan [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-icon-theme/plain/gnome/48x48/animations/process-working.png ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME throbber inconsistencies?
I'd be pretty surprised if DMZ has been "forked". Jakub Steiner, who designed DMZ, is one of the current gnome-themes-standard maintainers, and I'm not aware of any changes to the pointer theme. I don't know for sure that it has been forked, but it seems quite likely because of the similarities between DMZ-Black and the Adwaita cursor theme. The only (noticable) difference is the throbber. -- Marco Scannadinari ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME throbber inconsistencies?
And with regards to how I thought that the Tango project created the throbber, I was blindly convinced by these links: commacommacrash.com/2007/08/animated-gif-for-tango-throbber.html commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spinning_wheel_throbber.gif -- Marco Scannadinari ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gnome-control-center/panels/wacom - button mapping panel
Hi Przemo, On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Przemo Firszt wrote: > > I hope to do some work on wacom tablet button mapping in gnome control > center. First mockup of new individual button mapping panel: > http://firszt.eu/wacom-icons/mockup_of_wacom__button_mapping_panel.png > > Roadmap: > 1. Change existing panel to simple button list + add a new panel > activated after clicking on a button (mockup) I tend to dislike vertical tabs but I can see how having a dedicated panel per button is useful if we want to show that many options. > 2. First version would include only existing or already coded features - > single keystroke, on screen help, monitor switch, OLED labels matching > mapping. The last one is waiting for review on bugzilla. I understand that the label/icon's only purpose would be to show up the on screen help, is that right? > 3. Add option to edit label i.e. to show "Save" instead of "Ctrl-S" on > tablet > 4. Add option to select an icon instead of label. I can see how having a label might be good (especially if we had those keystrokes sequences), not so much for the icons though. > 5. Implement keystroke sequences. I can also see how this might be useful for some users but I am sure the design folks aren't going to like it as it might be too complicated for other users. Perhaps choosing a file/script to be run could replace the necessity of implementing the keystroke sequences ourselves but I'm sure the design team will find it equally funny. Maybe all these and other "advanced" features should belong in a 3rd party app for power users, outside of g-c-c. BTW, do you know we're thinking of implementing per-app bindings? I'm waiting on the design team to tell me how advanced it should/could be so I implement it: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670907 Thank you for your ideas! Cheers, -- Joaquim Rocha http://www.joaquimrocha.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
