Re: GNOME 3.14 Blocker Bugs (week 33)

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 18:32 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Thanks everybody for cleaning up last week's list by fixing and
> reassassing quite some items! 
> There are only eight items left marked as blockers:

I think we should add https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734298


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 01:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> 1. New categories: Core, Core Apps, Apps
>Note: Not every module has been put into right category. If you
> spot
>errors, please let release-t...@gnome.org know. I'm planning to add
>some cross checks in the release team scripts to ensure everything
>is and stays aligned.

This check seems to be overaggressive. I'm trying to add a module that
does not fit into any of those categories:

$ ssh mcatanz...@git.gnome.org finish-import libgames-scores
---
ERROR: libgames-scores.doap is not valid:
   doap:category property should be one of:
apps,core,core-apps,deprecated,infrastructure

Please see:
   https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/FAQ
---
ERROR: Cannot clear pending flag as DOAP syntax is invalid

So I decided to pretend to be an app, to get past the checker, but it
didn't work: I still get the same error no matter what I do. Am I making
a mistake or is this a bug on your end? Here is my doap:

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
 xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
 xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";
 xmlns:gnome="http://api.gnome.org/doap-extensions#";
 xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#";>

  libgames-scores
  Track players' scores history.
  A library that records players' scores and presents a
scores dialog.
  https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Games"; />
  http://download.gnome.org/sources/libgames-scores/"; />

  http://api.gnome.org/doap-extensions#apps"; />

  

  Michael Catanzaro
  mailto:mcatanz...@gnome.org"; />
  mcatanzaro

  



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 12:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> So I decided to pretend to be an app, to get past the checker, but it
> didn't work: I still get the same error no matter what I do. Am I
> making
> a mistake or is this a bug on your end? Here is my doap:

Actually I'm sorry, it's my fault. False alarm!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME 3.14 Blocker Bugs (week 33)

2014-08-24 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 11:29 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 18:32 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Thanks everybody for cleaning up last week's list by fixing and
> > reassassing quite some items! 
> > There are only eight items left marked as blockers:
> 
> I think we should add https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734298

All user comments seem to be about 3.10 but none about 3.12 (yet)? Is
there any indication that this is still a problem in 3.12/3.13 code?

In any case, a comment by a g-o-a maintainer would be extremely welcome
on that ticket (if g-o-a has maintainers). Too silent.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME 3.14 Blocker Bugs (week 33)

2014-08-24 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 11:29 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I think we should add https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734298

Google has recently imposed some new restriction, apparently.

I think the E-D-S CalDAV backend will need tweaked to work around it.


> OPTIONS /caldav/v2/xx%40gmail.com/events/ HTTP/1.1
> Soup-Debug-Timestamp: 1408911513
> Soup-Debug: SoupSessionSync 1 (0x2ab4100), SoupMessage 1 (0x7f41cc05b8b0), 
> SoupSocket 1 (0x7f41cc0298b0)
> Host: apidata.googleusercontent.com
> User-Agent: Evolution/3.12.4
> Connection: close
  
< HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
< Soup-Debug-Timestamp: 1408911513
< Soup-Debug: SoupMessage 1 (0x7f41cc05b8b0)
< Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
< Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:18:33 GMT
< Expires: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:18:33 GMT
< Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
< X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
< X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
< X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
< Server: GSE
< Alternate-Protocol: 443:quic
< Connection: close
< 
< Daily Limit for Unauthenticated Use Exceeded. Continued use requires signup.

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME 3.14 Blocker Bugs (week 33)

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 21:18 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> All user comments seem to be about 3.10 but none about 3.12 (yet)? Is
> there any indication that this is still a problem in 3.12/3.13 code?
> 
> In any case, a comment by a g-o-a maintainer would be extremely
> welcome
> on that ticket (if g-o-a has maintainers). Too silent.
> 
> andre

The problem started occurring for 3.12 users several months ago, around
April or so, then started occurring for 3.10 users more recently.

I've seen at least three or four distinct bug reports for the same
problem that haven't been marked as duplicates yet; I just picked one
with a recent comment to suggest.It seems likely that there are multiple
underlying bugs causing the same symptom (authentication dialog appears
unexpectedly and rejects valid passwords). For instance, some users
report that the authentication dialog always accepts their password on
the second attempt (I think these are 3.12 users) while for me on 3.10
my password is never accepted. Other users report that disabling
gnome-online-accounts and adding the account in evolution directly
solves the problem, someone somewhere pointed out a particular Fedora
release of g-o-a and says reverting that update resolves the issue (no I
don't remember where I read this), g-o-a developers say it's an e-d-s
bug, someone somewhere says it's only a bug with calendar I have no
idea what's actually going on, it seems like a confused mess to me.

Hopefully Matthew can sort it out now that he's found a problem.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

GNOME 3.13.90 releases

2014-08-24 Thread Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
Hi all,

In the course of packaging up GNOME 3.13.90, I was advised to switch to
webkit2gtk-4.0 (version 2.5.x) as the new epiphany browser would be
making use of this.

So I jumped into the trouble, adjusted all the packages that depended on
webkit2gtk-3.0 (I try to keep the number of variations low if possible)
and basically everything is set...

BASICALLY: up to this date, there hasn't been a single epiphany release
in the 3.13.x cycle. Is this still going to happen? Or are we no longer
supposed to package epiphany for distributions? :) I'm sure it's just an
oversight, but it happened in all 3.13.x releases so far.

Looking forward to get a release of epiphany 3.13.90 to showcase to our
users!

Dominique / DimStar
-- 
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger 

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME HIG: Feedback Wanted

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 08:47 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> A new version of the HIG is in the works, to be released along with
> GNOME 3.14 [1]. I'm currently looking for feedback.

I'm about halfway done reading. I have a few suggestions, all minor:

* The Visual Layout page discusses how many pixels to use as margins.
This is easy for developers to use, but it caused some confusion on LWN
given that on hidpi displays twice as many pixels will be used. Maybe
this should be clarified.

* On the Dialogs page: "In particular, it is currently not recommended
to make the Close button the default in an instant apply window, as this
can lead to users closing the window accidentally before they have
finished using it."  I think you can remove the word "currently," unless
you're planning to change your mind. :)

* Regarding the keybindings page: Ctrl+Alt+Delete is power off, not log
off, and it is not disabled default, although it shows up in g-c-c as
log off. [1]

* Throughout the HIG, you're mostly consistent in using ' and " instead
of the ’ and “ characters that are mandated by the Typography page. Some
search and replace might be appropriate here, to set a good example. :)

* On the index page: "If you have never read the Human Interface
Guidelines before, it is recommended that you start with the essentials
section, in particular the design principles page, before continuing to
learn about the design patterns." But this text is in the description
for the Interface elements section, not the Patterns section.

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675005


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME 3.14 Blocker Bugs (week 33)

2014-08-24 Thread Rick Opper
I was about to file a bug report concerning EDS and Google calendar...
(and/or GOA). Last week Evolution suddenly stopped syncing my default
Google calendar - created with GOA. 
I know, it's not directly related to the release, but Evolution is a
pretty big part of common Gnome installations, so having it work as
expected may be important for 3.14...

On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 16:30 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 11:29 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > I think we should add https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734298
> 
> Google has recently imposed some new restriction, apparently.
> 
> I think the E-D-S CalDAV backend will need tweaked to work around it.
> 
> 
> > OPTIONS /caldav/v2/xx%40gmail.com/events/ HTTP/1.1
> > Soup-Debug-Timestamp: 1408911513
> > Soup-Debug: SoupSessionSync 1 (0x2ab4100), SoupMessage 1 (0x7f41cc05b8b0), 
> > SoupSocket 1 (0x7f41cc0298b0)
> > Host: apidata.googleusercontent.com
> > User-Agent: Evolution/3.12.4
> > Connection: close
>   
> < HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
> < Soup-Debug-Timestamp: 1408911513
> < Soup-Debug: SoupMessage 1 (0x7f41cc05b8b0)
> < Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> < Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:18:33 GMT
> < Expires: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:18:33 GMT
> < Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
> < X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
> < X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
> < X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
> < Server: GSE
> < Alternate-Protocol: 443:quic
> < Connection: close
> < 
> < Daily Limit for Unauthenticated Use Exceeded. Continued use requires signup.
> 
> ___
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list