Re: This video is dedicated to all of you

2018-10-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 21:52 +, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via
> desktop-devel-list wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 18:30, Bastien Nocera 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 19:24 +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella via
> > > desktop-
> > > devel-list wrote:
> > > > https://youtu.be/
> > > 
> > > How is this person still allowed to post on d-d-l?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, can we please enable some moderation? Not only this stuff is
> > obnoxious
> > trolling, but people are replying to it. I dontyreally want this
> > stuff in
> > my inbox.
> 
> Mailing lists suck IMO, especially mailman2 where you need to
> remember a
> password and in case you forgot you'll need to ask a sysadmin to make
> a
> new password for every moderator. Mailman3 would fix this, but super
> slow development pace last time I checked. Ideally it would be a more
> free for all.
> 
> I didn't see the previous emails from Mr. Novella. He sent something
> many months ago. I find d-d-l rather quiet. This email I would even
> have
> opened based upon the subject as it is pretty spammy.
> 
> I've set the moderation bit on Mr. Novella but do think asking for
> moderation is overlooking that if you follow various other GNOME
> discussion methods you'll find a way lower signal to noise ratio
> (many useless comments per hour).

What does this have to do with the fact that the mailing-list needs to
be moderated? It's just whataboutism.

If keeping track of the mailing-list admin password is too complicated,
I'd be happy to help moderate it.

Cheers

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME 3.30 flatpak runtimes available on flathub

2018-10-25 Thread Milan Crha via desktop-devel-list
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 17:15 +0100, Abderrahim Kitouni wrote:
> If you find any problem, please file an issue at
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues

Hi,
is there any list of intentional changes from 3.28 runtime, please?

I'm not talking about updated libraries (like the switch from enchant1
to enchant2), but about things like empty /usr/share/zoneinfo [1] or a
wrong CMake install libdir (for some libraries?) [2], which breaks
building. The former is harder to find and it's kind of regression from
the 3.28 runtime/SDK.
Thanks and bye,
Milan

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/93
[2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/77

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: GNOME PeerTube Instance?

2018-10-25 Thread Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list
I just noticed I got my instances list wrong, it's just that some 
instances default to local videos only and others default to the 
overview, showing both their videos and the videos from instances they 
want to promote.


Cheers,
Adrien Plazas

Le jeu. 25 oct. 2018 à 8:39, Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list 
 a écrit :

Hi all,

PeerTube is a federated video sharing platform you probably already 
know of. Given that GNOME produces videos, I think it could be 
interesting for us to have our own instance. It would:

- allow to host release videos
- allow to host GUADEC videos and videos from other conferences
- allow Foundation members to publish video snippets or tutorials 
like Christian do sometimes


But more importantly it would make these videos easily accessible to 
the public in a way that respect their privacy while offering the 
comfort and features of modern services like a web player and 
comments. A GNOME instance would be closed on itself but other 
instances could integrate it to spread our videos out. It is possible 
to comment on PeerTube via an account on the local instance or via 
any ActivityPub-compatible account like a Mastodon one.


A few examples of good quality instances publishing videos but not 
federating other instances:

- https://thinkerview.video
- https://skeptikon.fr
- https://video.lqdn.fr

An example of an instance federated with others: https://framatube.org

Let's install such a service‽ :)

Cheers,
Adrien Plazas
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

GNOME PeerTube Instance?

2018-10-25 Thread Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list

Hi all,

PeerTube is a federated video sharing platform you probably already 
know of. Given that GNOME produces videos, I think it could be 
interesting for us to have our own instance. It would:

- allow to host release videos
- allow to host GUADEC videos and videos from other conferences
- allow Foundation members to publish video snippets or tutorials like 
Christian do sometimes


But more importantly it would make these videos easily accessible to 
the public in a way that respect their privacy while offering the 
comfort and features of modern services like a web player and comments. 
A GNOME instance would be closed on itself but other instances could 
integrate it to spread our videos out. It is possible to comment on 
PeerTube via an account on the local instance or via any 
ActivityPub-compatible account like a Mastodon one.


A few examples of good quality instances publishing videos but not 
federating other instances:

- https://thinkerview.video
- https://skeptikon.fr
- https://video.lqdn.fr

An example of an instance federated with others: https://framatube.org

Let's install such a service‽ :)

Cheers,
Adrien Plazas
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list