Re: git and trailing whitespace
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote: On Fri, 08.05.09 11:31, Davyd Madeley (da...@madeley.id.au) wrote: It's a bit of an edge-case, but Markdown files give trailing-double-space a meaning. Really? Just grepped through the spec, couldn't find any mention of that. Am I blind? Block Elements [...] When you do want to insert a br / break tag using Markdown, you end a line with two or more spaces, then type return. [...] ciao -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Git day minus 1
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Kalle Vahlman kalle.vahl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kalle, Probably that's why it links to Git Community Book and other resources... please don't get me wrong, I didn't mean to be harsh or anything, I'm sure I'll love git and I'm really grateful to Owen and the team that have stand up and finally made both, the decision about the tool and the actual work to make it happen. That said I think one of the major point in not loosing any contributor and instead gain new ones, is to have a documentation on the new tools that rocks, I've always contributed documentation in the areas I could, unfortunately this time I would made good use of docs about the new infrastructure (in the gnome context) and how to get the most out of it. RTFM in this case just does not apply very well... cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Git day minus 1
2009/4/15 Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net: Part of the migration project has been to update the documentation and there's a introduction document in place for developers and a guide for translators as well. There's room for improvement still, but in the meantime a lot of GNOME contributers are already familiar with git and can help out on irc etc. are you referring to this doc? http://live.gnome.org/GitForGnomeDevelopers if you are, I hope you guys realise that is not even close to help someone that doesn't know anything about git (like myself) cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Modules needing a release for 2.26.0
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: pygtksourceview 2.4.0 2.4.0 done 2.5.0 I owe you one kg of Italian Ice cream. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Andre I think there are some misunderstanding, or if not, I'm the one misunderstanding :) Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations gnome-python-desktop contains the GnomePrint bindings, is not using them, so I think it's not even worth discussing to remove them from there, it's different than modules to be ported to GtkPrint, there is nothing to port. We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe. Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point in talking about porting. Does GnomeVFS no longer belong in the GNOME Developer platform? http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Platform#upcoming_deprecations The same apply here, python bindings for gnomeVFS are included in gnome-python so unless Gnome is not shipping it anymore as part of the platform, both gnome-python and gnome-python-desktop are not using GnomeVFS so there is really nothing to be done there. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point in talking about porting. That's the whole point: we don't want to ship libgnomeprint* anymore :-) Sure, is GnomePrint going to be shipped in 2.26? If the answer is yes we do there is no point in discussing it :) (and put it as a showstopper) just my two cent cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Andre, * http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort : gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update) * http://live.gnome.org/GioPort : PATCHES: dasher TODO: gnome-python-desktop, gnome-utils/gsearchtool I don't think that gnome-python-desktop would need removing GtkPrint and gnomeVFS, it contains GnomePrint python bindings which cannot be removed and I cannot find any reference to GnomeVFS that needs to be removed. If I'm mistaking please correct me, cc'ing Gustavo for a better opinion. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: python-gmenu and multiple languages
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: In python, it's similar, except that I think the GKeyFile API is not available in the bindings. But you have the ConfigParser stuff, iirc. that's right Vincent, we don't have GKeyFile wrapped in pygobject (glib module), btw I'm seeing more and more functions into Glib and GTK+ that use GKeyFile APIs, maybe at one point will make sense to wrap them as well. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member gia...@gnome.org ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME 2.24 Showstopper Review
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gustavo, It sounds like a simpe grep-find generated list, but I doubt it applies to python bindings. looks like that are a couple of examples that are using old libs, nothing that is a blocker. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: pygtkosurceview branched for GNOME 2.22
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le dimanche 10 août 2008, à 01:01 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit : In that case, it has to be in extras or in some set of a GNOME release? It doesn't contain any translatable string, AFAIK. That's right, no translatable strings in pygtksourceview. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti GNOME Foundation member [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
On Jan 19, 2008 2:35 AM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feel free to run your MAINTAINERS-DOAP scripts on all my modules, I'll fill in the blanks. /Somebody sick of entering unneeded crapola 100% agreed, this is a non-sense, people can hack on gtk gnome core but cannot write/edit *once* an XML file, come on guys. Go Olav, whatever you think is better and easier to maintain. cheers -- Gian Mario Tagliaretti ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
