Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Many thanks Martyn for taking care of this. Best regards 2014-02-03 Martyn Russell : > On 29/01/14 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files >> headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see >> this metabug for more information: >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 >> >> Below is the list of the affected modules so, If you agree with the >> change, please let me know to apply the patch in your module. Of course, >> if you want to review the patch before applying, write me and I'll >> attatch it in bugzilla (can't send patches to this list due to size >> restrictions). >> >> Many thanks in advance for your help and best regards. >> >> This is the list of the modules affected: >> >> > ... > > tracker >> > > I've commented on the bug and updated the one file that needs updating. > Note, the gvdb/* files are imported and won't be updated unless we update > the imported code to avoid possible future upgrade conflicts. > > Thanks for the initiative all, > > -- > Regards, > Martyn > > Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH. > http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On 29/01/14 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: Hi all, I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see this metabug for more information: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 Below is the list of the affected modules so, If you agree with the change, please let me know to apply the patch in your module. Of course, if you want to review the patch before applying, write me and I'll attatch it in bugzilla (can't send patches to this list due to size restrictions). Many thanks in advance for your help and best regards. This is the list of the modules affected: ... tracker I've commented on the bug and updated the one file that needs updating. Note, the gvdb/* files are imported and won't be updated unless we update the imported code to avoid possible future upgrade conflicts. Thanks for the initiative all, -- Regards, Martyn Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH. http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On 31/01/14 15:19, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Sorry for the broken patches. They have been auto-generated and was > suposed not to break files. If you're considering a patch, please look at the diff (e.g. "git show --color", or commit using "git gui" or something) before sending it anywhere, and only proceed if it looks sensible. The quoted Epiphany patch is obviously not what you meant to do; a brief glance at the diff would have demonstrated that. This is even more important if you're committing patches without anyone else reviewing them. S ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 16:19 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Sorry for the broken patches. They have been auto-generated and was suposed > not to break files. So I found the script you used. It has a warning that says: # becareful, regex pattern might match too many lines So you HAD to test the changes. Please do it now and revert anything that is still broken. Claudio > > If there is something broken, please revert the commit (o let me know to > revert it) and I'll generate manually the patch. > > If I detect any other broken patch, I'll revert it and send again the patch > in the following days > > > 2014-01-31 Claudio Saavedra : > > > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 17:03 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:44 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. If you notice > > > > there is something wrong, please email me to fix it. > > > > Other modules are broken too. It seems to me from inspecting the > > breakage that whatever script you used to replace the address in the > > sources fails whenever there are two instances of the text to be removed > > in the same file, as everything in between gets removed too. > > > > I think you should have done a clean jhbuild build before pushing any > > changes programatically to bugzilla. We should probably have a hard rule > > about this to avoid these massive breakages from happening in the > > future. > > > > Claudio > > > > > > > > You broke ephy. > > > > > > > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/diff/embed/ephy-embed.c?id=d1a500a86767210ebae8150f0713c602141e2477 > > > > > > I reverted your patch. If you want this fixed post a patch to bugzilla > > > next time. > > > > > > Claudio > > > > > > > Many thanks to all of you for your comments and special thanks to > > Andika > > > > Triwidada for his help with this issue. > > > > > > > > Andika: now we can close bugs in bugzilla, so I'll start doing so this > > > > afternoon. If a maintainer doesn't agree with the patch commited, just > > > > reopening the bug should be enough to get noticed about it. > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-01-29 Olav Vitters : > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García > > wrote: > > > > > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source > > files > > > > > > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You > > can see > > > > > > > > > > Nice initiative! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Olav > > > > > ___ > > > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > ___ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Sorry for the broken patches. They have been auto-generated and was suposed not to break files. If there is something broken, please revert the commit (o let me know to revert it) and I'll generate manually the patch. If I detect any other broken patch, I'll revert it and send again the patch in the following days 2014-01-31 Claudio Saavedra : > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 17:03 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:44 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. If you notice > > > there is something wrong, please email me to fix it. > > Other modules are broken too. It seems to me from inspecting the > breakage that whatever script you used to replace the address in the > sources fails whenever there are two instances of the text to be removed > in the same file, as everything in between gets removed too. > > I think you should have done a clean jhbuild build before pushing any > changes programatically to bugzilla. We should probably have a hard rule > about this to avoid these massive breakages from happening in the > future. > > Claudio > > > > > You broke ephy. > > > > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/diff/embed/ephy-embed.c?id=d1a500a86767210ebae8150f0713c602141e2477 > > > > I reverted your patch. If you want this fixed post a patch to bugzilla > > next time. > > > > Claudio > > > > > Many thanks to all of you for your comments and special thanks to > Andika > > > Triwidada for his help with this issue. > > > > > > Andika: now we can close bugs in bugzilla, so I'll start doing so this > > > afternoon. If a maintainer doesn't agree with the patch commited, just > > > reopening the bug should be enough to get noticed about it. > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > > 2014-01-29 Olav Vitters : > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García > wrote: > > > > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source > files > > > > > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You > can see > > > > > > > > Nice initiative! > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Olav > > > > ___ > > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > > ___ > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > ___ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 17:03 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:44 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. If you notice > > there is something wrong, please email me to fix it. Other modules are broken too. It seems to me from inspecting the breakage that whatever script you used to replace the address in the sources fails whenever there are two instances of the text to be removed in the same file, as everything in between gets removed too. I think you should have done a clean jhbuild build before pushing any changes programatically to bugzilla. We should probably have a hard rule about this to avoid these massive breakages from happening in the future. Claudio > > You broke ephy. > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/diff/embed/ephy-embed.c?id=d1a500a86767210ebae8150f0713c602141e2477 > > I reverted your patch. If you want this fixed post a patch to bugzilla > next time. > > Claudio > > > Many thanks to all of you for your comments and special thanks to Andika > > Triwidada for his help with this issue. > > > > Andika: now we can close bugs in bugzilla, so I'll start doing so this > > afternoon. If a maintainer doesn't agree with the patch commited, just > > reopening the bug should be enough to get noticed about it. > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > 2014-01-29 Olav Vitters : > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > > > > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see > > > > > > Nice initiative! > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Olav > > > ___ > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > ___ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:44 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Hi all, > > I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. If you notice > there is something wrong, please email me to fix it. You broke ephy. https://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/diff/embed/ephy-embed.c?id=d1a500a86767210ebae8150f0713c602141e2477 I reverted your patch. If you want this fixed post a patch to bugzilla next time. Claudio > Many thanks to all of you for your comments and special thanks to Andika > Triwidada for his help with this issue. > > Andika: now we can close bugs in bugzilla, so I'll start doing so this > afternoon. If a maintainer doesn't agree with the patch commited, just > reopening the bug should be enough to get noticed about it. > > Cheers! > > > 2014-01-29 Olav Vitters : > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > > > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see > > > > Nice initiative! > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Olav > > ___ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: Hi all, I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. You broke the glib build at least; gio/data-to-c.pl lost its executable bits? Were you making these patches from a Windows system or something? Note the first line in https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=078dbda148a81af1b3a76fbda72f089b963087f1 My follow up fix: https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=a7435d2e69d4757c129e0e5cb36eb2c810f50bf1 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Hi all, I've commited all the remaining patches about this issue. If you notice there is something wrong, please email me to fix it. Many thanks to all of you for your comments and special thanks to Andika Triwidada for his help with this issue. Andika: now we can close bugs in bugzilla, so I'll start doing so this afternoon. If a maintainer doesn't agree with the patch commited, just reopening the bug should be enough to get noticed about it. Cheers! 2014-01-29 Olav Vitters : > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see > > Nice initiative! > > > -- > Regards, > Olav > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see Nice initiative! -- Regards, Olav ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Done, Thanks! 2014-01-29 meg ford > Feel free to push them for gnome-sound-recorder. I'll check in the next > few days and if you haven't had a chance I will do this myself. > > Thanks, > Meg Ford > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < > daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That's the same I though in a firs't stage, but didn't want to generate >> problems... if after some days, there are some remaining modules to commit, >> I'll push them directly >> >> Thanks Hughsie! >> >> >> 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes >> >> On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: >>> > Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one >>> > manually? >>> >>> I'm only talking for myself now, but I'd be surprised if any >>> maintainer is going to say no to those patches. If I were you, I'd >>> just commit the changes, and apologise to any maintainers that >>> complained. >>> >>> Richard >>> ___ >>> desktop-devel-list mailing list >>> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org >>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >>> >> >> >> ___ >> desktop-devel-list mailing list >> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >> > > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Feel free to push them for gnome-sound-recorder. I'll check in the next few days and if you haven't had a chance I will do this myself. Thanks, Meg Ford On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's the same I though in a firs't stage, but didn't want to generate > problems... if after some days, there are some remaining modules to commit, > I'll push them directly > > Thanks Hughsie! > > > 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes > > On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: >> > Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one >> > manually? >> >> I'm only talking for myself now, but I'd be surprised if any >> maintainer is going to say no to those patches. If I were you, I'd >> just commit the changes, and apologise to any maintainers that >> complained. >> >> Richard >> ___ >> desktop-devel-list mailing list >> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >> > > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
That's the same I though in a firs't stage, but didn't want to generate problems... if after some days, there are some remaining modules to commit, I'll push them directly Thanks Hughsie! 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes > On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: > > Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one > > manually? > > I'm only talking for myself now, but I'd be surprised if any > maintainer is going to say no to those patches. If I were you, I'd > just commit the changes, and apologise to any maintainers that > complained. > > Richard > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On 29 January 2014 15:03, Andika Triwidada wrote: > Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one > manually? I'm only talking for myself now, but I'd be surprised if any maintainer is going to say no to those patches. If I were you, I'd just commit the changes, and apologise to any maintainers that complained. Richard ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
alacarte, gnome-music and gnome-menus patches commited Thanks! 2014-01-29 Vadim Rutkovsky > On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > > gnome-music > > Feel free to push the changes directly to the repo. > > > -- > Thanks, > Vadim > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Andika Triwidada wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >>> devhelp >> >> I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll >> have a look. > > Hi Fred, Robert, > > In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 I wrote > 'complete' list modules > who caught this bug. I believe there are other modules affected too, > but I haven't check > them due to bandwidth/space limitation here. I wonder if someone who > has complete > clones of all modules can do wider check. > > From my ~300 modules' clone, I got this list of affected modules: > http://kanada.andika.info/gnome/fsf-address.no-xlat.modules I have created several bug reports specific to modules. For other modules, I was ran out of steam then need to attend non GNOME matters :( Do you think all those hundreds modules need to be addressed one by one manually? > > Grep results is here: > http://kanada.andika.info/gnome/fsf-address.no-xlat.files > > Regards, > Andika ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> devhelp > > I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll > have a look. Hi Fred, Robert, In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 I wrote 'complete' list modules who caught this bug. I believe there are other modules affected too, but I haven't check them due to bandwidth/space limitation here. I wonder if someone who has complete clones of all modules can do wider check. >From my ~300 modules' clone, I got this list of affected modules: http://kanada.andika.info/gnome/fsf-address.no-xlat.modules Grep results is here: http://kanada.andika.info/gnome/fsf-address.no-xlat.files Regards, Andika ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > gnome-music Feel free to push the changes directly to the repo. -- Thanks, Vadim signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Mustieles García < daniel.mustie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files > headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see > this metabug for more information: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 > > Below is the list of the affected modules so, If you agree with the > change, please let me know to apply the patch in your module. Of course, if > you want to review the patch before applying, write me and I'll attatch it > in bugzilla (can't send patches to this list due to size restrictions). > > Many thanks in advance for your help and best regards. > > This is the list of the modules affected: > > alacarte > gnome-menus > > Feel free to push these fixes directly to my repos as well. > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > -- Jasper ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Thanks Fred and Robert, I've sent patches via bugzilla, so you can review them. Cheers! 2014-01-29 Robert Roth > Hi Daniel, > > gnome-system-monitor >> > > There's no report for system monitor yet, but please do file one with the > patch attached and it will get reviewed fairly soon. > > Regards, > Robert > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Hi Daniel, gnome-system-monitor > There's no report for system monitor yet, but please do file one with the patch attached and it will get reviewed fairly soon. Regards, Robert ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Hi Daniel, > devhelp I didn't find a bug report for this one, please do file one and I'll have a look. > jhbuild https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721532 feel free to attach a patch and it will be quickly reviewed. Fred ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Thanks Debarshi and Hughsie! Your modules are fixed and bugs have been closed. Cheers! 2014-01-29 Richard Hughes > On 29 January 2014 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García > wrote: > > gnome-control-center > > gnome-desktop > > gnome-software > > Fine with me, thanks. > > Richard > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On 29 January 2014 09:55, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > gnome-control-center > gnome-desktop > gnome-software Fine with me, thanks. Richard ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles Garc?a wrote: > gnome-online-accounts Sure, go ahead. Thanks, Debarshi -- Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity doesn't necessarily make you a hipster. -- Anonymous pgphNaS0sF5VU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files
Hi all, I've created several patches to fix wrong FSF's address in source files headers. There are several modules affected by this module. You can see this metabug for more information: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721455 Below is the list of the affected modules so, If you agree with the change, please let me know to apply the patch in your module. Of course, if you want to review the patch before applying, write me and I'll attatch it in bugzilla (can't send patches to this list due to size restrictions). Many thanks in advance for your help and best regards. This is the list of the modules affected: alacarte alleyoop aravis atk bakery balsa banshee beagle blam brasero byzanz chronojump clutter cogl conduit conglomerate dasher dconf devhelp dia drwright ekiga eog epiphany epiphany-extensions evince evolution-exchange evolution-rss evolution-webcal file-roller five-or-more four-in-a-row galeon gbrainy gcab gcalctool gcompris gconf gcr gdk-pixbuf gdl gedit gedit-latex genius gftp gimp gimp-gap gimp-help-2 gitg glade glib gnac gnoduino gnome-applets gnome-bluetooth gnome-calculator gnome-calendar gnome-chess gnome-commander gnome-contacts gnome-control-center gnome-cups-manager gnome-desktop gnome-doc-utils gnome-font-viewer gnome-hello gnome-initial-setup gnome-klotski gnome-mahjongg gnome-main-menu gnome-media gnome-menus gnome-mines gnome-mud gnome-music gnome-nibbles gnome-online-accounts gnome-panel gnome-pilot-conduits gnome-robots gnome-search-tool gnome-session gnome-settings-daemon gnome-software gnome-sound-recorder gnome-subtitles gnome-sudoku gnome-system-monitor gnome-system-tools gnome-tetravex gnome-user-share gnome-web-photo gok goobox gparted gthumb gtksourceview gucharmap gwget gyrus hardware-monitor hipo hotssh iagno jhbuild json-glib krb5-auth-dialog libcryptui libgnome-media-profiles libsecret libwnck lightsoff longomatch metacity mistelix msitools murrine nautilus nautilus-sound-converter nemiver pan2 phonemgr pitivi pybliographer quadrapassel rhythmbox sabayon seahorse seahorse-nautilus seahorse-plugins seahorse-sharing sound-juicer sushi swell-foop tali tasks tomboy totem tracker transmageddon vino xchat-gnome yelp yelp-xsl zenity ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
