Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft - Call for Review
Hei On 11/3/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I decided to postpone the review deadline to next monday (November 5) > to give a litle bit more time for feedback. > Great, October 3rd was a bit `off-date`. We are not that fast!. Sorry couldn't avoid joking on that typo. You could add to Epiphany that the filechooser now sports previews for images when built with --enable-filepicker. Maybe "Show previews for images when browsing for files from web forms" ? Diego > Thanks, > > --lucasr > > > 2007/11/1, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > > > The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.22 (and partially for 2.24 and future > > 2.x releases) is available at: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft > > > > This is a call for triaging the Roadmap. If you're a maintainer/developer > > of any GNOME module and think there's any wrong or missing information > > in there, please let us know or just edit that page directly. > > > > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > > too-specific/internal technical details though. > > > > We plan to heat up discussions about the actual content of the Roadmap > > in the next days. You can see the major topics for discussion in the > > "Proposed GNOME-wide/Platform goals" section. > > > > Big thanks for all the maintainers/developers who provided the > > necessary information to build this roadmap! > > > > We plan to publish the Roadmap in the official page[1] on October 3 so it > > would be really nice to have all the fixes until this date. > > > > Cheers! > > > > --lucasr > > > > [1] http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap > > > ___ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft - Call for Review
Hi all, I decided to postpone the review deadline to next monday (November 5) to give a litle bit more time for feedback. Thanks, --lucasr 2007/11/1, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.22 (and partially for 2.24 and future > 2.x releases) is available at: > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft > > This is a call for triaging the Roadmap. If you're a maintainer/developer > of any GNOME module and think there's any wrong or missing information > in there, please let us know or just edit that page directly. > > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > too-specific/internal technical details though. > > We plan to heat up discussions about the actual content of the Roadmap > in the next days. You can see the major topics for discussion in the > "Proposed GNOME-wide/Platform goals" section. > > Big thanks for all the maintainers/developers who provided the > necessary information to build this roadmap! > > We plan to publish the Roadmap in the official page[1] on October 3 so it > would be really nice to have all the fixes until this date. > > Cheers! > > --lucasr > > [1] http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Le vendredi 25 mai 2007, à 22:21 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit : > Hei Diego, > > > Just a quick thought, should GnomeGoals be considered on the RoadMap > > as dateless goals? > > I think it would be interesting to have Gnome Goals in the roadmap but > I think they must the be attached to specific releases (not dateless > as you suggested). I would put the goals in the "For everyone" > category. Well, a good roadmap item for the GNOME Goals would be "Make regular GNOME Goals to help clean up GNOME and to help people contribute". If the GNOME Goals people are happy to target this, of course :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Hei Diego, > Just a quick thought, should GnomeGoals be considered on the RoadMap > as dateless goals? I think it would be interesting to have Gnome Goals in the roadmap but I think they must the be attached to specific releases (not dateless as you suggested). I would put the goals in the "For everyone" category. > Kudos to the RoadMap Gang!. Thanks! --lucasr ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Hey Lucas, Just a quick thought, should GnomeGoals be considered on the RoadMap as dateless goals? Kudos to the RoadMap Gang!. Greetings! Diego ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Em Qui, 2007-05-24 às 16:38 +0300, Lucas Rocha escreveu: > Hi John, > > > If vinagre (vnc client i am developing) gets ready at time for 2.20, it > > may be included as part of vino. In this case, should it be mentioned at > > vino's Roadmap? > > Yes, it should. Also, you could put other Vino stuff planned for 2.20 > and future releases. > Page updated. Thanks, Lucas. -- Jonh Wendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN / Google Talk) Linux User #114432 https://launchpad.net/~wendell ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Hi John, 2007/5/24, Jonh Wendell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Em Qua, 2007-05-23 às 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha escreveu: > > Hi all, > > > > The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.20 (and partially for 2.22 and future > > releases) is available at: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft > > > > This is a call for error triaging in the Roadmap. If you're a > > maintainer/developer of any GNOME module and think there's any wrong > > or missing information in there, please let us know or edit that page > > directly. > > Hi, Lucas. > > If vinagre (vnc client i am developing) gets ready at time for 2.20, it > may be included as part of vino. In this case, should it be mentioned at > vino's Roadmap? Yes, it should. Also, you could put other Vino stuff planned for 2.20 and future releases. Thanks, --lucasr ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Em Qua, 2007-05-23 às 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha escreveu: > Hi all, > > The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.20 (and partially for 2.22 and future > releases) is available at: > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft > > This is a call for error triaging in the Roadmap. If you're a > maintainer/developer of any GNOME module and think there's any wrong > or missing information in there, please let us know or edit that page > directly. Hi, Lucas. If vinagre (vnc client i am developing) gets ready at time for 2.20, it may be included as part of vino. In this case, should it be mentioned at vino's Roadmap? Thanks, -- Jonh Wendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN / Google Talk) Linux User #114432 https://launchpad.net/~wendell ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
On 5/23/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The GNOME Roadmap draft for 2.20 (and partially for 2.22 and future > releases) is available at: > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft > Big thanks for all the maintainers/developers who provided the > necessary information to build this roadmap! A HUGE thanks to the Roadmap Gang. This is awesome! Elijah ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft, correction
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 16:04 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > My mistake: the Python support is planned for 2.20. Fixed! Should proposed modules be in the roadmap? http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft George (gk4) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft, correction
Hi Peter, My mistake: the Python support is planned for 2.20. Fixed! Thanks! --lucasr 2007/5/23, Peter Parente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Lucas, > > The road map states that the Python bindings for AT-SPI (pyatspi) will > appear in GNOME 2.22. > > http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap/Draft#head-4e0678fa6fc7635e3845712cf65d4af9bb07dbd9-2 > > At least one project, Accerciser, is successfully using these bindings > today. LSR is also planning on migrating to pyatspi before 2.20. Both > Accerciser and LSR are proposed for inclusion in GNOME 2.20. Other > projects such as LDTP, dogtail, and Orca are in the process of migrating > or planning to migrate to using these bindings in the very near future, > quite possibly for GNOME 2.20 also. > > http://live.gnome.org/GAP/PythonATSPI#projects > > Could we please bump the inclusion of pyatspi to GNOME 2.20 to ease this > migration? > > Thanks, > Pete > > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Hi, 2007/5/23, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 15:33 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2007/5/23, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > > > > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > > > > too-specific/internal technical details though. Vincent suggested to > > > > create a higher level summary of the Roadmap to be more readable for > > > > users. Volunteers? > > > [snip] > > > > > > You can make the roadmap a bit more readable, without creating a > > > separate document, just by showing the user-visible names for modules, > > > as we do in the release notes. You can still show the tarball/svn name > > > too. > > > > Isn't it what has been done already? > > Actually, yes. You've just missed a few in some of their mentions. For > instance "Evolution", "Sabayon", "Seahorse", "File Roller", "Deskbar". Done, thanks! --lucasr ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 15:33 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > Hi, > > 2007/5/23, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > [snip] > > > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > > > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > > > too-specific/internal technical details though. Vincent suggested to > > > create a higher level summary of the Roadmap to be more readable for > > > users. Volunteers? > > [snip] > > > > You can make the roadmap a bit more readable, without creating a > > separate document, just by showing the user-visible names for modules, > > as we do in the release notes. You can still show the tarball/svn name > > too. > > Isn't it what has been done already? Actually, yes. You've just missed a few in some of their mentions. For instance "Evolution", "Sabayon", "Seahorse", "File Roller", "Deskbar". -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
Hi, 2007/5/23, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: > [snip] > > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > > too-specific/internal technical details though. Vincent suggested to > > create a higher level summary of the Roadmap to be more readable for > > users. Volunteers? > [snip] > > You can make the roadmap a bit more readable, without creating a > separate document, just by showing the user-visible names for modules, > as we do in the release notes. You can still show the tarball/svn name > too. Isn't it what has been done already? > Well done. Thanks! --lucasr ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: GNOME Roadmap Draft
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:13 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: [snip] > Note: the Roadmap is not the Release Notes. Therefore, we can go a > little bit deeper into the technical details. We tried to cleanup the > too-specific/internal technical details though. Vincent suggested to > create a higher level summary of the Roadmap to be more readable for > users. Volunteers? [snip] You can make the roadmap a bit more readable, without creating a separate document, just by showing the user-visible names for modules, as we do in the release notes. You can still show the tarball/svn name too. Well done. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
