Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
tir, 18,.04.2006 kl. 13.29 +0200, skrev Stanislav Brabec: > Kjartan Maraas píše v Pá 14. 04. 2006 v 15:51 +0200: > > tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes: > > > Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, > > > so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale > > > name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up > > > yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. > > > > > I'll start removing the no.po files and references during 2.15.x. > > Hopefully we'll have them all removed before 2.16.0. That doesn't fix it > > for all the non-GNOME packages in a normal distro though. Maybe teaming > > up with the GNU translation project on that task would be best. > > It seems to be my fault I did many years ago in the CVSROOT/commitinto > script. But now I don't have any access to it. > It's been fixed by Guillermo by now so don't worry :-) > I did a review of all po files in projects included into SuSE Linux and > I fould many problems: > - Non dialect translations in dialect-specific directories. > - Translations provided but locale not present in glibc. > - Translations with invalid locale codes. > I'm currently going through my Fedora Core setup and I'm trying to fix the issues I see for the norwegian variants at least. Hopefully that will result in fewer problems in all distros. Cheers Kjartan ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
Kjartan Maraas píše v Pá 14. 04. 2006 v 15:51 +0200: > tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes: > > Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, > > so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale > > name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up > > yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. > > > I'll start removing the no.po files and references during 2.15.x. > Hopefully we'll have them all removed before 2.16.0. That doesn't fix it > for all the non-GNOME packages in a normal distro though. Maybe teaming > up with the GNU translation project on that task would be best. It seems to be my fault I did many years ago in the CVSROOT/commitinto script. But now I don't have any access to it. I did a review of all po files in projects included into SuSE Linux and I fould many problems: - Non dialect translations in dialect-specific directories. - Translations provided but locale not present in glibc. - Translations with invalid locale codes. Some of these problems are related to GNOME CVS projects: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162162 -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer - SuSE CR, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 296 542 382 190 00 Praha 9fax: +420 296 542 374 Czech Republichttp://www.suse.cz/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 03:20 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > And Rodney, can you make that 0.35 release or at least bump the > version up to 0.35, so we can simply require 0.35 instead of > 0.34.90? I can roll an 0.34.90 tarball if people think that is necessary. I don't want to release 0.35 though, until a few important bugs are fixed. Particularly, the following three bugs are things that I'd like to see as fixed in 0.35: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329346 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330509 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338423 The first one here, has a patch, but I'd like to make it a bit more generic, so that we don't need a separate method for every single variable that we want to grab out of Makevars or another file. I should hopefully be able to get that one cleaned up this weekend. Hopefully the other two won't be that hard to fix properly either. -- dobey ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
fre, 14,.04.2006 kl. 15.51 +0200, skrev Kjartan Maraas: > tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes: > > Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, > > so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale > > name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up > > yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. > > > I'll start removing the no.po files and references during 2.15.x. > Hopefully we'll have them all removed before 2.16.0. That doesn't fix it > for all the non-GNOME packages in a normal distro though. Maybe teaming > up with the GNU translation project on that task would be best. > Sorry for replying to my own mail, but I'm having problems removing the files because the pre-commits script kick in on cvs rm of the files and complains because it's impossible to run msgfmt on a non-existing file. Could someone fix that please? I couldn't even check out the CVSROOT module since I'm not in the right group it seems. Cheers Kjartan ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes: > Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, > so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale > name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up > yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. > I'll start removing the no.po files and references during 2.15.x. Hopefully we'll have them all removed before 2.16.0. That doesn't fix it for all the non-GNOME packages in a normal distro though. Maybe teaming up with the GNU translation project on that task would be best. Cheers Kjartan ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. -- dobey On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 08:52 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Great! > > I updated http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLinguas accordingly. Could > you verify there's no insanity in there (or fix them)? > > Thanks, > > Vincent > ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mardi 11 avril 2006 à 23:22 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
> > OK,
> >
> > So, in accordance with previous correspondence I sent about the use of
> > po/LINGUAS rather than ALL_LINGUAS in configure.{in,ac}, I hereby
> > present to you, the Correct (TM) way to migrate to using the LINGUAS
> > file in your po subdirectory or even multiple subdirectories with
> > different levels of i18n support.
>
> Great!
>
> I updated http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLinguas accordingly. Could
> you verify there's no insanity in there (or fix them)?
And Rodney, can you make that 0.35 release or at least bump the
version up to 0.35, so we can simply require 0.35 instead of
0.34.90?
behdad
> Thanks,
>
> Vincent
>
>
--behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill"
-- Dan Bern, "New American Language"
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories
Le mardi 11 avril 2006 à 23:22 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
> OK,
>
> So, in accordance with previous correspondence I sent about the use of
> po/LINGUAS rather than ALL_LINGUAS in configure.{in,ac}, I hereby
> present to you, the Correct (TM) way to migrate to using the LINGUAS
> file in your po subdirectory or even multiple subdirectories with
> different levels of i18n support.
Great!
I updated http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLinguas accordingly. Could
you verify there's no insanity in there (or fix them)?
Thanks,
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
