Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
2008/11/17 Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Vivien Malerba: > > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME > > 2.26. > > Please see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing - > especially adding it to the jhbuild moduleset if required and list it at > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/ExternalDependencies > I'll add it to the jhbuild moduleset ASAP. It's been in Garnome for some time (even though it's not been yet updated to the latest version). Vivien ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
Am Montag, den 17.11.2008, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Vivien Malerba: > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME > 2.26. Please see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing - especially adding it to the jhbuild moduleset if required and list it at http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/ExternalDependencies andre -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
2008/11/17 Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:57 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:56:01AM +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME > 2.26. > > > > Why? Which applications want to use this? > > > > > Libgda is used by Anjuta's Symbol-db plugin and Glom. > > > > Glom is not part of GNOME. What is the purpose of having this as > > external dependency? > > Anjuta, which wants to use libgda, is in the developer tools release > set: > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/DevelTools > > > I recall this was proposed before, but too lazy too read up on it. > > It was proposed as a platform module. That was not wise and still isn't. > I don't see a problem with it being an external dependency. It's proposed as an external dependency, not a platform module... ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:57 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:56:01AM +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME 2.26. > > Why? Which applications want to use this? > > > Libgda is used by Anjuta's Symbol-db plugin and Glom. > > Glom is not part of GNOME. What is the purpose of having this as > external dependency? Anjuta, which wants to use libgda, is in the developer tools release set: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/DevelTools > I recall this was proposed before, but too lazy too read up on it. It was proposed as a platform module. That was not wise and still isn't. I don't see a problem with it being an external dependency. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:56:01AM +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME 2.26. Why? Which applications want to use this? > Libgda is used by Anjuta's Symbol-db plugin and Glom. Glom is not part of GNOME. What is the purpose of having this as external dependency? I recall this was proposed before, but too lazy too read up on it. -- Regards, Olav ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: New module proposal for GNOME 2.26: Libgda
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:56 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > I would like to propose Libgda as a new external dependency for GNOME > 2.26. Shouldn't something in the Desktop suite use, or be proposing to use, libgda first? Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://burtonini.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
