Re: gnome-software/packagekit support for arch linux

2014-03-28 Thread Petko Ditchev
 Well I for one am using Arch for the new software (GNOME included) and 
not for the Arch way, and I'll be very happy if the packagekit package 
gets more love. I think more and more people will be like me - switching 
to Arch because of the new software and AUR, and not so much for the 
hands-on approach that the distro has.


Petko

On 03/27/2014 08:34 AM, Alex Jordan wrote:


On Mar 26, 2014 7:47 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me 
mailto:s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:


 Looking at the reactions around the internet from the release, it
 seems that GNOME is very popular on Arch Linux based distros.  In
 fact, in about three weeks most Arch Linux folks will already be on
 GNOME 3.12 and enjoying the fruits of six months of our labor while
 most others are still waiting for an official release.  While they
 might be able to obtain through COPR or some other method they aren't
 official.

 Unfortunately, none of them will be able to enjoy GNOME Software, due
 to the fact that there is no active development of a pacman backend
 for packagekit.  Arch Linux users are missing out on a major part of
 the GNOME eco-system.

 These are two AUR packages, one has been orphaned and the last update
 was in 2011.

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-packagekit-git/

 The second has some update on it and it is from 2013:

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/packagekit-git/

 What can we do to rectify this situation?  Given the large popularity
 of Arch Linux its undeniable that they are a big part of our customer
 base.

 sri
It's worth mentioning that as an Arch user, I don't have any major 
problems with the PackageKit backend. It _is_ lacking in a few areas, 
but it is functional and the parts that are there work well.
It's also worth mentioning that due to The Arch Way, Arch users are 
much more likely to want to do things themselves. For example, on 
systems where I even have Software installed, I rarely use it. I 
prefer directly invoking pacman (well, a small wrapper called 
pacmatic). Direct control is why I use Arch. What I am trying to get 
at is this: just because GNOME is my style doesn't mean that something 
like Software is my style, and presumably, a large portion of Arch 
users feel the same. Therefore, this may not be the best use of time.
That being said, I don't want to impose my views so I'll leave it up 
to the fine folks here to talk time budgeting.

Congratulations on the 3.12 release!




___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: gnome-software/packagekit support for arch linux

2014-03-27 Thread Alex Jordan
On Mar 26, 2014 7:47 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:

 Looking at the reactions around the internet from the release, it
 seems that GNOME is very popular on Arch Linux based distros.  In
 fact, in about three weeks most Arch Linux folks will already be on
 GNOME 3.12 and enjoying the fruits of six months of our labor while
 most others are still waiting for an official release.  While they
 might be able to obtain through COPR or some other method they aren't
 official.

 Unfortunately, none of them will be able to enjoy GNOME Software, due
 to the fact that there is no active development of a pacman backend
 for packagekit.  Arch Linux users are missing out on a major part of
 the GNOME eco-system.

 These are two AUR packages, one has been orphaned and the last update
 was in 2011.

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-packagekit-git/

 The second has some update on it and it is from 2013:

 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/packagekit-git/

 What can we do to rectify this situation?  Given the large popularity
 of Arch Linux its undeniable that they are a big part of our customer
 base.

 sri
It's worth mentioning that as an Arch user, I don't have any major problems
with the PackageKit backend. It _is_ lacking in a few areas, but it is
functional and the parts that are there work well.
It's also worth mentioning that due to The Arch Way, Arch users are much
more likely to want to do things themselves. For example, on systems where
I even have Software installed, I rarely use it. I prefer directly invoking
pacman (well, a small wrapper called pacmatic). Direct control is why I use
Arch. What I am trying to get at is this: just because GNOME is my style
doesn't mean that something like Software is my style, and presumably, a
large portion of Arch users feel the same. Therefore, this may not be the
best use of time.
That being said, I don't want to impose my views so I'll leave it up to the
fine folks here to talk time budgeting.
Congratulations on the 3.12 release!
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: gnome-software/packagekit support for arch linux

2014-03-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 March 2014 02:46, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
 Unfortunately, none of them will be able to enjoy GNOME Software, due
 to the fact that there is no active development of a pacman backend
 for packagekit.  Arch Linux users are missing out on a major part of
 the GNOME eco-system.

There are two problem here. One is that indeed, the PackageKit arch
backend is under-maintained, and doesn't support the newer features
that gnome-software uses so heavily (e.g. the new filter enums). The
second is that arch does not generate AppStream metadata, so even if
the PackageKit backend worked well enough, there would be no rich
content (long translated descriptions, screenshots, ratings, etc) to
show. If anyone from arch wants to make this work, please grab me on
#PackageKit on freenode and we can talk in more detail.

Richard
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


gnome-software/packagekit support for arch linux

2014-03-26 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
Looking at the reactions around the internet from the release, it
seems that GNOME is very popular on Arch Linux based distros.  In
fact, in about three weeks most Arch Linux folks will already be on
GNOME 3.12 and enjoying the fruits of six months of our labor while
most others are still waiting for an official release.  While they
might be able to obtain through COPR or some other method they aren't
official.

Unfortunately, none of them will be able to enjoy GNOME Software, due
to the fact that there is no active development of a pacman backend
for packagekit.  Arch Linux users are missing out on a major part of
the GNOME eco-system.

These are two AUR packages, one has been orphaned and the last update
was in 2011.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-packagekit-git/

The second has some update on it and it is from 2013:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/packagekit-git/

What can we do to rectify this situation?  Given the large popularity
of Arch Linux its undeniable that they are a big part of our customer
base.

sri
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list