[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
@Nick, if the issue is easy to trigger in your setup would it be
possible to at least test on a machine if installing a recent version of
firefox would fix the issue?

as for your question about flag/profiler I don't have any suggestion
offhand and would need to investigate but again you might have more eyes
on the question if it's asked upstream so I would recommend adding a
comment to the report Amin referenced

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Nick Hummel
Hi All,

I'm a developer with Steve's group. Thank you for taking a look at this
and linking to that other bug! I took a look through the profiler
summaries linked in the thread and it appears very similar to what we
are observing. We also captured performance profiles for the current
version of Firefox we're using (100.0.2), and we observed similar
behavior from the Renderer, Compositor, and SwComposite tracks.

Since we are unable to change Firefox version quickly in our use case,
we would like to understand if there are any mitigations or settings we
could modify to prevent these symptoms. The last comment in the linked
bug thread mentions that disabling and re-enabling the Compositor
resolved symptoms, so we will try this out tomorrow. Longer term though,
upgrading the version is absolutely something we're looking at.

In addition to testing changes with the Compositor settings, are there
any parameters we could change in the about:config page? In our initial
testing, we have observed CPU usage vary roughly proportionately with
the layout.frame_rate parameter when these CPU throttling symptoms are
present (default was -1, and when we set to 30 or 15 for example, we see
the CPU usage decrease).

We can also collect additional Firefox profiler results or other logs if
they would help clarify the issue/symptoms.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048827] [NEW] yaru mouse cursor theme is grey instead of black

2024-01-09 Thread Chase Clark
Public bug reported:

- this is a fresh install of the latest Ubuntu 24.04

- I have fully updated the debs and snaps

- my mouse cursor is grey when it should be black

- the strange thing is the cursor looks normal when I boot off the USB
and then looks grey on first boot

- even more strange is when I went to screenshot the cursor for this bug
report, it looked normal in the screenshot

- For graphics I have AMD 6600XT


- I will try in X11 as well to see if this is a Wayland-only issue

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: yaru-theme-gtk 22.04.5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Jan  9 21:57:08 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-10 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230807.2)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: yaru-theme
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: yaru-theme (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to yaru-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048827

Title:
  yaru mouse cursor theme is grey instead of black

Status in yaru-theme package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  - this is a fresh install of the latest Ubuntu 24.04

  - I have fully updated the debs and snaps

  - my mouse cursor is grey when it should be black

  - the strange thing is the cursor looks normal when I boot off the USB
  and then looks grey on first boot

  - even more strange is when I went to screenshot the cursor for this
  bug report, it looked normal in the screenshot

  - For graphics I have AMD 6600XT

  
  - I will try in X11 as well to see if this is a Wayland-only issue

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: yaru-theme-gtk 22.04.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan  9 21:57:08 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-10 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230807.2)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: yaru-theme
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/2048827/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2030947] Re: gnome-shell spams journal with `g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed` when 'Zoom' a11y feature en

2024-01-09 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Tags added: noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030947

Title:
  gnome-shell spams journal with `g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier:
  assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed`
  when 'Zoom' a11y feature enabled

Status in GNOME Shell:
  New
Status in gjs package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  gnome-shell logs

  gnome-shell[4537]: g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion
  'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed

  multiple times per second for weeks now.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell 44.3-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.3.0-7.7-generic 6.3.5
  Uname: Linux 6.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 10 10:38:23 2023
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-11-26 (256 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20221126)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 44.3-1ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2030947/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2016925] Re: [amdgpu] Firefox window is visually corrupted after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.04

2024-01-09 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Let's let it close automatically... if there are no more comments in two
months.

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016925

Title:
  [amdgpu] Firefox window is visually corrupted after upgrading to
  Ubuntu 23.04

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After upgrading from Ubuntu 22.10 to Ubuntu 23.04, every time I open
  firefox the windows is heavily visually corrupted. It seems to work
  fine under the corruption, but it is completely unusuable.

  The tar version of Firefox works fine. In the attached screenshot you
  can see the snap version of Firefox (corrupted) and the tar version of
  Firefox (working fine).

  I tried uninstalling (with --purge) and reinstalling and refreshing
  firefox to no avail.

  All other applications, including 3D games, are working fine. I am
  using an AMD RX5500 with default mesa drivers.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: firefox 1:1snap1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-20.20-generic 6.2.6
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-20-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Apr 18 18:04:26 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-04 (895 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
  SnapChanges:
   IDEstado  Generado   Listo  Resumen
   1215  Done2023-04-18T17:42:17-03:00  2023-04-18T17:44:05-03:00  Eliminar 
snap "firefox"
   1216  Done2023-04-18T17:45:37-03:00  2023-04-18T17:47:25-03:00  Instalar 
snap "firefox"
   1217  Done2023-04-18T17:48:16-03:00  2023-04-18T17:48:30-03:00  Eliminar 
snap "firefox"
   1218  Done2023-04-18T17:48:39-03:00  2023-04-18T17:48:49-03:00  Instalar 
snap "firefox"
  SourcePackage: firefox
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to lunar on 2023-04-18 (0 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2016925/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048807] [NEW] upgrade 23.04 to 23.10 fails

2024-01-09 Thread Gord Mawdsley
Public bug reported:

sudo apt-get install -f
[sudo] password for gord: 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  i965-va-driver intel-media-va-driver libaom3 libavcodec59 libavutil57
  libcodec2-1.0 libdav1d6 libgsm1 libhwy1 libigdgmm12 libjxl0.7 libmfx1
  librav1e0 libshine3 libsnappy1v5 libsoxr0 libspeexdsp1 libsvtav1enc1
  libswresample4 libva-drm2 libva-x11-2 libva2 libvdpau1 libx264-164
  libx265-199 libxvidcore4 libzvbi0 mesa-va-drivers mesa-vdpau-drivers
  va-driver-all vdpau-driver-all
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following additional packages will be installed:
  libvdpau1
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libvdpau1
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 17 not upgraded.
242 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/27.8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 110 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 267468 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libvdpau1_1.5-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libvdpau1:amd64 (1.5-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libvdpau1_1.5-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite shared '/etc/vdpau_wrapper.cfg', which is different from 
other instances of package libvdpau1:amd64
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libvdpau1_1.5-2_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


I ran autoremove and fix-broken many times

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
Package: libvdpau1 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40-generic 6.2.16
Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Jan  9 19:36:46 2024
DistUpgraded: 2024-01-02 20:20:31,903 DEBUG /openCache(), new cache size 76413
DistroCodename: lunar
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics & Display 
[8086:0f31] (rev 0e) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics 
& Display [1849:0f31]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-07-24 (169 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.2.0-39-generic 
root=UUID=fdc37e2b-a361-4507-8f3f-5a111640986f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: libvdpau
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to lunar on 2024-01-03 (6 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 10/24/2014
dmi.bios.release: 5.6
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: P1.30
dmi.board.name: IMB-150
dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP1.30:bd10/24/2014:br5.6:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnIMB-150:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:skuToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.sku: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.114-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.7-1ubuntu3.4
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: libvdpau (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lunar ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libvdpau in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048807

Title:
  upgrade 23.04 to 23.10 fails

Status in libvdpau package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  sudo apt-get install -f
  [sudo] password for gord: 
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  Correcting dependencies... Done
  The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
required:
i965-va-driver intel-media-va-driver libaom3 libavcodec59 libavutil57
libcodec2-1.0 libdav1d6 libgsm1 libhwy1 libigdgmm12 libjxl0.7 libmfx1
librav1e0 libshine3 libsnappy1v5 libsoxr0 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043177] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in wl_resource_post_error_vargs from wl_resource_post_error "destroyed popup not top most popup"

2024-01-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: mutter
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043177

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in wl_resource_post_error_vargs from
  wl_resource_post_error "destroyed popup not top most popup"

Status in Mutter:
  New
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-shell.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
45.0-1ubuntu2, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/53aea76c746a4e6657e752b77398505921f13491 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2043177/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2047256] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 Some image thumbnails no longer displayed

2024-01-09 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2047256

** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047256

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 Some image thumbnails no longer displayed

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After recent updates on my Ubuntu Noble 24.04 nautilus does not show 
thumbnails of PDF files.
  On a different partition same PC Ubuntu Noble 24.04 not recently updated PDF 
thumbnails are correctly displayed

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: nautilus 1:45~rc-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu6
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Dec 22 16:15:59 2023
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(879, 943)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-10 (12 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20231210)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:
   file-roller   43.1-1
   nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.49.92-2ubuntu1
   nautilus-image-converter  0.4.0-2
   nautilus-share0.7.5-0.3
   python3-nautilus  4.0-1build1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2047256/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Amin Bandali
Hello,

The reported version of Firefox (100.0.2) is rather old at this point,
and could be a potential security risk: to my knowledge, Mozilla don't
backport bug fixes to older versions of Firefox (except for the current
Firefox ESR series), and many security and non-security related issues
have since been reported and fixed in later Firefox versions.  Thus, I
would highly recommend considering updating your system packages,
including Firefox, to latest versions and then try again - your issue
may already have been fixed in a newer version of Firefox.

If the issue still persists with up-to-date Firefox and system packages,
I would echo Seb's recommendation of reporting the bug upstream at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org, and include a performance profile per
https://profiler.firefox.com as well.

Searching through Bugzilla, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/1733377 came
up, but I'm not sure whether or not it's the same issue.  Please feel
free to comment on that and/or open a new issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Steve Smaldone
** Summary changed:

- Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU
+ Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. We don't really change the code over
upstream and have limited resources and knowledge of the project
compared to them, it would be a good idea to check if there is a similar
issue reported on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ already and if not to
open also there.

We might pick up the issue/work on it when our team capacity allows for
it but upstream might help getting it resolved sooner.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1928867] Re: System freeze on bulk rename

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
There is a fix proposed on
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/merge_requests/575

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Also affects: gnome-shell via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1443
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928867

Title:
  System freeze on bulk rename

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Unknown
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 20.04
  Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1

  Bug:
  I have 8 files named as file-1.jpg, file-2.jpg, ... file-8.jpg
  When I select them all and rename using template as 'file-[1, 2, 3]' in 
descending order, the system freezes. Perhaps because the files already exist 
with same name?

  I was expecting the files to be renamed in descending series -
  file-1.jpg as file-8.jpg, file-2.jpg as file-7.jpg and so on..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 19 00:44:49 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'161'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(891, 546)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (389 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1928867/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1928867] Re: System freeze on bulk rename

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
There is a fix proposed on
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/merge_requests/575

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928867

Title:
  System freeze on bulk rename

Status in GNOME Shell:
  Unknown
Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 20.04
  Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1

  Bug:
  I have 8 files named as file-1.jpg, file-2.jpg, ... file-8.jpg
  When I select them all and rename using template as 'file-[1, 2, 3]' in 
descending order, the system freezes. Perhaps because the files already exist 
with same name?

  I was expecting the files to be renamed in descending series -
  file-1.jpg as file-8.jpg, file-2.jpg as file-7.jpg and so on..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 19 00:44:49 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'161'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(891, 546)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (389 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1928867/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037528] Re: every tab with touchscreen on a folder gives the context menu.

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Also affects: nautilus via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/2872
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037528

Title:
  every tab with touchscreen on a folder gives the context menu.

Status in Nautilus:
  Unknown
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu installed on Chuwi u-book x pro (13 inch).
  CPU: Intel® Core™ i7-7Y75 × 4
  GPU: Intel® HD Graphics 615 (KBL GT2)
  Tapping a folder in Nautilus always gives the context menu.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: nautilus 1:44.2.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-33.33-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 27 12:08:40 2023
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'click-policy' b"'single'"
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'maximized' b'true'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-09-19 (7 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:
   file-roller   43.0-1
   nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.48.0-1ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/2037528/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] Re: Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Steve Smaldone
Additional info:
Firefox is at version 100.0.2
It is installed as a deb package
We're running Ubuntu 20.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
 * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
 * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
 * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
 * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring 
periodically in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on 
the off chance it matters, we're including it in this report:
 * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
 * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2048792/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048797] [NEW] Screen Sharing no longer works with nouveau driver

2024-01-09 Thread ElTouco72
Public bug reported:

Hi

Since the end of last november, screen sharing no longer works, i get a black 
screen.
here is the log i get

nouveau :01:00.0: gr: DATA_ERROR 009c [] ch 1 [02ffd8c000 gnome-
shell[1369]] subc 0 class c797 mthd 17e0 data 0030

if i install NVIDIA proprietary driver (nvidia-driver-535) the screen
sharing work again, back to nouveau it fails.

i'm on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS with latest update

Linux touco-System-Product-Name 6.2.0-39-generic #40~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Nov 16 10:53:04 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

my graphics card is [GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash Rate] (rev a1)

i have a laptop with exact Ubuntu version and updates, screen sharing
works with nouveau driver but the graphic card is NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™
3070 Laptop GPU

I made the test with chrome on this site https://www.webrtc-
experiment.com/Pluginfree-Screen-Sharing

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission non accordée: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Jan  9 19:23:06 2024
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GA106 [GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash Rate] [10de:2504] (rev 
a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd GA106 [GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash 
Rate] [1458:4096]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-07-12 (546 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
MachineType: ASUS System Product Name
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.2.0-39-generic 
root=UUID=c179fd07-f21e-43e9-856b-eeaeb54b2ebb ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/11/2023
dmi.bios.release: 30.10
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 3010
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: PRIME Z690M-PLUS D4
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
dmi.chassis.version: Default string
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr3010:bd12/11/2023:br30.10:svnASUS:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnPRIMEZ690M-PLUSD4:rvrRev1.xx:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuSKU:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.sku: SKU
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.113-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.7~22.04.5
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-nouveau in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048797

Title:
  Screen Sharing no longer works with nouveau driver

Status in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi

  Since the end of last november, screen sharing no longer works, i get a black 
screen.
  here is the log i get

  nouveau :01:00.0: gr: DATA_ERROR 009c [] ch 1 [02ffd8c000
  gnome-shell[1369]] subc 0 class c797 mthd 17e0 data 0030

  if i install NVIDIA proprietary driver (nvidia-driver-535) the screen
  sharing work again, back to nouveau it fails.

  i'm on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS with latest update

  Linux touco-System-Product-Name 6.2.0-39-generic #40~22.04.1-Ubuntu
  SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Nov 16 10:53:04 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
  GNU/Linux

  my graphics card is [GeForce RTX 3060 Lite Hash Rate] (rev a1)

  i have a laptop with exact Ubuntu version and updates, screen sharing
  works with nouveau driver but the graphic card is NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™
  3070 Laptop GPU

  I made the test with chrome on this site https://www.webrtc-
  experiment.com/Pluginfree-Screen-Sharing

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1951075] Re: Nautilus doesn't load and gives GVFS-WARNING

2024-01-09 Thread kenorb
Same on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS, I've Keybase installed. I've killed nautilus
(as "nautilus -q" didn't help), killed all keybase processes (one stuck
at [keybase] ), but didn't help either. nautilus still doesn't
start.

$ strace -f nautilus
execve("/usr/bin/nautilus", ["nautilus"], 0x7ffe661c58b8 /* 83 vars */) = 0
...
[pid 20669] poll([{fd=6, events=POLLIN}], 1, 0) = 1 ([{fd=6, revents=POLLIN}])
[pid 20667] write(2, "\n(org.gnome.Nautilus:20667): GVFS-\33[1;33mWARNING\33[0m 
**: \33[34m18:17:13.047\33[0m: The peer-to-peer connection failed: Timeout was 
reached. Falling back to the session bus. Your application is probably missing 
--filesystem=xdg-run/gvfsd privileges.\n", 246
(org.gnome.Nautilus:20667): GVFS-WARNING **: 18:17:13.047: The peer-to-peer 
connection failed: Timeout was reached. Falling back to the session bus. Your 
application is probably missing --filesystem=xdg-run/gvfsd privileges.
 
[pid 20669] read(6,  
...
[pid 20669] write(6, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8) = 8
[pid 20669] sendmsg(5, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="l\1\0\1\f\0\0\0\20\0\0\0z\0\0\0\1\1o\0\24\0\0\0/org/gtk/vfs/mount/1\0\0\0\0\2\1s\0\21\0\0\0org.gtk.vfs.Mount\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\6\1s\0\5\0\0\0:1.51\0\0\0\10\1g\0\3ayu\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\1s\0\21\0\0\0CreateFileMonitor\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0/\0\0\0\0\0\0\0",
 iov_len=156}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 
156
[pid 20669] poll([{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}], 2, 0) = 1 
([{fd=6, revents=POLLIN}])
[pid 20669] read(6, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 8
[pid 20669] poll([{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}], 2, -1  

[pid 20667] <... poll resumed>) = ? ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK (Interrupted 
by signal)

It's not starting at all, only restart helps. It happens very often.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951075

Title:
  Nautilus doesn't load and gives GVFS-WARNING

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After loading a cifs network drive on the command line, nautilus no
  longer loads and shows

  (org.gnome.Nautilus:17319): GVFS-WARNING **: 20:32:43.301: The peer-
  to-peer connection failed: Timeout was reached. Falling back to the
  session bus. Your application is probably missing --filesystem=xdg-
  run/gvfsd privileges.

  when run from the command line. This is not the same as
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1935734 as I'm
  not trying to open as root but as a non-privileged user.

  This only started happening after upgrading to 21.10 recently. I tried
  upgrading gvfs to 1.48.x though a ppa and the update didn't resolve
  the issue. It was working in 21.04, so I assume downgrading gvfs

  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 21.10
  Release:  21.10

  $ apt-cache policy nautilus gvfs
  nautilus:
Installed: 1:40.2-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:40.2-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:40.2-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  gvfs:
Installed: 1.47.91-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.47.91-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1.47.91-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: nautilus 1:40.2-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-21.21-generic 5.13.18
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Nov 16 20:35:33 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-01-27 (1024 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Release amd64 
(20181017.3)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-11-12 (4 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1951075/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2030947] Re: gnome-shell spams journal with `g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed` when 'Zoom' a11y feature en

2024-01-09 Thread corrado venturini
Same on Ubuntu 24.04
corrado@corrado-n9-nn-1210:~$ apt policy gnome-shell
gnome-shell:
  Installed: 45.2-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 45.2-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 45.2-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
corrado@corrado-n9-nn-1210:~$ 

Jan 09 18:38:02 corrado-n9-nn-1210 gnome-shell[2134]: 
g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < 
CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed
Jan 09 18:38:02 corrado-n9-nn-1210 gnome-shell[2134]: 
g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < 
CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed
Jan 09 18:38:02 corrado-n9-nn-1210 gnome-shell[2134]: 
g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < 
CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030947

Title:
  gnome-shell spams journal with `g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier:
  assertion 'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed`
  when 'Zoom' a11y feature enabled

Status in GNOME Shell:
  New
Status in gjs package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  gnome-shell logs

  gnome-shell[4537]: g_closure_add_invalidate_notifier: assertion
  'closure->n_inotifiers < CLOSURE_MAX_N_INOTIFIERS' failed

  multiple times per second for weeks now.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-shell 44.3-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.3.0-7.7-generic 6.3.5
  Uname: Linux 6.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 10 10:38:23 2023
  DisplayManager: gdm3
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-11-26 (256 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20221126)
  RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 44.3-1ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2030947/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048759] Re: After reformatting USB many times why is there a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

2024-01-09 Thread Norvel Roosevelt Miller IV
By burnout or overload of USB I mean I like stored more than that 2.1TB
stick could hold and if it helps it is now a drive not recognized as
being there to an extent of being usable but recognized as existing
maybe or maybe not, maybe.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048759

Title:
  After reformatting USB many times why is there a large
  /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

Status in gnome-disk-utility package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  I reformatted to NTFS on another computer, I then reformatted to ext4,
  could not write, then reformatted some and some took ownership, almost
  always "read only". After all that and always naming it
  "UbuntuFilesXE" I have a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE part of
  like my system. It is root owned and grouped and is over 228GB and
  rest of like my system is near 40GB now. It is like it is a mounted
  USB but it is entirely ON like my computer. I was formatting between
  ext4 and NTFS only on like my Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS desktop on a Lenovo
  Thinkpad T460. I would like to remove this large storage hog but do
  not know if it is safe to remove. I have had a freshly formatted AND
  owned USB named like I mentioned be like "read only" with this. I have
  a 64 bit OS. I expected to have only USB formatted or changed with
  minimal computer storage impact, not this.

  gnome-disk-utility:
Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 42.0-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe
  not, maybe.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 42.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg ./boot/grub/loopback.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan  9 03:53:54 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-20 (20 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/2048759/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048792] [NEW] Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

2024-01-09 Thread Steve Smaldone
Public bug reported:

At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
even.

We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
* CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average vs 
<10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
   * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
   * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
   * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
   * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
   * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
   * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue is happening across both FireFox windows. For reference, the stations 
always have 2 windows open: one for the screen UI and one for the projector on 
the pod face.
   * (Using the term 'track' here as defined by the open source FireFox 
profiler: https://profiler.firefox.com/. Basically a thread within the FireFox 
main process) 
   * There are many memory copy and SW interrupt calls being made in these 
tracks.
   * This validates that FireFox is contributing to increased software 
interrupt load
   * Additionally, we found an interesting pair of calls occurring periodically 
in the Renderer track. We have not deep dived these yet, but on the off chance 
it matters, we're including it in this report:
   * viaduct_log_error - every 50 - 500ms
   * wgpu_render_pass_end_pipeline_statistics_query - every 50 - 1000ms

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792

Title:
  Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
  abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox.  This utilization
  is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
  starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
  processing.  This happens, at times, when the browser should be idle,
  even.

  We have not isolated this issue to be a bug with firefox itself or an issue 
with the webpage content being provided to the browser. Regardless, here are 
the symptoms:
  * CPU usage is extremely high for the FireFox process (>100% on average 
vs <10% average for healthy stations) even while the screen is sitting idle (no 
animations, user interactions, etc.)
 * We have isolated the thread within FireFox causing the most CPU usage to 
the Renderer thread with the SwComposite threads also consuming abnormally high 
CPU.
 * In the FireFox Task and Process Managers, we have validated there is no 
single tab or window consuming abnormally high CPU, just the FireFox master 
process.
 * Additionally, we have confirmed that the FireFox browser history (taken 
from the places.sqlite file) does not have any webpages being loaded during the 
times when CPU consumption experiences a step function change up or down.
 * We also have linux perf logs for the FireFox process on healthy stations 
and impacted stations while sitting idle on the login screen, which can provide 
some stack traces for the Renderer and other threads which may be more useful 
to someone with FireFox expertise.
 * The biggest difference is that the impacted workcells have the Renderer 
and Compositor 'tracks' very active while the healthy workcells see no usage of 
these tracks at all.
 * These 2 tracks also have supporting tracks such as SwComposite and 
WRRendererBackend#X. There were 2 of each of these, which may indicate the 
issue 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2016925] Re: [amdgpu] Firefox window is visually corrupted after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.04

2024-01-09 Thread Tony Mansson
This issue was fixed a couple of months later in a regular update. I'm
on 23.10 now on the same machine and haven't had any problems with snaps
since. The issue can be closed as far as I am concerned.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016925

Title:
  [amdgpu] Firefox window is visually corrupted after upgrading to
  Ubuntu 23.04

Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After upgrading from Ubuntu 22.10 to Ubuntu 23.04, every time I open
  firefox the windows is heavily visually corrupted. It seems to work
  fine under the corruption, but it is completely unusuable.

  The tar version of Firefox works fine. In the attached screenshot you
  can see the snap version of Firefox (corrupted) and the tar version of
  Firefox (working fine).

  I tried uninstalling (with --purge) and reinstalling and refreshing
  firefox to no avail.

  All other applications, including 3D games, are working fine. I am
  using an AMD RX5500 with default mesa drivers.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: firefox 1:1snap1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-20.20-generic 6.2.6
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-20-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Apr 18 18:04:26 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-04 (895 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
  SnapChanges:
   IDEstado  Generado   Listo  Resumen
   1215  Done2023-04-18T17:42:17-03:00  2023-04-18T17:44:05-03:00  Eliminar 
snap "firefox"
   1216  Done2023-04-18T17:45:37-03:00  2023-04-18T17:47:25-03:00  Instalar 
snap "firefox"
   1217  Done2023-04-18T17:48:16-03:00  2023-04-18T17:48:30-03:00  Eliminar 
snap "firefox"
   1218  Done2023-04-18T17:48:39-03:00  2023-04-18T17:48:49-03:00  Instalar 
snap "firefox"
  SourcePackage: firefox
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to lunar on 2023-04-18 (0 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2016925/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048759] Re: After reformatting USB many times why is there a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

2024-01-09 Thread Norvel Roosevelt Miller IV
I now remember I got USBs at time of reinstalling OS. That means that
all USB operations were after reinstalling. I now think order was
reinstall OS, check size, reformat USB, rsync to USB and burn out, then
reformatting another USB and checking. Feel free to check like my logs
on this but I think nothing to see here except like my own stupidity and
lack of memory. All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe,
maybe or maybe not, maybe.

** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048759

Title:
  After reformatting USB many times why is there a large
  /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

Status in gnome-disk-utility package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  I reformatted to NTFS on another computer, I then reformatted to ext4,
  could not write, then reformatted some and some took ownership, almost
  always "read only". After all that and always naming it
  "UbuntuFilesXE" I have a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE part of
  like my system. It is root owned and grouped and is over 228GB and
  rest of like my system is near 40GB now. It is like it is a mounted
  USB but it is entirely ON like my computer. I was formatting between
  ext4 and NTFS only on like my Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS desktop on a Lenovo
  Thinkpad T460. I would like to remove this large storage hog but do
  not know if it is safe to remove. I have had a freshly formatted AND
  owned USB named like I mentioned be like "read only" with this. I have
  a 64 bit OS. I expected to have only USB formatted or changed with
  minimal computer storage impact, not this.

  gnome-disk-utility:
Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 42.0-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe
  not, maybe.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 42.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg ./boot/grub/loopback.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan  9 03:53:54 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-20 (20 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/2048759/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2035076] Re: Can't enter capital accented letters with Caps Lock on Wayland

2024-01-09 Thread Jeremie Tamburini
@lastexile7gr

The package doesn't come automatically with the updates, you have to pass "-t 
mantic-proposed" when using apt.
This is the command I've used to update the mutter package in my system:

sudo apt install mutter-common -t mantic-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035076

Title:
  Can't enter capital accented letters with Caps Lock on Wayland

Status in Mutter:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter package in Fedora:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Capital accented letters can't be entered using CAPS LOCK in the Wayland 
session

  Test Case
  -
  Open a terminal and install basic French support:
  sudo apt install language-pack-gnome-fr

  Open the Settings app. In the sidebar, click Keyboard
  Click +, choose French (France), then choose the French (AZERTY) keyboard
  Close the Settings app
  In the top right of the screen, click en and switch the keyboard layout to 
French (AZERTY)
  In the text editor, type é (this is the number 2 key on a US English 
keyboard).
  Now, press the Caps Lock key to enable Caps Lock.
  Press the same key. You should get É

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  This fix is included in mutter 45.2 so see the master bug for this upstream 
update: LP: #2043000

  Original bug report
  ---
  Most programs don't recognize Italian accented capital letters.
  When "Caps Lock" is on àèìòù should be written as ÀÈÌÒÙ... but for some 
reasons they are not capitalized.
  I've noticed that everything works fine using the Live session which still 
uses X11 session.

  It looks there's no problem with programs that use xwayland like Gimp
  and MarkText.

  WORKAROUND
  ===
  In "Settings -> Keyboard" it's possible to set a "compose key".
  For example I've selected the [Super left] key. If I want to compose È I 
press and immediately release each key:
  [Super left] + [E] + [Alt Gr] + [']

  If you want É:
  [Super left] + [E] + [']

  Do the same for the other vowels.
  ===

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: gnome-text-editor 45~beta-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.3.0-7.7-generic 6.3.5
  Uname: Linux 6.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Sep 11 11:48:41 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-09-07 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20230906.3)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: gnome-text-editor
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2035076/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

2024-01-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
i guess rebuilding gnome snaps with proposed on arm64 and testing that
new gnome snap on mantic for pi5 & x1s would help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4

  directx-headers
  - build-dep of the new Mesa

  mesa
  - new major release (23.2.x)
  - new HW support, Meteor Lake..

  [Test case]
  We want to cover at least 2-3 different, widely used and already previously 
supported GPU generations from both AMD and Intel which are supported by this 
release, as those are the ones that cover most bases; nouveau users tend to 
switch to the NVIDIA blob after installation. No need to test ancient GPU's 
supported by mesa-amber. And best to focus on the newer generations (~5y and 
newer) as the older ones are less likely to break at this point.
  - AMD: Vega, Navi1x (RX5000*), Navi2x (RX6000*), Navi3x (RX7000*)
  - Intel: gen9 (SKL/APL/KBL/CFL/WHL/CML), gen11 (ICL), gen12 (TGL/RKL/RPL/DG2)

  Install the new packages and run some tests:
  - check that the desktop is still using hw acceleration and hasn't fallen 
back to swrast/llvmpipe
  - run freely available benchmarks that torture the GPU (Unigine 
Heaven/Valley/Superposition)
  - run some games from Steam if possible

  and in each case check that there is no gfx corruption happening or
  worse.

  Note that upstream releases have already been tested for OpenGL and
  Vulkan conformance by their CI.

  [Where things could go wrong]
  This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to 
catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know 
if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later 
stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2047579] Re: gnome-software unuable to install updates (Prepared update not found)

2024-01-09 Thread Yosha872
Thanks for the idea, however I give up with this 'bug', I will upgrade
this laptop to Xubuntu 23.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047579

Title:
  gnome-software unuable to install updates (Prepared update not found)

Status in gnome-software package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Click on 'Software' then 'Updates' then on 'Download' then 'Restart & Update' 
I have a error message:
  'Unable to install updates: Prepared update not 
found:/var/lib/PackageKit/prepared-update'

  lsb_release -a : 'Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS' (however this is Xubuntu
  22.04.3).

  apt-cache policy gnome-software: installed 41.5-2ubuntu2

  Note: My bug report seems very similar to bug #1900167 opened in
  october 2020 by a other user (on Ubuntu 20.10).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-software 41.5-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Wed Dec 27 17:36:48 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-03-27 (275 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  InstalledPlugins:
   gnome-software-plugin-flatpak N/A
   gnome-software-plugin-snap41.5-2ubuntu2
  SourcePackage: gnome-software
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2047579/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

2024-01-09 Thread Timo Aaltonen
unigine tests take no parameters, just launch and run

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4

  directx-headers
  - build-dep of the new Mesa

  mesa
  - new major release (23.2.x)
  - new HW support, Meteor Lake..

  [Test case]
  We want to cover at least 2-3 different, widely used and already previously 
supported GPU generations from both AMD and Intel which are supported by this 
release, as those are the ones that cover most bases; nouveau users tend to 
switch to the NVIDIA blob after installation. No need to test ancient GPU's 
supported by mesa-amber. And best to focus on the newer generations (~5y and 
newer) as the older ones are less likely to break at this point.
  - AMD: Vega, Navi1x (RX5000*), Navi2x (RX6000*), Navi3x (RX7000*)
  - Intel: gen9 (SKL/APL/KBL/CFL/WHL/CML), gen11 (ICL), gen12 (TGL/RKL/RPL/DG2)

  Install the new packages and run some tests:
  - check that the desktop is still using hw acceleration and hasn't fallen 
back to swrast/llvmpipe
  - run freely available benchmarks that torture the GPU (Unigine 
Heaven/Valley/Superposition)
  - run some games from Steam if possible

  and in each case check that there is no gfx corruption happening or
  worse.

  Note that upstream releases have already been tested for OpenGL and
  Vulkan conformance by their CI.

  [Where things could go wrong]
  This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to 
catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know 
if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later 
stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043027] Re: Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-01-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I agree that there is an issue with making it difficult for people to
easily and fully test -proposed updates.

I wrote a blog post about the way I install packages from -proposed.
Steps 0-3

https://jeremy.bicha.net/2022/03/29/how-to-install-a-bunch-of-debs/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043027

Title:
  Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Clicking does not work correctly with Wacom tablets in the Ubuntu/GNOME X11 
sessions

  Test Case
  -
  One of the people affected by this issue will verify whether their Wacom 
tablet is working noticably better with the upgraded Mutter packages

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  The fix for this issue is included in upstream's mutter 45.2 release so 
please see bug 2043000 as the master bug for this upgrade

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  Tablet seems to work until I open Krita (as I could read on Internet, it may 
be related with Qt Apps).

  When Krita is open, mouse movement works ok with the tablet, but when
  it comes to click action it doesn't work and any further action with
  mouse is not captured (even outside Krita!).

  To regain control of the mouse I have to Alt+Tab and then I can click
  again.

  Some details that may be handy:
  - I've got two monitors
  - Maybe Qt apps related
  - My graphic card is nVidia GTX 1060 6Gb, driver used nvidia-driver-535

  Thanks for your effort. I love Ubuntu!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..06.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  535.129.03  Thu Oct 19 
18:56:32 UTC 2023
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Nov  8 17:20:34 2023
  DistUpgraded: 2023-11-08 00:54:28,961 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
  DistroCodename: mantic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] [10de:1c03] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd. GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 6GB] 
[19da:1438]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-09 (578 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
  MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic 
root=UUID=9dd904a0-11bb-40fa-9fe8-2f10449a416c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (1 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/15/2020
  dmi.bios.release: 5.17
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0608
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: TUF GAMING B550-PLUS
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

2024-01-09 Thread Sergio Costas
Can somebody modify the description to specify exactly how to do those
tests, please? (which commands/parameters, and expected results).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4

  directx-headers
  - build-dep of the new Mesa

  mesa
  - new major release (23.2.x)
  - new HW support, Meteor Lake..

  [Test case]
  We want to cover at least 2-3 different, widely used and already previously 
supported GPU generations from both AMD and Intel which are supported by this 
release, as those are the ones that cover most bases; nouveau users tend to 
switch to the NVIDIA blob after installation. No need to test ancient GPU's 
supported by mesa-amber. And best to focus on the newer generations (~5y and 
newer) as the older ones are less likely to break at this point.
  - AMD: Vega, Navi1x (RX5000*), Navi2x (RX6000*), Navi3x (RX7000*)
  - Intel: gen9 (SKL/APL/KBL/CFL/WHL/CML), gen11 (ICL), gen12 (TGL/RKL/RPL/DG2)

  Install the new packages and run some tests:
  - check that the desktop is still using hw acceleration and hasn't fallen 
back to swrast/llvmpipe
  - run freely available benchmarks that torture the GPU (Unigine 
Heaven/Valley/Superposition)
  - run some games from Steam if possible

  and in each case check that there is no gfx corruption happening or
  worse.

  Note that upstream releases have already been tested for OpenGL and
  Vulkan conformance by their CI.

  [Where things could go wrong]
  This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to 
catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know 
if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later 
stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1993127] Re: /usr/bin/nautilus:11:g_list_store_find_with_equal_func_full:g_list_store_find_with_equal_func:g_list_store_find:nautilus_view_model_get_index:scroll_to_file_on_idl

2024-01-09 Thread Khalid Abu Shawarib
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993127

Title:
  
/usr/bin/nautilus:11:g_list_store_find_with_equal_func_full:g_list_store_find_with_equal_func:g_list_store_find:nautilus_view_model_get_index:scroll_to_file_on_idle

Status in Nautilus:
  Fix Released
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
nautilus.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
1:43.0-1ubuntu1, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/32454f0bde038596049406d7ad99e47263fb8bf7 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1993127/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037528] Re: every tab with touchscreen on a folder gives the context menu.

2024-01-09 Thread Khalid Abu Shawarib
Upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/2872

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #2872
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/2872

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037528

Title:
  every tab with touchscreen on a folder gives the context menu.

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu installed on Chuwi u-book x pro (13 inch).
  CPU: Intel® Core™ i7-7Y75 × 4
  GPU: Intel® HD Graphics 615 (KBL GT2)
  Tapping a folder in Nautilus always gives the context menu.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: nautilus 1:44.2.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-33.33-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 27 12:08:40 2023
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'click-policy' b"'single'"
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.preferences' b'migrated-gtk-settings' b'true'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'maximized' b'true'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-09-19 (7 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:
   file-roller   43.0-1
   nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.48.0-1ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2037528/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048569] Re: rightclick->open link doesn't work on file://full/path/filename.cpp:linenumber links

2024-01-09 Thread Egmont Koblinger
What we _could_ perhaps do (because detecting a URI in a text flow is
undefined territory, with already quite a few quirks in place, such as
stripping off the trailing dot) is to strip off the trailing
":linenumber". That is, the trailing ":" if it's followed by numbers
only.

That way you could easily and quickly open the desired file
"filename.cpp". Not at the desired position, though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048569

Title:
  rightclick->open link doesn't work on
  file://full/path/filename.cpp:linenumber links

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  TLDR: I want to be able to open links like
  file:///full/path/to/filename.cpp:linenumber with rightclick open link

  video explanation: https://youtu.be/PmQAx7HF7_c

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Jan  8 14:05:15 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-05 (612 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2048569/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1685484] Re: DHCP exit hook for setting systemd-timesyncd NTP servers doesn't work

2024-01-09 Thread Alfred
To ubuntu 22.04, I refer to 
https://roll.urown.net/desktop/network/time-sync.html.
Using NM's dispatch scripts, NetworkManager can talk with timesyncd when 
configuring to use internal dhcp client.

If want to use dhclient's hook, I think you should configure NetworkManager to 
use dhclient.
[main]
dhcp=dhclient

I don't test it, just for your reference.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685484

Title:
  DHCP exit hook for setting systemd-timesyncd NTP servers doesn't work

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in systemd package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  I think it's regression for
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1578663 in
  zesty.

  1. NTP servers are send via DHCP and seen by NM:

  $ nmcli con show connection1 | grep ntp
  DHCP4.OPTION[30]:   requested_ntp_servers = 1
  DHCP4.OPTION[31]:   ntp_servers = 80.50.231.226 
217.96.29.26 212.160.106.226

  2. timesyncd is using hardcoded default NTP server:

  $ systemctl -n 200 status systemd-timesyncd.service
  * systemd-timesyncd.service - Network Time Synchronization
     Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service; enabled; 
vendor preset: enabled)
    Drop-In: /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d
     `-disable-with-time-daemon.conf
     Active: active (running) since Sat 2017-04-22 13:12:23 CEST; 16min ago
   Docs: man:systemd-timesyncd.service(8)
   Main PID: 576 (systemd-timesyn)
     Status: "Synchronized to time server 91.189.89.199:123 (ntp.ubuntu.com)."
  Tasks: 2 (limit: 4915)
     Memory: 1.5M
    CPU: 20ms
     CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-timesyncd.service
     `-576 /lib/systemd/systemd-timesyncd

  Apr 22 13:12:23 slodki systemd[1]: Starting Network Time Synchronization...
  Apr 22 13:12:23 slodki systemd[1]: Started Network Time Synchronization.
  Apr 22 13:12:53 slodki systemd-timesyncd[576]: Synchronized to time server 
91.189.89.199:123 (ntp.ubuntu.com).

  3. There are not other time sync deamons installed:

  $ cat 
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf
  [Unit]
  # don't run timesyncd if we have another NTP daemon installed
  ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/ntpd
  ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/openntpd
  ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/chronyd
  ConditionFileIsExecutable=!/usr/sbin/VBoxService

  $ ls -l /usr/sbin/{ntpd,openntpd,chronyd,VBoxService}
  ls: cannot access '/usr/sbin/ntpd': No such file or directory
  ls: cannot access '/usr/sbin/openntpd': No such file or directory
  ls: cannot access '/usr/sbin/chronyd': No such file or directory
  ls: cannot access '/usr/sbin/VBoxService': No such file or directory

  4. There is only one default timesyncd.conf file with default values:

  $ sudo find / -iname \*timesync\*
  /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf
  /etc/systemd/system/sysinit.target.wants/systemd-timesyncd.service
  /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/timesyncd
  /usr/share/man/man5/timesyncd.conf.d.5.gz
  /usr/share/man/man5/timesyncd.conf.5.gz
  /usr/share/man/man8/systemd-timesyncd.8.gz
  /usr/share/man/man8/systemd-timesyncd.service.8.gz
  
/tmp/systemd-private-d029f63116924e99b9fc44caf622e299-systemd-timesyncd.service-6NwdRT
  /lib/systemd/systemd-timesyncd
  /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service
  /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d
  
/var/tmp/systemd-private-d029f63116924e99b9fc44caf622e299-systemd-timesyncd.service-jz0q47

  $ cat /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf
  #  This file is part of systemd.
  #
  #  systemd is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  #  under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by
  #  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
  #  (at your option) any later version.
  #
  # Entries in this file show the compile time defaults.
  # You can change settings by editing this file.
  # Defaults can be restored by simply deleting this file.
  #
  # See timesyncd.conf(5) for details.

  [Time]
  #NTP=
  #FallbackNTP=ntp.ubuntu.com

  5. DHCP hook installed as /etc/dhcp/dhclient-exit-hooks.d/timesyncd is
  not working,
  TIMESYNCD_CONF=/run/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/01-dhclient.conf is not
  created.

  6. After manually executing steps from hook all works as expected:

  $ sudo mkdir -p /run/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/
  $ sudo cat  [Time]
  > NTP=80.50.231.226 217.96.29.26 212.160.106.226
  > EOF
  $ sudo systemctl try-restart systemd-timesyncd.service
  $ sudo systemctl status systemd-timesyncd.service
  * systemd-timesyncd.service - Network Time Synchronization
     Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service; enabled; 
vendor preset: enabled)
    

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048569] Re: rightclick->open link doesn't work on file://full/path/filename.cpp:linenumber links

2024-01-09 Thread Egmont Koblinger
The problem is: according to the URI specification, there is no way to
denote the line number. In fact, the URI
"file:///full/path/to/filename.cpp:linenumber" refers to a file whose
name is literally "filename.cpp:linenumber".

Correspondingly, the entire stack that handles the opening of a URI (the
gtk_show_uri() method and anything that's underneath it) doesn't know
the concept of line number either. Think of all the .desktop and similar
files shipped by text editors and similar software, currently they are
unable to specify how to pass on the line number to them.

Getting it modified to support line numbers would require to modify GTK,
modify the .desktop file specification, and _all_ the software out there
that ship such a .desktop file, that is, practically all the text
viewers/editors out there, to conform to a nonstandard (and backwards
incompatible!) extension of the URI specification. This is clearly not
going to happen.

In order to move forward, first the URI specification would have to be
modified to introduce the concept of line number. In a backwards
compatible way, that is, the ':' character is out of question, it would
need to go to '?query' or '#fragment', probably the latter. Also figure
out what to do if the file is in any other format than plain text (what
would the given field mean for pdf (page number?), png, music/video
(time offset?) etc.) How to distinguish opening an html file as a
rendered page (when '#fragment' jumps to the corresponding 'a name' or
'id') vs. opening an html file as raw text (and then jumping to the
given line number)?

Then the remaining software components would one by one need to be
updated to this spec.

This was also discussed in the user comments in the gist page of the
explicit hyperlink feature for terminals, and was similarly
inconclusive.

Unfortunately, it's practically a WONTFIX.

You can probably use the nonstandard wrapper that you created for Qt
Creator for GNOME Terminal as well. Just have a wrapper script that
opens your file that handles this ':' and translates to the line number
command line parameter of your preferred text viewer/editor.
Unfortunately the world is not ready to standardize this personal hack
into a mainstream solution, and such a change cannot begin at GNOME
Terminal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048569

Title:
  rightclick->open link doesn't work on
  file://full/path/filename.cpp:linenumber links

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  TLDR: I want to be able to open links like
  file:///full/path/to/filename.cpp:linenumber with rightclick open link

  video explanation: https://youtu.be/PmQAx7HF7_c

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-terminal 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Jan  8 14:05:15 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-05 (612 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2048569/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2043027] Re: Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-01-09 Thread Kevin Missett
First, thank you to Jeremy Bicha and Steve Langasek, and anyone else
involved in bringing the update to mutter.

I've been trying for the past few days to install the update. I enabled
-proposed, but every time I try to install the newer version of mutter
(whether directly by the version name, or by "mantic-proposed", I get
this message:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 mutter : Depends: mutter-common (>= 45.2-0ubuntu3) but 
45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0 is installed

The set of fixes does not include updating mutter-common; when I check
versions in aptitude, it does not list that version. I've tried
uninstalling both mutter and mutter-common, but when I go to reinstall,
it all defaults back to the 45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0 versions. While I
do see 45.2-0ubuntu3 in the list of versions for mutter, mutter-common
only lists the version I have installed.

All that said, I know that the seven-day window will soon pass, and
maybe this will just become part of the regular updates; however, if
this problem has prevented others from testing, my guess is that it will
hold things up until there's been direct verification.

I realize this thread is not for support for this type of problem --
i.e., there may just be some command I'm not familiar with that would
resolve this whole thing, and so there may be no larger issue at all
other than my own lack of experience -- but I wanted to mention this in
case it isn't just me. I would be happy to install and test the new
package, but until either mutter-common is also updated, or I can find
out what I'm doing wrong, I can't provide any more feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043027

Title:
  Wacom Intuos S stop working after upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Impact
  --
  Clicking does not work correctly with Wacom tablets in the Ubuntu/GNOME X11 
sessions

  Test Case
  -
  One of the people affected by this issue will verify whether their Wacom 
tablet is working noticably better with the upgraded Mutter packages

  What Could Go Wrong
  ---
  The fix for this issue is included in upstream's mutter 45.2 release so 
please see bug 2043000 as the master bug for this upgrade

  Original Bug Report
  ---
  Tablet seems to work until I open Krita (as I could read on Internet, it may 
be related with Qt Apps).

  When Krita is open, mouse movement works ok with the tablet, but when
  it comes to click action it doesn't work and any further action with
  mouse is not captured (even outside Krita!).

  To regain control of the mouse I have to Alt+Tab and then I can click
  again.

  Some details that may be handy:
  - I've got two monitors
  - Maybe Qt apps related
  - My graphic card is nVidia GTX 1060 6Gb, driver used nvidia-driver-535

  Thanks for your effort. I love Ubuntu!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..06.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  535.129.03  Thu Oct 19 
18:56:32 UTC 2023
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Nov  8 17:20:34 2023
  DistUpgraded: 2023-11-08 00:54:28,961 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
  DistroCodename: mantic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   nvidia/535.129.03, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!) (WARNING! Diff between built and installed 
module!)
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1928867] Re: System freeze on bulk rename

2024-01-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928867

Title:
  System freeze on bulk rename

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 20.04
  Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1

  Bug:
  I have 8 files named as file-1.jpg, file-2.jpg, ... file-8.jpg
  When I select them all and rename using template as 'file-[1, 2, 3]' in 
descending order, the system freezes. Perhaps because the files already exist 
with same name?

  I was expecting the files to be renamed in descending series -
  file-1.jpg as file-8.jpg, file-2.jpg as file-7.jpg and so on..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 19 00:44:49 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'161'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(891, 546)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (389 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928867/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1928867] Re: System freeze on bulk rename

2024-01-09 Thread Khalid Abu Shawarib
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928867

Title:
  System freeze on bulk rename

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 20.04
  Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1

  Bug:
  I have 8 files named as file-1.jpg, file-2.jpg, ... file-8.jpg
  When I select them all and rename using template as 'file-[1, 2, 3]' in 
descending order, the system freezes. Perhaps because the files already exist 
with same name?

  I was expecting the files to be renamed in descending series -
  file-1.jpg as file-8.jpg, file-2.jpg as file-7.jpg and so on..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 19 00:44:49 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'161'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(891, 546)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (389 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928867/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1928867] Re: System freeze on bulk rename

2024-01-09 Thread Khalid Abu Shawarib
This is a known upstream bug:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1443

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #1443
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1443

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928867

Title:
  System freeze on bulk rename

Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu 20.04
  Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1

  Bug:
  I have 8 files named as file-1.jpg, file-2.jpg, ... file-8.jpg
  When I select them all and rename using template as 'file-[1, 2, 3]' in 
descending order, the system freezes. Perhaps because the files already exist 
with same name?

  I was expecting the files to be renamed in descending series -
  file-1.jpg as file-8.jpg, file-2.jpg as file-7.jpg and so on..

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.17
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed May 19 00:44:49 2021
  GsettingsChanges:
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'sidebar-width' b'161'
   b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(891, 546)'
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (389 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1928867/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2047737] Re: Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or json extensions

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could you perhaps attach an example of file showing the issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047737

Title:
  Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or
  json extensions

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After attempting to open a folder that contains js or json files the app 
crashes.
  when testing from terminal I get a segmentation fault and no other error info.
  even enabling G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all did not provide additional info.
  removing nautilus extensions, resetting xdg-mime for js/json, and disabling 
nautilus features (search, file count, etc ...) did not fix the problem either.

  additional info
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  Release:22.04

  $ apt-cache policy nautilus
  nautilus:
Installed: 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:42.6-0ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:42.2-0ubuntu2.1 500
  500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 
Packages
   1:42.0-1ubuntu2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: nautilus 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Dec 30 14:50:09 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-02-14 (319 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:
   evince42.3-0ubuntu3.1
   file-roller   3.42.0-1
   nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
   nautilus-share0.7.3-2ubuntu6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2047737/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2047737] Re: Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or json extensions

2024-01-09 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It sounds like some part of the system has crashed. To
help us find the cause of the crash please follow these steps:

1. Run these commands:
journalctl -b0 > journal.txt
journalctl -b-1 > prevjournal.txt
and attach the resulting text files here.

2. Look in /var/crash for crash files and if found run:
ubuntu-bug YOURFILE.crash
Then tell us the ID of the newly-created bug.

3. If step 2 failed then look at https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/ID where
ID is the content of file /var/lib/whoopsie/whoopsie-id on the machine.
Do you find any links to recent problems on that page? If so then please
send the links to us.

Please take care to avoid attaching .crash files to bugs as we are
unable to process them as file attachments. It would also be a security
risk for yourself.

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047737

Title:
  Nautilus crashes when opening folders that contain files with js or
  json extensions

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After attempting to open a folder that contains js or json files the app 
crashes.
  when testing from terminal I get a segmentation fault and no other error info.
  even enabling G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all did not provide additional info.
  removing nautilus extensions, resetting xdg-mime for js/json, and disabling 
nautilus features (search, file count, etc ...) did not fix the problem either.

  additional info
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  Release:22.04

  $ apt-cache policy nautilus
  nautilus:
Installed: 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1:42.6-0ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1:42.2-0ubuntu2.1 500
  500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 
Packages
   1:42.0-1ubuntu2 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: nautilus 1:42.6-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Dec 30 14:50:09 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-02-14 (319 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  SourcePackage: nautilus
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  usr_lib_nautilus:
   evince42.3-0ubuntu3.1
   file-roller   3.42.0-1
   nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.44.0-1ubuntu1
   nautilus-share0.7.3-2ubuntu6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2047737/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048759] Re: After reformatting USB many times why is there a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

2024-01-09 Thread Norvel Roosevelt Miller IV
By memory I know I overloaded a 2.1TB USB some time. I had a previous OS
by same USB bootable thing and almost same setup. I know I used rsync
with no exclude or -x or --one-file-system to overload that USB. I think
I overloaded it BEFORE reinstalling OS. I think order was overload USB,
reinstall OS, check that OS is 31GB, it was, reformat another USB some
and set ownership of that USB some, check size of usage, 251GB, done. I
am unsure if overload was after reformat but I am almost certain that I
checked and found 251GB BEFORE overload if that happened. Also, with
reinstalling I had a bootable USB and another 2.1TB USB plugged in and
only one USB option which I took to boot. All as per one might be maybe
or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe not, maybe.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048759

Title:
  After reformatting USB many times why is there a large
  /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

Status in gnome-disk-utility package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I reformatted to NTFS on another computer, I then reformatted to ext4,
  could not write, then reformatted some and some took ownership, almost
  always "read only". After all that and always naming it
  "UbuntuFilesXE" I have a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE part of
  like my system. It is root owned and grouped and is over 228GB and
  rest of like my system is near 40GB now. It is like it is a mounted
  USB but it is entirely ON like my computer. I was formatting between
  ext4 and NTFS only on like my Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS desktop on a Lenovo
  Thinkpad T460. I would like to remove this large storage hog but do
  not know if it is safe to remove. I have had a freshly formatted AND
  owned USB named like I mentioned be like "read only" with this. I have
  a 64 bit OS. I expected to have only USB formatted or changed with
  minimal computer storage impact, not this.

  gnome-disk-utility:
Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 42.0-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe
  not, maybe.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 42.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg ./boot/grub/loopback.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan  9 03:53:54 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-20 (20 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/2048759/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2048759] [NEW] After reformatting USB many times why is there a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

2024-01-09 Thread Norvel Roosevelt Miller IV
Public bug reported:

I reformatted to NTFS on another computer, I then reformatted to ext4,
could not write, then reformatted some and some took ownership, almost
always "read only". After all that and always naming it "UbuntuFilesXE"
I have a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE part of like my system. It is
root owned and grouped and is over 228GB and rest of like my system is
near 40GB now. It is like it is a mounted USB but it is entirely ON like
my computer. I was formatting between ext4 and NTFS only on like my
Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS desktop on a Lenovo Thinkpad T460. I would like to
remove this large storage hog but do not know if it is safe to remove. I
have had a freshly formatted AND owned USB named like I mentioned be
like "read only" with this. I have a 64 bit OS. I expected to have only
USB formatted or changed with minimal computer storage impact, not this.

gnome-disk-utility:
  Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 42.0-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe not,
maybe.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: gnome-disk-utility 42.0-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg ./boot/grub/loopback.cfg
CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Jan  9 03:53:54 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-20 (20 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048759

Title:
  After reformatting USB many times why is there a large
  /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE on computer?

Status in gnome-disk-utility package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I reformatted to NTFS on another computer, I then reformatted to ext4,
  could not write, then reformatted some and some took ownership, almost
  always "read only". After all that and always naming it
  "UbuntuFilesXE" I have a large /media/norvel/UbuntuFilesXE part of
  like my system. It is root owned and grouped and is over 228GB and
  rest of like my system is near 40GB now. It is like it is a mounted
  USB but it is entirely ON like my computer. I was formatting between
  ext4 and NTFS only on like my Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS desktop on a Lenovo
  Thinkpad T460. I would like to remove this large storage hog but do
  not know if it is safe to remove. I have had a freshly formatted AND
  owned USB named like I mentioned be like "read only" with this. I have
  a 64 bit OS. I expected to have only USB formatted or changed with
  minimal computer storage impact, not this.

  gnome-disk-utility:
Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 42.0-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  All as per one might be maybe or might not be maybe, maybe or maybe
  not, maybe.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 42.0-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./boot/grub/grub.cfg ./boot/grub/loopback.cfg
  CasperMD5CheckResult: fail
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Jan  9 03:53:54 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-12-20 (20 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/2048759/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp