[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1722655] [NEW] Firefox crashes on launch
Public bug reported: Firefox 56.0 crashes right when I attempt to launch it on my Raspberry Pi 3 running Ubuntu Mate 16.04. The error message ExceptionHandler::GenerateDump cloned child ExceptionHandler::WaitForContinueSignal waiting for continue signal... 29604 ExceptionHandler::SendContinueSignalToChild sent continue signal to child which is printed to the terminal when I launch it from a terminal is similar to the error message reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1671079 but that bug report is about Firefox 52, the bug has already been fixed, and setting export LOGNAME=$USER doesn't solve the problem, so it seems to be a different bug. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1722655 Title: Firefox crashes on launch Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Firefox 56.0 crashes right when I attempt to launch it on my Raspberry Pi 3 running Ubuntu Mate 16.04. The error message ExceptionHandler::GenerateDump cloned child ExceptionHandler::WaitForContinueSignal waiting for continue signal... 29604 ExceptionHandler::SendContinueSignalToChild sent continue signal to child which is printed to the terminal when I launch it from a terminal is similar to the error message reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1671079 but that bug report is about Firefox 52, the bug has already been fixed, and setting export LOGNAME=$USER doesn't solve the problem, so it seems to be a different bug. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1722655/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1759954] [NEW] Segmentation fault on window screenshot when using scaling
Public bug reported: When using scaling in Ubuntu, gnome-screenshot segfaults when an area screenshot is taken. To replicate the problem, launch "Displays" from the dash, slide the slider at "Scale for menu and title bars" to any value strictly greater than 1. Then issue the command "gnome-screenshot -w". It will either print "Segmentation fault" and terminate or print something like https://pastebin.com/t5AMDE6w and terminate. It won't take a screenshot. There is a bug titled "Segfault when using -w / --window to screenshot current window." which sounds like the same problem but I cannot access that bug report, so I'm not sure it actually is properly in the system. The search function tells me its there but the link to it it provides doesn't work. I use Ubuntu 16.04 with the latest updates installed and gnome- screenshot 3.18.0. ** Affects: gnome-screenshot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screenshot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759954 Title: Segmentation fault on window screenshot when using scaling Status in gnome-screenshot package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: When using scaling in Ubuntu, gnome-screenshot segfaults when an area screenshot is taken. To replicate the problem, launch "Displays" from the dash, slide the slider at "Scale for menu and title bars" to any value strictly greater than 1. Then issue the command "gnome-screenshot -w". It will either print "Segmentation fault" and terminate or print something like https://pastebin.com/t5AMDE6w and terminate. It won't take a screenshot. There is a bug titled "Segfault when using -w / --window to screenshot current window." which sounds like the same problem but I cannot access that bug report, so I'm not sure it actually is properly in the system. The search function tells me its there but the link to it it provides doesn't work. I use Ubuntu 16.04 with the latest updates installed and gnome- screenshot 3.18.0. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1759954/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 141388] Re: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.)
It's been a few years and I still don't get why the status of this bug report is "invalid". The bug clearly still exists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141388 Title: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.) Status in Gnome System Monitor: Invalid Status in gnome-system-monitor package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor When selecting a Processes column for sorting and the down-arrow icon is displayed Process Name, Status, Nice, ID, and Memory sort low-to- high top-to-bottom (towards the bottom of the screen). However the %CPU column when displaying the down-arrow icon sorts high-to-low top-to-bottom. When the up-arrow icon is displayed the situation is reversed; %CPU is low-to-high top-to-bottom and the others high-to-low top-to-bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/141388/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 141388] Re: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.)
Why is the status of this bug report "invalid"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141388 Title: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.) Status in The GNOME System Monitor: Invalid Status in “gnome-system-monitor” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor When selecting a Processes column for sorting and the down-arrow icon is displayed Process Name, Status, Nice, ID, and Memory sort low-to- high top-to-bottom (towards the bottom of the screen). However the %CPU column when displaying the down-arrow icon sorts high-to-low top-to-bottom. When the up-arrow icon is displayed the situation is reversed; %CPU is low-to-high top-to-bottom and the others high-to-low top-to-bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/141388/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 141388] Re: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.)
I had the problem of all columns in the past, too. But I don't remember which version it was. Since then everything was ok but now I have the problem that the CPU usage column is reversed, too. I use Ubuntu 14.04 64 Bit and think this problem didn't exist in the last few versions of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141388 Title: Sort order of Processes %CPU column reversed (compared to Nice, ID, Memory, etc.) Status in The GNOME System Monitor: Invalid Status in “gnome-system-monitor” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor When selecting a Processes column for sorting and the down-arrow icon is displayed Process Name, Status, Nice, ID, and Memory sort low-to- high top-to-bottom (towards the bottom of the screen). However the %CPU column when displaying the down-arrow icon sorts high-to-low top-to-bottom. When the up-arrow icon is displayed the situation is reversed; %CPU is low-to-high top-to-bottom and the others high-to-low top-to-bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/141388/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1326190] [NEW] "MB" instead of "MiB" when splitting archives
Public bug reported: Hi, if you create a 7zip-archive, you can choose that it's splitted up into files with a certain size. I just wanted to split a big file into many 100 MB big files but as it turned out it created 100 MiB files. So every file has 104'857'600 byte instead of the intended 100'000'000 byte. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1326190 Title: "MB" instead of "MiB" when splitting archives Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hi, if you create a 7zip-archive, you can choose that it's splitted up into files with a certain size. I just wanted to split a big file into many 100 MB big files but as it turned out it created 100 MiB files. So every file has 104'857'600 byte instead of the intended 100'000'000 byte. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1326190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1438251] [NEW] Ubuntu gets stuck when opening /proc in nautilus
Public bug reported: The title contains pretty much all I know about this. I tried opening nautilus via a terminal to see further information but the system gets stuck before anything is displayed in the terminal. I can't even switch to a tty via ctrl+alt+F[1..6]. I'm using an HP Probook 6550b with Ubuntu 14.04.2. $ uname -a Linux christoph-laptop-14-04 3.13.0-37-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 22 21:28:38 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438251 Title: Ubuntu gets stuck when opening /proc in nautilus Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The title contains pretty much all I know about this. I tried opening nautilus via a terminal to see further information but the system gets stuck before anything is displayed in the terminal. I can't even switch to a tty via ctrl+alt+F[1..6]. I'm using an HP Probook 6550b with Ubuntu 14.04.2. $ uname -a Linux christoph-laptop-14-04 3.13.0-37-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 22 21:28:38 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1438251/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1571806] [NEW] Backup files are silently ignored when using certain archive types
Public bug reported: Depending on the kind of archive you create using file-roller, backup files (files with a `~` on the end of their names) are included or ignored. The user doesn't see any warning at all and will probably only discover this when they try to extract the archive. # How to reproduce the symptom. (I'm assuming you're using Nautilus with file-roller integration.) Create a folder `testFolder` (or any name but I'll use this one to refer to it) and create a file called `testFile~` in it. Then move to the parent folder of `testFolder`. Right-click test folder and choose "Compress". ## Correct behavior. Choose `.7z` as the archive format making it a 7zip archive and click "Create". The archive will contain the folder `testFolder` and in it the file `testFile~`. ## Incorrect behavior. Choose `.tar` as the archive format making it a tarball and click "Create". The tarball will contain the folder `testFolder` but it will be empty. Note that this isn't the fault of `tar`. If you create the tarball from the command line using the command `tar`, `testFile~` will be included. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571806 Title: Backup files are silently ignored when using certain archive types Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Depending on the kind of archive you create using file-roller, backup files (files with a `~` on the end of their names) are included or ignored. The user doesn't see any warning at all and will probably only discover this when they try to extract the archive. # How to reproduce the symptom. (I'm assuming you're using Nautilus with file-roller integration.) Create a folder `testFolder` (or any name but I'll use this one to refer to it) and create a file called `testFile~` in it. Then move to the parent folder of `testFolder`. Right-click test folder and choose "Compress". ## Correct behavior. Choose `.7z` as the archive format making it a 7zip archive and click "Create". The archive will contain the folder `testFolder` and in it the file `testFile~`. ## Incorrect behavior. Choose `.tar` as the archive format making it a tarball and click "Create". The tarball will contain the folder `testFolder` but it will be empty. Note that this isn't the fault of `tar`. If you create the tarball from the command line using the command `tar`, `testFile~` will be included. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1571806/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1567536] Re: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field)
Sorry, I didn't receive an email that you answered. I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit with kernel 3.19.0-30-generic and Unity version 7.2.6. gnome-calculator is version 3.10.3 on my system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567536 Title: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field) Status in gnome-calculator package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with several calculators and got different results. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1567536/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1567536] Re: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field)
The bug also occurs when using gnome-caluculator version 3.18.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 (kernel version 4.4.0-21-generic; 64 bit). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567536 Title: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field) Status in gnome-calculator package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with several calculators and got different results. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1567536/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1567536] Re: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field)
Why is this still incomplete? ** Description changed: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input - field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this - without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with - several calculators and got different results. + field. Tested with gnome-calculator 3.18.3. ** Description changed: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input - field. Tested with gnome-calculator 3.18.3. + field. Tested with gnome-calculator 3.18.3 on a 64 bit system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567536 Title: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field) Status in gnome-calculator package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input field. Tested with gnome-calculator 3.18.3 on a 64 bit system. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1567536/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1567536] [NEW] Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field)
Public bug reported: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with several calculators and got different results. ** Affects: gnome-calculator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input - field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this, good - luck. I tried to with several calculators and got different results. + field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this + without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with + several calculators and got different results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567536 Title: Now Answer At All (Calculator Clears Input Field) Status in gnome-calculator package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Just copy this into the calculator and press enter: (2+3i)^((3+4i)×(4+5i)) The calculator doesn't show any result but instead clears the input field. If you're trying to figure out the correct solution to this without calculating it by hand, good luck with that. I tried to with several calculators and got different results. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calculator/+bug/1567536/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1210607] Re: Scientific Notation not given proper order of operations
Which calculator would do what you described? I just checked a few ones and didn't find any. I'd be surprised a lot, to be honest, because that'd be wrong and I probably would've gotten a very wrong result at some point because I rely on calculators having implemented the correct order of operations. Every school or university teaches that multiplication and division have the same precedence (modulo may or may not be on the same level, mostly depending on the notation) and are calculated from the left to the right. So 8*10^12/6*10^9 = 8*(10^12)/6*(10^9) = ((8*(10^12))/6)*(10^9) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210607 Title: Scientific Notation not given proper order of operations Status in GNOME Calculator: Confirmed Status in gnome-calculator package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: gnome-calculator 3.8.1 (3.8.1-0ubuntu1) on Ubuntu 13.04 x86_64: In Advanced mode, enter: 8×10¹²÷6×10⁹ (keystrokes: [8] [×10^y] [1] [2] [/] [6] [×10^y] [9]) Result: 1.3×10²¹ Correct answer: 1333.333 (so gnome-calculator is off by 18 orders of magnitude. The ‘×10^y’ steps should be carried out first, according to operator precedence for exponentiation.) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: gnome-calculator 1:3.8.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-28.41-generic 3.8.13.5 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-28-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Aug 9 13:07:33 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-calculator InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-04-13 (117 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: gnome-calculator UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-04-26 (105 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-calculator/+bug/1210607/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1517587] [NEW] Nautilus File Chooser Doesn't Show User Dirs
Public bug reported: # Symptoms: In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places" items (Home, Desktop, Documents, Downloads, Music, Pictures, Videos, Trash) which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. # How to replicate the bug: Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser (just try saving this website by pressing ctrl + S in your web browser), everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - Symptoms: In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", + *Symptoms*: In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", "Devices", "Bookmarks", and "Network" items which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. - How to replicate the bug: Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some - of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart - your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine - and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser, everything - in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be - displayed. + # How to replicate the bug: + Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser, everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. ** Description changed: - *Symptoms*: In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", - "Devices", "Bookmarks", and "Network" items which are also shown in the - file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go - missing in the file chooser. + # Symptoms: + In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", "Devices", "Bookmarks", and "Network" items which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. # How to replicate the bug: Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser, everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. ** Description changed: # Symptoms: In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", "Devices", "Bookmarks", and "Network" items which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. # How to replicate the bug: - Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser, everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. + Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser (just try saving this website by pressing ctrl + S in your web browser), everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. ** Description changed: # Symptoms: - In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places", "Devices", "Bookmarks", and "Network" items which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. + In the pane on the left, there usually are "Places" items (Home, Desktop, Documents, Downloads, Music, Pictures, Videos, Trash) which are also shown in the file chooser. The problem is that items in the "Places" category can go missing in the file chooser. # How to replicate the bug: Open ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and change some of the directories. Make sure these directories actually exist. Restart your machine. What you will find is that Nautilus will work just fine and use the new directories. But if you use the file chooser (just try saving this website by pressing ctrl + S in your web browser), everything in "Places" that isn't the default value any more, will not be displayed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1517587 Titl
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1254291] Re: Cant re-add rubbish bin to exclusions after removing
Can you add the location `trash:///`? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254291 Title: Cant re-add rubbish bin to exclusions after removing Status in Déjà Dup: Confirmed Status in deja-dup package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: open deja-dup for the first time. Navigate to folders and highlight "Rubbish bin" Realise you made a mistake and want to re-add the Rubbish Bin to the list of exclusions. Press the "+" icon then get lost in nautilus, unable to find "Rubbish bin". I would expect it to be possible to re-add the rubbish bin to exclusions. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: deja-dup 27.3.1-0ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 3.12.0-031200-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Nov 23 15:51:19 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-06-29 (511 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120425) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: deja-dup UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-07-12 (133 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1254291/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1471300] [NEW] Virtual Memory cannot be shown
Public bug reported: Open gnome-system-monitor, switch to the tab "Processes", right-click on a the heading of a column, check "Virtual Memory". On my system (Ubuntu 15.04 64 Bit) with gnome-system-monitor 3.15.91 no virtual memory column is shown. ** Affects: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471300 Title: Virtual Memory cannot be shown Status in gnome-system-monitor package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Open gnome-system-monitor, switch to the tab "Processes", right-click on a the heading of a column, check "Virtual Memory". On my system (Ubuntu 15.04 64 Bit) with gnome-system-monitor 3.15.91 no virtual memory column is shown. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/1471300/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
