[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1948933] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948933 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in libreoffice source package in Hirsute: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * Version 7.1.6 is currently released in hirsute. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.1.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.1.7 (that's a total of 27 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_194503_1ee54@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_113740_b763e@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211029_170024_1bc17@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211028_225613_de9da@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211028_104330_62f27@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1948933] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948933 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Hirsute: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * Version 7.1.6 is currently released in hirsute. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.1.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.1.7 (that's a total of 27 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_194503_1ee54@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_113740_b763e@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211029_170024_1bc17@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211028_225613_de9da@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211028_104330_62f27@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] [NEW] [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950467 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+attachment/5539575/+files/libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950467 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
** Description changed: [Impact] - * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release + * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release - * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 + * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 +and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at + https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages - * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released + * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. - * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and + * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] - * Backport of + * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 - * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build + * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] - * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include + * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). - * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: - https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ + * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: + https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ - * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: - * Automated tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests - * Automated UI tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests - * Regression tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests - * Feature tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests + * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: + * Automated tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests + * Automated UI tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests + * Regression tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests + * Feature tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests - * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. - * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz - * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz - * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz - * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz - * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz + * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. + * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz + * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz + * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz + * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz + * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz - * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite + * General smoke testing of all the applications i
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
This is meant in addition to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/libreoffice/+bug/192 not as a replacement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950467 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1948933] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute
Upgraded libreoffice from 1:7.1.6-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 to 1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 from hirsute-proposed in a clean and up-to-date hirsute amd64 VM, and successfully ran test plan at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948933 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.1.7 for hirsute Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Hirsute: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * Version 7.1.6 is currently released in hirsute. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.1.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.1.7 (that's a total of 27 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.1.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_194503_1ee54@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211028_113740_b763e@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211029_170024_1bc17@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211028_225613_de9da@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute-ricotz-ppa/hirsute/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211028_104330_62f27@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1951738] [NEW] [SRU] libreoffice 7.2.3 for impish
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.2.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.2 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.2#7.2.3_release * Version 7.2.2 is currently released in impish. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.2.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.2.3 (that's a total of ?? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_72/1116/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_122557_220e4@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_140906_e9b32@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211121_135011_ebc4d@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211121_121636_a621c@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211121_120225_a0cce@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of ?? bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: High Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951738 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.2.3 for impish Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Status in libreoffice source package in Impish: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.2.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.2 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.2#7.2.3_release * Version 7.2.2 is currently released in impish. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.2.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.2.3 (that's a total of ?? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_72/
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
Hello, Thank you for your review. I have updated the patch and minimized the usage of internal libraries as far as possible. See the packaging git branch [1] for more details. We provide libreoffice_*.orig-tarballs.tar.xz to fallback on library versions used upstream if the system environment is not sufficient. The new requirement to include a "~bpo" string seems a bit unfortunate given the established versioning of the package [2] [3]. Could you make a recommendation here while this is not a plain rebuild of the hirsute package? [1] https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/log/?h=wip/focal-7.1 [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice [3] https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages ** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+attachment/5542451/+files/libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff ** Patch removed: "libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+attachment/5539575/+files/libreoffice_7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950467 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launc
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1945770] Re: firefox: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
@schopin Could you try to rebuild the following firefox package against your openssl3 packages? https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox- next/+sourcepub/12906002/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945770 Title: firefox: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0 Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hello, As part of a rebuild against OpenSSL3, this package failed to build on one or several architectures. You can find the details of the rebuild at https://people.canonical.com/~schopin/rebuilds/openssl-3.0.0-impish.html or for the amd64 failed build, directly at https://launchpad.net/~schopin/+archive/ubuntu/openssl-3.0.0/+build/22098525/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.firefox_92.0+build3-0ubuntu2.0~ssl3ppa1.1_BUILDING.txt.gz We're planning to transition to OpenSSL 3.0 for the 22.04 release, and consider this issue as blocking for this transition. You can find general migration informations at https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man7/migration_guide.html For your tests, you can build against libssl-dev as found in the PPA schopin/openssl-3.0.0 Looking at the build failure, the problem lies in the openssl-sys crate. It seems the version 0.9.64 of this crate should fix the failure: https://github.com/sfackler/rust-openssl/blob/master/openssl-sys/CHANGELOG.md#v0964---2021-06-18 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1945770/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1951738] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.2.3 for impish
** Description changed: [Impact] - * LibreOffice 7.2.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.2 line: - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.2#7.2.3_release + * LibreOffice 7.2.3 is in its third bugfix release of the 7.2 line: + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.2#7.2.3_release - * Version 7.2.2 is currently released in impish. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.2.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.2.3 (that's a total of ?? bugs): - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs + * Version 7.2.2 is currently released in impish. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.2.2 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.2.3 (that's a total of 112 bugs): + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.2.3/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs - * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and + * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] - * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include + * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). - * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: - https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_72/1116/ + * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: + https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_72/1116/ - * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: - * Automated tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests - * Automated UI tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests - * Regression tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests - * Feature tests - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests + * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: + * Automated tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests + * Automated UI tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests + * Regression tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests + * Feature tests + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests - * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. - * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_122557_220e4@/log.gz - * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_140906_e9b32@/log.gz - * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211121_135011_ebc4d@/log.gz - * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211121_121636_a621c@/log.gz - * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211121_120225_a0cce@/log.gz - * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice + * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. + * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_122557_220e4@/log.gz + * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20211121_140906_e9b32@/log.gz + * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20211121_135011_ebc4d@/log.gz + * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20211121_121636_a621c@/log.gz + * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/impish/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211121_120225_a0cce@/log.gz + * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual te
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1950467] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal
@ddstreet Thank you, I have uploaded the updated package with the required versioning :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950467 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.1.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.1.7 is in its seventh (and last) bugfix release of the 7.1 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.1#7.1.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for hirsute handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1948933 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_71/1460/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/2020_055401_85a70@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/2020_013227_b21ba@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/2020_015816_7e469@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/2020_002248_216a6@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20211109_232224_7b3ab@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 27 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 923932] Re: [Classic session] LibreOffice icons are larger than other app's icons
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923932 Title: [Classic session] LibreOffice icons are larger than other app's icons Status in LibreOffice: Invalid Status in gnome-panel package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in gnome-panel source package in Precise: Invalid Status in libreoffice source package in Precise: Won't Fix Bug description: When using gnome-session-fallback (GNOME Classic session / gnome-panel) then LibreOffice icons are much larger image dimensions than the other icons in the menu. --- ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) Package: libreoffice PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-12.21-generic 3.2.2 Tags: precise Uname: Linux 3.2.0-12-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-25 (6 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/923932/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1952839] Re: package libreoffice-impress 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attemp
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try performing the update again. This will likely resolve your issue, but the failure could be caused by filesystem or memory corruption. So please also run a fsck on your filesystem(s) and a memory test. Thanks in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952839 Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: update package is brokened ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libreoffice-impress 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-55-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Wed Dec 1 11:21:09 2021 DuplicateSignature: package:libreoffice-impress:1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Removing libreoffice-ogltrans (1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... dpkg: error processing package libreoffice-impress (--remove): package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-06-07 (177 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210209.1) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-impress 1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1952839/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1952220] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operat
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try performing the update again. This will likely resolve your issue, but the failure could be caused by filesystem or memory corruption. So please also run a fsck on your filesystem(s) and a memory test. Thanks in advance! ** Tags added: corrupted-package ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952220 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Looks similar to Bug #1928787 But affects Package: libreoffice-common 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libreoffice-common 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-40.44~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-40-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 AptOrdering: libreoffice-common:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Tue Nov 23 09:19:59 2021 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2_all.deb ... Unpacking libreoffice-common (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2) over (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2_all.deb (--unpack): unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted DuplicateSignature: package:libreoffice-common:1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Unpacking libreoffice-common (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2) over (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2_all.deb (--unpack): unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted ErrorMessage: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-14 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/gallery/environment.sdg.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1952220/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1952715] Re: package libreoffice-help-en-us 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/share/libreoffice/help/en-US/text/swriter/menu/insert_frame
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try performing the update again. This will likely resolve your issue, but the failure could be caused by filesystem or memory corruption. So please also run a fsck on your filesystem(s) and a memory test. Thanks in advance! ** Tags added: corrupted-package ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952715 Title: package libreoffice-help-en-us 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/share/libreoffice/help/en- US/text/swriter/menu/insert_frame.html.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: idk ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libreoffice-help-en-us 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-40.44~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-40-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Thu Nov 25 16:20:25 2021 DuplicateSignature: package:libreoffice-help-en-us:1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 Unpacking libreoffice-help-en-us (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2) over (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-GESKDO/29-libreoffice-help-en-us_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2_all.deb (--unpack): unable to open '/usr/share/libreoffice/help/en-US/text/swriter/menu/insert_frame.html.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted ErrorMessage: unable to open '/usr/share/libreoffice/help/en-US/text/swriter/menu/insert_frame.html.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-23 (67 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-help-en-us 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/share/libreoffice/help/en-US/text/swriter/menu/insert_frame.html.dpkg-new': Operation not permitted UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1952715/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1861985] [NEW] Sync gexiv2 0.12.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gexiv2 0.12.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Use python2 instead of python in the autopkg test. Debian switched to use python3. Changelog entries since current focal version 0.10.9-1ubuntu1: gexiv2 (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Drop patch Use-exiv2-version-0.25.patch. Exiv2 version 0.27 is now in Debian unstable. Drop this patch so gexiv2 can build against it. (Closes: #942519, #950169) * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0. No changes necessary. -- Jason Crain Sun, 02 Feb 2020 04:29:42 -0700 gexiv2 (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 0.12.0 * Update d/copyright * Add gexiv2 mailing list to Upstream-Contact. * Update d/rules * Remove dbgsym migration code since migration is complete. * No longer need to specify meson build system since autotools build was removed. * Renamed enable-gtk-doc option to gtk_doc. * Update d/control * Bump debhelper level to 12. * Switch to the 'debhelper-compat' dependency style. Remove the d/compat file. * Update Standards-Version to 4.4.1 No changes necessary. * Add Rules-Requires-Root: no * Update symbols * Dynamically generate d/libgexiv2-2.symbols. Upstream removed the script which kept C++ symbols from being exported due to regressions on OpenBSD (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gexiv2/issues/27). Mark all C++ symbols as optional since these aren't part of the API. * Use 'python3' instead of 'python' in autopkgtest. Thanks to Matthias Klose (Closes: #943447) * Install /usr/share/vala/vapi/gexiv2.deps. This file tells vala about dependencies. * Add patch Use-exiv2-version-0.25.patch. This modifies gexiv2 to use exiv2 version 0.25, the version currently in Debian unstable. Upstream is set to use exiv2 version 0.26 or later, which is only currently available in Debian experimental. -- Jason Crain Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:59:35 -0600 ** Affects: gexiv2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gexiv2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861985 Title: Sync gexiv2 0.12.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in gexiv2 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gexiv2 0.12.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Use python2 instead of python in the autopkg test. Debian switched to use python3. Changelog entries since current focal version 0.10.9-1ubuntu1: gexiv2 (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Drop patch Use-exiv2-version-0.25.patch. Exiv2 version 0.27 is now in Debian unstable. Drop this patch so gexiv2 can build against it. (Closes: #942519, #950169) * Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0. No changes necessary. -- Jason Crain Sun, 02 Feb 2020 04:29:42 -0700 gexiv2 (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 0.12.0 * Update d/copyright * Add gexiv2 mailing list to Upstream-Contact. * Update d/rules * Remove dbgsym migration code since migration is complete. * No longer need to specify meson build system since autotools build was removed. * Renamed enable-gtk-doc option to gtk_doc. * Update d/control * Bump debhelper level to 12. * Switch to the 'debhelper-compat' dependency style. Remove the d/compat file. * Update Standards-Version to 4.4.1 No changes necessary. * Add Rules-Requires-Root: no * Update symbols * Dynamically generate d/libgexiv2-2.symbols. Upstream removed the script which kept C++ symbols from being exported due to regressions on OpenBSD (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gexiv2/issues/27). Mark all C++ symbols as optional since these aren't part of the API. * Use 'python3' instead of 'python' in autopkgtest. Thanks to Matthias Klose (Closes: #943447) * Install /usr/share/vala/vapi/gexiv2.deps. This file tells vala about dependencies. * Add patch Use-exiv2-version-0.25.patch. This modifies gexiv2 to use exiv2 version 0.25, the version currently in Debian unstable. Upstream is set to use exiv2 version 0.26 or later, which is only currently available in Debian experimental. -- Jason Crain Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:59:35 -0600 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gexiv2/+bug/1861985/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1715931] Re: Update to exiv2 version 0.27
Note that 0.27.2-8ubutnu1 dropped the previously applied patch for CVE-2019-17402 which is still required! ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-17402 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to exiv2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715931 Title: Update to exiv2 version 0.27 Status in exiv2 package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in exiv2 source package in Focal: Fix Committed Status in exiv2 package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: 0.26 was released in April http://www.exiv2.org/whatsnew.html "This release contains a large collection of new features, new lenses and bugfixes across all areas of Exiv2. " Presumably debian stretch freeze interfered with a prompter update Currently in debian exp here: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/exiv2 I was hoping to to get a new feature release of the very popular Digikam (5.7.0) into artful under a FFE, but that has bumped the minimum exiv2 build depend from 0.25 -> 0.26. If due to rdeps etc an update in artful turns out not to be possible, I would like to target this for early in 18.04 LTS cycle. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exiv2/+bug/1715931/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989418] [NEW] [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_103401_f46f5@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_144020_84b5b@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220904_113245_95845@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220904_100953_3af7d@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220904_095636_d0c69@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: High Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989418 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreof
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989418] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal
** Attachment added: "libreoffice_7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418/+attachment/5615444/+files/libreoffice_7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989418 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_103401_f46f5@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_144020_84b5b@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220904_113245_95845@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220904_100953_3af7d@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220904_095636_d0c69@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1750199] Re: Blurry Icons on HighDPI
** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144583 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750199 Title: Blurry Icons on HighDPI Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: On bionic with libreoffice 6.0 from proposed new and subjectively better icons are shipped which is great. However, they still are rather blurry on a HighDPI screen. Can we patch the package to provide a higher resolution iconset? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1750199/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989418] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989418 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_103401_f46f5@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_144020_84b5b@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220904_113245_95845@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220904_100953_3af7d@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220904_095636_d0c69@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1988744] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.6 for jammy
Upgraded libreoffice from 1:7.3.5-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 to 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 from jammy-proposed in a clean and up-to-date jammy amd64 VM, and successfully ran test plan at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988744 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.6 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * Version 7.3.5 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.5 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.6 (that's a total of 50 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.6/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.6/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220903_204748_cb772@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220903_234903_5c5f9@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220903_221954_4437b@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220903_203030_f897a@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220903_202914_32e82@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1981966] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981966 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.5 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is in its fifth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.5_release * Version 7.3.4 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.4 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.5 (that's a total of 83 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.5/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1797/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220719_091411_74233@/log.gz * [arm64] ... * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220719_110142_388ca@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220719_082728_0b9aa@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220719_080609_7c067@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 83 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1981966/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989418] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal
@teward It is a backport as it was done at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045. It basically got the same testing as the corresponding SRU for jammy. The package is already uploaded and sitting int the focal/unapproved queue. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libreoffice -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989418 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_103401_f46f5@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_144020_84b5b@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220904_113245_95845@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220904_100953_3af7d@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220904_095636_d0c69@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1989418] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989418 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Fresh PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.5 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1987045 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.5 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_103401_f46f5@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220904_144020_84b5b@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220904_113245_95845@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220904_100953_3af7d@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-prereleases/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220904_095636_d0c69@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 50 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990263] [NEW] bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1
Public bug reported: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 81 ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. (gdb) bt #0 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 #1 0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591 #2 0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192 #3 bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137 #4 0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x771eb8cf in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #6 0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #7 0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #8 0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290 #9 0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59 #10 0x7733b905 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #11 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #12 0x772da783 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #13 0x77337e22 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #14 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #15 0x772da59d in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #17 0x77138098 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) at ./src/main.c:65 ** Affects: libwnck3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Status: New ** Tags: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990263 Title: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. (gdb) bt #0 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 #1 0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591 #2 0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192 #3 bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137 #4 0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x771eb8cf in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #6 0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #7 0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #8 0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290 #9 0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59 #10 0x7733b905 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #11 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #12 0x772da783 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #13 0x77337e22 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #14 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #15 0x772da59d in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #17 0x77138098 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) at ./src/main.c:65 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990263/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990263] Re: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1
** Description changed: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. (gdb) bt #0 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 #1 0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591 #2 0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192 #3 bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137 #4 0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x771eb8cf in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #6 0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #7 0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #8 0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290 #9 0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59 #10 0x7733b905 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #11 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #12 0x772da783 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #13 0x77337e22 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #14 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #15 0x772da59d in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #17 0x77138098 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) at ./src/main.c:65 + + Happens when running gnome-xorg/x11 session under gnome-shell 43.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990263 Title: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: bamfdaemon crashes with libwnck3 43.0-1 Thread 1 "bamfdaemon" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 81../libwnck/wnck-handle.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden. (gdb) bt #0 0x77e10616 in invalidate_icons (self=0x5581da30) at ../libwnck/wnck-handle.c:81 #1 0x555713ca in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-legacy-screen.c:591 #2 0x5557b695 in bamf_legacy_screen_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3192 #3 bamf_matcher_init (self=0x55868140) at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3137 #4 0x77204791 in g_type_create_instance () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #5 0x771eb8cf in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #6 0x771ed118 in g_object_new_with_properties () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #7 0x771edec1 in g_object_new () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #8 0x5557b758 in bamf_matcher_get_default () at ./src/bamf-matcher.c:3290 #9 0x55574861 in bamf_on_bus_acquired (connection=0x55628000, name=, self=0x55697320) at ./src/bamf-daemon.c:59 #10 0x7733b905 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #11 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #12 0x772da783 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #13 0x77337e22 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #14 0x772da559 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #15 0x772da59d in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0 #16 0x770e33bf in g_main_context_dispatch () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #17 0x77138098 in () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #18 0x770e2a6f in g_main_loop_run () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #19 0x5556c43b in main (argc=, argv=) at ./src/main.c:65 Happens when running gnome-xorg/x11 session under gnome-shell 43.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990263/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] [NEW] [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz * [armhf] ... * [i386] ... * [ppc64el] ... * [s390x] ... * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Medium Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regressi
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz * [armhf] ... * [i386] ... - * [ppc64el] ... - * [s390x] ... + * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220921_140441_6e26b@/log.gz + * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220921_134627_506c7@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Attachment added: "libreoffice_7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382/+attachment/5617843/+files/libreoffice_7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz * [armhf] ... - * [i386] ... + * [i386] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/i386/libr/libreoffice/20220921_150152_8877b@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220921_140441_6e26b@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220921_134627_506c7@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests ht
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
@teward, sorry, this took longer than expected. The missing armhf autopkgtest run finished successfully. ** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz - * [armhf] ... + * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220922_104328_3c444@/log.gz * [i386] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/i386/libr/libreoffice/20220921_150152_8877b@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220921_140441_6e26b@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220921_134627_506c7@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing ca
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990669] [NEW] Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1: libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262) (LP: #1990263) -- Dmitry Shachnev Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49 +0300 ** Affects: libwnck3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: libwnck3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990669 Title: Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1: libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262) (LP: #1990263) -- Dmitry Shachnev Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49 +0300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990669/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990673] Re: Default paragraph style should be "Text body"
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #47295 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295 ** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990673 Title: Default paragraph style should be "Text body" Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Summary: when creating a new Writer document, the first paragraph has the style "Default Paragraph Style", which leads to surprising behaviour. This bug has been reported in upstream [1], but at least some devs seem to believe that this is a packaging issue [2] so it might make sense to be fixed in downstream. Ideally fixed in upstream as well. [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47295 [2] even though this issue is seemingly present on all platforms To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1990673/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990669] Re: Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: libwnck3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libwnck3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990669 Title: Sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in libwnck3 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Please sync libwnck3 43.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current kinetic version 43.0-1: libwnck3 (43.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add a patch to fix segfault in invalidate_icons. (Closes: #1020262) (LP: #1990263) -- Dmitry Shachnev Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:16:49 +0300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwnck3/+bug/1990669/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990382] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990382 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.6 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.6_release * This source packages matches the processed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1988744 and a test build is currently available at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages * Similar backport of 7.3.6 for focal handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.0.7 (EOL since November 26, 2018) is currently released in bionic. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionci/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/1900/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_023821_f6636@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20220921_015824_12ef6@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20220922_104328_3c444@/log.gz * [i386] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/i386/libr/libreoffice/20220921_150152_8877b@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20220921_140441_6e26b@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20220921_134627_506c7@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990886] Re: Security updates missing after 91.11.0
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-36319 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-36318 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-36314 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-2505 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-38472 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-38473 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-38477 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-38476 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-38478 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-3033 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-3032 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-3034 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-36059 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990886 Title: Security updates missing after 91.11.0 Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: Upstream released Thunderbird 91.11.0 on June 28, 2022. It's now at 91.13.1 from September 19, 2022. The release notes say: "By popular demand, Thunderbird 91.13.1 contains important security updates that shipped in Thunderbird 102.2.1. Users are encouraged to update as soon as possible." Source: https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/91.13.1/releasenotes/ Ubuntu 22.04 Jammy (but also the other supported LTS) still has Thunderbird 91.11.0 (1:91.11.0+build2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1) without the security fixes after 91.11.0. The package should be updated to 91.13.1. Given that it has been three months without security updates, there seems to be some general friction with following upstream. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1990886/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1772520] Re: [upstream] Font metrics mixed up when selecting Arabic characters in Writer
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #30731 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30731 ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Importance: Medium => Unknown ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Invalid => Unknown ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Remote watch: Document Foundation Bugzilla #119347 => Document Foundation Bugzilla #30731 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772520 Title: [upstream] Font metrics mixed up when selecting Arabic characters in Writer Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: In most fonts, many characters in the Arabic script change their width and height as typing progresses. For example the letter ب (U+0628) is reduced to about a half or even a third of its width if it's followed by another character such as ا (U+0627): با. Usually LibreOffice understands the changes in font metrics pretty well but not always. See the attached screenshot where I've written the sentence "مرحبا يا صديقي العزيز" in Writer and started selecting letters from the beginning of the line. The selection shown in the screenshot looks like the whole first word plus the following space but actually it only covers the first 4 letters of the first word out of 5 total: مرحب. From a user's point of view, this is very confusing, as I can't tell how far I've already selected without counting the characters in my mind. Even more surprisingly, LibreOffice Calc shows the selection as expected, i.e. different from Writer, so this does not feel like a font problem per se, although only some fonts display this behavior. The font I'm using in this example is Scheherazade, available through a third-party repository at packages.sil.org. The font is designed to cover a very wide variety of characters used for Arabic-script minority languages in both Asia and Africa, and in many cases it's the only professionally made font available for people working on many of these languages. Description: Ubuntu 17.10 Release: 17.10 libreoffice-writer: Installed: 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 Candidate: 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 Version table: *** 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 500 500 http://mr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:5.4.5-0ubuntu0.17.10.5 500 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-security/main amd64 Packages 1:5.4.1-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://mr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful/main amd64 Packages ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: libreoffice-writer 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-41.46-generic 4.13.16 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-41-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.8 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon May 21 21:03:43 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-13 (462 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Release amd64 (20161012.2) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2017-11-05 (197 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1772520/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1724876] Re: libreoffice soffice.bin using 100% cpu
** Changed in: df-libreoffice Importance: Medium => Unknown ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Remote watch: Document Foundation Bugzilla #128406 => Document Foundation Bugzilla #121963 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724876 Title: libreoffice soffice.bin using 100% cpu Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: With literally every action in libreoffice Calc, CPU usage goes to 100% due to soffice.bin, and stays on 100% for minutes. To the extend that libreoffice calc is UNUSABLE for anything that has to do with spreadsheets. As far as I am concerned, this is a critical bug because it makes the program unusable, and often even the complete computer due to the high cpu load. - 'Every action' includes typing as much as one single letter in a cell. Or opening the file. - the file I am working on is only 1.1Mb in size - the same file used to open fine in previous versions of libreoffice. what I've tried so far - without any improvement in speed: - under tools, options, assigned memory 256 Mb for Libreoffice, and 20Mb per object (no solution) - automatic calculation has been turned off (no solution) - libreoffice-gnome and libreoffice-gtk have been removed (no solution) - purged and reinstalled libreoffice. (no solution) - created new user profile - also no resolve System: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on AMD A8 with 8Gb ram and running on an SSD. Libreoffice: Version: 5.1.6.2 Build ID: 1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial2 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.4; UI Render: default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1724876/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1969709] Re: libreoffice font selection unusably slow
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #148169 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148169 ** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148169 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969709 Title: libreoffice font selection unusably slow Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Trying to scroll through the font list in the menu bar, I experience an unacceptable degree of lagging. Just popping up the dropdown list takes 7-10 seconds and the system takes the same amount of time to respond to perform individidual scrolling gestures. The CPU jumps to 100% and the whole system becomes unresponsive. I have tried deb, snap and even the packages offered on the site of the LibreOffice project. They all manifest the same behaviour. The only thing that works is disabling font previews. I have downgraded to 7.2 for now, which appears to be unaffected. I have contacted the LibreOffice team and they tell me that this should be solved by fontconfig 2.14. Unfortunately, Ubuntu 22.04 is shipping 2.13... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:7.3.2-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 21 05:01:24 2022 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-27 (24 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20220326) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1969709/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1979116] Re: no USB-key any more in the sidebar of the save-dialog
LibreOffice is using the qt5 VCL backend on lubuntu. It seems QT5 is missing some plugin/library to access removable devices in its native file dialog? ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979116 Title: no USB-key any more in the sidebar of the save-dialog Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: If I want to save a new document, then in the save-dialog there's no USB-key any more in the sidebar (so, on the left side), no matter if in the Options (in "LibreOffice" in "General") "Use LibreOffice dialogs" is checked or unchecked. But the USB-key still appears in the file-manager of the system. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: libreoffice (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-44.49-generic 5.13.19 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-44-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71.2 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: LXQt Date: Sat Jun 18 12:05:53 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-02-06 (131 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012) RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1979116/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995054] [NEW] [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233324_4fa91@/log.gz * [arm64] ... * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221028_023850_ff210@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233859_894f7@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221027_225956_efc56@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of ? bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: High Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Critical => High ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995054 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * Mor
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995054] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy
** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233324_4fa91@/log.gz - * [arm64] ... + * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221028_084007_5ae64@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221028_023850_ff210@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233859_894f7@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221027_225956_efc56@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of ? bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995054 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995477] Re: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/soffice« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openoffice-debian-menus 4
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924684 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924684 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1924684 package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/soffice', which is also in package openoffice-debian-menus 4.1.9-9805 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995477 Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/soffice« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openoffice-debian-menus 4.1.6-9790 ist Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: libre office package is connected to openoffice package. i cant update the full system bc there is always a error mssg with broken libre office package. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libreoffice-common (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-56.62-generic 5.4.73 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-56-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Wed Nov 2 11:25:18 2022 DpkgTerminalLog: Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.6_all.deb ... Entpacken von libreoffice-common (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.6) ... dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_1%3a6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.6_all.deb (--unpack): Versuch, »/usr/bin/soffice« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openoffice-debian-menus 4.1.6-9790 ist ErrorMessage: Versuch, »/usr/bin/soffice« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openoffice-debian-menus 4.1.6-9790 ist InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-07-29 (1191 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Release amd64 (20181017.3) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/bin/soffice« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket openoffice-debian-menus 4.1.6-9790 ist UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-16 (900 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995477/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995054] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy
** Description changed: [Impact] - * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its sixth bugfix release of the 7.3 line: + * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233324_4fa91@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221028_084007_5ae64@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221028_023850_ff210@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233859_894f7@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221027_225956_efc56@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of ? bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995054 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995054] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy
** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release - * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of ? bugs): + * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of 28 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233324_4fa91@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221028_084007_5ae64@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221028_023850_ff210@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233859_894f7@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221027_225956_efc56@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] - * A minor release with a total of ? bug fixes always carries the + * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995054 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of 28 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995704] Re: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04
** Package changed: libreoffice (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995704 Title: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04 Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please do the following to reproduce the memory leak I can observe on my laptop (Acer Aspire 5, Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD iGPU, Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell): Close all programs. Open LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the LEFT side of the screen. Open a new instance of LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the RIGHT side of the screen. Now your screen is full with 2 tiled windows of LibreOffice Calc. In the middle of the screen, drag now with the mouse the edge between the tiled windows and move it several times randomly to the right and to the left so that the size of both windows changes simultaneously. Look at the RAM consumption in the system monitor!!! On my machine, with numerous moves of the edge between the tiled windows, I can make my 24GB completely full. Reboot empties the RAM. Can you reproduce it? Is it only related to LibreOffice? My system: Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell LibreOffice from the official repositories Version: 7.3.6.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 Calc: threaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1995704/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995704] Re: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04
This is clearly a leak in the gnome-shell process. Comparing the memory consumption before and after shows a massive increase. Whether this originates in mutter/mesa/wayland will have to be determined. It can be reproduced easily while concurrently resizing any tiled application windows. ** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995704 Title: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04 Status in Mutter: Unknown Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-shell source package in Jammy: Confirmed Bug description: Please do the following to reproduce the memory leak I can observe on my laptop (Acer Aspire 5, Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD iGPU, Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell): Close all programs. Open LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the LEFT side of the screen. Open a new instance of LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the RIGHT side of the screen. Now your screen is full with 2 tiled windows of LibreOffice Calc. In the middle of the screen, drag now with the mouse the edge between the tiled windows and move it several times randomly to the right and to the left so that the size of both windows changes simultaneously. Look at the RAM consumption in the system monitor!!! On my machine, with numerous moves of the edge between the tiled windows, I can make my 24GB completely full. Reboot empties the RAM. Can you reproduce it? Is it only related to LibreOffice? My system: Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell LibreOffice from the official repositories Version: 7.3.6.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 Calc: threaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1995704/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995704] Re: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues #2246 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2246 ** Also affects: mutter via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2246 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995704 Title: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04 Status in Mutter: Unknown Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-shell source package in Jammy: Confirmed Bug description: Please do the following to reproduce the memory leak I can observe on my laptop (Acer Aspire 5, Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD iGPU, Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell): Close all programs. Open LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the LEFT side of the screen. Open a new instance of LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the RIGHT side of the screen. Now your screen is full with 2 tiled windows of LibreOffice Calc. In the middle of the screen, drag now with the mouse the edge between the tiled windows and move it several times randomly to the right and to the left so that the size of both windows changes simultaneously. Look at the RAM consumption in the system monitor!!! On my machine, with numerous moves of the edge between the tiled windows, I can make my 24GB completely full. Reboot empties the RAM. Can you reproduce it? Is it only related to LibreOffice? My system: Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell LibreOffice from the official repositories Version: 7.3.6.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 Calc: threaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1995704/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995704] Re: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04
Might be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1985089 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995704 Title: Huge memory leak when tiling LibreOffice windows in Ubuntu 22.04 Status in Mutter: Unknown Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-shell source package in Jammy: Confirmed Bug description: Please do the following to reproduce the memory leak I can observe on my laptop (Acer Aspire 5, Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD iGPU, Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell): Close all programs. Open LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the LEFT side of the screen. Open a new instance of LibreOffice Calc and tile the window maximised on the RIGHT side of the screen. Now your screen is full with 2 tiled windows of LibreOffice Calc. In the middle of the screen, drag now with the mouse the edge between the tiled windows and move it several times randomly to the right and to the left so that the size of both windows changes simultaneously. Look at the RAM consumption in the system monitor!!! On my machine, with numerous moves of the edge between the tiled windows, I can make my 24GB completely full. Reboot empties the RAM. Can you reproduce it? Is it only related to LibreOffice? My system: Ubuntu 22.04 with Gnome Shell LibreOffice from the official repositories Version: 7.3.6.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 Calc: threaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1995704/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995924] [NEW] Huge amount of memory usage while resizing tiled windows
Public bug reported: I opened two application windows, nautilus and gnome-terminal. Maximizing them both side-by-side and resizing them concurrently a couple of times in the middle seems to cause a memory leak in the gnome- shell process. USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND max 1466 46.0 4.8 5179148 393964 ? Ssl 08:45 0:16 /usr/bin/gnome-shell USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND max 1466 25.6 60.4 9979868 4918832 ? Ssl 08:45 2:09 /usr/bin/gnome-shell See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2246 Might be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1985089 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-52.58-generic 5.15.60 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-52-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Nov 8 08:47:03 2022 DisplayManager: gdm3 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-14 (54 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220809.1) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.5-0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: gnome-shell UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session ** Summary changed: - Hude amount of memory usage while resizing tiled windows + Huge amount of memory usage while resizing tiled windows -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995924 Title: Huge amount of memory usage while resizing tiled windows Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I opened two application windows, nautilus and gnome-terminal. Maximizing them both side-by-side and resizing them concurrently a couple of times in the middle seems to cause a memory leak in the gnome-shell process. USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND max 1466 46.0 4.8 5179148 393964 ? Ssl 08:45 0:16 /usr/bin/gnome-shell USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND max 1466 25.6 60.4 9979868 4918832 ? Ssl 08:45 2:09 /usr/bin/gnome-shell See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2246 Might be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1985089 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gnome-shell 42.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-52.58-generic 5.15.60 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-52-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Nov 8 08:47:03 2022 DisplayManager: gdm3 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-09-14 (54 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220809.1) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.5-0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: gnome-shell UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1995924/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996076] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal
** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996076/+attachment/5630088/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996076 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_131732_0f324@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134252_403d2@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221109_152925_85c50@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134511_07b38@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221109_125147_0715b@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996076/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996076] [NEW] [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_131732_0f324@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134252_403d2@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221109_152925_85c50@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134511_07b38@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221109_125147_0715b@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: High Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996076 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996082] [NEW] [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic
Public bug reported: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionic/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] ... * [arm64] ... * [armhf] ... * [ppc64el] ... * [s390x] ... * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: High Assignee: Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996082 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionic/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regressi
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996082] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic
** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996082/+attachment/5630090/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996082 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionic/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] ... * [arm64] ... * [armhf] ... * [ppc64el] ... * [s390x] ... * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996082/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996082] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic
** Patch removed: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996082/+attachment/5630090/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch ** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996082/+attachment/5630092/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo18.04.1.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996082 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionic/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] ... * [arm64] ... * [armhf] ... * [ppc64el] ... * [s390x] ... * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996082/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996076] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal
** Patch removed: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996076/+attachment/5630088/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch ** Patch added: "libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996076/+attachment/5630091/+files/libreoffice_7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_bpo20.04.1.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996076 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for focal Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Focal: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1989418 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in focal-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Focal/20.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_131732_0f324@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134252_403d2@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221109_152925_85c50@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221109_134511_07b38@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/focal/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221109_125147_0715b@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1996076/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996082] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic
** Description changed: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Scope] * Backport of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 * Backport target is Bionic/18.04 LTS only to provide an official build of a more recent upstream version of LibreOffice [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. - * [amd64] ... - * [arm64] ... - * [armhf] ... - * [ppc64el] ... - * [s390x] ... + * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_194619_aafcb@/log.gz + * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221109_182935_ad523@/log.gz + * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221109_193157_bfaf9@/log.gz + * [i386] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/i386/libr/libreoffice/20221110_005928_4e278@/log.gz + * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221109_191816_d9338@/log.gz + * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-libreoffice-experimental/bionic/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221109_173606_13453@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1996082 Title: [BPO] libreoffice 7.3.7 for bionic Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * This source packages matches the proposed SRU for jammy handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054 and its backport is currently provided by the LibreOffice Still PPA at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-still/+packages * Previous backport of 7.3.6 handled at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1990382 * LibreOffice 6.4.7 (EOL since November 30, 2020) is currently released in focal. * LibreOffice 7.3.6 is currently released in bionic-backports. * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of q
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995054] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy
Upgraded libreoffice from 1:7.3.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 to 1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 from jammy-proposed in a clean and up-to-date jammy amd64 VM, and successfully ran test plan at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995054 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.3.7 for jammy Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.3.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.3 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.3#7.3.7_release * Version 7.3.6 is currently released in jammy. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.3.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.3.7 (that's a total of 28 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.3.7/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_73/2020/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233324_4fa91@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20221028_084007_5ae64@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20221028_023850_ff210@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20221027_233859_894f7@/log.gz * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-libreoffice-libreoffice-still/jammy/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20221027_225956_efc56@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 28 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1995054/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1753731] [NEW] Playing media file over gvfs ceased working
Public bug reported: I am trying to play a media file over gvfs with totem which stopped working. Also showing the media information of such a remote file in nautilus doesn't work anymore. My guess was this is a regression of 1.13.1, but using gst-play-1.0 directly surprisingly works. ** Affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: I am trying to play a media file over gvfs with totem which stopped working. Also showing the media information of such a remote file in nautilus doesn't work anymore. - Using gst-play-1.0 directly surprisingly works. + My guess was this is a regression of 1.13.1, but using gst-play-1.0 + directly surprisingly works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753731 Title: Playing media file over gvfs ceased working Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I am trying to play a media file over gvfs with totem which stopped working. Also showing the media information of such a remote file in nautilus doesn't work anymore. My guess was this is a regression of 1.13.1, but using gst-play-1.0 directly surprisingly works. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1753731/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1766874] Re: wrong font line spacing in libreoffice
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1769654 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769654 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117411 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526510 ** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #117411 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117411 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1526510 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526510 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1769654 Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766874 Title: wrong font line spacing in libreoffice Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Several fonts got a smaller line spacing in LibreOffice 6.0.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 than in LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on Ubuntu 16.04. Font height and font width are the same. It also appears in Xubuntu 18.04 and Ubuntu Mate 18.04. If I install original DEB-Packages (5.4.6 and 6.0.3) from LibreOffice Web-page, it works just fine. In other distributions like Manjaro and MX-Linux line spacing is still the same. How I tried it: 1. open new document in LibreOffice Witer 2. using font 'Liberation Serif' 12 3. fill first two lines with 1234567890123..., next hundred lines with line-number 3,4,5,6,... 4. Save it. 5. open in different distributions and compare 6. try different fonts. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: libreoffice 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Wed Apr 25 14:58:17 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-23 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Beta amd64 (20180404) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=de_CH:de PATH=(custom, no username) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1766874/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1769654] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #898115 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898115 ** Also affects: fonts-liberation2 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898115 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #898116 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898116 ** Also affects: fonts-liberation (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898116 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769654 Title: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in fonts-liberation package in Debian: Unknown Status in fonts-liberation2 package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package includes fonts "Liberation Sans" (etc "Liberation") with sligtly shrinked font metrics. This issue leads to all office documents typed in Liberation Sans fonts have corrupted formatting in Ubuntu 18.04 (but these documents correctly opened in other OS's, for example Ubuntu 17.10). Documents with corrupted formatting can not print properly: all paragraphs are shifted up, embedded tables in text - splitted on page breaks. Document circulation in system based on Ubuntu 18.04 operating systems temporarily paralized, because Liberation fonts are basic fonts for open-source document circulation. In attachment I have type a example office document with 2 pages and enumerated strings. On normal ordinary conditions this document have 54 strings on first page and 54 string on second page. But if this document open in Ubuntu 18.04, it's found than 5 strings from second page moves to first page. Compare font versions embedded with Ubuntu packages we can see that versions are different (sudo apr search fonts-liberation* command): Ubuntu 17.10 - 1:1.07.4-2, 2.00.1-3 Ubuntu 18.04 - 1:1.07.4-5, 2.00.1-5 I have create a bug 117411 "Font metrics slightly changed after update OS to Ubuntu 18.04", see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117411, but I think that this bug concerns a Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1769654/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1769654] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics
** Also affects: fonts-liberation (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fonts-liberation2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-liberation in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769654 Title: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics Status in fonts-liberation package in Ubuntu: New Status in fonts-liberation2 package in Ubuntu: New Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in fonts-liberation package in Debian: New Status in fonts-liberation2 package in Debian: New Bug description: Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package includes fonts "Liberation Sans" (etc "Liberation") with sligtly shrinked font metrics. This issue leads to all office documents typed in Liberation Sans fonts have corrupted formatting in Ubuntu 18.04 (but these documents correctly opened in other OS's, for example Ubuntu 17.10). Documents with corrupted formatting can not print properly: all paragraphs are shifted up, embedded tables in text - splitted on page breaks. Document circulation in system based on Ubuntu 18.04 operating systems temporarily paralized, because Liberation fonts are basic fonts for open-source document circulation. In attachment I have type a example office document with 2 pages and enumerated strings. On normal ordinary conditions this document have 54 strings on first page and 54 string on second page. But if this document open in Ubuntu 18.04, it's found than 5 strings from second page moves to first page. Compare font versions embedded with Ubuntu packages we can see that versions are different (sudo apr search fonts-liberation* command): Ubuntu 17.10 - 1:1.07.4-2, 2.00.1-3 Ubuntu 18.04 - 1:1.07.4-5, 2.00.1-5 I have create a bug 117411 "Font metrics slightly changed after update OS to Ubuntu 18.04", see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117411, but I think that this bug concerns a Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-liberation/+bug/1769654/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1765389] Re: [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch
** Description changed: - There is an issue with revert-prce2.patch of vte2.91. It includes some unrelated reverts which - are changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to vanilla upstream. + [Impact] - Test-Build: - https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra + * revert-prce2.patch includes some unrelated reverts which are +changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to +vanilla upstream. Therefore projects using this binding will +require distro-patching to accommodate for that. +Users of vte-2.91.vapi and Vte-2.91.gir/typelib are such candidates. + * vte-2.91.vapi is a buildtime dependency + * Vte-2.91.typelib is a runtime dependency with immediate effect on users. + + [Test Case] + + * + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+attachment/5122590/+files/vte-2.91.vapi.diff + shows the current unwanted changes of the vala bindings + + [Regression Potential] + + * This change breaks the API of vala bindings and the API/ABI of +Vte-2.91.typelib + * Packages using this specific API would have already received +distro-patches which should be dropped. + * I am currently not aware of such packages in the archive. + + [Other Info] + + * Test-Build: https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765389 Title: [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in vte2.91 source package in Bionic: Triaged Bug description: [Impact] * revert-prce2.patch includes some unrelated reverts which are changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to vanilla upstream. Therefore projects using this binding will require distro-patching to accommodate for that. Users of vte-2.91.vapi and Vte-2.91.gir/typelib are such candidates. * vte-2.91.vapi is a buildtime dependency * Vte-2.91.typelib is a runtime dependency with immediate effect on users. [Test Case] * https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+attachment/5122590/+files/vte-2.91.vapi.diff shows the current unwanted changes of the vala bindings [Regression Potential] * This change breaks the API of vala bindings and the API/ABI of Vte-2.91.typelib * Packages using this specific API would have already received distro-patches which should be dropped. * I am currently not aware of such packages in the archive. [Other Info] * Test-Build: https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1748437] Re: libreoffice-l10n 6.0.0 missing files [ppa fresh]
Rebuilds are on there way. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/49528/ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115567 ** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #115567 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115567 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748437 Title: libreoffice-l10n 6.0.0 missing files [ppa fresh] Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Libreoffice is missing a lot of translations with the update to 6.0 If found the problem to be in "libreoffice-l10n - 1:6.0.0~rc3-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo0" The language deb "libreoffice-l10n-es_6.0.0~rc3-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo0_all.deb" is missing all the translation files (and comparing the size of the rest of debs with 5.4.4 l10n-es is not alone in this problem) In https://translations.documentfoundation.org (Pootle) the translation is finished and using the snap candidate (snap install --candidate libreoffice) l10n-es works ok Links: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=xenial https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/8771810 /+listing-archive-extra https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=superseded&field.series_filter=xenial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1748437/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1751005] Re: libreoffice cannot open a document not within $HOME
Eventually those apparmor changes will hit the backported PPA builds too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751005 Title: libreoffice cannot open a document not within $HOME Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Opinion Bug description: Starting with today's update to LibreOffice 5.4.5.1 40m0(Build:1), files not within the user $HOME directory cannot be opened. This has nothing to do with ownership or permissions - the target document is owned by the user with full permissions. Moving the file to ~/Desktop allows it to be opened normally. Error message in popup window: Access to /home2/mico/documents/personal/2018 lists.ods was denied. Error message when launched from terminal: $: localc "2018 lists.ods" javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common is installed. If it is already installed then try removing ~/.libreoffice/3/user/config/javasettings_Linux_*.xml Warning: failed to read path from javaldx The file mentioned in the error message does not exist. I removed the corresponding file under ~/.libreoffice/4/ but that makes no difference. This but started in Ubuntu 18.04 (alpha) around Feb. 15, and with today's update (Feb. 22) it appeared in Ubuntu 17.10. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: libreoffice-core 1:5.4.5-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-36.40-generic 4.13.13 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-36-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Feb 22 09:35:49 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-01-27 (25 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20180105.1) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1751005/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1748895] Re: LO unable to find a working email configuration
Please try to unset your email-client inside of libreoffice settings, and rely on the system-wide setting which can be made in e.g. gnome- control-center -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748895 Title: LO unable to find a working email configuration Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Installed from PPA: ppa:libreoffice/ppa $ lsb_release -a LSB Version: core-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-amd64:core-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-noarch:printing-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-amd64:printing-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-noarch:security-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-amd64:security-9.20160110ubuntu0.2-noarch Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial $ apt-cache policy libreoffice libreoffice: Installed: 1:6.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo1 Candidate: 1:6.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo1 Version table: *** 1:6.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo1 500 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/ppa/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:5.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~xenial2 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates/universe amd64 Packages 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/universe amd64 Packages 1:5.1.2-0ubuntu1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages WHAT YOU EXPECT TO HAPPEN: Should spawn an new Evolution eMAIL with attached ODF document WHAT HAPPENED INSTEAD: Error Dialogue: LibreOffice is unable to find a working email configuration. Please save your document locally and attached from within your eMAIL client. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1748895/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1471949] Re: Firefox 39 crashes on startup or within a few seconds on Precise/x86
** Branch unlinked: lp:firefox -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471949 Title: Firefox 39 crashes on startup or within a few seconds on Precise/x86 Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in gcc-4.8 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in gcc-mozilla package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in firefox source package in Precise: Fix Released Status in gcc-mozilla source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in firefox source package in Trusty: New Status in gcc-4.8 source package in Trusty: New Bug description: This is blocking publication of Firefox 39. The build for x86 on 12.04 currently crashes on startup, or within a few seconds of startup. It's basically unusable. An example crash report is: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/d0d97dbb-f6bc- 4e4d-88ff-e5fff2150702. Unfortunately, despite the warning in the PPA description for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa, ordinary users are still installing pre-release packages from it. It works on all other releases and on Precise/x86-64. I did test Firefox 39 with this toolchain when it was still the nightly version whilst preparing the switch to GCC 4.8, and it worked fine. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1471949/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1765389] [NEW] [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch
Public bug reported: There is an issue with revert-prce2.patch of vte2.91. It includes some unrelated reverts which are changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to vanilla upstream. Test-Build: https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra ** Affects: vte2.91 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "vte2.91_0.52.1-1ubuntu1_0.52.1-1ubuntu2.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765389/+attachment/5122589/+files/vte2.91_0.52.1-1ubuntu1_0.52.1-1ubuntu2.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765389 Title: [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: There is an issue with revert-prce2.patch of vte2.91. It includes some unrelated reverts which are changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to vanilla upstream. Test-Build: https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1765389] Re: [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch
** Patch added: "Vala binding difference caused by current g-i annotation reverts" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+attachment/5122590/+files/vte-2.91.vapi.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765389 Title: [FFe] Drop unrelated changes from revert-prce2.patch Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: There is an issue with revert-prce2.patch of vte2.91. It includes some unrelated reverts which are changing the gir/vapi API in unnecessary ways compared to vanilla upstream. Test-Build: https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/8991295/+listing-archive-extra To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1765389/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1814562] [NEW] Update to new upstream 1.0.2
Public bug reported: There is a new upstream release which fixes issues with valac 0.43/44 https://launchpad.net/zeitgeist/+milestone/1.0.2 2018-01-31: Zeitgeist 1.0.2 "Phoenix" --- Overall: - Fix compile errors and warnings with new vala - fts: Correctly implement the org.gnome.zeitgeist.Index DBus interface - test-log: Use correct free function for ZeitgeistResultSet - Do not require rapper as it is not used anymore - Make ontology2code work with python3 - Properly fallback with the Zeitgeist version - rdflib directly to parse the trig files - Update Ontology2code to ba able to specify the output path Libzeitgeist: - Asynchronous out-parameters are only allowed at the end of argument lists *** THIS IS AN UNAVOIDABLE VALA API BREAK *** ** Affects: zeitgeist (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to zeitgeist in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814562 Title: Update to new upstream 1.0.2 Status in zeitgeist package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: There is a new upstream release which fixes issues with valac 0.43/44 https://launchpad.net/zeitgeist/+milestone/1.0.2 2018-01-31: Zeitgeist 1.0.2 "Phoenix" --- Overall: - Fix compile errors and warnings with new vala - fts: Correctly implement the org.gnome.zeitgeist.Index DBus interface - test-log: Use correct free function for ZeitgeistResultSet - Do not require rapper as it is not used anymore - Make ontology2code work with python3 - Properly fallback with the Zeitgeist version - rdflib directly to parse the trig files - Update Ontology2code to ba able to specify the output path Libzeitgeist: - Asynchronous out-parameters are only allowed at the end of argument lists *** THIS IS AN UNAVOIDABLE VALA API BREAK *** To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeitgeist/+bug/1814562/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1772683] Re: [snap] Cannot sign a document, gpg keys are not listed
** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #118478 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118478 ** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118478 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772683 Title: [snap] Cannot sign a document, gpg keys are not listed Status in LibreOffice: Unknown Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: (initially reported on the forum: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t /libreoffice-snap-missing-features-and-known-bugs/3920/10) Libreoffice 6.0.4.2 (64, candidate channel). Steps to reproduce: 1) snap run libreoffice.writer 2) write something, then save the document (anywhere) on disk 3) Open the File menu, then Digital Signatures > Digital Signatures… 4) in the dialog, click "Sign Document…" Expected result: your GPG keys are listed Current result: no keys are listed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1772683/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1796625] [NEW] javascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev is missing /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/jsc/*
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1795901 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1795901 *** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: The backport of webkit2gtk-4.0 2.22.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 is faulty and provides an incomplete installation. /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/jsc/* is not installed with libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev as it is correctly done in 2.22.2-1ubuntu1 This causes build failure all over the place in bionic, like: /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/webkit2/WebKitJavascriptResult.h:28:10: fatal error: jsc/jsc.h: No such file or directory #include ^~~ ** Affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: webkit2gtk (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: The backport of webkit2gtk-4.0 2.22.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 is faulty and provides an incomplete installation. /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/jsc/* is not installed with libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev as it is correctly done in 2.22.2-1ubuntu1 + + This causes build failure all over the place in bionic, like: + + /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/webkit2/WebKitJavascriptResult.h:28:10: fatal error: jsc/jsc.h: No such file or directory + #include + ^~~ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to webkit2gtk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796625 Title: javascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev is missing /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/jsc/* Status in webkit2gtk package in Ubuntu: New Status in webkit2gtk package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: The backport of webkit2gtk-4.0 2.22.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 is faulty and provides an incomplete installation. /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/jsc/* is not installed with libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-dev as it is correctly done in 2.22.2-1ubuntu1 This causes build failure all over the place in bionic, like: /usr/include/webkitgtk-4.0/webkit2/WebKitJavascriptResult.h:28:10: fatal error: jsc/jsc.h: No such file or directory #include ^~~ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/1796625/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1780472] Re: After beta update all plugins are turned off and can't be turned on
The current builds of 62.0~b7+build1 in ppa:mozillateam/firefox-next will fix this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780472 Title: After beta update all plugins are turned off and can't be turned on Status in Mozilla Firefox: Unknown Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: After last beta update all plugins are turned off and can't be turned on. Also I can't install any new one from FF add-on page and get error that it can't be installed (pure error message about installation failure). Previous beta release works stable and no problem occurs. Please also see attached screenshot. Some more tech details: Application Basics -- Name: Firefox Version: 62.0b6 Build ID: 20180706070917 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0 OS: Linux 4.15.0-24-generic Multiprocess Windows: 2/2 (Enabled by default) Web Content Processes: 4/4 Enterprise Policies: Inactive Google Key: Found Mozilla Location Service Key: Missing Safe Mode: false Crash Reports for the Last 3 Days - All Crash Reports Firefox Features -- Extensions -- Name: Group Speed Dial Version: 9.7 Enabled: false ID: admin@fastaddons.com_GroupSpeedDial Name: HTTPS Everywhere Version: 2018.6.21 Enabled: false ID: https-everywhere-...@eff.org Name: Privacy Badger Version: 2018.5.10 Enabled: false ID: jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ@jetpack Name: uBlock Origin Version: 1.16.12 Enabled: false ID: ublo...@raymondhill.net Name: uGet Integration Version: 2.1.3.1 Enabled: false ID: uget-integration@slgobinath Security Software - Type: Type: Type: Graphics Features Compositing: Basic Asynchronous Pan/Zoom: wheel input enabled; scrollbar drag enabled; keyboard enabled; autoscroll enabled WebGL 1 Driver WSI Info: GLX 1.4 GLX_VENDOR(client): Mesa Project and SGI GLX_VENDOR(server): SGI Extensions: GLX_ARB_create_context GLX_ARB_create_context_profile GLX_ARB_create_context_robustness GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float GLX_ARB_framebuffer_sRGB GLX_ARB_get_proc_address GLX_ARB_multisample GLX_EXT_buffer_age GLX_EXT_create_context_es2_profile GLX_EXT_create_context_es_profile GLX_EXT_fbconfig_packed_float GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB GLX_EXT_import_context GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap GLX_EXT_visual_info GLX_EXT_visual_rating GLX_INTEL_swap_event GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer GLX_MESA_multithread_makecurrent GLX_MESA_query_renderer GLX_MESA_swap_control GLX_OML_swap_method GLX_OML_sync_control GLX_SGIS_multisample GLX_SGIX_fbconfig GLX_SGIX_pbuffer GLX_SGIX_visual_select_group GLX_SGI_make_current_read GLX_SGI_swap_control GLX_SGI_video_sync WebGL 1 Driver Renderer: Intel Open Source Technology Center -- Mesa DRI Intel(R) HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) WebGL 1 Driver Version: 3.0 Mesa 18.0.5 WebGL 1 Driver Extensions: GL_3DFX_texture_compression_FXT1 GL_AMD_conservative_depth GL_AMD_draw_buffers_blend GL_AMD_seamless_cubemap_per_texture GL_AMD_shader_trinary_minmax GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt3 GL_ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt5 GL_APPLE_object_purgeable GL_APPLE_packed_pixels GL_ARB_ES2_compatibility GL_ARB_ES3_compatibility GL_ARB_arrays_of_arrays GL_ARB_blend_func_extended GL_ARB_buffer_storage GL_ARB_clear_buffer_object GL_ARB_clear_texture GL_ARB_clip_control GL_ARB_color_buffer_float GL_ARB_compressed_texture_pixel_storage GL_ARB_compute_shader GL_ARB_conditional_render_inverted GL_ARB_conservative_depth GL_ARB_copy_buffer GL_ARB_copy_image GL_ARB_cull_distance GL_ARB_debug_output GL_ARB_depth_buffer_float GL_ARB_depth_clamp GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_derivative_control GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ARB_draw_buffers_blend GL_ARB_draw_elements_base_vertex GL_ARB_draw_instanced GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location GL_ARB_explicit_uniform_location GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_fragment_shader GL_ARB_framebuffer_no_attachments GL_ARB_framebuffer_object GL_ARB_framebuffer_sRGB GL_ARB_get_program_binary GL_ARB_get_texture_sub_image GL_ARB_half_float_pixel GL_ARB_half_float_vertex GL_ARB_instanced_arrays GL_ARB_internalformat_query GL_ARB_internalformat_query2 GL_ARB_invalidate_subdata GL_ARB_map_buffer_alignment GL_ARB_map_buffer_range GL_ARB_multi_bind GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_occlusion_query2 GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp GL_ARB_program_interface_query GL_ARB_provoking_vertex GL_ARB_query_buffer_object GL_ARB_robust_buffer_access_behavior GL_ARB_robustness GL_ARB_sample_shading GL_ARB_sampler_objects GL_ARB_se
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1780501] Re: Traceback calling Vte.Terminal.feed_child()
For reference https://lazka.github.io/pgi-
docs/#Vte-2.91/classes/Terminal.html#Vte.Terminal.feed_child
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780501
Title:
Traceback calling Vte.Terminal.feed_child()
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in vte2.91 source package in Bionic:
Triaged
Bug description:
I was upgrading from Bionic to Cosmic when I received a conffile
prompt regarding /etc/update-initramfs/initramfs.conf, I clicked keep
and then saw this Traceback:
Original exception was:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/cosmic", line 8, in
sys.exit(main())
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeMain.py", line
238, in main
if app.run():
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py",
line 1949, in run
return self.fullUpgrade()
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py",
line 1912, in fullUpgrade
if not self.doDistUpgrade():
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py",
line 1248, in doDistUpgrade
res = self.cache.commit(fprogress,iprogress)
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeCache.py", line
293, in commit
apt.Cache.commit(self, fprogress, iprogress)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 606, in commit
pm = apt_pkg.PackageManager(self._depcache)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 569, in
install_archives
# compat with older API
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeView.py", line
229, in run
res = os.WEXITSTATUS(self.wait_child())
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewGtk3.py",
line 340, in wait_child
self.update_interface()
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewGtk3.py",
line 347, in update_interface
InstallProgress.update_interface(self)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/progress/base.py", line 252, in
update_interface
if err.errno != errno.EAGAIN and err.errno != errno.EWOULDBLOCK:
File
"/tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-filpk342/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewGtk3.py",
line 276, in conffile
self.term.feed_child("n\n", -1)
TypeError: Vte.Terminal.feed_child() takes exactly 2 arguments (3 given)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1780501/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1725238] Re: Clicking snap:// urls doesn't work
The current firefox - 57.0~b12+build2-0ubuntu0.*.*.1 packages include this patch now. https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next/+packages ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725238 Title: Clicking snap:// urls doesn't work Status in Mozilla Firefox: Fix Released Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I am unable to trigger GNOME Software to install snaps. Steps to reproduce: 1. Visit http://snapcraft.io/zzt 2. Click green Install button 3. Browser is taken to snap://zzt Outcome:- "The address wasn't understood" error page in Firefox Expected outcome:- GNOME Software launches directly on the ZZT snap app page. Here's a video showing it:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOaGt8W2zrY ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: firefox 56.0+build6-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: alan 2350 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: alan 2350 F pulseaudio BuildID: 20171003222101 Channel: Unavailable CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Oct 20 12:06:27 2017 Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing ForcedLayersAccel: False IfupdownConfig: # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite) InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-08-02 (78 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170712) Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing PrefSources: prefs.js Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=56.0/20171003222101 (In use) RunningIncompatibleAddons: False SourcePackage: firefox Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 09/13/2017 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: JBET66WW (1.30 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: 20BV001BUK dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: 0B98417 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrJBET66WW(1.30):bd09/13/2017:svnLENOVO:pn20BV001BUK:pvrThinkPadT450:rvnLENOVO:rn20BV001BUK:rvr0B98417WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T450 dmi.product.name: 20BV001BUK dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T450 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1725238/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1769654] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics
@sil2100 , @osomon : Backported packages should not have a higher version than their original source. 2.00.1-7ubuntu0.18.04.1 > 2.00.1-7 This breaks the upgrade path. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-liberation in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769654 Title: Ubuntu 18.04 embedded fonts Liberation have corrupted metrics Status in fonts-liberation package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in fonts-liberation2 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in fonts-liberation source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in fonts-liberation2 source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in libreoffice source package in Bionic: Confirmed Status in fonts-liberation package in Debian: Fix Released Status in fonts-liberation2 package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] fonts-liberation and fonts-liberation2 in bionic have skewed font metrics. This is causing visible formatting issues in any program rendering text using those fonts, most notably libreoffice (recent versions fail to build because some unit tests that check the rendered layout fail). This was fixed in debian and synced in cosmic (https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-liberation/blob/master/debian/patches/unset_OS2_UseTypoMetrics.patch). Backporting to bionic is a prerequisite to backporting a recent version of libreoffice (6.0.6, bug #1785679). [Test Case] See original description (at the bottom of the description) for example text documents and their expected layout when opened in libreoffice. A good test case is whether libreoffice 6.0.6 builds successfully (all unit tests pass - some unit tests exercise text layout and they fail with the broken version of fonts-liberation2). [Regression Potential] Rendering of text across a variety of programs (especially word processors and web browsers) should be checked to ensure that this doesn't introduce regressions. [Other Info] This is backported straight from Debian, no Ubuntu-specific modifications. [Original description] Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package includes fonts "Liberation Sans" (etc "Liberation") with sligtly shrinked font metrics. This issue leads to all office documents typed in Liberation Sans fonts have corrupted formatting in Ubuntu 18.04 (but these documents correctly opened in other OS's, for example Ubuntu 17.10). Documents with corrupted formatting can not print properly: all paragraphs are shifted up, embedded tables in text - splitted on page breaks. Document circulation in system based on Ubuntu 18.04 operating systems temporarily paralized, because Liberation fonts are basic fonts for open-source document circulation. In attachment I have type a example office document with 2 pages and enumerated strings. On normal ordinary conditions this document have 54 strings on first page and 54 string on second page. But if this document open in Ubuntu 18.04, it's found than 5 strings from second page moves to first page. Compare font versions embedded with Ubuntu packages we can see that versions are different (sudo apr search fonts-liberation* command): Ubuntu 17.10 - 1:1.07.4-2, 2.00.1-3 Ubuntu 18.04 - 1:1.07.4-5, 2.00.1-5 I have create a bug 117411 "Font metrics slightly changed after update OS to Ubuntu 18.04", see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117411, but I think that this bug concerns a Ubuntu/Xubuntu 18.04 package. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-liberation/+bug/1769654/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1077233] [NEW] Sync libcroco 0.6.8-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync libcroco 0.6.8-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current raring version 0.6.6-1: libcroco (0.6.8-1) experimental; urgency=low * Team upload * New upstream release -- Simon McVittie Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:08:40 + ** Affects: libcroco (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libcroco in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077233 Title: Sync libcroco 0.6.8-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Status in “libcroco” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync libcroco 0.6.8-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current raring version 0.6.6-1: libcroco (0.6.8-1) experimental; urgency=low * Team upload * New upstream release -- Simon McVittie Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:08:40 + To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcroco/+bug/1077233/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1056819] Re: There is no libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386 in the xorg-edgers PPA
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386/amd64 are available and can be both installed ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056819 Title: There is no libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386 in the xorg-edgers PPA Status in “xorg” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: There is a bug in the Radeon r300 DRI drivers (r300_dri.so) in the :i386 version. I first filed a bug report in here http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31800, but the Wine guys pointed out that the problem is driver related and has to be fixed upstream. The problem is that I cannot file a meaningful bug report to freedesktop.org without debug symbols. There is a libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg and a libgl1-mesa-dri:i386, but for the latter there is not package containing the debug symbols available: There is no libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386 package, defeating the purpose of the xorg-edgers PPA. (Since there seems to be no way to file a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers, I've reported my issue here. Please do not close the bug report without further instructions how to report a bug at the very PPA in question!) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1056819/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1003286] [NEW] dbus unity launcherentry.updates aren't getting dismissed
Public bug reported:
After first triggering launcherentry.updates a added urgency timeout
never gets dismissed and continuously firing updates from now on.
g_timeout_add_seconds (2, (GSourceFunc)
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency,
entry);
static void
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency (UnityLauncherEntry *entry)
{
g_return_if_fail (entry);
unity_launcher_entry_set_urgent (entry, FALSE);
}
** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Didier Roche (didrocks)
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003286
Title:
dbus unity launcherentry.updates aren't getting dismissed
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
After first triggering launcherentry.updates a added urgency timeout
never gets dismissed and continuously firing updates from now on.
g_timeout_add_seconds (2, (GSourceFunc)
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency,
entry);
static void
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency (UnityLauncherEntry *entry)
{
g_return_if_fail (entry);
unity_launcher_entry_set_urgent (entry, FALSE);
}
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1003286/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1057128] Re: gdm fails to start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1056936 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056936 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1056936 [FFE] GDM 3.6.0 won't start without gnome-session 3.6.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057128 Title: gdm fails to start Status in “gdm” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After an update, i put gdm as a display manager on the next boot, i have a freezing black screen ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-15.23-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-15-generic i686 .tmp.unity.support.test.1: ApportVersion: 2.5.2-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Wed Sep 26 20:58:57 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: vboxhost, 4.2.0, 3.5.0-15-generic, i686: installed ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Dell Latitude D630 [1028:01f9] Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:01f9] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha i386 (20120612) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D630 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-15-generic root=UUID=7fb143a5-9e03-4546-a9e9-17732a3ee1a9 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display Title: Xorg crash UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 07/14/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A16 dmi.board.name: 0KU184 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA16:bd07/14/2009:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD630:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0KU184:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude D630 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8.2+bzr3377-0ubuntu1 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.39-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0~git20120917.7cfd42ce-0ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0~git20120917.7cfd42ce-0ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120913.8637f772-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.8-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1057128/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1042052] Re: gnome keyring auto-login failure
I uploaded an update realizing this symlink. Thanks https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+sourcepub/2623003 /+listing-archive-extra ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042052 Title: gnome keyring auto-login failure Status in “gdm” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: This bug report is against gdm 3.5.90 from ricotz/staging ppa I think the lack of auto keyring login is just due to a missing pam profile. ln -s /etc/pam.d/gdm /etc/pam.d/gdm-password This will fix the keyring auto-login. I am not sure if the gdm profile is used anymore, of if it should be different to gdm-password. But currently it seems from the logs that gdm runs the auto-login profile (via gdm-launch-environment) and then tries to run the gdm-password profile. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1042052/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1041998] Re: gdm fails on initial boot, due to broken initial VT switching.
Thanks for looking into it!
I pushed a new snapshot including the upstream changes
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+sourcepub/2623986
/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041998
Title:
gdm fails on initial boot, due to broken initial VT switching.
Status in GDM: The Gnome Display Manager:
Fix Released
Status in “gdm” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
This bug report is against the gdm 3.5.90 package off ricotz/staging
ppa.
On inital boot, gdm fails to load as it is trying to start on VT1.
This seems to be the issue that was previously fixed by the
"06_first_vt.patch".
Digging a bit into the gdm package, it is built with '--with-initial-
vt=7', however apparently this is never getting set.
From what I can tell, It would appear that the following code from
gdm_server_start(), fails to set 'vtarg' on that initial boot. (this
is what replaced the previous "06_first_vt.patch")
/* Hardcode the VT for the initial X server, but nothing else */
if (server->priv->is_initial
&& g_strcmp0 (server->priv->display_seat_id, "seat0") == 0) {
vtarg = "vt" GDM_INITIAL_VT;
}
after which vtarg = null, and gdm is spawned on the current vt1, rather than
vt7
As work around if I boot with lightdm, and then start gdm afterwards
then it loads correctly.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1041998/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1042495] Re: [FFe] gdm 3.5.90
@jbicha: Thanks for preparing this FFe, but i must admit it is a bit
irritating not mentioning where this package is coming from.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042495
Title:
[FFe] gdm 3.5.90
Status in “gdm” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
I'd like to upload GDM 3.5.90. The current version in the archives,
3.0 is rather dated and isn't really supported. Upstream has made
quite a few changes in the 3 release cycles since 3.0, and Debian is
shipping 3.4. GDM 3.5 will also be needed if we want to upgrade gnome-
shell past 3.5.4 as gnome-shell now hard-depends on APIs (for the new
lock screen mostly) which currently aren't satisfied by any other
display manager.
I considered uploading this before feature freeze but as there were
multiple high-priority bugs that needed fixed, I thought it would be
better to wait until those were resolved.
My plan is to upload to -proposed and wait to push it into the regular
archives after a few more people have verified that it works.
GDM NEWS
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdm/tree/NEWS
Debian Changelog up to 3.4
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/gdm3/current/changelog
And here's the Ubuntu-specific changelog. We're going to add a few
more git patches to fix some bugs.
gdm (3.5.90-0ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Sync with Debian. Remaining changes:
* debian/*:
- rename the package from gdm3 back to gdm
- comment out everything from debian/greeter.gsettings
to get the Gnome Shell experience
* debian/rules, debian/gdm.{postinst,postrm,init}:
- change back user/group from Debian-gdm to gdm
- update the lib name and gir path from libgdmgreeter to libgdm
- update pam profile name after the upstream rename of
gdm-welcome to gdm-launch-environment
- symlink gdm-password pam profile to gdm (LP: #1042052)
* debian/gdm.install:
- don't install debian/Xsession, prefer the upstream version
* debian/rules:
- drop --with-selinux (unrecognized options) and --with-pam-domain
(unknown without 10_gdm_pam.patch - dropped below)
- add --with-initial-vt=7 (see 06_first_vt.patch)
- add --without-systemdsystemunitdir
- add --with-consolekit-directory
* debian/control*:
- update to Standards-Version 3.9.3, no additional changes needed.
- add libplymouth-dev to build-depends
* debian/patches/*:
- 04_reload_config.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 05_debug_xserver_core.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 06_first_vt.patch: dropped, replaced with --with-initial-vt=7
- 07_libexec-paths.patch: updated
- 08_frequent-users_greeter.patch: updated
- 09_default_session.patch: updated
- 10_gdm_pam.patch: dropped
- 16_xserver_path.patch: dropped
- 17_switch_on_finish.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 18_parametrize_create_display.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 19_static_transient_display.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 20_switch_kill_greeter.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 21_static_display_purge.patch: dropped
- 22_noconsole.patch: updated
- 23_start_polkit.patch: dropped, applied in new version
- 91_shell_version_control.patch: dropped
- 92_gsettings_path.patch: dropped
- 93_private_lib.patch: updated
* Merge changes from Ubuntu 3.0.4-0ubuntu16:
- add debian/gdm.upstart (updated to run the main binary, and
update the dconf profile)
- add debian/gdm.preinst
- add debian/{xterm,xsession}.desktop
- merge debian/{gdm,gdm-autologin}.pam
- merge debian/gdm.config tweak for lightdm
- merge debian/gdm.init changes
- debian/patches:
- add ubuntu_run_xsession.d.patch
- add ubuntu_dont_catch_sigsegv.patch (updated)
- add ubuntu_upstart_event.patch
- add ubuntu_no_debug.patch
- add ubuntu_xresources_is_a_dir.patch
- add ubuntu_no_LANG_setting_in_Xsession.patch (updated)
- drop ubuntu_plymouth.patch (upstream)
* TODO: the following Ubuntu patches need to be ported:
- 30_don_t_save_failsafe_session.patch
- 33-multi-keyboard-layouts.patch
- 42_no_ecryptfs_autologin.patch
- ubuntu_guest_session.patch
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1042495/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1045302] Re: [ppa] LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 in stable ppa
3.6.1~rc2 is identical to the 3.6.1 release, which made it not necessary to rename and rebuild it again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045302 Title: [ppa] LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 in stable ppa Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: hi firstly thanks a lot to you for providing us with the most actual version of Libre office. But, some user rely to find only stable versions of this programm in https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa Now we happen to find a RC2 there ? I now from the project page that there is realy no such a great difference. Some of us are still interested to help testing this a believe to find a RC only in: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-prereleases We would be happy to have a clarification of this. Thanks in advance for helping to make Ubuntu better every day! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1045302/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1045433] Re: libreoffice does not install on ubuntu 10.04
Please use the stable ppa for the 3.5 series: ppa:libreoffice/libreoffice-3-5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045433 Title: libreoffice does not install on ubuntu 10.04 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: after some recent updates libreoffice has disappeared from my Ubuntu 10.04 system, and cannot be reinstalled. this is from the terminal response, it says unmet dependencies and/or broken packages: ~$ sudo apt-get -f install libreoffice Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut Status-Informationen einlesen... Fertig Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder dass, wenn Sie die Unstable-Distribution verwenden, einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben. Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: Die folgenden Pakete haben nicht-erfüllte Abhängigkeiten: libreoffice: Hängt ab: libreoffice-core (= 1:3.5.4-0ubuntu1~lucid1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-writer soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-calc soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-impress soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-draw soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-math soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-base soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-filter-mobiledev soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab: libreoffice-java-common (>= 1:3.5.4~) soll aber nicht installiert werden E: Kaputte Pakete To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1045433/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1045302] Re: [ppa] LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 in stable ppa
At least precise is suppose to get a backport of 3.6.x in this ppa. But currently there is no ETA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045302 Title: [ppa] LibreOffice 3.6.1 RC2 in stable ppa Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: hi firstly thanks a lot to you for providing us with the most actual version of Libre office. But, some user rely to find only stable versions of this programm in https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa Now we happen to find a RC2 there ? I now from the project page that there is realy no such a great difference. Some of us are still interested to help testing this a believe to find a RC only in: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-prereleases We would be happy to have a clarification of this. Thanks in advance for helping to make Ubuntu better every day! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1045302/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1003286] Re: dbus unity launcherentry.updates aren't getting dismissed
@Didier: This fix isn't working. The return type of the
"progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency" is still void and should be
bool.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003286
Title:
dbus unity launcherentry.updates aren't getting dismissed
Status in Files:
Fix Committed
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Test Case]
1. install the version from -proposed
2. launch a copy of a big file
3. look at the dbus traffic and see that it's not sending the updates signal
once the copy is finished
[Regression Potential]
No regression at stake, the signal can just be still sent if the return FALSE
fails, which is unlikely.
After first triggering launcherentry.updates a added urgency timeout
never gets dismissed and continuously firing updates from now on.
g_timeout_add_seconds (2, (GSourceFunc)
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency,
entry);
static void
progress_ui_handler_disable_unity_urgency (UnityLauncherEntry *entry)
{
g_return_if_fail (entry);
unity_launcher_entry_set_urgent (entry, FALSE);
}
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pantheon-files/+bug/1003286/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1222823] Re: Libreoffice 'exceptions.ImportError object has no attribute 'with_traceback'"
@cpina: Libreoffice 4.1+ requires python 3.3 which isn't available on Precise/12.04. Therefore it isn't possible to provide the python3 bindings. So it is needed that plugins are python2 compatible to work. @bjoern: Feel free to correct me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222823 Title: Libreoffice 'exceptions.ImportError object has no attribute 'with_traceback'" Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite: Invalid Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This happens here in an Ubuntu 12.04 32 bit. It may happen to other versions but I haven't tried yet. When using Libreoffice 1:4.1.1-0ubuntu1~precise1 (Help - About LibreOffice shows Version: 4.1.1.2, Build ID: 410m0(Build:2) installed using the PPA libreoffice-4.1: when adding the attached extension it shows an error message such as: - : 'exceptions.ImportError' object has no attribute 'with_traceback', traceback follows /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/uno.py:334 in function _uno_import() ["%s (or '%s.%s' is unknown)" % (py_import_exc, name, x)] /usr/lib/python2.7/copy.py:60 in function () [from org.python.core import PyStringMap] /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/uno.py:268 in function _uno_import() [return _g_delegatee( name, *optargs, **kwargs )] /usr/lib/python2.7/decimal.py:139 in function () [import copy as _copy] /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/uno.py:268 in function _uno_import() [return _g_delegatee( name, *optargs, **kwargs )] /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/simplejson/__init__.py:109 in function () [from decimal import Decimal] /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/uno.py:268 in function _uno_import() [return _g_delegatee( name, *optargs, **kwargs )] /home/carles/.config/libreoffice/4/user/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lumd3lp.tmp_/Mendeley-1.10-dev3.oxt/Scripts/MendeleyDesktopAPI.py:17 in function () [try: import simplejson as json] /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonloader.py:103 in function getModuleFromUrl() [exec(codeobject, mod.__dict__)] /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonloader.py:149 in function writeRegistryInfo() [mod = self.getModuleFromUrl( locationUrl )] - Using Libreoffice 4.1 from libreoffice.org: works correctly. Editing the extension with this change: -except ImportError: import json +except: import json (it appears twice) Then it works correctly - not sure why. Let me know if you need some more information. Thank you, To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1222823/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1191025] Re: Thunderbird: New messages in sub-folders get counted
Not a plank bug. ** Changed in: pantheon-dock Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191025 Title: Thunderbird: New messages in sub-folders get counted Status in Pantheon Dock: Invalid Status in “thunderbird” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: When you start Thunderbird Pantheon-Dock properly shows how many messages you have in the inbox, but whenever a new email arrives it increments the number in the dock regardless of whether the message was for the inbox or a subfolder. Realistically it should not be incrementing the counter if the email did not belong to the inbox. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pantheon-dock/+bug/1191025/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1239169] Re: Nautilus quicklist includes erroneous entries related to file transactions
** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239169 Title: Nautilus quicklist includes erroneous entries related to file transactions Status in Plank: New Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: ## Description Sometimes the Nautilus quicklist will show items that shouldn't be there: As you can see in the screenshot there are file transaction entries in the quicklist of the launcher. That would give you the impression that a file transaction is in progress. In fact, however, there isn't. Clicking the "Show Copy Dialog" entry will display an empty window without window controls. The other entry doesn't do anything. ## Steps to reproduce What happens, as far as I can tell, is that these quicklist items will stick after completing a file transaction. So in order to reproduce this bug you will have to: 1. Make sure that Plank and Nautilus are running and that the Nautilus quicklist is displayed properly 2. Copy some files with Nautilus to another location in your file system. The quicklist should now have the extra entries. 3. After the file transaction is complete check back with the launcher and see if the entries are still there. ## Additional information ~$ policy plank plank: Installed: 0.3.0+bzr904-0ubuntu1~12.04~ricotz1 Candidate: 0.3.0+bzr904-0ubuntu1~12.04~ricotz1 $ policy nautilus nautilus: Installed: 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu8 Candidate: 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu8 $ policy openbox openbox: Installed: 3.5.0-8~precise Candidate: 3.5.0-8~precise $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Release: 12.04 $ uname -a Linux UBN 3.8.0-31-generic #46~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 11 18:21:16 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/plank/+bug/1239169/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1229407] [NEW] FFe: Sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Update leading to the 1.2.0 release which is targetted for saucy. Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.1.4-1: gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.1.90-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release candidate: + debian/rules, debian/build-deps.in: - Build-depend on GStreamer >= 1.1.90. + debian/libgstreamer-plugins-base.symbols: - Add new symbols. -- Sebastian Dröge Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:42:47 +0200 ** Affects: gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-base1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229407 Title: FFe: Sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Status in “gst-plugins-base1.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Update leading to the 1.2.0 release which is targetted for saucy. Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.1.4-1: gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.1.90-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release candidate: + debian/rules, debian/build-deps.in: - Build-depend on GStreamer >= 1.1.90. + debian/libgstreamer-plugins-base.symbols: - Add new symbols. -- Sebastian Dröge Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:42:47 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-base1.0/+bug/1229407/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1229406] [NEW] FFe: Sync gstreamer1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gstreamer1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Update leading to the 1.2.0 release which is targetted for saucy. Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.1.4-1: gstreamer1.0 (1.1.90-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release candidate: + debian/libgstreamer.symbols: - Add new symbols. -- Sebastian Dröge Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:39:40 +0200 ** Affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229406 Title: FFe: Sync gstreamer1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Status in “gstreamer1.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gstreamer1.0 1.1.90-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Update leading to the 1.2.0 release which is targetted for saucy. Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.1.4-1: gstreamer1.0 (1.1.90-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release candidate: + debian/libgstreamer.symbols: - Add new symbols. -- Sebastian Dröge Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:39:40 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1229406/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1231359] [NEW] Sync gnome-common 3.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gnome-common 3.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 3.7.4-1: gnome-common (3.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. - Use autoreconf instead of running the individual tools manually. This also means gnome-autogen.sh no longer fails with newer automake versions. Closes: #722231 * Drop debian/patches/02_autogen_required_versions.patch, it no longer applies and the minimum required versions are available since a very long time now. * Wrap dependencies. -- Michael Biebl Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:11:33 +0200 ** Affects: gnome-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-common in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231359 Title: Sync gnome-common 3.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in “gnome-common” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gnome-common 3.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 3.7.4-1: gnome-common (3.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. - Use autoreconf instead of running the individual tools manually. This also means gnome-autogen.sh no longer fails with newer automake versions. Closes: #722231 * Drop debian/patches/02_autogen_required_versions.patch, it no longer applies and the minimum required versions are available since a very long time now. * Wrap dependencies. -- Michael Biebl Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:11:33 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-common/+bug/1231359/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1231367] [NEW] Sync at-spi2-atk 2.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync at-spi2-atk 2.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: There are no ubuntu specific changes. Changelog entries since current saucy version 2.10.0-0ubuntu1: at-spi2-atk (2.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Luke Yelavich ] * New upstream release * Bump libatspi build depend to >= 2.9.90 * Bump libatk-dev build dependency to >= 2.9.4 -- Samuel Thibault Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:06 +0200 ** Affects: at-spi2-atk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to at-spi2-atk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231367 Title: Sync at-spi2-atk 2.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in “at-spi2-atk” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync at-spi2-atk 2.10.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: There are no ubuntu specific changes. Changelog entries since current saucy version 2.10.0-0ubuntu1: at-spi2-atk (2.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Luke Yelavich ] * New upstream release * Bump libatspi build depend to >= 2.9.90 * Bump libatk-dev build dependency to >= 2.9.4 -- Samuel Thibault Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:06 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi2-atk/+bug/1231367/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1200164] [NEW] Sync mdds 0.8.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync mdds 0.8.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 0.7.1-3: mdds (0.8.1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:55 +0200 mdds (0.8.0-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 09 May 2013 22:17:38 +0200 ** Affects: mdds (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mdds in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200164 Title: Sync mdds 0.8.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Status in “mdds” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync mdds 0.8.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 0.7.1-3: mdds (0.8.1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:55 +0200 mdds (0.8.0-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 09 May 2013 22:17:38 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdds/+bug/1200164/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1260604] Re: GDM does not work with new accountsservice 0.6.35-0ubuntu5
** Patch added: "lp1260604.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1260604/+attachment/3928776/+files/lp1260604.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1260604 Title: GDM does not work with new accountsservice 0.6.35-0ubuntu5 Status in “accountsservice” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Gdm does not work with the latest accountsservice versions 0.6.35-0ubuntu3 - 0.6.35-0ubuntu5. Actually the X will not start and there is no login screen available, only black screen. Login from tty1 is of course possible, but startx will not work. I have tested this with gnome-shell and gdm with both trusty official versions and the versions in the Gnome3 Staging PPA (trusty branch). Also, I have tested this with ATI open source drivers and NVidia proprietary drivers. None of these work. Downgrading back to the version acoountsservice 0.6.35-0ubuntu2 helps and desktop is fine again. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1260604/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214343] [NEW] Sync gstreamer1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gstreamer1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.0.8-1: gstreamer1.0 (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Sebastian Dröge Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:46:36 +0200 ** Affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214343 Title: Sync gstreamer1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in “gstreamer1.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gstreamer1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.0.8-1: gstreamer1.0 (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Sebastian Dröge Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:46:36 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1214343/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1214344] [NEW] Sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.0.8-1: gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Sebastian Dröge Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:49:19 +0200 ** Affects: gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-base1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214344 Title: Sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Status in “gst-plugins-base1.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Please sync gst-plugins-base1.0 1.0.9-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current saucy version 1.0.8-1: gst-plugins-base1.0 (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream bugfix release. -- Sebastian Dröge Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:49:19 +0200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-base1.0/+bug/1214344/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1155576] Re: Sync mdds 0.7.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
** Changed in: mdds (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mdds in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155576 Title: Sync mdds 0.7.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Status in “mdds” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “mdds” source package in Raring: Won't Fix Status in “mdds” source package in Saucy: Fix Released Bug description: Please sync mdds 0.7.1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current raring version 0.6.1-1: mdds (0.7.1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:54:54 +0100 mdds (0.7.0-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:53:55 +0100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdds/+bug/1155576/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
