[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1547611] Re: Response from pinging broadcast address does not reflect the actual sender address.
After more than 2 Years registering this bug, not a single person Canonical care to take care of this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to iputils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547611 Title: Response from pinging broadcast address does not reflect the actual sender address. Status in iputils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: In Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop, when I ping the broadcast address (in my case the eth1 is 172.22.1.65/16): ping -Ieth1 -b 255.255.255.255 OR ping -b 172.22.255.255 The response from multiple host are NOT reflected properly. Intead the subsequent response are marked (DUP!) BUT stamped with the same address of the first received response. Ex: rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ ping -Ieth1 -bc2 255.255.255.255 WARNING: pinging broadcast address PING 255.255.255.255 (255.255.255.255) from 172.22.1.65 eth1: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.634 ms 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.647 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.648 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.83 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.566 ms From wireshark/tcpdump, I can confirmed that those 3 duplicates packets are coming from different hosts: 172.22.2.1, 172.22.0.10 (2 replies, not sure why, but not important in this case), and 172.22.1.65 (itself, I allow the node to answer broadcasted ping for this test). rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ sudo tcpdump -ni eth1 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 12:49:08.471063 IP 172.23.0.1.123 > 172.23.255.255.123: NTPv4, Broadcast, length 48 12:49:09.000925 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001424 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001437 IP 172.22.255.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.003996 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.004006 IP 172.22.2.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:10.001551 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002093 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002106 IP 172.22.255.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002107 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.003683 IP 172.22.2.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 The issue was NOT see in Ubuntu 12.04 Server. While those replies are marked (DUP!) HOWEVER the 'from' address are correct. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/1547611/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 24444] crazy stuff
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 148084 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Greetings! This stuff is actually crazy, you need to see that for sure! Just take a peek here http://www.nullix.net/driver.php?UE8yNDQ0NEBidWdzLmxhdW5jaHBhZC5uZXQ- Sincerely, goffredo torelli From: Bug 2 [mailto:24...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 5:57 AM To: torelli...@libero.it Subject: TIL: I'm a dad. AM: CeraVe Hydrating Cleanser (just switched from foaming) St Ives pads CeraVe in the tub Paula's Choice SPF 50 PM: Albolene for makeup/sunscreen removal CeraVe Hydrating cleanser St Ives pads Patch testing the newly released CeraVe serum CeraVe in the tub I'm 30. My skin has never been very breakout prone, but I've always had issues with dryness, and associated overproduction of oil. Until I started building my routine here I had no idea how sensitive my skin is. Previously, I was using the Clinique three step routine and it was much too harsh for my skin. Since starting this new routine the dryness and associated oiliness have been dramatically reduced. At this point, I think my main concerns is continuing to eliminate the dry/oily patches and getting my skin to a normal texture. I've already made progress but there's still a lot of room for improvement. Beyond that, I would love to continue preventing wrinkles. I'm very fair skinned so I've never spent much time without sunscreen but I also haven't been diligent about using it every day. Ultimate goal, I guess, is to end up an old lady with skin like my great grandmother. She was 99 when she died and she consistently looked 20 years younger than her age because she avoided the sun and took very good care of her skin. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "01AD5573CBF3DB4B.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2/+attachment/5006457/+files/01AD5573CBF3DB4B.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2 Title: file-roller : suggest program to install upon unrecognized format Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: If I try to open an unsupported archive format (eg RAR) with file-roller, an error just tells me that the RAR format in not supported. Thus, I might just think it is a missing feature in the program, although the solution (install the appropriate package) is pretty easy. Should't file-roller just provide a little more information in these error messages, maybe by suggesting which packages to install in order to be able to open the desired format ? I don't know how relevant this is, since it is basically distro-based (name of the packages... ?). Or a simpler solution : since zip/unzip, rar/unrar (nad maybe others) are fairly small packages, shouldn't file-roller just depend on them, so that you get a complete, full-featured tool for any format, out of the box ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 24444] ✈Re: hey! that was amazing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 148084 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Greetings, I've had an incredible weekend with my friends and family, therefore i just wanted to talk about this great memories together with you, just take a peek http://www.ferrumtrans.ru/admin456/tiny_mce/themes/advanced/boot.php?UE8yNDQ0NEBidWdzLmxhdW5jaHBhZC5uZXQ- See you soon, goffredo torelli From: Bug 2 [mailto:24...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:30 PM To: torelli...@libero.it Subject: Thank you My mom dropped off a cheeseburger today. I had hot chocolate yesterday. Turns out as hungry as my stomach was, my mouth wasn't. I'm also broke until Friday. I know I was supposed to paypal, but I got super broke, and I have to save a $5 just so I can get back and forth over the bridge. So many crap landlord stories, same as I've been told (I'll leave that for another day or never, I have vertigo I'm trying to calm). I know what you mean. I rarely turn on the heat as much as I do for fear of The Electric Bill. But I saw my cats trying to wear each other, and I was purple so I thought I'd indulge. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "95350BAC3EBCB5A9.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2/+attachment/4974015/+files/95350BAC3EBCB5A9.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2 Title: file-roller : suggest program to install upon unrecognized format Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: If I try to open an unsupported archive format (eg RAR) with file-roller, an error just tells me that the RAR format in not supported. Thus, I might just think it is a missing feature in the program, although the solution (install the appropriate package) is pretty easy. Should't file-roller just provide a little more information in these error messages, maybe by suggesting which packages to install in order to be able to open the desired format ? I don't know how relevant this is, since it is basically distro-based (name of the packages... ?). Or a simpler solution : since zip/unzip, rar/unrar (nad maybe others) are fairly small packages, shouldn't file-roller just depend on them, so that you get a complete, full-featured tool for any format, out of the box ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 148084] wow! suggestions
Greetings! I want your suggestions about my latest work so please read my article and inform me your opinion http://www.llevegratis.com/observer.php?UE8xNDgwODRAYnVncy5sYXVuY2hwYWQubmV0 Be well, goffredo torelli From: Bug 148084 [mailto:148...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 8:39 PM To: torelli...@libero.it Subject: such an inspiration! I say take it to the next level this year: 1. Weigh yourself immediately before and after, if possible. Get the weight of your poo each time and do the math at the end of the year. 2. Note the amount of tp squares you use and how many ply it is. Estimate how many rolls of tp you used at the end of the year. 3. Note the day/time of your poo, average when you're most likely to go throughout the day. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ** Attachment added: "71EDF063EDD73944.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084/+attachment/4967243/+files/71EDF063EDD73944.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Title: totem-like/firefox-like plugin installer for file-roller Status in File Roller: Fix Released Status in One Hundred Papercuts: Invalid Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: When opening an unsupported archive type using file roller, it would be better to tell the user that the archive type is not supported by his system and to provide him a list of package to be downloaded and installed automatically if he chooses to. This would help users who are trying to open rar, 7zip and so on archives. This would work the same way as when totem doesn't find a particular codec or firefox needs a plugin. This might require some work upstream too. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/148084/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 24444] Re: Can You Sleep Your Way Thin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 148084 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Hi, Listen carefully. This program is the real deal, true blue, no frills, down to earth transformation program - without all the hype. I know what it takes. I have the proof that it works. I know it will work for you. I'm NOT some 20 year old genetically blessed girl telling you how to get skinny. The truth is, I'm probably a lot more like you than you may think... read more here http://brucesteel.ca/treatment.php?1HfDnWRY3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2 Title: file-roller : suggest program to install upon unrecognized format Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: If I try to open an unsupported archive format (eg RAR) with file-roller, an error just tells me that the RAR format in not supported. Thus, I might just think it is a missing feature in the program, although the solution (install the appropriate package) is pretty easy. Should't file-roller just provide a little more information in these error messages, maybe by suggesting which packages to install in order to be able to open the desired format ? I don't know how relevant this is, since it is basically distro-based (name of the packages... ?). Or a simpler solution : since zip/unzip, rar/unrar (nad maybe others) are fairly small packages, shouldn't file-roller just depend on them, so that you get a complete, full-featured tool for any format, out of the box ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 24444] Snapchat adds multi-snap recording and Photoshop-style editing features
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 148084 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Dear! Snap today announced a pair of new Snapchat features that should make recording and editing new http://phpstack-271-11384-40518.cloudwaysapps.com/mightx.php?a0a1 Very truly yours, goffredo torelli ** Attachment added: "F3ED5AAE0D401CD5CD3324B4A43F60B2.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2/+attachment/4917831/+files/F3ED5AAE0D401CD5CD3324B4A43F60B2.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2 Title: file-roller : suggest program to install upon unrecognized format Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: If I try to open an unsupported archive format (eg RAR) with file-roller, an error just tells me that the RAR format in not supported. Thus, I might just think it is a missing feature in the program, although the solution (install the appropriate package) is pretty easy. Should't file-roller just provide a little more information in these error messages, maybe by suggesting which packages to install in order to be able to open the desired format ? I don't know how relevant this is, since it is basically distro-based (name of the packages... ?). Or a simpler solution : since zip/unzip, rar/unrar (nad maybe others) are fairly small packages, shouldn't file-roller just depend on them, so that you get a complete, full-featured tool for any format, out of the box ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 148084] Re: Saudis release woman arrested after viral miniskirt video
Dear friend! DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Saudi Arabia announced on Wednesday that a woman who was detained http://www.woozzle.com/spiritx.php?4a4b Yours truly, goffredo torelli From: Bug 148084 [mailto:148...@bugs.launchpad.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 5:36 PM To: torelli...@libero.it Subject: Snow-plow chin I'm a full time student at the moment. This last quarter I had a lot of files on google drive and the website my school used for grades/professor communication and assignments. So I'd like something like a tablet to be able to organize all that stuff on while being able to make stuff like power points or record lectures. I use a google calender that I update frequently so having a tablet would help instead of the much smaller screen on my LG G2 phone. I don't draw a lot, never have done it on a tablet before but I suppose I could give it a shot. /u/anon2lol could show me the stuff he does. As for gaming, I wouldn't really care much since I have this rig for it at the moment. I'd rather just netflix or whatever. [](/ajshrug) ** Attachment added: "D2EF6D7BFD3400F897B4E6DAAD39ECD5.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084/+attachment/4917832/+files/D2EF6D7BFD3400F897B4E6DAAD39ECD5.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148084 Title: totem-like/firefox-like plugin installer for file-roller Status in File Roller: Fix Released Status in One Hundred Papercuts: Invalid Status in file-roller package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: When opening an unsupported archive type using file roller, it would be better to tell the user that the archive type is not supported by his system and to provide him a list of package to be downloaded and installed automatically if he chooses to. This would help users who are trying to open rar, 7zip and so on archives. This would work the same way as when totem doesn't find a particular codec or firefox needs a plugin. This might require some work upstream too. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/148084/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1574096] [NEW] Asus's touchpad does't work
Public bug reported: in these pc touchpad doesn't work ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu8.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-59.65~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt19 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-59-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true Date: Sat Apr 23 21:33:21 2016 DistUpgraded: 2016-04-23 18:07:02,116 DEBUG failed to SystemUnLock() (E:Non bloccato) DistroCodename: wily DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Device [8086:191b] (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c5d] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c5d] InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-17 (65 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20150805) Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0a2a Intel Corp. Bus 001 Device 005: ID 045e:00e1 Microsoft Corp. Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 Reciever Bus 001 Device 002: ID 04f2:b424 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GL552VW ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=it PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-59-generic root=UUID=559bd433-509b-42a7-8e2e-179b5e7b0feb ro i8042.reset i8042.nomux i8042.nopnp i8042.noloop quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to wily on 2016-04-23 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 10/22/2015 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: GL552VW.213 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: GL552VW dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrGL552VW.213:bd10/22/2015:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnGL552VW:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnGL552VW:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: GL552VW dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+15.10.20151202-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.65+git20151026.c745e541-0ubuntu0ricotz~trusty version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri N/A version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A xserver.bootTime: Sat Apr 23 20:59:28 2016 xserver.configfile: default xserver.errors: xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log xserver.outputs: product id1135 vendor LGD xserver.version: 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3.1~trusty1 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 ubuntu wily -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574096 Title: Asus's touchpad does't work Status in xorg package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: in these pc touchpad doesn't work ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu8.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-59.65~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt19 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-59-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true Date: Sat Apr 23 21:33:21 2016 DistUpgraded: 2016-04-23 18:07:02,116 DEBUG failed to SystemUnLock() (E:Non bloccato) DistroCodename: wily DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Device [8086:191b] (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c5d] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1c5d] InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-17 (65 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta amd64 (20150805) Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0a2a Intel Corp. Bus 001 Device 005: ID 045e:00e1 Microsoft Corp. Wireless Laser
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1547611] [NEW] Response from pinging broadcast address does not reflect the actual sender address.
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop, when I ping the broadcast address (in my case the eth1 is 172.22.1.65/16): ping -Ieth1 -b 255.255.255.255 OR ping -b 172.22.255.255 The response from multiple host are NOT reflected properly. Intead the subsequent response are marked (DUP!) BUT stamped with the same address of the first received response. Ex: rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ ping -Ieth1 -bc2 255.255.255.255 WARNING: pinging broadcast address PING 255.255.255.255 (255.255.255.255) from 172.22.1.65 eth1: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.634 ms 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.647 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.648 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.83 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.566 ms >From wireshark/tcpdump, I can confirmed that those 3 duplicates packets are coming from different hosts: 172.22.2.1, 172.22.0.10 (2 replies, not sure why, but not important in this case), and 172.22.1.65 (itself, I allow the node to answer broadcasted ping for this test). rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ sudo tcpdump -ni eth1 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 12:49:08.471063 IP 172.23.0.1.123 > 172.23.255.255.123: NTPv4, Broadcast, length 48 12:49:09.000925 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001424 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001437 IP 172.22.255.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.003996 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.004006 IP 172.22.2.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:10.001551 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002093 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002106 IP 172.22.255.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002107 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.003683 IP 172.22.2.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 The issue was NOT see in Ubuntu 12.04 Server. While those replies are marked (DUP!) HOWEVER the 'from' address are correct. ** Affects: iputils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to iputils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547611 Title: Response from pinging broadcast address does not reflect the actual sender address. Status in iputils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: In Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop, when I ping the broadcast address (in my case the eth1 is 172.22.1.65/16): ping -Ieth1 -b 255.255.255.255 OR ping -b 172.22.255.255 The response from multiple host are NOT reflected properly. Intead the subsequent response are marked (DUP!) BUT stamped with the same address of the first received response. Ex: rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ ping -Ieth1 -bc2 255.255.255.255 WARNING: pinging broadcast address PING 255.255.255.255 (255.255.255.255) from 172.22.1.65 eth1: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.634 ms 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.647 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.648 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.83 ms (DUP!) 64 bytes from 172.22.0.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.566 ms From wireshark/tcpdump, I can confirmed that those 3 duplicates packets are coming from different hosts: 172.22.2.1, 172.22.0.10 (2 replies, not sure why, but not important in this case), and 172.22.1.65 (itself, I allow the node to answer broadcasted ping for this test). rtp-lab@wks65lnx:~$ sudo tcpdump -ni eth1 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 12:49:08.471063 IP 172.23.0.1.123 > 172.23.255.255.123: NTPv4, Broadcast, length 48 12:49:09.000925 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001424 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.001437 IP 172.22.255.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.003996 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:09.004006 IP 172.22.2.1 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 1, length 64 12:49:10.001551 IP 172.22.1.65 > 255.255.255.255: ICMP echo request, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002093 IP 172.22.0.10 > 172.22.1.65: ICMP echo reply, id 21934, seq 2, length 64 12:49:10.002106 IP 172.22.255.1 >
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1467583] [NEW] PROBLEM
Public bug reported: --- ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-21.21-generic 3.19.8 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Mon Jun 22 17:56:13 2015 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: vivid DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 6.30.223.248+bdcom, 3.19.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed bcmwl, 6.30.223.248+bdcom, 3.19.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed tp-smapi, 0.41, 3.19.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0116] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Apple Inc. Device [106b:00ea] InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-06-20 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 Vivid Vervet - Release amd64 (20150422) MachineType: Apple Inc. MacBookAir4,1 ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-21-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=69f19b32-45d5-4cae-a423-e9801940319b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg UdevLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/udev' UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/24/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.bios.version: MBA41.88Z.0077.B0F.1201241549 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag# dmi.board.name: Mac-C08A6BB70A942AC2 dmi.board.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.board.version: MacBookAir4,1 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.chassis.version: Mac-C08A6BB70A942AC2 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAppleInc.:bvrMBA41.88Z.0077.B0F.1201241549:bd01/24/2012:svnAppleInc.:pnMacBookAir4,1:pvr1.0:rvnAppleInc.:rnMac-C08A6BB70A942AC2:rvrMacBookAir4,1:cvnAppleInc.:ct10:cvrMac-C08A6BB70A942AC2: dmi.product.name: MacBookAir4,1 dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: Apple Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.1+15.04.20150410.1-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.60-2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.5.2-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.5.2-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.9.0-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.5.0-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917-1~exp1ubuntu2.2 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.11-1ubuntu2build1 xserver.bootTime: Mon Jun 22 17:41:56 2015 xserver.configfile: default xserver.errors: xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log xserver.outputs: product id 40179 vendor APP xserver.version: 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ubuntu vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467583 Title: PROBLEM Status in xorg package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: --- ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-21.21-generic 3.19.8 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1.1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Mon Jun 22 17:56:13 2015 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: vivid DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 6.30.223.248+bdcom, 3.19.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed bcmwl, 6.30.223.248+bdcom, 3.19.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed tp-smapi, 0.41, 3.19.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0116] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Apple Inc. Device [106b:00ea] InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-06-20 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 Vivid Vervet - Release amd64 (20150422) MachineType: Apple Inc. MacBookAir4,1 ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-21-generic.efi.signed root=UUID=69f19b32-45d5-4cae-a423-e9801940319b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg UdevLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/udev' UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/24/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.bios.version: MBA41.88Z.0077.B0F.1201241549 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag# dmi.board.name: Mac-C08A6BB70A942AC2 dmi.board.vendor: Apple Inc.
