[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1988488] Re: Screen freeze before the login screen (if the third party software option was selected)
This appears to be fixed in Daily (tested 10/15/22) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988488 Title: Screen freeze before the login screen (if the third party software option was selected) Status in GNOME Shell: New Status in gnome-shell package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: [ Workaround ] 1. Install *without* the third-party option. 2. sudo apt install ubuntu-restricted-extras 3. sudo apt remove gstreamer1.0-vaapi [ Original Description ] The problem started to appear 2 weeks ago after one of my daily updates. It also happens after I re-install the system from a freshly downloaded ISO file. The system freezes at the moment, it starts the gnome display manager. I file the bug-report after a partial upgrade just before I will reboot the system. If needed I can reboot in recovery mode, since the gnome display manager is not started in that case. I tried the continue button without effect and also "apt upgrade" and "apt dist-upgrade" do have the same effect I run the VM from the Host-OpenZFS file system, so I can restore to before the update. Recently I use a Virtualbox snapshot to restore the system to before the update/upgrade. If you need log files, let me know. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10 Package: systemd 251.4-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.23.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Sep 1 19:42:04 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-28 (96 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.10 "Kinetic Kudu" - Alpha amd64 (20220526) Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021 VirtualBox USB Tablet Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Lsusb-t: /: Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/6p, 5000M /: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=xhci_hcd/8p, 480M |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 12M MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-27-generic root=UUID=9eaf84b0-b69b-4760-80b5-310e3a258bda ro quiet splash RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: systemd UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.board.name: VirtualBox dmi.board.vendor: Oracle Corporation dmi.board.version: 1.2 dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Oracle Corporation dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2:rvnOracleCorporation:rnVirtualBox:rvr1.2:cvnOracleCorporation:ct1:cvr:sku: dmi.product.family: Virtual Machine dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1988488/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1825628] Re: Totem not playing some files correctly (sound but no video)
Suggest that this si a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer-vaapi/+bug/1784242 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825628 Title: Totem not playing some files correctly (sound but no video) Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: When played in Totem some videos will play sound but video output is a series of green and pink screens (see screenshot). Problem appeared following update to 19.04, all files played fine under previous releases. When run from the commandline Totem gives the following error. (totem:1601): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:03:46.890: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node slider owner GtkScale) See below mediainfo output for a non-working file: eneral Complete name: Bananas In Pyjamas The Christmas Tree.mp4 Format : MPEG-4 Format profile : Base Media Codec ID : isom (isom/iso2/avc1/mp41) File size: 74.2 MiB Duration : 12 min 0 s Overall bit rate : 865 kb/s Writing application : Lavf57.83.100 Video ID : 1 Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : High@L4 Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames Format settings, CABAC : Yes Format settings, ReFrames: 4 frames Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info: Advanced Video Coding Duration : 12 min 0 s Bit rate : 729 kb/s Width: 1 024 pixels Height : 576 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 25.000 FPS Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 Bit depth: 8 bits Scan type: Progressive Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.049 Stream size : 62.5 MiB (84%) Writing library : x264 core 157 Encoding settings: cabac=1 / ref=3 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=hex / subme=7 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=18 / lookahead_threads=3 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=1 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=40 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=22.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / vbv_maxrate=1404 / vbv_bufsize=3000 / crf_max=0.0 / nal_hrd=none / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00 Codec configuration box : avcC Audio ID : 2 Format : AAC LC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Low Complexity Codec ID : mp4a-40-2 Duration : 12 min 0 s Bit rate mode: Constant Bit rate : 128 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel layout : L R Sampling rate: 44.1 kHz Frame rate : 43.066 FPS (1024 SPF) Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 11.0 MiB (15%) Default : Yes Alternate group : 1 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04 Package: libgstreamer1.0-0 1.15.90-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6 Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Apr 20 19:56:58 2019 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-02-04 (75 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Release amd64 (20181017.3) SourcePackage: gstreamer1.0 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-19 (0 days ago) XorgLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/Xorg.0.log' To manage
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1825628] Re: Totem not playing some files correctly (sound but no video)
This fixed it immediately for me: sudo apt remove gstreamer1.0-vaapi Not sure why this is causing a problem, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825628 Title: Totem not playing some files correctly (sound but no video) Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: When played in Totem some videos will play sound but video output is a series of green and pink screens (see screenshot). Problem appeared following update to 19.04, all files played fine under previous releases. When run from the commandline Totem gives the following error. (totem:1601): Gtk-WARNING **: 20:03:46.890: Drawing a gadget with negative dimensions. Did you forget to allocate a size? (node slider owner GtkScale) See below mediainfo output for a non-working file: eneral Complete name: Bananas In Pyjamas The Christmas Tree.mp4 Format : MPEG-4 Format profile : Base Media Codec ID : isom (isom/iso2/avc1/mp41) File size: 74.2 MiB Duration : 12 min 0 s Overall bit rate : 865 kb/s Writing application : Lavf57.83.100 Video ID : 1 Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : High@L4 Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames Format settings, CABAC : Yes Format settings, ReFrames: 4 frames Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info: Advanced Video Coding Duration : 12 min 0 s Bit rate : 729 kb/s Width: 1 024 pixels Height : 576 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 25.000 FPS Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 Bit depth: 8 bits Scan type: Progressive Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.049 Stream size : 62.5 MiB (84%) Writing library : x264 core 157 Encoding settings: cabac=1 / ref=3 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=hex / subme=7 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=18 / lookahead_threads=3 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=3 / b_pyramid=2 / b_adapt=1 / b_bias=0 / direct=1 / weightb=1 / open_gop=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=250 / keyint_min=25 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=40 / rc=crf / mbtree=1 / crf=22.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / vbv_maxrate=1404 / vbv_bufsize=3000 / crf_max=0.0 / nal_hrd=none / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00 Codec configuration box : avcC Audio ID : 2 Format : AAC LC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Low Complexity Codec ID : mp4a-40-2 Duration : 12 min 0 s Bit rate mode: Constant Bit rate : 128 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel layout : L R Sampling rate: 44.1 kHz Frame rate : 43.066 FPS (1024 SPF) Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 11.0 MiB (15%) Default : Yes Alternate group : 1 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04 Package: libgstreamer1.0-0 1.15.90-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6 Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Apr 20 19:56:58 2019 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-02-04 (75 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Release amd64 (20181017.3) SourcePackage: gstreamer1.0 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-04-19 (0 days ago) XorgLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/Xorg.0.log' To
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1562875] Re: Totem can't play H264 on fresh 16.04 beta install
Mine broke on upgrade from 14.04 -> 15.10 -> 16.04 64 bit. I removed the multiverse repository, reloaded, added it back in, reloaded, then from the command line, reinstalled ubuntu-restricted-extras. For some reason, Synaptic wasn't installing anything. It just blinked and said all was well. I had to use apt-get to get it to do anything. May not be related to this bug, but I'm sharing just in case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1562875 Title: Totem can't play H264 on fresh 16.04 beta install Status in gstreamer1.0 package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Totem can't play neither find the correct codec to play H264 *.mp4 video in last 16.04 beta. Terminal says : ** Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|1.0|totem|H.264 (Main Profile) decoder|decoder-video/x-h264, stream-format=(string)avc, alignment=(string)au, level=(string)4, profile=(string)main, max- input-size=(int)51696, parsed=(boolean)true (H.264 (Main Profile) decoder) Totem tries to find the correct codec but fails, see attachment ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libgstreamer1.0-0 1.8.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-15.31-generic 4.4.6 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Mar 28 15:51:47 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-26 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 (20160323) LogAlsaMixer: Error: command ['/usr/bin/amixer'] failed with exit code 1: amixer: Mixer attach default error: No such file or directory ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fr_FR PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gstreamer1.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1562875/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1245097] Re: Internal data flow error playing dvds
(at least 64-bit installs of Ubuntu 13.10) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245097 Title: Internal data flow error playing dvds Status in The GStreamer Multimedia Framework: Unknown Status in “gst-plugins-ugly1.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Since upgrading to saucy salamander, with totem 3.8.2-0ubuntu1, I have errors playing DVDs. They start playing, but after a little while, I get the Internal data flow error and playback stops. This didn't happen before upgrading ubuntu. The dvds are actually iso files created with ddrescue, but I don't expect that would change things. The same files play without problem in mplayer. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer/+bug/1245097/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1245097] Re: Internal data flow error playing dvds
Manually updating liborc-0.4-0 this way will break installing Wine (at least on 64-bit installs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245097 Title: Internal data flow error playing dvds Status in The GStreamer Multimedia Framework: Unknown Status in “gst-plugins-ugly1.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Since upgrading to saucy salamander, with totem 3.8.2-0ubuntu1, I have errors playing DVDs. They start playing, but after a little while, I get the Internal data flow error and playback stops. This didn't happen before upgrading ubuntu. The dvds are actually iso files created with ddrescue, but I don't expect that would change things. The same files play without problem in mplayer. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer/+bug/1245097/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 907311] Re: Not exiting properly? An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting
I've been dealing with this bug since 12.04. I just freshly installed 13.04 64-bit on my main machine and if I double-click on an ISO and Brasero opens to burn it, even if I just cancel out of that window, brasero remains running and does not exit on it's own. This prevents being able to open brasero again until one kills the running instance. This is a show-stopper. Seriously needs to be fixed, or change the default app for burning ISOs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907311 Title: Not exiting properly? An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “brasero” package in Arch Linux: New Bug description: After successfully burning an ISO file (by clicking on it in nautilus) I am unable to burn any more. Double-clicking ISO files has no effect. Running brasero from the launcher does nothing. If I open a terminal to run brasero, I get: $ brasero ** (brasero:4117): WARNING **: An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting The only solution is to $ killall brasero (Edit to add: there is no icon in the dock(?) indicating that brasero is running, and alt-tab does not show it, so I can't switch to it). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: brasero 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic-pae 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Dec 21 12:14:15 2011 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (67 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/907311/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 965895] Re: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries
This does not seem to be a problem with Ubuntu 13.04, but if you've done the fix above where you've renamed /etc/xdg/autostart/nm-applet.desktop to /etc/xdg/autostart/znm-applet.desktop, and then you update from 12.10 to 13.04, you will see two network applets after login. Make sure to remove the znm-applet.desktop file you made to correct this behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965895 Title: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries Status in Ubuntu on the Nexus 7: Triaged Status in “network-manager-applet” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Precise: Fix Released Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Quantal: In Progress Bug description: SRU INFORMATION: see comment 61 After I boot in to the LiveCD environment for Ubuntu 12.04, I click on the NetworkManager icon in the top-right of the screen and it's only showing four items: -- | ✓ Enable Networking | ✓ Enable Wireless | -- | | Connection Information | Edit Connections... -- If I then select the Enable Networking or Enable Wireless option to disable that interface and then re-enable it, then the NetworkManager populates with all the normal menu items (listing of all WiFi SSID, VPN connection, etc.). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: network-manager 0.9.3.995+git201203152001.04b2a74-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.312 Date: Tue Mar 27 03:23:48 2012 IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120325) NetworkManager.state: [main] NetworkingEnabled=true WirelessEnabled=true WWANEnabled=true WimaxEnabled=true ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: network-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-nexus7/+bug/965895/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1125260] Re: gtk_file_chooser_get_current_folder() function is broken in 2.24.10 GTK+ 2.24.15
Just updated to 13.04 and this bug was the first thing I tried to replicate. I attempted to produce the bug in OpenShot, since that's where I run into it the most, and everything has worked normally. Unable to reproduce the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125260 Title: gtk_file_chooser_get_current_folder() function is broken in 2.24.10 GTK+ 2.24.15 Status in GTK+ GUI Toolkit: Fix Released Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Ubuntu users of EiskaltDC++ reported us about problem with GTK+ dialog for choosing folders: it always returns path to home directory instead of chosen one. https://code.google.com/p/eiskaltdc/issues/detail?id=1392#c8 After small investigation I found that problem affects only Ubuntu Quantal and Raring. Bug is reproducible only in GTK+ 2.24.10, and it was fixed in GTK+ 2.24.15. Related link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691040 Unfortunately, GTK+ 2.24.15 is not available in Ubuntu Raring yet. But I think that packages will be updated soon, because Ubuntu is not in freeze yet. So the most important question is about Ubuntu Quantal. Please add necessary patch into the package: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=81df0059 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1125260/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070004] Re: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destination through Other... saves to /HOME directory
This bug is still present on today's daily build of Ubuntu 13.04. Tested with Openshot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070004 Title: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destination through Other... saves to /HOME directory Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Certain applications, like DeVeDe or Openshot, use a simplified save dialogue box. From these simplified lists, the user is presented with some default directories to save in (Video, Desktop, Home, etc). Selecting any of these destinations from this menu works as expected. However, if the user wishes to save to some other location besides the ones suggested, they must click on Other... which displays the full, normal save dialogue. When this is used, it does not matter which directory the user chooses - the application will save to the /HOME directory. I have tested this using DeVeDe on Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit (fresh install) and 12.10 32-bit (upgrade install). This *is not* a bug with DeVeDe, but it was the first application I found that was using the simplified save dialogue (and I also was able to reproduce this using Openshot, which does the same thing). If the application uses the normal save dialogue box, everything works as expected. Please help me provide the information needed for this bug report. I do not know what package to file this against, or what other information that needs to be attached. It would also be helpful if someone can reproduce this. I have not filed a bug report because I did not know what to attach or what package to file against. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is a video demonstrating the problem using DeVeDe. I tell DeVeDe to export a video to my Desktop from the defaults menu, which works as expected. I then tell it to save it to my Desktop, but using the Other... menu. I would expect it to say that there's a file already there with the same name, and offer to overwrite it. Instead, it saves the file to my /Home directory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O5O6XnRTisfeature=youtu.be To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/1070004/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 965895] Re: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries
Juan, I tested your workaround on my Ubuntu 12.10 netbook and it corrected the problem. It's certainly doesn't actually fix the problem, but it allows everything to work normally in the meantime. Good work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965895 Title: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries Status in Ubuntu on the Nexus 7: Triaged Status in “network-manager-applet” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Precise: In Progress Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Quantal: In Progress Bug description: After I boot in to the LiveCD environment for Ubuntu 12.04, I click on the NetworkManager icon in the top-right of the screen and it's only showing four items: -- | ✓ Enable Networking | ✓ Enable Wireless | -- | | Connection Information | Edit Connections... -- If I then select the Enable Networking or Enable Wireless option to disable that interface and then re-enable it, then the NetworkManager populates with all the normal menu items (listing of all WiFi SSID, VPN connection, etc.). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: network-manager 0.9.3.995+git201203152001.04b2a74-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.312 Date: Tue Mar 27 03:23:48 2012 IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120325) NetworkManager.state: [main] NetworkingEnabled=true WirelessEnabled=true WWANEnabled=true WimaxEnabled=true ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: network-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-nexus7/+bug/965895/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 919767] Re: brasero stays in memory after use
This is also the case for me on my 12.04 32-bit system but *only* if I double-click on an ISO and launch Brasero that way. If I open Brasero *first*, tell it I want to burn an image, and then choose the ISO, Brasero closes as expected when I'm finished. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919767 Title: brasero stays in memory after use Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2: New Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Basero 3.2.0 as it installs from the ISO. Synaptic says installed version is 3.2.0-0ubuntu6 Using either ubuntu studio 10.04 or 12.04(alpha dec19) if brasero is started by a right click on a toc file (or maybe a cue file) it opens a dialogue to burn a cd from. I can cancel or burn a cd, but in either case ps x still shows brasero running after the dialogue has gone when the application has completed it's task successfully. trying to burn a cd from a second toc file or even open brasero from the main menu then fails until brasero has been killed (kill pid). This is not a problem when opening an audio file (wav, ogg etc.) as the main brasero window is opened. I think that because the burn dialogue normally would not exit brasero it doesn't exit here either, however, the main window is not shown to exit from. This is important to UbuntuStudio because the main DAW (Ardour) puts out toc files as a finished product and brasero is needed (since the loss of gcdmaster) to actually print the file to CD. So this should be listed as a ubuntu studio bug as well. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/brasero/+bug/919767/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1062166] Re: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off
Here's an interesting thing... I have a computer I use often that *had* 12.04 on it, and I recently upgraded to 12.10 (shortly after the final release). It did *not* experience this problem until tonight. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062166 Title: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off Status in “gnome-screensaver” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: although in system settings the switch off screen (Bildschirm abschalten, wenn inaktiv für...) is set to never the screen will go dark after a while although not going to standby - its just darkened. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 5 12:04:09 2012 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GsettingsGnomeSession: org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 180 org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu' InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-17 (17 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1062166/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1062166] Re: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off
Lonnie, if you feel comfortable making the changes, you could try using dconf editor and seeing if the above settings help you. I know that this isn't the proper update-fix you're looking for, but this is all I'm able to do myself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062166 Title: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off Status in “gnome-screensaver” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: although in system settings the switch off screen (Bildschirm abschalten, wenn inaktiv für...) is set to never the screen will go dark after a while although not going to standby - its just darkened. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 5 12:04:09 2012 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GsettingsGnomeSession: org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 180 org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu' InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-17 (17 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1062166/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063969] Re: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420
Do we know if nvidia is looking to rectify this problem on their end? I know its a minor thing, the boot screen, (and I agree, system stability always wins) but I think it's one of those small bits of polish that need to be there if possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063969 Title: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420 Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” source package in Quantal: Triaged Bug description: On my Latitude E6420 running Kubuntu 12.10 (64-bit) with all updates, there is no splash screen. Instead, I just see text. This laptop has Nvidia graphics, though Optimus is disabled so that is not the issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: plymouth 0.8.4-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.27-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 8 13:57:54 2012 DefaultPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Beta amd64 (20121004) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6420 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A15 dmi.board.name: 0PH12P dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd08/15/2012:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6420:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn0PH12P:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6420 dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1063969/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070004] Re: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory
Still not sure on the exact package, but its probably something to either do with Nautilus or Gnome ** Package changed: ubuntu = nautilus (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070004 Title: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Certain applications, like DeVeDe or Openshot, use a simplified save dialogue box. From these simplified lists, the user is presented with some default directories to save in (Video, Desktop, Home, etc). Selecting any of these destinations from this menu works as expected. However, if the user wishes to save to some other location besides the ones suggested, they must click on Other... which displays the full, normal save dialogue. When this is used, it does not matter which directory the user chooses - the application will save to the /HOME directory. I have tested this using DeVeDe on Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit (fresh install) and 12.10 32-bit (upgrade install). This *is not* a bug with DeVeDe, but it was the first application I found that was using the simplified save dialogue (and I also was able to reproduce this using Openshot, which does the same thing). If the application uses the normal save dialogue box, everything works as expected. Please help me provide the information needed for this bug report. I do not know what package to file this against, or what other information that needs to be attached. It would also be helpful if someone can reproduce this. I have not filed a bug report because I did not know what to attach or what package to file against. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is a video demonstrating the problem using DeVeDe. I tell DeVeDe to export a video to my Desktop from the defaults menu, which works as expected. I then tell it to save it to my Desktop, but using the Other... menu. I would expect it to say that there's a file already there with the same name, and offer to overwrite it. Instead, it saves the file to my /Home directory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O5O6XnRTisfeature=youtu.be To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1070004/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070004] Re: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory
** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070004 Title: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Certain applications, like DeVeDe or Openshot, use a simplified save dialogue box. From these simplified lists, the user is presented with some default directories to save in (Video, Desktop, Home, etc). Selecting any of these destinations from this menu works as expected. However, if the user wishes to save to some other location besides the ones suggested, they must click on Other... which displays the full, normal save dialogue. When this is used, it does not matter which directory the user chooses - the application will save to the /HOME directory. I have tested this using DeVeDe on Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit (fresh install) and 12.10 32-bit (upgrade install). This *is not* a bug with DeVeDe, but it was the first application I found that was using the simplified save dialogue (and I also was able to reproduce this using Openshot, which does the same thing). If the application uses the normal save dialogue box, everything works as expected. Please help me provide the information needed for this bug report. I do not know what package to file this against, or what other information that needs to be attached. It would also be helpful if someone can reproduce this. I have not filed a bug report because I did not know what to attach or what package to file against. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is a video demonstrating the problem using DeVeDe. I tell DeVeDe to export a video to my Desktop from the defaults menu, which works as expected. I then tell it to save it to my Desktop, but using the Other... menu. I would expect it to say that there's a file already there with the same name, and offer to overwrite it. Instead, it saves the file to my /Home directory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O5O6XnRTisfeature=youtu.be To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/1070004/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070004] Re: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory
This bug may be affecting control GtkFileChooserButton -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070004 Title: For applications using simplified save dialogues, selecting a destionation through Other... saves to /HOME directory Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Certain applications, like DeVeDe or Openshot, use a simplified save dialogue box. From these simplified lists, the user is presented with some default directories to save in (Video, Desktop, Home, etc). Selecting any of these destinations from this menu works as expected. However, if the user wishes to save to some other location besides the ones suggested, they must click on Other... which displays the full, normal save dialogue. When this is used, it does not matter which directory the user chooses - the application will save to the /HOME directory. I have tested this using DeVeDe on Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit (fresh install) and 12.10 32-bit (upgrade install). This *is not* a bug with DeVeDe, but it was the first application I found that was using the simplified save dialogue (and I also was able to reproduce this using Openshot, which does the same thing). If the application uses the normal save dialogue box, everything works as expected. Please help me provide the information needed for this bug report. I do not know what package to file this against, or what other information that needs to be attached. It would also be helpful if someone can reproduce this. I have not filed a bug report because I did not know what to attach or what package to file against. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is a video demonstrating the problem using DeVeDe. I tell DeVeDe to export a video to my Desktop from the defaults menu, which works as expected. I then tell it to save it to my Desktop, but using the Other... menu. I would expect it to say that there's a file already there with the same name, and offer to overwrite it. Instead, it saves the file to my /Home directory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7O5O6XnRTisfeature=youtu.be To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/1070004/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 259990] Re: Brasero does not copy multisession CD:s properly
This still happens in Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit. When trying to copy a multisession DVD I have, Brasero offers to copy only a 5MB UDF image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259990 Title: Brasero does not copy multisession CD:s properly Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: brasero When I try to copy a multisession CD Brasero just copies the first session and claims it's done. I tried to copy a CD with ~290 MB of data. Brasero said it was going to burn the entire 290 MBs, but after ~50 MB (the first session) it stopped and said that the CD was successfully copied. The burning progress bar wasn't even filled yet. I use Brasero 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 in Ubuntu 8.04.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/259990/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1034928] Re: Fontconfig warning: Having multiple values in test isn't supported and may not works as expected
I can confirm the fonts-nanum. Just did an upgrade to 12.10 from a 12.04 64-bit desktop system that was fully updated and throughout the update, the terminal window spit countless Having multiple values in test isn't supported and may not works as expected against fonts- nanum. but that was the *only* font I saw errors with. Good news is I can run gedit from Terminal on this machine I get no font errors. However my 32-bit netbook (referenced in my earlier post) is still spitting up errors for andika,conf My 64-bit laptop that has a clean install of 12.10 is getting no font errors at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034928 Title: Fontconfig warning: Having multiple values in test isn't supported and may not works as expected Status in “culmus” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “fonts-arphic-ukai” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-arphic-uming” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-baekmuk” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-droid” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-nanum” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-nanum-coding” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in “fonts-sil-andika” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-tlwg” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-unfonts-core” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-unfonts-extra” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “language-selector” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “ttf-wqy-zenhei” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-arphic-ukai” package in Debian: New Status in “fonts-arphic-uming” package in Debian: Fix Committed Status in “fonts-baekmuk” package in Debian: Fix Released Status in “fonts-droid” package in Debian: Fix Committed Status in “fonts-nanum” package in Debian: Fix Released Status in “fonts-sil-andika” package in Debian: Fix Committed Status in “fonts-unfonts-core” package in Debian: Fix Released Status in “fonts-unfonts-extra” package in Debian: Fix Released Status in “ttf-wqy-zenhei” package in Debian: New Status in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: In 12.10, fontconfig prints warnings similar to the following whenever fontconfig is invoked: Fontconfig warning: /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-unfonts-core.conf, line 11: Having multiple values in test isn't supported and may not works as expected This affects fonts from a number of packages: fonts-arphic-ukai: /etc/fonts/conf.d/41-arphic-ukai.conf fonts-arphic-uming: /etc/fonts/conf.d/41-arphic-uming.conf fonts-droid: /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-droid-sans-fonts.conf fonts-tlwg-garuda: /etc/fonts/conf.d/89-tlwg-garuda-synthetic.conf fonts-tlwg-kinnari: /etc/fonts/conf.d/89-tlwg-kinnari-synthetic.conf fonts-tlwg-loma: /etc/fonts/conf.d/89-tlwg-loma-synthetic.conf fonts-tlwg-umpush: /etc/fonts/conf.d/89-tlwg-umpush-synthetic.conf fonts-nanum: /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-nanum.conf fonts-unfonts-core: /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-unfonts-core.conf To reproduce: 1) Open a terminal 2) Launch 'gedit' from the terminal Expected results: gedit launches, no fontconfig warnings in the terminal Actual results: gedit launches, fontconfig warnings are displayed in the terminal ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: fonts-unfonts-core 1.0.3.is.1.0.2-080608-5ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-8.8-generic 3.5.0 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-8-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Aug 9 10:02:59 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Beta amd64 (20100901.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: fonts-unfonts-core UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-08-07 (1 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/culmus/+bug/1034928/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063969] Re: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420
I just upgraded a completely up-to-date 12.04 64-bit install with latest proprietary nvidia drivers from x-swat that was displaying splashes at both boot and shutdown, to 12.10 and now both splashes are failing (text-only) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063969 Title: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420 Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” source package in Quantal: Triaged Bug description: On my Latitude E6420 running Kubuntu 12.10 (64-bit) with all updates, there is no splash screen. Instead, I just see text. This laptop has Nvidia graphics, though Optimus is disabled so that is not the issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: plymouth 0.8.4-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.27-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 8 13:57:54 2012 DefaultPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Beta amd64 (20121004) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6420 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A15 dmi.board.name: 0PH12P dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd08/15/2012:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6420:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn0PH12P:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6420 dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1063969/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 965895] Re: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries
This is no longer happening on my main laptop with a clean install of 12.04 64-bit, but is still happening on my 32-bit netbook that was upgraded from 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965895 Title: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries Status in “network-manager-applet” package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Precise: In Progress Status in “network-manager-applet” source package in Quantal: In Progress Bug description: After I boot in to the LiveCD environment for Ubuntu 12.04, I click on the NetworkManager icon in the top-right of the screen and it's only showing four items: -- | ✓ Enable Networking | ✓ Enable Wireless | -- | | Connection Information | Edit Connections... -- If I then select the Enable Networking or Enable Wireless option to disable that interface and then re-enable it, then the NetworkManager populates with all the normal menu items (listing of all WiFi SSID, VPN connection, etc.). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: network-manager 0.9.3.995+git201203152001.04b2a74-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.312 Date: Tue Mar 27 03:23:48 2012 IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120325) NetworkManager.state: [main] NetworkingEnabled=true WirelessEnabled=true WWANEnabled=true WimaxEnabled=true ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: network-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/965895/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1062166] Re: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off
I'm not certain which one thing fixed it, but here's what I did: Open dconf editor from the Dash Click on the Find, and type Power. Here's what I've got set: idle-brightness = 0 idle-dim-time = 0 sleep-display-ac = 0 sleep-display-battery = 0 sleep-inactive-ac-timeout = 0 sleep-inactive-battery-timeout = 0 Try setting those and see if it helps you. Again, not exactly sure which one thing fixes it - haven't taken the time to check. And ultimately, one shouldn't have to do this in the first place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062166 Title: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off Status in “gnome-screensaver” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: although in system settings the switch off screen (Bildschirm abschalten, wenn inaktiv für...) is set to never the screen will go dark after a while although not going to standby - its just darkened. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 5 12:04:09 2012 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GsettingsGnomeSession: org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 180 org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu' InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-17 (17 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1062166/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063969] Re: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420
This exact thing is happening to me using regular Ubuntu 64-bit on a Dell Precision M6500. Works just fine if using noveau, but goes text- only if using nvidia-current-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063969 Title: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420 Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” source package in Quantal: Triaged Bug description: On my Latitude E6420 running Kubuntu 12.10 (64-bit) with all updates, there is no splash screen. Instead, I just see text. This laptop has Nvidia graphics, though Optimus is disabled so that is not the issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: plymouth 0.8.4-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.27-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 8 13:57:54 2012 DefaultPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Beta amd64 (20121004) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6420 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A15 dmi.board.name: 0PH12P dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd08/15/2012:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6420:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn0PH12P:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6420 dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1063969/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1063969] Re: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420
Also confirmed that this seems specific to boot-only. When shutting down or restarting, I see the normal ubuntu logo and activity indicator dots animating just fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063969 Title: No Plymouth Splash on Latitude E6420 Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers” source package in Quantal: Triaged Bug description: On my Latitude E6420 running Kubuntu 12.10 (64-bit) with all updates, there is no splash screen. Instead, I just see text. This laptop has Nvidia graphics, though Optimus is disabled so that is not the issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: plymouth 0.8.4-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-17.27-generic 3.5.5 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 8 13:57:54 2012 DefaultPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Beta amd64 (20121004) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6420 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-17-generic root=UUID=20af3c8e-df88-479d-bc6f-da96a47b5fdf ro quiet splash SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A15 dmi.board.name: 0PH12P dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd08/15/2012:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6420:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn0PH12P:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6420 dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1063969/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1062166] Re: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off
Made some changes using dconf-editor under the power setting. So far, so good. Still a bug - I shouldn't need to do this. If anyone is still interested in this bug, I'll post the changes I made. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062166 Title: screen goes dark although screensaver is switched off Status in “gnome-screensaver” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: although in system settings the switch off screen (Bildschirm abschalten, wenn inaktiv für...) is set to never the screen will go dark after a while although not going to standby - its just darkened. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: gnome-screensaver 3.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-16.25-generic 3.5.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 5 12:04:09 2012 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GsettingsGnomeSession: org.gnome.desktop.session idle-delay uint32 180 org.gnome.desktop.session session-name 'ubuntu' InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-17 (17 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1062166/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1008401] Re: Totem hangs on launch if multiple instances are opened at once
I have two machines, one running 12.04 32-bit, one running 64. This occurs for me, as well. It's rare, but it does happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008401 Title: Totem hangs on launch if multiple instances are opened at once Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: If you to aggressive on the ol' double click or accidently open the same file multiple times (when trying to open the file), all the instances hang on launch. If you quickly try open the a video file repeatedly, before the first instance launches, you can recreate this behaviour. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1008401/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 965895] Re: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries
This is occurring for me on Ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 beta (both 32-bit builds). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965895 Title: After boot, NetworkManager indicator menu only shows four entries Status in Libappindicator: New Status in “libappindicator” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: After I boot in to the LiveCD environment for Ubuntu 12.04, I click on the NetworkManager icon in the top-right of the screen and it's only showing four items: -- | ✓ Enable Networking | ✓ Enable Wireless | -- | | Connection Information | Edit Connections... -- If I then select the Enable Networking or Enable Wireless option to disable that interface and then re-enable it, then the NetworkManager populates with all the normal menu items (listing of all WiFi SSID, VPN connection, etc.). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: network-manager 0.9.3.995+git201203152001.04b2a74-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.312 Date: Tue Mar 27 03:23:48 2012 IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120325) NetworkManager.state: [main] NetworkingEnabled=true WirelessEnabled=true WWANEnabled=true WimaxEnabled=true ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: network-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libappindicator/+bug/965895/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 259990] Re: Brasero does not copy multisession CD:s properly
I have DVDs created by a stand-alone Panasonic DVD recorder. When I use Brasero to copy these discs to an ISO, it seems to copy a track of 5MB or so, and then calls it done. I have to use Gnome Baker when I want to copy these DVDs. This is still a problem, even on Precise (12.04) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259990 Title: Brasero does not copy multisession CD:s properly Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: brasero When I try to copy a multisession CD Brasero just copies the first session and claims it's done. I tried to copy a CD with ~290 MB of data. Brasero said it was going to burn the entire 290 MBs, but after ~50 MB (the first session) it stopped and said that the CD was successfully copied. The burning progress bar wasn't even filled yet. I use Brasero 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 in Ubuntu 8.04.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/259990/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 973014] Re: gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad, (libgstvideoparsersbad.so), causes a failure to decode many common video files encoded as AVC 1 Baseline - L2.1, Baseline - L1.1 others
Thanks for this fix! Just applied it, and it worked for me as well. No ill effects so far. Brilliant! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973014 Title: gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad, (libgstvideoparsersbad.so), causes a failure to decode many common video files encoded as AVC 1 Baseline - L2.1, Baseline - L1.1 others Status in The GStreamer Multimedia Framework: Fix Released Status in “gstreamer0.10” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: *Adjusted description so as not to show as email to non logged in people Most affected files are Baseline@L2.1, Baseline@L1.1 * Those would be the most likely to fail to be decoded but certainly not limited to kust them. These files are commonly found online though many users will have locally. Also affected other than totem, totem youtube plugin, banshee would be the mozilla-plugin minitube. Typically the audio will play with no video though sometimes neither *Moving libgstvideoparsersbad.so to a .bak allows decoding to take place on the previously affected files, at least so here* Attached is a cut small sample file, noting the file plays fine in all non gstreamer players in all gstreamer players in 11.10 earlier The file should be playable in totem, banshee firefox with totem-mozilla plugin installed but only audio is decoded ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.36-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic-pae 3.2.13 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-21-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 3 21:33:08 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120301) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gstreamer0.10 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer/+bug/973014/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 973014] Re: Fails to decode many common video files encoded as AVC 1 Baseline - L2.1, Baseline - L1.1
Just updated from 10.04 to 12.04 last night, with all updates current, and this happens to me as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973014 Title: Fails to decode many common video files encoded as AVC 1 Baseline - L2.1, Baseline - L1.1 Status in “gstreamer0.10” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: *Adjusted description so as not to show as email to non logged in people Most affected files are Baseline@L2.1, Baseline@L1.1 * Those would be the most likely to fail to be decoded but not limited to. These files are commonly found online though many users will have locally. Also affected other than totem, banshee would be the mozilla-plugin minitube. Typically the audio will play with no video though sometimes neither Attached is a cut small sample file, noting the file plays fine in all non gstreamer players in all gstreamer players in 11.10 earlier The file should be playable in totem, banshee firefox with totem-mozilla plugin installed but only audio is decoded ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.36-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic-pae 3.2.13 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-21-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 3 21:33:08 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120301) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gstreamer0.10 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/973014/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 948294] [NEW] package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250
Public bug reported: Recieved this error after upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 beta 1 32 bit ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Mar 6 11:46:17 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110330) SourcePackage: gconf Title: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-06 (0 days ago) ** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948294 Title: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 Status in “gconf” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Recieved this error after upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 beta 1 32 bit ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Mar 6 11:46:17 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110330) SourcePackage: gconf Title: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-06 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/948294/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 948294] Re: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948294 Title: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 Status in “gconf” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Recieved this error after upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 beta 1 32 bit ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Mar 6 11:46:17 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110330) SourcePackage: gconf Title: package gconf2 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 250 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-06 (0 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/948294/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
