[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
Should Launcher icon size not be in the Universal Access are of the Setting section in the seeing tab? If not exclusively then maybe as well as? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: In Progress Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 922480] [NEW] Gwibber has no search icon in 12.04 precise (regressed from 11.10)
Public bug reported: Gwibber is missing a search icon in 12.04 precise. This was an issue raised in 11.10 but was fixed with a workaround. This would be a good opportunity to fix it propertly. ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gwibber in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922480 Title: Gwibber has no search icon in 12.04 precise (regressed from 11.10) Status in “gwibber” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Gwibber is missing a search icon in 12.04 precise. This was an issue raised in 11.10 but was fixed with a workaround. This would be a good opportunity to fix it propertly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/922480/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
Rename it to Desktop??? Everyone is happy with Appearance and that would keep it consistent with previous releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: Confirmed Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. Solution: rename User Interface to Desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
I think either style or look is a good name for the first tab. I'm more in favour of look because I think that best encompasses the background, theme and launcher icon size options. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: In Progress Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
It's also the fact that 'User Interface' is meaningless to most people non technical. I'm not so concerned about the positioning of it as people can find it if it has a sensible name (although you're right, the beginning is better) but with a name like User Interface they're likely to avoid it. It's a poor choice of name and had no justification for it in the design. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: New Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
I see the comment but there doesn't appear to be any reason for it! I think they're just not thinking of the non technical user. If my girlfriend, her parents or my dad (all Ubuntu users but far from technical) saw the term User Interface they wouldn't know what it was and they certainly wouldn't click on it because it has the term 'Interface' in, which sounds technical and low level. They are quite happy to click on a button that is labelled Appearence though as it has more meaning to them. It's this sort of terminology that just puts people off Linux and keeps its reputation as a techies playground. The designrs should remember that people who aren't technical, especially those who are older, are afraid that what ever they do on a computer is going to break it and unfriendly names like that is just going to intimidate more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: New Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 918580] Re: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04
Thanks for doing that though :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918580 Title: System Settings 'User Interface' name is bad in 12.04 Status in Ayatana Design: New Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I updated my 12.04 installation and noticed that in the System Settings section that Appearance has changed its name to User Interface. That name is a term that beginner users will not be familiar with and will most likely avoid clicking. Appearance is a much better name and has more meaning for the end user. These sorts of terms need to be avoided if Ubuntu wants to target less techy users and portray itself as a user friendly environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/918580/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 897143] Re: Ubuntuone does not display the correct usage size
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing the u1 reported and actual size of u1 sync'd files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897143/+attachment/2610951/+files/Screenshot%20at%202011-11-28%2010%3A04%3A36.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897143 Title: Ubuntuone does not display the correct usage size Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After syncing my files to ubuntuone I was concerned that not all my files were been sync'd to my cloud as the usage reported was far less than what I had actually sync'd. After sync'ing my account on another machine I have found that all my files have been sync'd successfully but the size reported by ubuntuone is incorrect. I have about 30GB of files sync'd but u1 says that I have 27.9GB sync'd. This could cause massive confusion to customers as well as potentially lose Canonical money as they are able to sync more files than their limits allow. Please see the attached screenshot which was taken on my client machine which was a fresh install that had been signed in with ubuntuone. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/897143/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 897143] [NEW] Ubuntuone does not display the correct usage size
Public bug reported: After syncing my files to ubuntuone I was concerned that not all my files were been sync'd to my cloud as the usage reported was far less than what I had actually sync'd. After sync'ing my account on another machine I have found that all my files have been sync'd successfully but the size reported by ubuntuone is incorrect. I have about 30GB of files sync'd but u1 says that I have 27.9GB sync'd. This could cause massive confusion to customers as well as potentially lose Canonical money as they are able to sync more files than their limits allow. Please see the attached screenshot which was taken on my client machine which was a fresh install that had been signed in with ubuntuone. ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897143 Title: Ubuntuone does not display the correct usage size Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After syncing my files to ubuntuone I was concerned that not all my files were been sync'd to my cloud as the usage reported was far less than what I had actually sync'd. After sync'ing my account on another machine I have found that all my files have been sync'd successfully but the size reported by ubuntuone is incorrect. I have about 30GB of files sync'd but u1 says that I have 27.9GB sync'd. This could cause massive confusion to customers as well as potentially lose Canonical money as they are able to sync more files than their limits allow. Please see the attached screenshot which was taken on my client machine which was a fresh install that had been signed in with ubuntuone. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/897143/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 844369] Re: Deja-Dup backup to Ubuntu One failed
I've just done a fresh install of the 11.10 release and set up a new ubuntuone account. I then went and turned on backups using the default settings (backup home, exclude Downloads and Wastebasket, using fairly simple password) and I get the same error as originally posted: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1359, in module with_tempdir(main) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1342, in with_tempdir fn() File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1312, in main full_backup(col_stats) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 469, in full_backup globals.backend) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 368, in write_multivol (tdp, dest_filename, vol_num))) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/asyncscheduler.py, line 145, in schedule_task return self.__run_synchronously(fn, params) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/asyncscheduler.py, line 171, in __run_synchronously ret = fn(*params) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 367, in lambda async_waiters.append(io_scheduler.schedule_task(lambda tdp, dest_filename, vol_num: put(tdp, dest_filename, vol_num), File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 292, in put backend.put(tdp, dest_filename) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py, line 319, in iterate return fn(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backends/u1backend.py, line 187, in put headers=headers, request_body=data) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntuone-couch/ubuntuone/couch/auth.py, line 147, in request url, method=http_method, headers=headers, body=request_body) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1436, in request (response, content) = self._request(conn, authority, uri, request_uri, method, body, headers, redirections, cachekey) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1188, in _request (response, content) = self._conn_request(conn, request_uri, method, body, headers) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1123, in _conn_request conn.connect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 890, in connect self.disable_ssl_certificate_validation, self.ca_certs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 76, in _ssl_wrap_socket cert_reqs=cert_reqs, ca_certs=ca_certs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py, line 372, in wrap_socket ciphers=ciphers) File /usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py, line 134, in __init__ self.do_handshake() File /usr/lib/python2.7/ssl.py, line 296, in do_handshake self._sslobj.do_handshake() SSLError: _ssl.c:488: The handshake operation timed out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844369 Title: Deja-Dup backup to Ubuntu One failed Status in Ubuntu One Servers: New Status in “deja-dup” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: First ever backup of $HOME to Ubuntu One via Deja Dup failed: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1345, in module with_tempdir(main) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1328, in with_tempdir fn() File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1298, in main full_backup(col_stats) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 455, in full_backup globals.backend) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 354, in write_multivol (tdp, dest_filename))) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/asyncscheduler.py, line 145, in schedule_task return self.__run_synchronously(fn, params) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/asyncscheduler.py, line 171, in __run_synchronously ret = fn(*params) File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 353, in lambda async_waiters.append(io_scheduler.schedule_task(lambda tdp, dest_filename: put(tdp, dest_filename), File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 279, in put backend.put(tdp, dest_filename) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py, line 319, in iterate return fn(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backends/u1backend.py, line 177, in put headers=headers, request_body=data) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntuone-couch/ubuntuone/couch/auth.py, line 143, in request url, method=http_method, headers=headers, body=request_body) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1436, in request (response, content) = self._request(conn, authority, uri, request_uri, method, body, headers, redirections, cachekey) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1188, in _request (response, content) = self._conn_request(conn, request_uri, method, body, headers) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/httplib2/__init__.py, line 1158, in _conn_request response = conn.getresponse() File
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 868957] [NEW] Gwibber searches button has missing icon in 11.10 Unity
Public bug reported: My install of 11.10 has no searches icon in Gwibber on the menu. It simply shows a black square with a no entry sign. See attached screenshot: ** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gwibber in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868957 Title: Gwibber searches button has missing icon in 11.10 Unity Status in “gwibber” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: My install of 11.10 has no searches icon in Gwibber on the menu. It simply shows a black square with a no entry sign. See attached screenshot: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/868957/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 868957] Re: Gwibber searches button has missing icon in 11.10 Unity
** Attachment added: Gwibber.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868957/+attachment/2516477/+files/Gwibber.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gwibber in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868957 Title: Gwibber searches button has missing icon in 11.10 Unity Status in “gwibber” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: My install of 11.10 has no searches icon in Gwibber on the menu. It simply shows a black square with a no entry sign. See attached screenshot: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwibber/+bug/868957/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 865985] Re: The 'Whats New' section in the Software Centre of 11.10 is blank
** Attachment added: Screen shot of the software centre non populating panels properly. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865985/+attachment/2505605/+files/sw_centre.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865985 Title: The 'Whats New' section in the Software Centre of 11.10 is blank Status in “software-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After installing a fresh cope of 11.10 this morning and updating I have noticed that the software centres' Whats New section is blank. This should surely show the last things that have been added to the repository, or the last popular pieces of software that were added and not leave a big blank panel in the middle of the s/w centres window. The Top Rated section is populated but doesn't fill all the available slots as the screenshot I have attached shows. There are 3 slots left blank. Please see attached screenshot. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/865985/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 842160] [NEW] package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 842072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842072 Public bug reported: Ran an apt-get dist-upgrade from the command prompt after doing a fresh install of the 11.10 Beta, and just after installing the Virtualbox guest extensions after being prompted to do so. I left the VM running and came back to find the error. Since the update bailed out I have run an apt-get -f install and this has completed the update. /var/log/apt/term.log shows: Preparing to replace gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 (using .../gnome -control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Just looks like a conflicting file in multiple packages. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.15-generic 3.0.3 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 5 21:15:31 2011 Dependencies: DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110901) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 oneiric package-conflict -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842160 Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ran an apt-get dist-upgrade from the command prompt after doing a fresh install of the 11.10 Beta, and just after installing the Virtualbox guest extensions after being prompted to do so. I left the VM running and came back to find the error. Since the update bailed out I have run an apt-get -f install and this has completed the update. /var/log/apt/term.log shows: Preparing to replace gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 (using .../gnome -control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Just looks like a conflicting file in multiple packages. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.15-generic 3.0.3 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 5 21:15:31 2011 Dependencies: DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110901) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 842160] Re: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', whi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 842072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842072 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842160 Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ran an apt-get dist-upgrade from the command prompt after doing a fresh install of the 11.10 Beta, and just after installing the Virtualbox guest extensions after being prompted to do so. I left the VM running and came back to find the error. Since the update bailed out I have run an apt-get -f install and this has completed the update. /var/log/apt/term.log shows: Preparing to replace gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 (using .../gnome -control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Just looks like a conflicting file in multiple packages. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.15-generic 3.0.3 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 5 21:15:31 2011 Dependencies: DuplicateSignature: Unpacking replacement gnome-control-center-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-control-center-data_1%3a3.1.91-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110901) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: gnome-control-center Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.1.5-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/gnome-power-manager.png', which is also in package gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/842160/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
