[Desktop-packages] [Bug 598308] Re: Volume at login set to Maximum
I also am affected by this bug. (Xonar DX) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598308 Title: Volume at login set to Maximum Status in “pulseaudio” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Release: Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit Desktop Edition What You Expected to Happen: System volume to remain as set before reboot and as shown in volume panel applet What Happened Instead: After reboot/shutdown at and after login system volume is set to maximum Extended Description: Intel HD Audio Chipset using S/PDIF coax out to speakers and system audio set to digital output After either rebooting or shutting down my system at the next login the system volume will be set to maximum. Once the panel loads I can click on the system volume applet and if I move the volume slider in any direction the volume will immediately be set to the correct level. Here is how the process goes: 1. (logged in system running)slide volume to 75% using system volume applet on panel 2. reboot 3. Login, 4. login soundbite plays at 100% volume 5. open rhythmbox play audio track system volume at 100% 6. click on system volume panel applet, do not click slider, slider shows volume set at 75% as before reboot < This is the odd part 7. click on volume slider and adjust in either direction system volume abruptly adjusts to match the volume level indicated by the slider. If any more information is needed please let me know. Thank you **MORE INFO 6/25/10** This also affects the system alert volume in the same fashion as above. Adjusting the slider for the alert value via the panel applet reset the volume to the correct level. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/598308/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Happens even without a Nautilus window having been opened in the current session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() Status in Nautilus: Expired Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “nautilus” package in Unity Linux: New Bug description: Binary package hint: nautilus changed settings in nautilus. activated the feature "open file with one click". Then nautilus crashed and apport started. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: d68af718cfa52b0ffd90b28d0c3f3daa CheckboxSystem: 7fe50468a9edf69a38c2a5a0c6c8ec60 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.27.91-0ubuntu3 ProcCmdline: nautilus ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic Signal: 6 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 g_assertion_message () g_assertion_message_expr () ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1039594] Re: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_get_impl()
Same than the above poster: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGFPE in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039594 Title: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_get_impl() Status in “evolution-data-server” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I am unable to add my Google calendar to Evolution; something along the line of "method not supported". ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: evolution-data-server 3.5.5-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-11.11-generic 3.5.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 21 10:26:19 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-calendar-factory InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha amd64 (20120820) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-calendar-factory ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7f105f5ec2c0 : mov (%rdi),%rax PC (0x7f105f5ec2c0) ok source "(%rdi)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination "%rax" ok SegvReason: reading unknown VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: evolution-data-server StacktraceTop: g_rec_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/evolution-data-server/calendar-backends/libecalbackendcontacts.so g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Title: evolution-calendar-factory crashed with SIGSEGV in g_rec_mutex_lock() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1039594/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1026520] Re: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in __opendirat()
[Laughters] I too have suffered from first colord annoyance today. Actually, apport does not bring me on this page, but on: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1027139 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to colord in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026520 Title: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in __opendirat() Status in “colord” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in “colord” source package in Quantal: Incomplete Bug description: happened after upgrade ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: colord 0.1.21-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-4.4-generic 3.5.0-rc6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-4-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 19 09:16:09 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/colord/colord-sane InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha i386 (20120514) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/colord/colord-sane ProcEnviron: SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0xb734314f:cmpb $0x0,(%edx) PC (0xb734314f) ok source "$0x0" ok destination "(%edx)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: colord StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 opendir () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 libusb_get_device_list () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0 Title: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in opendir() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1026520/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem
I revert what I said just above: this bug report is no duplicate at all. The proportion of space margins take upon printing is just too large -- margins are not intended to be _that_ wide. Anyone else suffering from the same issue, needing to enable "select page size using document page size" ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323 Title: [Printing] White-margins problem Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Printing a PDF file through the Evince document viewer may by default add white margins both on top and bottom and on both sides, especially if the PDF file has been created through the LibreOffice PDF-file export. One method to fix this issue -- and it seems to work for all cases in which a PDF file gets printed with too-wide margins, whether having or not been outputted through LibreOffice -- is to enable "select page size using document page size" by default. That way, it seems to me, PDF files would get printed the way they really were intended to be printed. For reference, the suggestion has been made to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/28971 in the prior. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-image-3.0.0-14-generic 3.0.0-14.23 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 1: DX [Xonar DX], device 0: Multichannel [Multichannel] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: stephane 1568 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: stephane 1568 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfeafc000 irq 17' Mixer name : 'Nvidia GPU 15 HDMI/DP' Components : 'HDA:10de0015,10de0101,00100100' Controls : 16 Simple ctrls : 4 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'DX'/'Asus Virtuoso 100 at 0xe800, irq 18' Mixer name : 'AV200' Components : 'CS4398 CS4362A CS5361 AV200' Controls : 18 Simple ctrls : 11 Date: Wed Dec 14 11:05:38 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-14-generic root=UUID=5ff2556f-bf26-4108-8a50-ef2f0159a986 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.0.0-14-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.0.0-14-generic N/A linux-firmware1.60 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/04/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0602 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5Q PRO TURBO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0602:bd08/04/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5QPROTURBO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
I am not affected by this issue, I have just realized -- the issue that affects me is present only on page printing: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: evince When using evince to display and print pdf documents the margins and proportions are wrong. As test pdf I used the Ubuntu CUPS test page. The pdf has been printed by using evince (scale is set to 100% and no options of the "View" menu are set) and lpr with two different printers (HP Laserjet 4200 and HP Officejet Pro 8500). I put the two prints (of the Laserjet) together and scanned them - the result is attached to this bug report. When using evince the top margin is much larger than using lpr. Printing with Adobe Reader or printing the same document using Windows is just like printing with lpr. But it is not only the top margin. If you move the evince sheet so the two top margins are beside each other you can see that the rest of the document is out of alignment as well. Additionally (as you can see) the line thickness isn't the same. This report isn't a duplicate of others that report from bad margins only when printing - the bad alignment can already be seen in the GUI. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 30 09:18:43 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) KernLog: Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.601275] type=1503 audit(1269932163.416:31): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.604902] type=1503 audit(1269932163.426:32): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1026520] Re: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in __opendirat()
Not to report any problem, but just to note that, having installed the 12/09/13 quantal build about 10 hours ago, I have yet to witness a colord crash, which was so frequent when I had one of the alpha builds installed. If this is the case, that this has been fixed, then long live magic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to colord in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026520 Title: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in __opendirat() Status in “colord” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in “colord” source package in Quantal: Incomplete Bug description: happened after upgrade ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: colord 0.1.21-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-4.4-generic 3.5.0-rc6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-4-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jul 19 09:16:09 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/colord/colord-sane InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha i386 (20120514) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/colord/colord-sane ProcEnviron: SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0xb734314f:cmpb $0x0,(%edx) PC (0xb734314f) ok source "$0x0" ok destination "(%edx)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: colord StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 opendir () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 libusb_get_device_list () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-1.0.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0 Title: colord-sane crashed with SIGSEGV in opendir() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1026520/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1043039] Re: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039 Title: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: A few minutes after having begun default-radio-stations playback (this has been tested for all of the "Absolute" stations), playback stops; message appears: "Python (v2.7) requires to install plugins to play media files of the following type: text/html decoder" Under every fresh Ubuntu installation I have seen, it happens that way, and Rhythmbox has to be restarted for playback to be started back again, for a sole few minutes before halting the same way as described before. A workaround for this issue is to right-click the radio station, select properties, copy its URL, and then paste it back into a browser, download the playlist file, open it using a text editor, tweak it if desired, then open it using Rhythmbox -- a new radio station will appear, working this time. For Absolute Classic Rock, this is the content of the .pls file to be opened using Rhythmbox: [playlist] Title1=Absolute Classic Rock File1=http://ogg2.as34763.net/vc160.ogg ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 28 21:20:53 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120817.3) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1043039] [NEW] rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback
Public bug reported: A few minutes after having begun default-radio-stations playback (this has been tested for all of the "Absolute" stations), playback stops; message appears: "Python (v2.7) requires to install plugins to play media files of the following type: text/html decoder" Under every fresh Ubuntu installation I have seen, it happens that way, and Rhythmbox has to be restarted for playback to be started back again, for a sole few minutes before halting the same way as described before. A workaround for this issue is to right-click the radio station, select properties, copy its URL, and then paste it back into a browser, download the playlist file, open it using a text editor, tweak it if desired, then open it using Rhythmbox -- a new radio station will appear, working this time. For Absolute Classic Rock, this is the content of the .pls file to be opened using Rhythmbox: [playlist] Title1=Absolute Classic Rock File1=http://ogg2.as34763.net/vc160.ogg ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 28 21:20:53 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120817.3) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043039 Title: rhythmbox: plugins required for radio playback Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: A few minutes after having begun default-radio-stations playback (this has been tested for all of the "Absolute" stations), playback stops; message appears: "Python (v2.7) requires to install plugins to play media files of the following type: text/html decoder" Under every fresh Ubuntu installation I have seen, it happens that way, and Rhythmbox has to be restarted for playback to be started back again, for a sole few minutes before halting the same way as described before. A workaround for this issue is to right-click the radio station, select properties, copy its URL, and then paste it back into a browser, download the playlist file, open it using a text editor, tweak it if desired, then open it using Rhythmbox -- a new radio station will appear, working this time. For Absolute Classic Rock, this is the content of the .pls file to be opened using Rhythmbox: [playlist] Title1=Absolute Classic Rock File1=http://ogg2.as34763.net/vc160.ogg ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox 2.96-0ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 28 21:20:53 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120817.3) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1043039/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 424956] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Happened to me under 12.10 (quantal). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424956 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() Status in Nautilus: Expired Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “nautilus” package in Unity Linux: New Bug description: Binary package hint: nautilus changed settings in nautilus. activated the feature "open file with one click". Then nautilus crashed and apport started. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: d68af718cfa52b0ffd90b28d0c3f3daa CheckboxSystem: 7fe50468a9edf69a38c2a5a0c6c8ec60 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.27.91-0ubuntu3 ProcCmdline: nautilus ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic Signal: 6 SourcePackage: nautilus StacktraceTop: raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 g_assertion_message () g_assertion_message_expr () ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise() Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/424956/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
Just to be clear, crop values should be unobtrusively detected and applied, but there would be no need whatsoever, as far as I am seeing it, for the implementation of crop-values-modification capabilities from the totem settings. (The goal merely being to respect the own predefined idiosyncrasies of the projected media file.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them. This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of this bug.) This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current latest build of totem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: totem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1014264] Re: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them. This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of this bug.) This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current latest build of totem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: totem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1014264] [NEW] totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values
Public bug reported: MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them. This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of this bug.) This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current latest build of totem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: totem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014264 Title: totem fails to recognize mkv-header crop values Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: MKV-file headers may contains values to be used for players affecting top-, left-, right-, and bottom-pixels cropping. Totem does not currently recognize those header values, and just ignores them. This can be demonstrated using the mkvmerge GUI program and its header editor to fiddle with such values, and them running the resulting files through totem. Another player than totem (VLC) was tried, which recognized those values, and therefore cropped the video upon playing to remove the annoying border flickering that was experienced in that given file, without the need for the stream to be reencoded, and either suffering from a deterioration in quality, or becoming huge through lossless reencoding. (Consider this as an argument for the pertinence of this bug.) This bug can be experienced under Precise, using the as-of-current latest build of totem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: totem 3.0.1-0ubuntu21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jun 17 06:41:52 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20120423) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: totem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1014264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
madbiologist: It is a "HP Deskjet F380 All-in-one." I am just curious, also, as to the reason why that option is not ticked in by default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: evince When using evince to display and print pdf documents the margins and proportions are wrong. As test pdf I used the Ubuntu CUPS test page. The pdf has been printed by using evince (scale is set to 100% and no options of the "View" menu are set) and lpr with two different printers (HP Laserjet 4200 and HP Officejet Pro 8500). I put the two prints (of the Laserjet) together and scanned them - the result is attached to this bug report. When using evince the top margin is much larger than using lpr. Printing with Adobe Reader or printing the same document using Windows is just like printing with lpr. But it is not only the top margin. If you move the evince sheet so the two top margins are beside each other you can see that the rest of the document is out of alignment as well. Additionally (as you can see) the line thickness isn't the same. This report isn't a duplicate of others that report from bad margins only when printing - the bad alignment can already be seen in the GUI. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 30 09:18:43 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) KernLog: Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.601275] type=1503 audit(1269932163.416:31): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.604902] type=1503 audit(1269932163.426:32): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 904323] Re: [Printing] White-margins problem
Actually, this report may be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904323 Title: [Printing] White-margins problem Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Printing a PDF file through the Evince document viewer may by default add white margins both on top and bottom and on both sides, especially if the PDF file has been created through the LibreOffice PDF-file export. One method to fix this issue -- and it seems to work for all cases in which a PDF file gets printed with too-wide margins, whether having or not been outputted through LibreOffice -- is to enable "select page size using document page size" by default. That way, it seems to me, PDF files would get printed the way they really were intended to be printed. For reference, the suggestion has been made to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/28971 in the prior. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-image-3.0.0-14-generic 3.0.0-14.23 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 1: DX [Xonar DX], device 0: Multichannel [Multichannel] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: stephane 1568 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: stephane 1568 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfeafc000 irq 17' Mixer name : 'Nvidia GPU 15 HDMI/DP' Components : 'HDA:10de0015,10de0101,00100100' Controls : 16 Simple ctrls : 4 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'DX'/'Asus Virtuoso 100 at 0xe800, irq 18' Mixer name : 'AV200' Components : 'CS4398 CS4362A CS5361 AV200' Controls : 18 Simple ctrls : 11 Date: Wed Dec 14 11:05:38 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-14-generic root=UUID=5ff2556f-bf26-4108-8a50-ef2f0159a986 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.0.0-14-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.0.0-14-generic N/A linux-firmware1.60 RfKill: 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/04/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0602 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5Q PRO TURBO dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0602:bd08/04/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5QPROTURBO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/904323/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 551480] Re: pdf: wrong proportions and margins
[11.10] -- I too am suffering from this white-margins, improper-scaling problem. Printing a PDF file through the Evince document viewer may by default add white margins both on top and bottom and on both sides. (I have been able to reproduce this issue using PDF files created through the LibreOffice PDF-file export, for it to be noted.) One method to fix the issue -- and it seems to work for all cases in which a PDF file gets printed with too-wide margins, whether having or not been outputted through LibreOffice -- is to enable "select page size using document page size" by default. That way, it seems to me, PDF files would get printed the way they really were intended to be printed. Should it not, in that case, be best for that parameter to be selected in Evince right out of the box? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551480 Title: pdf: wrong proportions and margins Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: evince When using evince to display and print pdf documents the margins and proportions are wrong. As test pdf I used the Ubuntu CUPS test page. The pdf has been printed by using evince (scale is set to 100% and no options of the "View" menu are set) and lpr with two different printers (HP Laserjet 4200 and HP Officejet Pro 8500). I put the two prints (of the Laserjet) together and scanned them - the result is attached to this bug report. When using evince the top margin is much larger than using lpr. Printing with Adobe Reader or printing the same document using Windows is just like printing with lpr. But it is not only the top margin. If you move the evince sheet so the two top margins are beside each other you can see that the rest of the document is out of alignment as well. Additionally (as you can see) the line thickness isn't the same. This report isn't a duplicate of others that report from bad margins only when printing - the bad alignment can already be seen in the GUI. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 30 09:18:43 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) KernLog: Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.601275] type=1503 audit(1269932163.416:31): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" Mar 30 08:56:03 tappy kernel: [136395.604902] type=1503 audit(1269932163.426:32): operation="open" pid=3560 parent=3559 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" requested_mask="::r" denied_mask="::r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0 name="/proc/filesystems" NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/551480/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 875917] Re: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center
** Attachment added: "oneiric-xrandr-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917/+attachment/2551334/+files/oneiric-xrandr-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917 Title: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Using a 1680x1050 monitor (in this case, an "Acer AL2216W"), under "System Settings > Displays," the (double-scaling) 840x525 resolution is unavailable, even though it is listed in xrandr (see posted log). That seems to be a regression from natty, as Gnome Control Center previously would be listing that resolution. A workaround to this issue of course is running "xrandr -s 840x525" through the terminal, even though that way it takes some time for the system to switch to that resolution (for it to be noted, there was no such waiting time in natty). I hope all this information to be helpful to you developers in investigating the current issue. If any more information would be needed, do not hesitate to prompt for it; I would then acquiesce in as much as the situation would require. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 16 14:46:16 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 20.0-0ubuntu3 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu1 indicator-datetime 0.3.0-0ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 875917] [NEW] Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center
Public bug reported: Using a 1680x1050 monitor (in this case, an "Acer AL2216W"), under "System Settings > Displays," the (double-scaling) 840x525 resolution is unavailable, even though it is listed in xrandr (see posted log). That seems to be a regression from natty, as Gnome Control Center previously would be listing that resolution. A workaround to this issue of course is running "xrandr -s 840x525" through the terminal, even though that way it takes some time for the system to switch to that resolution (for it to be noted, there was no such waiting time in natty). I hope all this information to be helpful to you developers in investigating the current issue. If any more information would be needed, do not hesitate to prompt for it; I would then acquiesce in as much as the situation would require. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 16 14:46:16 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 20.0-0ubuntu3 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu1 indicator-datetime 0.3.0-0ubuntu3 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875917 Title: Some resolutions missing from Gnome Control Center Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Using a 1680x1050 monitor (in this case, an "Acer AL2216W"), under "System Settings > Displays," the (double-scaling) 840x525 resolution is unavailable, even though it is listed in xrandr (see posted log). That seems to be a regression from natty, as Gnome Control Center previously would be listing that resolution. A workaround to this issue of course is running "xrandr -s 840x525" through the terminal, even though that way it takes some time for the system to switch to that resolution (for it to be noted, there was no such waiting time in natty). I hope all this information to be helpful to you developers in investigating the current issue. If any more information would be needed, do not hesitate to prompt for it; I would then acquiesce in as much as the situation would require. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 16 14:46:16 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 20.0-0ubuntu3 gnome-bluetooth3.2.0-0ubuntu1 indicator-datetime 0.3.0-0ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/875917/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
Bug moved to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control- center/+bug/875917 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Right now I am under natty, using a 1680x1050 monitor, and I can go to "system settings > monitors" to select a 840x525 resolution. However, when I was testing oneiric (the first beta), whenever I would go to "display settings" using that monitor, the double-scaling 840x525 resolution would be unavailable from there, although it would be from "NVIDIA X Server settings." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Sep 4 07:52:17 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-display-properties InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANGUAGE=en_CA:en LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) XsessionErrors: (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.SectionsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.GroupsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
Alright, I will open a new one with the relevant info -- meet you there! ** Attachment removed: "natty-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Right now I am under natty, using a 1680x1050 monitor, and I can go to "system settings > monitors" to select a 840x525 resolution. However, when I was testing oneiric (the first beta), whenever I would go to "display settings" using that monitor, the double-scaling 840x525 resolution would be unavailable from there, although it would be from "NVIDIA X Server settings." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Sep 4 07:52:17 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-display-properties InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANGUAGE=en_CA:en LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) XsessionErrors: (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.SectionsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.GroupsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
I am no longer using Oneiric, unfortunately. I am currently under natty. Does such a log still matters, then? ** Attachment added: "natty-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+attachment/2372692/+files/natty-log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Right now I am under natty, using a 1680x1050 monitor, and I can go to "system settings > monitors" to select a 840x525 resolution. However, when I was testing oneiric (the first beta), whenever I would go to "display settings" using that monitor, the double-scaling 840x525 resolution would be unavailable from there, although it would be from "NVIDIA X Server settings." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Sep 4 07:52:17 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-display-properties InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANGUAGE=en_CA:en LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) XsessionErrors: (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.SectionsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.GroupsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Desktop-packages] [Bug 840940] Re: Some resolutions missing from oneiric
@Sebastien Bacher: yes, it does. Switching to it through "xrandr -s 840x525," though, takes nearly as much as thirty seconds. Same thing for switching back to the native resolution. Switching to available-in-monitor-settings-window resolutions was almost instantaneous, conversely. However, as I previously mentioned, the desired resolution is lacking from that monitor-settings window (it was present in natty). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840940 Title: Some resolutions missing from oneiric Status in “gnome-control-center” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Right now I am under natty, using a 1680x1050 monitor, and I can go to "system settings > monitors" to select a 840x525 resolution. However, when I was testing oneiric (the first beta), whenever I would go to "display settings" using that monitor, the double-scaling 840x525 resolution would be unavailable from there, although it would be from "NVIDIA X Server settings." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Sep 4 07:52:17 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-display-properties InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANGUAGE=en_CA:en LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) XsessionErrors: (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.SectionsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. (:1332): dee-WARNING **: Transaction from com.canonical.Unity.FilesPlace.GroupsModel is in the past. Ignoring transaction. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/840940/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp