[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1101829] Re: Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

2013-03-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/raring-proposed/libav

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101829

Title:
  Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

Status in “libav” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  libavutil-dev from quantal (6:0.8.3-6ubuntu2) and quantal-updates
  (6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1) only depend on libavutil-51. It should
  depend on libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51 instead.

  The libavutil-dev package from precise and raring correctly depend on
  libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1101829/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1101829] Re: Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

2013-03-30 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libav - 6:0.8.6-1ubuntu1

---
libav (6:0.8.6-1ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian/unstable, LP: #1160734, remaining changes:
- don't build against libdirac, lame, libopenjpeg, librtmp, frei0r,
  vo-aacenc, vo-amrenc, x264, and xvid  (all in universe)
- do not build libav-extra-dbg, it is build from the libav-extra source
  package in ubuntu.
- drop libav-regular-dbg, not necessary in ubuntu
- Adjust LIB_PKGS/LIB_PKGS2 lists in debian/rules
- several ifdefs in debian/rules that allow the use of the same file
  in libav and libav-extra (most of this can be merged into the debian
  package)
  * Tested that co-instability of libavcodec-dev with libavcodec-extra-53 works.
LP: #1143929, #1101829
  * Remove all debug packages. In ubuntu, we provide debug symbols via the
.ddeb infrastructure.

libav (6:0.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Imported Upstream version 0.8.6, new releases fixes:
- h264: check for luma and chroma bit depth being equal (CVE-2013-2277)
- iff: validate CMAP palette size (CVE-2013-2495)
- msrledec: convert to bytestream2 API and add proper bounds checking 
(CVE-2013-2496)
- vorbisdec: Error on bark_map_size equal to 0 (CVE-2013-0894)
- Thus, closes: #703200

libav (6:0.8.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream security/bugfix release. New releases fixes
(bug numbers reference http://bugzilla.libav.org, Closes: #694483)
- Indeo 4 (CVE-2012-2791)
- VP5/VP6 (CVE-2012-2783)
- Indeo 3 (CVE-2012-2804)
- MPEG-1/2 (CVE-2012-2803)
- MP3 (CVE-2012-2797)
- AAC (CVE-2012-5144)
- AC-3 (CVE-2012-2802)
- AVS (CVE-2012-2801)
- DFA (CVE-2012-2798)
- ID3v2 (Bug 395)
- Serious Memory leaks on broken Ogg files
  * drop recordshow script. This clearly undermaintained script has
unclear copyright status and is unlikely to work properly anyway.
 -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de   Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:57:15 +0100

** Changed in: libav (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2783

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2791

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2797

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2798

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2801

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2802

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2803

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2804

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-5144

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-0894

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2277

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2495

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2496

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101829

Title:
  Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

Status in “libav” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  libavutil-dev from quantal (6:0.8.3-6ubuntu2) and quantal-updates
  (6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1) only depend on libavutil-51. It should
  depend on libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51 instead.

  The libavutil-dev package from precise and raring correctly depend on
  libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1101829/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1101829] Re: Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

2013-01-19 Thread Paolo Rotolo
** Changed in: libav (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101829

Title:
  Missing alternative libavutil-exta-51 dependency

Status in “libav” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  libavutil-dev from quantal (6:0.8.3-6ubuntu2) and quantal-updates
  (6:0.8.4-0ubuntu0.12.10.1) only depend on libavutil-51. It should
  depend on libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51 instead.

  The libavutil-dev package from precise and raring correctly depend on
  libavutil-51 | libavutil-exta-51.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1101829/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp