[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
This bug is still there, I am interested in discussing it, but nobody
assigned this bug to anybody.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-terminal package in Fedora:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The more gnome-specific and detailed bug description:

  the gnome-terminal either ignores or misinterprets the

  --geometry=+0+0 , --geometry=+0-0 , --geometry=-0+0 and
  --geometry=-0-0

  requests, while mate-terminal executes the correct positioning in the
  same environment (display manager and window manager).

  In case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the requests listed
  above, while mate-terminal is correctly positioned, in contrary to the
  urban legend, that under Wayland such a positioning is imposibble.

  In case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal positions itself into the corners
  of the rectangle containing the physical screens, even if that corner
  is not inside any of the physical screens.

  I.e.: in case of Xorg the gnome-terminal is ready to position itself
  into a not visible corner of the virtual space contaning the physical
  screens instead of do the same as the mate-terminal can do: to
  position itself into a corner of the visible physical screen.

  === The bug of gnome-terminal is that it is not able to position
  intself into visible corners, while the mate-terminal can do it, ...
  and in general the usual graphical programs can do it since the 80's.

  *** The original bug description:

  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man
  page of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the
  geometry request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by
  the automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".

  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For
  example, 80x24 or 80x24+200+200."

  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2022-01-20 Thread Péter Prőhle
tags:added: impish

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-terminal package in Fedora:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The more gnome-specific and detailed bug description:

  the gnome-terminal either ignores or misinterprets the

  --geometry=+0+0 , --geometry=+0-0 , --geometry=-0+0 and
  --geometry=-0-0

  requests, while mate-terminal executes the correct positioning in the
  same environment (display manager and window manager).

  In case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the requests listed
  above, while mate-terminal is correctly positioned, in contrary to the
  urban legend, that under Wayland such a positioning is imposibble.

  In case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal positions itself into the corners
  of the rectangle containing the physical screens, even if that corner
  is not inside any of the physical screens.

  I.e.: in case of Xorg the gnome-terminal is ready to position itself
  into a not visible corner of the virtual space contaning the physical
  screens instead of do the same as the mate-terminal can do: to
  position itself into a corner of the visible physical screen.

  === The bug of gnome-terminal is that it is not able to position
  intself into visible corners, while the mate-terminal can do it, ...
  and in general the usual graphical programs can do it since the 80's.

  *** The original bug description:

  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man
  page of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the
  geometry request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by
  the automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".

  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For
  example, 80x24 or 80x24+200+200."

  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Description changed:

+ The more gnome-specific and detailed bug description:
+ 
+ the gnome-terminal either ignores or misinterprets the
+ 
+ --geometry=+0+0 , --geometry=+0-0 , --geometry=-0+0 and --geometry=-0-0
+ 
+ requests, while mate-terminal executes the correct positioning in the
+ same environment (display manager and window manager).
+ 
+ In case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the requests listed
+ above, while mate-terminal is correctly positioned, in contrary to the
+ urban legend, that under Wayland such a positioning is imposibble.
+ 
+ In case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal positions itself into the corners of
+ the rectangle containing the physical screens, even if that corner is
+ not inside any of the physical screens.
+ 
+ I.e.: in case of Xorg the gnome-terminal is ready to position itself
+ into a not visible corner of the virtual space contaning the physical
+ screens instead of do the same as the mate-terminal can do: to position
+ itself into a corner of the visible physical screen.
+ 
+ === The bug of gnome-terminal is that it is not able to position intself
+ into visible corners, while the mate-terminal can do it, ... and in
+ general the usual graphical programs can do it since the 80's.
+ 
+ *** The original bug description:
+ 
  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man page
  of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the geometry
  request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by the
  automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".
  
  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For example,
  80x24 or 80x24+200+200."
  
  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

** Tags removed: wayland wayland-session
** Tags added: geometry gnome-terminal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-terminal package in Fedora:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The more gnome-specific and detailed bug description:

  the gnome-terminal either ignores or misinterprets the

  --geometry=+0+0 , --geometry=+0-0 , --geometry=-0+0 and
  --geometry=-0-0

  requests, while mate-terminal executes the correct positioning in the
  same environment (display manager and window manager).

  In case of Wayland, the gnome-terminal ignores the requests listed
  above, while mate-terminal is correctly positioned, in contrary to the
  urban legend, that under Wayland such a positioning is imposibble.

  In case of Xorg, the gnome-terminal positions itself into the corners
  of the rectangle containing the physical screens, even if that corner
  is not inside any of the physical screens.

  I.e.: in case of Xorg the gnome-terminal is ready to position itself
  into a not visible corner of the virtual space contaning the physical
  screens instead of do the same as the mate-terminal can do: to
  position itself into a corner of the visible physical screen.

  === The bug of gnome-terminal is that it is not able to position
  intself into visible corners, while the mate-terminal can do it, ...
  and in general the usual graphical programs can do it since the 80's.

  *** The original bug description:

  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man
  page of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the
  geometry request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by
  the automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".

  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For
  example, 80x24 or 80x24+200+200."

  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925732] Re: gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Summary changed:

- [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the 
gnome-terminal
+ gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732

Title:
  gnome-terminal ignores the --geometry location requests

Status in gnome-terminal package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnome-terminal package in Fedora:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The example "gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+200+200" from the man
  page of gnome-terminal, does not work: while the 80x24 part of the
  geometry request is executed, the location +200+200 is overridden by
  the automatic positioning of new windows by the "Gnome Shell".

  "--geometry=GEOMETRY Set the window size as COLSxROWS+X+Y. For
  example, 80x24 or 80x24+200+200."

  The "+X+Y" part is ignored since I upgraded from 20.10 to 21.04
  yesterday, just 4 hours after the official release.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1925732/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp