[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

2014-04-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: langpack-o-matic
   Importance: Low => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

2013-09-12 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Priority set to 'Low' because this bug is about a non-ideal default
configuration.

** Changed in: gutenprint (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

2013-09-12 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Status changed to 'Triaged' because the bug is:

- Valid.
- Well described.
- Reported in the upstream project (Ubuntu in Launchpad).
- Ready to be worked on by a developer.

** Changed in: gutenprint (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

2013-05-23 Thread Hendrik Knackstedt
** Summary changed:

- gutenprint locales need to be shipped as PO files
+ gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint: Locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint locales need to be shipped as PO files

2013-05-23 Thread Hendrik Knackstedt
** Tags added: saucy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 415452] Re: gutenprint locales need to be shipped as PO files

2013-05-12 Thread Hendrik Knackstedt
What's up with this bug? Any news? Anything that could be done to help
fix this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415452

Title:
  gutenprint locales need to be shipped as PO files

Status in scripts for language pack handling and generating:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Translations:
  Triaged
Status in “gutenprint” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
  New

Bug description:
  The gutenprint source package creates, amongst others, the gutenprint-
  locales binary package (http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/gutenprint-
  locales).

  There are several problems with this package:

  * It installs source .po files in /usr/share/locale. This is wrong in the 
sense that only binary .mo files should be installed there, if at all. Gettext 
programs cannot use the source .po files to load translations.
  * There is no need for the package to install translations, even if they were 
in compiled .mo format, since they are already stripped from the gutenprint 
source package, imported into Launchpad 
(https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gutenprint) and 
then exported in language packs (as an example, language-pack-de-base installs 
these translations in /usr/share/locale-langpack/de/LC_MESSAGES/gutenprint.mo)

  In short, it seems that there is no need for building this particular
  package and having it in the repos, unless it is fixed to install .mo
  translations -although they will in fact be extracted and put in the
  language packs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/langpack-o-matic/+bug/415452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp