[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #549: More changes on the reclaimer for better perfor...

[clebertsuconic]

Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/549
  
@barreiro can you rebase this against master?
git pull --rebase upstream master
git push origin -f

I will run some tests before merging it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] activemq pull request #190: Amq 6317 create schema statements

[bastijns-jeroen]

GitHub user bastijns-jeroen opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/190

Amq 6317 create schema statements



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/bastijns-jeroen/activemq 
AMQ-6317-createSchemaStatements

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/190.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #190


commit 68b627b5ee32f81e97544bb1a731c50adbb36bf7
Author: Jeroen Bastijns 
Date:   2016-06-09T09:09:18Z

AMQ-6317: Use an SQL Statement for each createSchemaStatement

commit abaa01c6683e1a7391abf944d7e82a1710882d33
Author: Jeroen Bastijns 
Date:   2016-06-10T06:42:17Z

AMQ-6317: fix formatting

commit 8df550d3b2b9bc1445e1d20d39f6963117752ef1
Author: Jeroen Bastijns 
Date:   2016-06-16T13:32:52Z

AMQ-6317: Adapt test to master




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Active MQ Performance

[ActiveMQ Investigation]

Hello Matt,

Thanks for your message. I will do these settings and see what happens. I
have attached links to code and results.

My test show these two problems:

- ActiveMQ Queue takes more time in Persistent Mode (Q28,Q31 rows in excel
sheet) as compared to Sonic.
- ActiveMQ Non Persistent Per Message Max time is very high. (Example: U59,
U56). It looks consumer is not fast enough to process them.

Overall, Maximum Time taken by any message in flight between producer and
sender in ActiveMQ is quote high.



I have copied the code to IDEONE editor (it's just a copy and IDEONE don't
have necessary libs) to share if it helps:

Producer: http://ideone.com/4nmARP
Consumer: http://ideone.com/QnFHYk

Results:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hHt7EsgwGSxHR11edunWSuzzTbc88Wch8lFkBXmPxUI/edit?usp=sharing

If you can't access code on IDEONE:

Producer -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RbGUKYUbWUk8LcxqbCwf53_lNEfhnxfDz3TPqSNT2Dg/edit?usp=sharing

Consumer -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jW5qPG40yUTBaHezEpjKrwBFZriL2bpxHZcM0U_2Gfk/edit?usp=sharing


Sorry if above link passage is not as per forum protocol. I am new to the
forum.

Thanks
AJ



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tp4712952p4713058.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.