Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml
Hi Clebert, The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. It's what I'm doing for Karaf: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags Regards JB On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote: > The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache > Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the > Source. > > I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it > would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the > progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their > support on docker or not. > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: >> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image >> for ActiveMQ >> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) >> >> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml
The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the Source. I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their support on docker or not. On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: > - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image > for ActiveMQ > - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) > > I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Clebert Suconic
Re: NMS 1.8.0 SessionExtensions not defined on .NET Framework
Created as AMQNET-631 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-631 - thanks! On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:16 PM Krzysztof wrote: > Hi, > > We must have missed that during the work on .net standard migration. Feel > free to submit the issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQNET/summary and we can expose > this api back again. > > Krzysztof Porebski > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 9:02 PM W B D wrote: > > > I have tried updating the Apache.ActiveMQ.NMS Nuget package to 1.8.0 in > my > > project, and am getting build errors indicating that the GetDestination > > method is not available on ISession. > > > > This method is defined in the SessionExtensions class, but it is > > conditionally compiled only if the symbol MONO or NET_3_5 is defined. > > > > I assume that this was defined previously, but is now inadvertently > omitted > > as part of the restructuring that was done for 1.8. Probably, the > extension > > methods could be defined for any supported version of .NET at this point, > > as .NET < 3.5 is no longer supported by the project. > > > > The extension method simply delegates to SessionUtil.GetDestination, > which > > is exposed to public as well, so for my immediate need I just called that > > directly. > > However, I assume this should not have been necessary and that the > > extension methods should still be provided as before, rather than have a > > breaking change. > > >
