Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
Any update on this? Thanks, sv - Stephen Vincent -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-AcitveMQ-5-7-1-release-tp4658048p4659843.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
I think if we can build a list of of svn commits that we want to pull into the 5.7.1 then can setup /w the needed changes. Any takers? On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Steve.V. stephen.vinc...@sas.com wrote: Any update on this? Thanks, sv - Stephen Vincent -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-AcitveMQ-5-7-1-release-tp4658048p4659843.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ** *Hiram Chirino* *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.* *hchir...@redhat.com hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com* *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirinohttp://twitter.com/hiramchirino * *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo http://hiramchirino.com/blog/*
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
Hello, since most of the people here agreed with 5.7.1 release, I'm just wondering, is there any concrete plan yet to release it? We are using 5.3 and are planning to upgrade. If there will be a 5.7.1 soon than we would like to wait. But if not, we will go for 5.7.0. Thanks. Regards Amex -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-AcitveMQ-5-7-1-release-tp4658048p4659635.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
+0 I'm neutral on this one. No strong feelings either way, unless there was a show-stopper bug fixed in the core product (not counting the XSS problem in the demos). On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Gaurav Sharma gaurav.cs.sha...@gmail.comwrote: +1 We might also consider rolling any patches for the lease db locker. When I had tested the original patch against oracle, it was working okay but folks are now reporting that the functionality is broken in 5.7 On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:01, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits that has since been fixed. As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this stable release with those bug fixes. And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting the broker. Just a though. -- Claus Ibsen - Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
[DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
Hi Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits that has since been fixed. As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this stable release with those bug fixes. And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting the broker. Just a though. -- Claus Ibsen - Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
+1 ... we should branch off the tag and back port those improvements. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits that has since been fixed. As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this stable release with those bug fixes. And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting the broker. Just a though. -- Claus Ibsen - Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen -- ** *Hiram Chirino* *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.* *hchir...@redhat.com hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com* *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirinohttp://twitter.com/hiramchirino * *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo http://hiramchirino.com/blog/*
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
+1 On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 15:01 +0200, Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits that has since been fixed. As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this stable release with those bug fixes. And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting the broker. Just a though. -- Tim Bish Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. tim.b...@redhat.com | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: [DISCUSS] - AcitveMQ 5.7.1 release
+1 We might also consider rolling any patches for the lease db locker. When I had tested the original patch against oracle, it was working okay but folks are now reporting that the functionality is broken in 5.7 On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:01, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yes I know we recently did a 5.7.0 release. However since we got some bug fixes, and also there were some files missing in the binary kits that has since been fixed. As one of the goals for 5.8.0 is to reduce the activemq-core and move stuff to separate transports / stores / spring-xbean etc. I wonder if we should consider cutting a 5.7.1 before we start on these goals mentioned above for real. Then the community has this stable release with those bug fixes. And one of the fixes I would like to get in the 5.7.1 would also to consider making it more secure out of the box. Eg the mail I posted today about not including the samples out of the box, when starting the broker. Just a though. -- Claus Ibsen - Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
