Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-11 Thread artnaseef 
Re-reading the entire thread, it appears there is an mbean leak.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691397.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-11 Thread artnaseef 
A leak is a major concern.  

With that said, I have questions.  First, I thought the creation of addition
mbeans was failing, is that not right?  If so, then what is actually
leaking?  Are the mbeans being created but not removed?

Also, can you clarify under what conditions this occurs?  For example, does
it involve the use of an anonymous producer?




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691394.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-11 Thread Claus Ibsen 
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:00 AM, artnaseef  wrote:
> Hey Claus - we can work on a 5.10.2; this bug exists in 5.10.1?
>

Yes 5.10.1 and 5.11.0 are affected.


> Before starting down that route, though, is it possible to clarify the
> impact of this bug?  It sounds like a nuisance from what I read - and could
> hurt performance in some use-cases.  Is that fair?
>
>

IMHO its a major issue that can cause the broker to run out of memory,
and of course before that slow down. And managing the broker becomes
more problematic as the JMX tree has an ever grown number of mbeans.

The issue is caused when clients are using JMS and the activemq-pool
and/or activemq-jms-pool.
And out of the box Camel users would usually do that.



>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691299.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-10 Thread artnaseef 
Hey Claus - we can work on a 5.10.2; this bug exists in 5.10.1?

Before starting down that route, though, is it possible to clarify the
impact of this bug?  It sounds like a nuisance from what I read - and could
hurt performance in some use-cases.  Is that fair?



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691299.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Claus Ibsen 
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Paul Gale  wrote:
> Given Claus' discovery does the severity of the issue warrant an immediate
> dot release 5.11.1?
>

Its fixed now on master and 2.11 branch. And IMHO should be backported
to 5.10.x branch as well.

Patch releases would be a good idea, starting with 5.10.2, and then
catch up with a few other fixes before doing 5.11.1.


> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Okay I have narrowed it down to the git commit that caused this issue.
>> I posted that in the ticket.
>>
>> It its due this ticket:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5015
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Claus Ibsen 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I logged a ticket about this. Not sure what the title it, but I
>> > suspect its related to the activemq-pool.
>> >
>> > I found an easier way of reproducing it using the
>> camel-example-management.
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5564
>> >
>> > Just change the AMQ version in its pom.xml
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.camel.example.management.*
>> >
>>  
>> org.apache.activemq.xbean,org.apache.activemq.broker,org.apache.activemq.pool
>> >   
>> >   
>> >   5.11.0
>> > 
>> >
>> > I attached screenshot of 5.10.0 working and 5.10.1 and 5.11.0 failing.
>> > So as the issue is introduced in 5.10.1 that narrows down what code
>> > change caused this, as it must be a commit in that patch branch.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Claus Ibsen 
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Just upgraded Camel master branch to 5.11.0 and you can reproduce the
>> >> issue there also
>> >>
>> >> cd examples/camel-example-management
>> >> mvn clean install camel:run
>> >>
>> >> Connect to the JVM using jconsole.
>> >>
>> >> Notice the AcitveMQ tree under dynamic producers keeps adding new
>> >> mbeans, until your JVM runs out of memory.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Claus Ibsen 
>> wrote:
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
>> >>> Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.
>> >>>
>> >>> I posted output from console as 2 gists
>> >>>
>> >>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599
>> >>>
>> >>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully 
>> wrote:
>>  claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
>>  culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but
>> that
>>  would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
>>  useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
>>  factory.
>> 
>>  On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
>> > release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
>> >
>> > The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
>> > producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app
>> with
>> > the AMQ connection pool.
>> >
>> > Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
>> > mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
>> > no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
>> >
>> > Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
>> > okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
>> > then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
>> >
>> > I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
>> > redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
>> >
>> >
>> > I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered
>> and
>> > you can see
>> >
>> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
>> > notification:
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
>> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
>> > notification:
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
>> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
>> > notification:
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicP

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Paul Gale 
Actually if you're working with a forked repo (as I am) the command will be:

git fetch --tags upstream

Just an FYI


Thanks,
Paul

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, artnaseef  wrote:

> Yup:
>
> git tag -v activemq-5.11.0
>
>
> git fetch --tags
>
> get tag -v actrivemq-5.11.0
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691128.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
Yup:

git tag -v activemq-5.11.0


git fetch --tags

get tag -v actrivemq-5.11.0




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691128.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
Ahh, good catch dkulp.  Perhaps Paul needs to update his repo?  I think I
need to do that too.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691127.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Daniel Kulp 


> On Feb 5, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Paul Gale  wrote:
> 
> I am trying to build 5.11.0 based on the Git tag "activemq-5.11.0".
> However, this tag points to commit 48b0cf3 dating from 2014-12-29.
> 
> Shouldn't this tag point to commit 4ba1a16 dated 2015-01-30? If so, can one
> of the committers please move said tag?

The tag seems OK in the Apache repo which is the one that matters:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5


Dan



> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:39 PM, artnaseef  wrote:
> 
>> Good question - do we know the exact conditions required to cause the
>> problem?  And all of the impacts when the problem occurs?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691118.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
Cool - thanks Tim.  Let me know if I can help.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691124.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
The tag should be moved to the actual release.  I don't want to touch that
myself though as I do not know how to be sure which commit is truly the
correct one.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691123.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Paul Gale 
I am trying to build 5.11.0 based on the Git tag "activemq-5.11.0".
However, this tag points to commit 48b0cf3 dating from 2014-12-29.

Shouldn't this tag point to commit 4ba1a16 dated 2015-01-30? If so, can one
of the committers please move said tag?

Thanks,
Paul

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:39 PM, artnaseef  wrote:

> Good question - do we know the exact conditions required to cause the
> problem?  And all of the impacts when the problem occurs?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691118.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Timothy Bish 

On 02/05/2015 02:37 PM, artnaseef wrote:

Good find Claus.  I'll try to find time tonight to look at that one as it's
an area I've been in before.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691117.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.


I'm on it.

--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
Good question - do we know the exact conditions required to cause the
problem?  And all of the impacts when the problem occurs?



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691118.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread artnaseef 
Good find Claus.  I'll try to find time tonight to look at that one as it's
an area I've been in before.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4691117.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Paul Gale 
Given Claus' discovery does the severity of the issue warrant an immediate
dot release 5.11.1?

Thanks,
Paul

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:

> Hi
>
> Okay I have narrowed it down to the git commit that caused this issue.
> I posted that in the ticket.
>
> It its due this ticket:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5015
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Claus Ibsen 
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I logged a ticket about this. Not sure what the title it, but I
> > suspect its related to the activemq-pool.
> >
> > I found an easier way of reproducing it using the
> camel-example-management.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5564
> >
> > Just change the AMQ version in its pom.xml
> >
> > 
> >
>  
> org.apache.camel.example.management.*
> >
>  
> org.apache.activemq.xbean,org.apache.activemq.broker,org.apache.activemq.pool
> >   
> >   
> >   5.11.0
> > 
> >
> > I attached screenshot of 5.10.0 working and 5.10.1 and 5.11.0 failing.
> > So as the issue is introduced in 5.10.1 that narrows down what code
> > change caused this, as it must be a commit in that patch branch.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Claus Ibsen 
> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Just upgraded Camel master branch to 5.11.0 and you can reproduce the
> >> issue there also
> >>
> >> cd examples/camel-example-management
> >> mvn clean install camel:run
> >>
> >> Connect to the JVM using jconsole.
> >>
> >> Notice the AcitveMQ tree under dynamic producers keeps adding new
> >> mbeans, until your JVM runs out of memory.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Claus Ibsen 
> wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
> >>> Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.
> >>>
> >>> I posted output from console as 2 gists
> >>>
> >>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599
> >>>
> >>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully 
> wrote:
>  claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
>  culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but
> that
>  would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
>  useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
>  factory.
> 
>  On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen 
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
> > release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
> >
> > The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
> > producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app
> with
> > the AMQ connection pool.
> >
> > Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
> > mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
> > no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
> >
> > Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
> > okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
> > then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
> >
> > I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
> > redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
> >
> >
> > I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered
> and
> > you can see
> >
> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
> > notification:
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
> > notification:
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
> > notification:
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
> > WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
> > notification:
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=brok

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-05 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

Okay I have narrowed it down to the git commit that caused this issue.
I posted that in the ticket.

It its due this ticket:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5015

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> I logged a ticket about this. Not sure what the title it, but I
> suspect its related to the activemq-pool.
>
> I found an easier way of reproducing it using the camel-example-management.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5564
>
> Just change the AMQ version in its pom.xml
>
> 
> 
> org.apache.camel.example.management.*
> 
> org.apache.activemq.xbean,org.apache.activemq.broker,org.apache.activemq.pool
>   
>   
>   5.11.0
> 
>
> I attached screenshot of 5.10.0 working and 5.10.1 and 5.11.0 failing.
> So as the issue is introduced in 5.10.1 that narrows down what code
> change caused this, as it must be a commit in that patch branch.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just upgraded Camel master branch to 5.11.0 and you can reproduce the
>> issue there also
>>
>> cd examples/camel-example-management
>> mvn clean install camel:run
>>
>> Connect to the JVM using jconsole.
>>
>> Notice the AcitveMQ tree under dynamic producers keeps adding new
>> mbeans, until your JVM runs out of memory.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
>>> Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.
>>>
>>> I posted output from console as 2 gists
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599
>>>
>>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
 claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
 culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but that
 would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
 useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
 factory.

 On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
> release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
>
> The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
> producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
> the AMQ connection pool.
>
> Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
> mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
> no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
>
> Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
> okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
> then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
>
> I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
> redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
>
>
> I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
> you can see
>
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.re

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

On 01/30/2015 03:00 PM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

-note-
this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
mvn install.
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
-end note-

Could you please review the artifacts and vote?

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1

Regards,
Gary.



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-04 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

I logged a ticket about this. Not sure what the title it, but I
suspect its related to the activemq-pool.

I found an easier way of reproducing it using the camel-example-management.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5564

Just change the AMQ version in its pom.xml



org.apache.camel.example.management.*

org.apache.activemq.xbean,org.apache.activemq.broker,org.apache.activemq.pool
  
  
  5.11.0


I attached screenshot of 5.10.0 working and 5.10.1 and 5.11.0 failing.
So as the issue is introduced in 5.10.1 that narrows down what code
change caused this, as it must be a commit in that patch branch.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just upgraded Camel master branch to 5.11.0 and you can reproduce the
> issue there also
>
> cd examples/camel-example-management
> mvn clean install camel:run
>
> Connect to the JVM using jconsole.
>
> Notice the AcitveMQ tree under dynamic producers keeps adding new
> mbeans, until your JVM runs out of memory.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
>> Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.
>>
>> I posted output from console as 2 gists
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>>> claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
>>> culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but that
>>> would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
>>> useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
>>> factory.
>>>
>>> On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
 Hi

 Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
 release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.

 The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
 producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
 the AMQ connection pool.

 Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
 mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
 no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)

 Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
 okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
 then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.

 I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
 redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.


 I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
 you can see

 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_1,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_2_11_8]
 WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56629@31316 | JMX
 notification: 
 javax.management.MBeanServerNotification

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-04 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

Just upgraded Camel master branch to 5.11.0 and you can reproduce the
issue there also

cd examples/camel-example-management
mvn clean install camel:run

Connect to the JVM using jconsole.

Notice the AcitveMQ tree under dynamic producers keeps adding new
mbeans, until your JVM runs out of memory.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
> Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.
>
> I posted output from console as 2 gists
>
> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599
>
> https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>> claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
>> culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but that
>> would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
>> useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
>> factory.
>>
>> On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
>>> release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
>>>
>>> The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
>>> producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
>>> the AMQ connection pool.
>>>
>>> Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
>>> mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
>>> no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
>>>
>>> Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
>>> okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
>>> then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
>>>
>>> I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
>>> redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
>>> you can see
>>>
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_1,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_2_11_8]
>>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56629@31316 | JMX
>>> notification: 
>>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_2,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_3_1_9]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just wanted to share this and say there is maybe a glitch in this release.
>>>
>>> As I discovered this using hawtio, I created a branch with my current
>>> work code that reproduces the issue.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/tree/amq511bug
>>>
>>> The commit has instructions how to reproduce.
>>> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/commit/9162529299059d25e1e6b7c7d7e0be45ee4556b4
>>>
>>> As I was a hunt in the hay-stack I had to disable various stuff in the
>>> hawtio spring xml file w

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-04 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

I have done as Arthur suggested to dump the stacktrace, and also with
Gary's turn on|off the anonoymous producers.

I posted output from console as 2 gists

https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/b5fbb1287d383107e599

https://gist.github.com/davsclaus/0472ed0ab85ec5af9e79

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
> culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but that
> would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
> useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
> factory.
>
> On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
>> release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
>>
>> The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
>> producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
>> the AMQ connection pool.
>>
>> Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
>> mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
>> no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
>>
>> Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
>> okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
>> then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
>>
>> I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
>> redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
>>
>>
>> I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
>> you can see
>>
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_1,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_2_11_8]
>> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56629@31316 | JMX
>> notification: 
>> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_2,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_3_1_9]
>>
>>
>>
>> Just wanted to share this and say there is maybe a glitch in this release.
>>
>> As I discovered this using hawtio, I created a branch with my current
>> work code that reproduces the issue.
>>
>> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/tree/amq511bug
>>
>> The commit has instructions how to reproduce.
>> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/commit/9162529299059d25e1e6b7c7d7e0be45ee4556b4
>>
>> As I was a hunt in the hay-stack I had to disable various stuff in the
>> hawtio spring xml file where we setup stuff we use for testing and
>> developing, hence the removal of the NOB, and some Camel routes and
>> whatnot.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
>>> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>>>
>>> -note-
>>> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-03 Thread Gary Tully 
claus, that looks like producers are not being cached - I thought the
culprit may be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4968 but that
would have made 5.10. In any event, can you set
useAnonymousProducers=false on your activemq pooled connection
factory.

On 3 February 2015 at 16:55, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
> release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.
>
> The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
> producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
> the AMQ connection pool.
>
> Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
> mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
> no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)
>
> Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
> okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
> then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.
>
> I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
> redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.
>
>
> I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
> you can see
>
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_1,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_2_11_8]
> WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56629@31316 | JMX
> notification: 
> javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_2,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_3_1_9]
>
>
>
> Just wanted to share this and say there is maybe a glitch in this release.
>
> As I discovered this using hawtio, I created a branch with my current
> work code that reproduces the issue.
>
> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/tree/amq511bug
>
> The commit has instructions how to reproduce.
> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/commit/9162529299059d25e1e6b7c7d7e0be45ee4556b4
>
> As I was a hunt in the hay-stack I had to disable various stuff in the
> hawtio spring xml file where we setup stuff we use for testing and
> developing, hence the removal of the NOB, and some Camel routes and
> whatnot.
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
>> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> -note-
>> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
>> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
>> mvn install.
>> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
>> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
>> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
>> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
>> -end note-
>>
>> Could you please review the artifacts and

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-03 Thread artnaseef 
Hey Claus - can you try dumping the stack trace when the MBeans are created
and removed to see the internal cause?  I'm thinking along the following
lines:

LOG.warn(..., new Exception())




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-rc3-tp4690743p4690944.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-03 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

Just wanted to say I have stumbled on a weird issue with the 5.11.0
release which I had trouble reproducing consistently.

The issue is subtle causing AMQ to continuously re-create dynamic
producer mbeans in the JMX tree. This is using a Camel spring app with
the AMQ connection pool.

Though just now I was able to see that 5.10.0 was stable and the
mbeans didnt re-create continusly, but with 5.11.0 that happens (with
no other change that switching from 5.10.0 to 5.11.0)

Though I think that issue could go unnoticed as the jmx tree looks
okay, but you may discover a flicker in jconsole when it redraws, and
then there is a little CPU time to create/destroy the mbeans.

I noticed this with hawtio as it also "flicker" when the jmx tree is
redrawn. And therefore was using hawtio to track down the issue.


I enabled a WARN logging when a mbean was registerede/unregistered and
you can see

WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56632@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_5,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_6_1_8]
WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56633@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_6,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_7_1_8]
WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56634@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_7,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_8_1_8]
WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56626@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_8,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_1_1_8]
WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56628@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_1,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_2_11_8]
WARN  | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:56629@31316 | JMX
notification: 
javax.management.MBeanServerNotification[source=JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerDelegate][type=JMX.mbean.registered][message=][mbeanName=org.apache.activemq:type=Broker,brokerName=broker1,endpoint=dynamicProducer,clientId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-4_2,producerId=ID_davsclaus.air-56625-1422981975940-5_3_1_9]



Just wanted to share this and say there is maybe a glitch in this release.

As I discovered this using hawtio, I created a branch with my current
work code that reproduces the issue.

https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/tree/amq511bug

The commit has instructions how to reproduce.
https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/commit/9162529299059d25e1e6b7c7d7e0be45ee4556b4

As I was a hunt in the hay-stack I had to disable various stuff in the
hawtio spring xml file where we setup stuff we use for testing and
developing, hence the removal of the NOB, and some Camel routes and
whatnot.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/act

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Daniel Kulp 
+1

Looks good.

Dan



> On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> 
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
> 
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
> 
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> 
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> 
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> 
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
> 
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
> 
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
> Here's my +1
> 
> Regards,
> Gary.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Rob Davies 

+1


Gary Tully 
30 January 2015 14:00
Hi folks,

I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 
release.

This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

-note-
this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case 
from rc2

however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
mvn install.
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to 
address that.

I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
-end note-

Could you please review the artifacts and vote?

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1

Regards,
Gary.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Jim Gomes 
+1

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, 8:11 AM Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> * Sigs ok
> * Legal ok (almost)
>- a bunch of Copyright notices pointing to 2014 or 2013 (need to
> cleanup)
> * Builds from source ok (almost)
>
> There is one consistent failure in activemq-karaf-itest, however test
> does pass when ran individually. No product defect, but should be
> addressed.
> ActiveMQAMQPBrokerFeatureTest>ActiveMQBrokerFeatureTest.test:66->
> AbstractJmsFeatureTest.produceMessage:67->getConnection:53
> » ClassNotFound
>
>
> All in all, quite impressive. Very solid release, awesome work.
>
> Thanks Gary,
> Hadrian
>
>
> On 01/30/2015 09:00 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> >
> > -note-
> > this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from
> rc2
> > however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> > mvn install.
> > I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address
> that.
> > I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> > disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> > round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> > -end note-
> >
> > Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
> >
> > The list of resolved issues is here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >
> > You can get binary distributions here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >
> > Source archives are here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >
> > Maven2 repository is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/
> >
> > Source tag:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=
> 66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
> >
> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gary.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

+1 (binding)

* Sigs ok
* Legal ok (almost)
  - a bunch of Copyright notices pointing to 2014 or 2013 (need to cleanup)
* Builds from source ok (almost)

There is one consistent failure in activemq-karaf-itest, however test 
does pass when ran individually. No product defect, but should be addressed.
ActiveMQAMQPBrokerFeatureTest>ActiveMQBrokerFeatureTest.test:66->AbstractJmsFeatureTest.produceMessage:67->getConnection:53 
» ClassNotFound



All in all, quite impressive. Very solid release, awesome work.

Thanks Gary,
Hadrian


On 01/30/2015 09:00 AM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

-note-
this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
mvn install.
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
-end note-

Could you please review the artifacts and vote?

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1

Regards,
Gary.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Hiram Chirino 
+1

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Gary.



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Robbie Gemmell 
+1 (non-binding)

I gave a kick of the tyres to the broker binaries on linux, verified
the checksums+sigs, built the source release skipping the tests, did a
'quick' subset of the tests (Client, Broker, Stomp, MQTT, JDBC,
LevelDB, AMQP), and verified a dependent project using the build
output.

Robbie

On 30 January 2015 at 14:00, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Gary.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-02-02 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Timothy Bish  wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 01/30/2015 09:00 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
>> release.
>> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> -note-
>> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from
>> rc2
>> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
>> mvn install.
>> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address
>> that.
>> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
>> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
>> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
>> -end note-
>>
>> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>>
>> You can get binary distributions here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>>
>> Source archives are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>>
>> Maven2 repository is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>>
>> Source tag:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=
>> 66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>>
>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gary.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
> tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
> skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-01-31 Thread Timothy Bish 

+1

On 01/30/2015 09:00 AM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

-note-
this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
mvn install.
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
-end note-

Could you please review the artifacts and vote?

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1

Regards,
Gary.




--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-01-31 Thread Krzysztof Sobkowiak 

+1 (non-binding)

Regards
Krzysztof

On 30.01.2015 15:00, Gary Tully wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Gary.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-01-31 Thread Jim Gomes 
+1

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015, 10:34 PM Claus Ibsen  wrote:

> Hi
>
> +1
>
> Tested against Camel in Action source code also.
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> >
> > -note-
> > this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from
> rc2
> > however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> > mvn install.
> > I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address
> that.
> > I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> > disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> > round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> > -end note-
> >
> > Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
> >
> > The list of resolved issues is here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >
> > You can get binary distributions here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >
> > Source archives are here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >
> > Maven2 repository is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1016/
> >
> > Source tag:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=
> 66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
> >
> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gary.
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8 : http://fabric8.io/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-01-30 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

+1

Tested against Camel in Action source code also.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> -note-
> this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
> however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
> mvn install.
> I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
> I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
> disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
> round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
> -end note-
>
> Could you please review the artifacts and vote?
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards,
> Gary.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0 (rc3)

2015-01-30 Thread Gary Tully 
Hi folks,

I've just cut a third release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

-note-
this candidate includes the fix for the 'reliably' broken test case from rc2
however there can be no expectation of a 'reliable' full test run from
mvn install.
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5552 to address that.
I think a resolution to that issue would address all of the
disapproving commentary on the rc2 vote. If you voted -1 last time
round, please chime in on AMQ-5552.
-end note-

Could you please review the artifacts and vote?

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1016/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=66bd5da9405765ddbc950b4f1c5a6ef6195207e5

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve the release as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here's my +1

Regards,
Gary.

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-30 Thread Gary Tully 
new rc with the reliable unit test failure resolved, on the way.

On 29 January 2015 at 17:56, Gary Tully  wrote:
> the pmc has decided, but the non binding -1 are accumulating. I will try 
> again.
>
> someone hit it on the head with "appropriate set of tests" to verify
> the distro. That does not exist today in the project. It is all or
> nothing. I can't see anyone taking our source and waiting hours for
> the tests to complete to get the artifacts. And anyone who does will
> not be put off by one known failure in thousands. In any event,  that
> is why we currently document to skip the tests.
> Now there is a job for someone to contribute to.
>
> On 29 January 2015 at 15:22, jgoodyear  wrote:
>>
>>  -1 (non-binding)
>>
>>  If users can't build the source as provided than it should not go out the
>> door.
>>
>>  At Apache Karaf we're held up RC processes many times due to test cases, in
>> fact the project can't go through the release:perform without the test cases
>> having run cleanly - the RC will fail out.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690646.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Gary Tully 
the pmc has decided, but the non binding -1 are accumulating. I will try again.

someone hit it on the head with "appropriate set of tests" to verify
the distro. That does not exist today in the project. It is all or
nothing. I can't see anyone taking our source and waiting hours for
the tests to complete to get the artifacts. And anyone who does will
not be put off by one known failure in thousands. In any event,  that
is why we currently document to skip the tests.
Now there is a job for someone to contribute to.

On 29 January 2015 at 15:22, jgoodyear  wrote:
>
>  -1 (non-binding)
>
>  If users can't build the source as provided than it should not go out the
> door.
>
>  At Apache Karaf we're held up RC processes many times due to test cases, in
> fact the project can't go through the release:perform without the test cases
> having run cleanly - the RC will fail out.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690646.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 
Right, but in the interest of speed the tests are skipped. Other than 
that, well, you're perfectly correct.


Hadrian


On 01/29/2015 10:22 AM, jgoodyear wrote:

  -1 (non-binding)

  If users can't build the source as provided than it should not go out the
door.

  At Apache Karaf we're held up RC processes many times due to test cases, in
fact the project can't go through the release:perform without the test cases
having run cleanly - the RC will fail out.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690646.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread jgoodyear 

 -1 (non-binding)

 If users can't build the source as provided than it should not go out the
door.

 At Apache Karaf we're held up RC processes many times due to test cases, in
fact the project can't go through the release:perform without the test cases
having run cleanly - the RC will fail out.  



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690646.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

Gary,

The ASF has clear, documented guidelines of what constitutes a release 
and what a release tester is supposed to do. I follow those guidelines.

You say you have better ones that take precedence. Uhm, ok.

In general I think I am quite a flexible person. A decent argument can 
easily sway my vote. It happened in the past. I don't see one in this 
case. I also don't know what else I could add that would be considered 
constructive along the lines that the quality of our releases is 
important and if it's reasonably possible we should try our best to 
ensure said quality. If you can think of such a positive, constructive 
argument, please consider that I made it (I tried my best in my own 
words). I myself am guilty of being more "flexible" in the past, I don't 
think this is a good thing and I will try to correct that.


That said, as I mentioned before, my guidelines also say that a release 
cannot be vetoed. So now we (pmc) need to make a choice.


Cheers,
Hadrian


On 01/29/2015 08:33 AM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hadrian,
the true writer really is the reader. If the guidelines replaced "
compile it as provided", with " compile and tests it as provided" your
suggestion would have some merit.
We even document[1] the maven skip tests build option.

[1] http://activemq.apache.org/building.html

On 29 January 2015 at 12:06, Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:

Gary,

It's a very simple matter. We release source distributions, not binaries.
One cannot reliably build binaries from the source distro. Even with -fae,
everything else depending stomp is skipped, so failures may be hiding other
problems. I would suggest carefully reviewing the ASF release policy [1], in
particular the #what and #approving-a-release sections. Note the use of
terms "must" (pmc must obey requirements [...]) and "may" (releases may not
be vetoed).

How about re-cutting the release after making sure the tests pass reliably?

Cheers,
Hadrian


[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html



On 01/29/2015 06:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:

Dan,
the test is mixing stomp and openwire and asserting a jms semantic in
the event of a stomp disconnect without an unsubscribe. The patch
applied broker configuration that makes the test work reliably. Having
a reliable redelivery flag semantic has been evolving for some time.
Stomp users have never had redelivery flag semantics that could be
relied on so they won't care. The full story is in the commit log.

On 28 January 2015 at 17:26, Daniel Kulp  wrote:

I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with
the failing tests.

The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the
original test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the
stomp code that the new patch is really just working around.   Are users
that are using stomp going to have to make the same changes that were done
in the test in their environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.

Thanks!
Dan




On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread jgenender 
I have to agree on this.  Cutting a release with broken tests is a slippery
slope.  This needs to build out-of-the-box so folks can build this
themselves.  This is the expectation and its what lets people fix heir own
issues.  Once we start ignoring a few tests, we start ignoring a lot of
tests.  The whole point on unit tests is to see what code broke other
functionality.

This gets my -1 (nonbinding) vote.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690633.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread James Carman 
You're splitting hairs here.  Our users expect to be able to download
the source distribution and use THE BUILD to generate the resulting
software.  Part of the build is running the appropriate tests to
assure it is working properly.  How many maven tutorials do you see
that say "run mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true"?  None; they
tell you to run "mvn clean install".  That's how people expect things
to work.

Why not listen to a legitimate concern from a PMC member (and various
contributors) and hold off on this release to address the test
failure?  It appears that there is a fix for this test already
available, right?  So, merge it in and re-cut the release.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hadrian,
> the true writer really is the reader. If the guidelines replaced "
> compile it as provided", with " compile and tests it as provided" your
> suggestion would have some merit.
> We even document[1] the maven skip tests build option.
>
> [1] http://activemq.apache.org/building.html
>
> On 29 January 2015 at 12:06, Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:
>> Gary,
>>
>> It's a very simple matter. We release source distributions, not binaries.
>> One cannot reliably build binaries from the source distro. Even with -fae,
>> everything else depending stomp is skipped, so failures may be hiding other
>> problems. I would suggest carefully reviewing the ASF release policy [1], in
>> particular the #what and #approving-a-release sections. Note the use of
>> terms "must" (pmc must obey requirements [...]) and "may" (releases may not
>> be vetoed).
>>
>> How about re-cutting the release after making sure the tests pass reliably?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/29/2015 06:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan,
>>> the test is mixing stomp and openwire and asserting a jms semantic in
>>> the event of a stomp disconnect without an unsubscribe. The patch
>>> applied broker configuration that makes the test work reliably. Having
>>> a reliable redelivery flag semantic has been evolving for some time.
>>> Stomp users have never had redelivery flag semantics that could be
>>> relied on so they won't care. The full story is in the commit log.
>>>
>>> On 28 January 2015 at 17:26, Daniel Kulp  wrote:

 I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with
 the failing tests.

 The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the
 original test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the
 stomp code that the new patch is really just working around.   Are users
 that are using stomp going to have to make the same changes that were done
 in the test in their environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.

 Thanks!
 Dan



> On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
> if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary

 --
 Daniel Kulp
 dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
 Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Gary Tully 
Hadrian,
the true writer really is the reader. If the guidelines replaced "
compile it as provided", with " compile and tests it as provided" your
suggestion would have some merit.
We even document[1] the maven skip tests build option.

[1] http://activemq.apache.org/building.html

On 29 January 2015 at 12:06, Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:
> Gary,
>
> It's a very simple matter. We release source distributions, not binaries.
> One cannot reliably build binaries from the source distro. Even with -fae,
> everything else depending stomp is skipped, so failures may be hiding other
> problems. I would suggest carefully reviewing the ASF release policy [1], in
> particular the #what and #approving-a-release sections. Note the use of
> terms "must" (pmc must obey requirements [...]) and "may" (releases may not
> be vetoed).
>
> How about re-cutting the release after making sure the tests pass reliably?
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
>
>
> On 01/29/2015 06:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> Dan,
>> the test is mixing stomp and openwire and asserting a jms semantic in
>> the event of a stomp disconnect without an unsubscribe. The patch
>> applied broker configuration that makes the test work reliably. Having
>> a reliable redelivery flag semantic has been evolving for some time.
>> Stomp users have never had redelivery flag semantics that could be
>> relied on so they won't care. The full story is in the commit log.
>>
>> On 28 January 2015 at 17:26, Daniel Kulp  wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with
>>> the failing tests.
>>>
>>> The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the
>>> original test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the
>>> stomp code that the new patch is really just working around.   Are users
>>> that are using stomp going to have to make the same changes that were done
>>> in the test in their environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
 On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

 Hi folks,

 I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
 release.
 This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

 Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
 if
 you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
 regressions
 on the platform you're using.

 The list of resolved issues is here:

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

 You can get binary distributions here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

 Source archives are here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

 Maven2 repository is at:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

 Source tag:

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

 The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
 [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

 Here's my +1

 Regards

 Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
Hi Claus, thanks for testing all this. I already started working on further
improvements of the script, so that we respect environment variables if set
in system and add more docs in scripts to make it easier for people to
configure it properly.

We should list this change in 5.11 new features and I’ll some docs on the
topic as there is none at the moment.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:

> Hi
>
> The bin/env script worked fine.
>
> Would be good idea to remember to add a note about this in the release
> notes.
> Also maybe add a note about it too in the bin/activemq script so
> people is easier aware of this,
> and that they should configure the env file, and leave activemq as-is.
>
>
> I am voting +1
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac 
> wrote:
> > Hi Claus,
> >
> > there’s a new script in bin folder called “bin/env” where you should
> > configure environment variables. We moved all that from the activemq
> script
> > to make it all in one place and easier to manage. It should be documented
> > better.
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > --
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > dbosa...@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Claus Ibsen 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I gave 5.11.0 a test spin with latest code from Apache Camel and all
> >> JMS / Stomp / MQTT modules worked fine and all test passed.
> >>
> >> I installed latest hawtio web console following Dejans guide and the
> >> console works.
> >> http://sensatic.net/activemq/activemq-and-hawtio.html
> >>
> >> But I do seem to have an issue with the modified scripts. I can't set
> >> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS in my environment and have those used by the
> >> bin/activemq script.
> >>
> >> I have tried setting it as pre existing env variable and also setting
> >> it in the top of the bin/activemq script.
> >>
> >> Only by hacking the script and hardcoded works for me.
> >>
> >> This was the hack I had to do in the invoke_console() function, as I
> >> start ActiveMQ with bin/activemq console
> >>
> >> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS="-Dhawtio.realm=activemq -Dhawtio.role=admins
> >> -Dhawtio.rolePrincipalClasses=org.apache.activemq.jaas.GroupPrincipal
> >> $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS $ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START $ACTIVEMQ_SSL_OPTS
> >> -Djava.awt.headless=true -Djava.io.tmpdir=\"${ACTIVEMQ_TMP}\""
> >> echo "Options are $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS"
> >>
> >>
> >> I wonder if anyone else can reproduce the script issue as that would
> >> cause pain for users who think their options are in use, but are not.
> >> But maybe I did something wrong, so would be good to have others test
> >> as well.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully 
> wrote:
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> >> release.
> >> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> >> >
> >> > Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be
> great if
> >> > you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> >> regressions
> >> > on the platform you're using.
> >> >
> >> > The list of resolved issues is here:
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >> >
> >> > You can get binary distributions here:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >> >
> >> > Source archives are here:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >> >
> >> > Maven2 repository is at:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
> >> >
> >> > Source tag:
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
> >> >
> >> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >> >
> >> > Here's my +1
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Claus Ibsen
> >> -
> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> >> Twitter: davsclaus
> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> >> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> >> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

The bin/env script worked fine.

Would be good idea to remember to add a note about this in the release notes.
Also maybe add a note about it too in the bin/activemq script so
people is easier aware of this,
and that they should configure the env file, and leave activemq as-is.


I am voting +1




On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> there’s a new script in bin folder called “bin/env” where you should
> configure environment variables. We moved all that from the activemq script
> to make it all in one place and easier to manage. It should be documented
> better.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> --
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosa...@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I gave 5.11.0 a test spin with latest code from Apache Camel and all
>> JMS / Stomp / MQTT modules worked fine and all test passed.
>>
>> I installed latest hawtio web console following Dejans guide and the
>> console works.
>> http://sensatic.net/activemq/activemq-and-hawtio.html
>>
>> But I do seem to have an issue with the modified scripts. I can't set
>> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS in my environment and have those used by the
>> bin/activemq script.
>>
>> I have tried setting it as pre existing env variable and also setting
>> it in the top of the bin/activemq script.
>>
>> Only by hacking the script and hardcoded works for me.
>>
>> This was the hack I had to do in the invoke_console() function, as I
>> start ActiveMQ with bin/activemq console
>>
>> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS="-Dhawtio.realm=activemq -Dhawtio.role=admins
>> -Dhawtio.rolePrincipalClasses=org.apache.activemq.jaas.GroupPrincipal
>> $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS $ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START $ACTIVEMQ_SSL_OPTS
>> -Djava.awt.headless=true -Djava.io.tmpdir=\"${ACTIVEMQ_TMP}\""
>> echo "Options are $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS"
>>
>>
>> I wonder if anyone else can reproduce the script issue as that would
>> cause pain for users who think their options are in use, but are not.
>> But maybe I did something wrong, so would be good to have others test
>> as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
>> release.
>> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>> >
>> > Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
>> > you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
>> regressions
>> > on the platform you're using.
>> >
>> > The list of resolved issues is here:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>> >
>> > You can get binary distributions here:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>> >
>> > Source archives are here:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>> >
>> > Maven2 repository is at:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>> >
>> > Source tag:
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>> >
>> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > Here's my +1
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Gary
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> Email: cib...@redhat.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
>> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
>>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

Gary,

It's a very simple matter. We release source distributions, not 
binaries. One cannot reliably build binaries from the source distro. 
Even with -fae, everything else depending stomp is skipped, so failures 
may be hiding other problems. I would suggest carefully reviewing the 
ASF release policy [1], in particular the #what and #approving-a-release 
sections. Note the use of terms "must" (pmc must obey requirements 
[...]) and "may" (releases may not be vetoed).


How about re-cutting the release after making sure the tests pass reliably?

Cheers,
Hadrian


[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html


On 01/29/2015 06:17 AM, Gary Tully wrote:

Dan,
the test is mixing stomp and openwire and asserting a jms semantic in
the event of a stomp disconnect without an unsubscribe. The patch
applied broker configuration that makes the test work reliably. Having
a reliable redelivery flag semantic has been evolving for some time.
Stomp users have never had redelivery flag semantics that could be
relied on so they won't care. The full story is in the commit log.

On 28 January 2015 at 17:26, Daniel Kulp  wrote:

I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with the 
failing tests.

The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the original 
test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the stomp code that 
the new patch is really just working around.   Are users that are using stomp 
going to have to make the same changes that were done in the test in their 
environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.

Thanks!
Dan




On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Gary Tully 
Dan,
the test is mixing stomp and openwire and asserting a jms semantic in
the event of a stomp disconnect without an unsubscribe. The patch
applied broker configuration that makes the test work reliably. Having
a reliable redelivery flag semantic has been evolving for some time.
Stomp users have never had redelivery flag semantics that could be
relied on so they won't care. The full story is in the commit log.

On 28 January 2015 at 17:26, Daniel Kulp  wrote:
> I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with the 
> failing tests.
>
> The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the original 
> test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the stomp code 
> that the new patch is really just working around.   Are users that are using 
> stomp going to have to make the same changes that were done in the test in 
> their environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
>> On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
>> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
>> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
>> on the platform you're using.
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>>
>> You can get binary distributions here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>>
>> Source archives are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>>
>> Maven2 repository is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>>
>> Source tag:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>>
>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Gary
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
Hi Claus,

there’s a new script in bin folder called “bin/env” where you should
configure environment variables. We moved all that from the activemq script
to make it all in one place and easier to manage. It should be documented
better.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Claus Ibsen  wrote:

> Hi
>
> I gave 5.11.0 a test spin with latest code from Apache Camel and all
> JMS / Stomp / MQTT modules worked fine and all test passed.
>
> I installed latest hawtio web console following Dejans guide and the
> console works.
> http://sensatic.net/activemq/activemq-and-hawtio.html
>
> But I do seem to have an issue with the modified scripts. I can't set
> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS in my environment and have those used by the
> bin/activemq script.
>
> I have tried setting it as pre existing env variable and also setting
> it in the top of the bin/activemq script.
>
> Only by hacking the script and hardcoded works for me.
>
> This was the hack I had to do in the invoke_console() function, as I
> start ActiveMQ with bin/activemq console
>
> ACTIVEMQ_OPTS="-Dhawtio.realm=activemq -Dhawtio.role=admins
> -Dhawtio.rolePrincipalClasses=org.apache.activemq.jaas.GroupPrincipal
> $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS $ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START $ACTIVEMQ_SSL_OPTS
> -Djava.awt.headless=true -Djava.io.tmpdir=\"${ACTIVEMQ_TMP}\""
> echo "Options are $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS"
>
>
> I wonder if anyone else can reproduce the script issue as that would
> cause pain for users who think their options are in use, but are not.
> But maybe I did something wrong, so would be good to have others test
> as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> >
> > Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> > you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> > on the platform you're using.
> >
> > The list of resolved issues is here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >
> > You can get binary distributions here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >
> > Source archives are here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >
> > Maven2 repository is at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
> >
> > Source tag:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
> >
> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Gary
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cib...@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-29 Thread Claus Ibsen 
Hi

I gave 5.11.0 a test spin with latest code from Apache Camel and all
JMS / Stomp / MQTT modules worked fine and all test passed.

I installed latest hawtio web console following Dejans guide and the
console works.
http://sensatic.net/activemq/activemq-and-hawtio.html

But I do seem to have an issue with the modified scripts. I can't set
ACTIVEMQ_OPTS in my environment and have those used by the
bin/activemq script.

I have tried setting it as pre existing env variable and also setting
it in the top of the bin/activemq script.

Only by hacking the script and hardcoded works for me.

This was the hack I had to do in the invoke_console() function, as I
start ActiveMQ with bin/activemq console

ACTIVEMQ_OPTS="-Dhawtio.realm=activemq -Dhawtio.role=admins
-Dhawtio.rolePrincipalClasses=org.apache.activemq.jaas.GroupPrincipal
$ACTIVEMQ_OPTS $ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_START $ACTIVEMQ_SSL_OPTS
-Djava.awt.headless=true -Djava.io.tmpdir=\"${ACTIVEMQ_TMP}\""
echo "Options are $ACTIVEMQ_OPTS"


I wonder if anyone else can reproduce the script issue as that would
cause pain for users who think their options are in use, but are not.
But maybe I did something wrong, so would be good to have others test
as well.






On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-28 Thread jb 

+0

Honnestly, I'm not really concerned by the stomp failing tests (and 
stomp ;)), but I understand that it can "impact" users.


Regards
JB

Le 2015-01-28 18:26, Daniel Kulp a écrit :

I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue
with the failing tests.

The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the
original test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in
the stomp code that the new patch is really just working around.   Are
users that are using stomp going to have to make the same changes that
were done in the test in their environments?   If so, that’s a bigger
issue.

Thanks!
Dan




On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 
release.

This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great 
if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any 
regressions

on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-28 Thread James Carman 
If it doesn't build reliably from src, then I wouldn't suggest we
release it.  -1 from me

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-28 Thread Daniel Kulp 
I’m more or less -1 until someone can more fully explain the issue with the 
failing tests.

The “patch” changes the test, but my question really is whether the original 
test code is “correct” and is really exposing some flaw in the stomp code that 
the new patch is really just working around.   Are users that are using stomp 
going to have to make the same changes that were done in the test in their 
environments?   If so, that’s a bigger issue.  

Thanks!
Dan



> On Jan 26, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> 
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
> 
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> 
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> 
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> 
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
> 
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
> 
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> 
> Here's my +1
> 
> Regards
> 
> Gary

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-28 Thread Hiram Chirino 
+1

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-28 Thread Robbie Gemmell 
+1 (non-binding)

I gave a kick of the tyres to the broker binary, built the source
release and successfully ran a 'quick' subset of the tests (Client,
Broker, AMQP, MQTT, LevelDB, Stomp with the below patch).

I'd expect most users to grab binaries than build the source or run
the tests. and as there has been a general commitment to do more
frequent point releases the test fix can likely be incorporated into
the next release before many will even try the 5.11.x series, so I'd
agree the change shouldnt block the release (but should obviously be
incorported if anything else did).

Robbie

On 27 January 2015 at 16:57, Gary Tully  wrote:
> I found one regression in stomp - fixed via
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=1e5d2127
> which shows the config workaround. I think the use case is tenuous at
> best so I don't think it should block the release.
>
> On 26 January 2015 at 21:02, Gary Tully  wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
>> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
>> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
>> on the platform you're using.
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>>
>> You can get binary distributions here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>>
>> Source archives are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>>
>> Maven2 repository is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>>
>> Source tag:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>>
>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

-1 (binding).

* sigs ok
* release artifacts look ok
* project does *not* build from source:

There are 5 failures in activemq-stomp, all of the following kind:
StompTest.testSubscribeWithClientAck:739 null

That means that anybody who uses this stomp feature won't be able to 
upgrade.


I think we'll need to test this better and re-cut the release.

Cheers,
Hadrian



On 01/26/2015 04:02 PM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Mark Frazier 
+1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread artnaseef 
+1 (non-binding)

The {{org.apache.activemq.bugs.AMQ2149LevelDBTest}} test fails in 5.10.0
with at least similar symptoms , so there's no reason to hold up 5.11.0 for
this.




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690504.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Timothy Bish 

On 01/27/2015 05:53 PM, artnaseef wrote:

That makes sense.  Here's what I'll do - if I can get the test to fail on
5.10, then I'll ignore it for the 5.11 release.  Let me know if you have
seen this test failing under 5.10 and I'll skip it.

Either way, I'll keep tracking down the issue.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690500.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Yes, it does occasionally fail on 5.10.  You can see it fail if you 
check the jenkins build results often enough.


--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread artnaseef 
That makes sense.  Here's what I'll do - if I can get the test to fail on
5.10, then I'll ignore it for the 5.11 release.  Let me know if you have
seen this test failing under 5.10 and I'll skip it.

Either way, I'll keep tracking down the issue.



--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690500.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Gary Tully 
Apologies Art, I should have given you a heads up. That test failure
(it always works locally) is an old nugget[1] that has been on the
todo list for a long time. I did not think it should hold up the
release. For the past three weeks I have been tracking down
regressions and failures and intermittent failures; the entire test
suite is in good shape. Sure there is still work to do, but I think it
is time we cut a line in the sand.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4886

On 27 January 2015 at 18:25, artnaseef  wrote:
> Hey Gary - what happened to the test failures on AMQ2149LevelDBTest.log?  As
> you may have noticed - I was still working on that one as I had the
> impression from our prior discussion that it was in the path to getting 5.11
> released.
>
> Was there a change on that front?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690483.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread artnaseef 
Hey Gary - what happened to the test failures on AMQ2149LevelDBTest.log?  As
you may have noticed - I was still working on that one as I had the
impression from our prior discussion that it was in the path to getting 5.11
released.

Was there a change on that front?




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4690430p4690483.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Gary Tully 
I found one regression in stomp - fixed via
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=1e5d2127
which shows the config workaround. I think the use case is tenuous at
best so I don't think it should block the release.

On 26 January 2015 at 21:02, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Jim Gomes 
+1

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, 1:03 PM Gary Tully  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=
> f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Hiram Chirino 
+1

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Timothy Bish 

+1

On 01/26/2015 04:02 PM, Gary Tully wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary




--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Gary Tully 
thanks James, I tidied up those two issues.

On 27 January 2015 at 14:11, James Green  wrote:
> Are you aware that the list of resolved issues includes issues marked
> "Unresolved"? See AMQ-5217 
>  and AMQ-5537  for instance.
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 11:37, Krzysztof Sobkowiak 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Quick tests on Karaf 2.4.1 and 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT ok.
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> On 26.01.2015 22:02, Gary Tully wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
>> release.
>> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>> >
>> > Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
>> > you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
>> regressions
>> > on the platform you're using.
>> >
>> > The list of resolved issues is here:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>> >
>> > You can get binary distributions here:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>> >
>> > Source archives are here:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>> >
>> > Maven2 repository is at:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>> >
>> > Source tag:
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>> >
>> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > Here's my +1
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Gary
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
>> @ ASF
>> Capgemini  | Software Solutions Center
>>  | Wroclaw
>> e-mail: krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com  |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread James Green 
Are you aware that the list of resolved issues includes issues marked
"Unresolved"? See AMQ-5217 
 and AMQ-5537  for instance.

On 27 January 2015 at 11:37, Krzysztof Sobkowiak 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Quick tests on Karaf 2.4.1 and 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT ok.
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 26.01.2015 22:02, Gary Tully wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> > This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
> >
> > Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> > you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> > on the platform you're using.
> >
> > The list of resolved issues is here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >
> > You can get binary distributions here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >
> > Source archives are here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >
> > Maven2 repository is at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
> >
> > Source tag:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
> >
> > The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Gary
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
> @ ASF
> Capgemini  | Software Solutions Center
>  | Wroclaw
> e-mail: krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com  |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Krzysztof Sobkowiak 
Hi

+1 (non-binding).

Quick tests on Karaf 2.4.1 and 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT ok.

Regards
Krzysztof

On 26.01.2015 22:02, Gary Tully wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary

-- 
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
@ ASF
Capgemini  | Software Solutions Center
 | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com  |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Andy Taylor 

+1

kicked its tyres and seems fine

On 27/01/15 10:45, Dejan Bosanac wrote:

+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:


Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-27 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
+1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0
> release.
> This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/
>
> Source tag:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1
>
> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
>
> Gary
>

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-26 Thread Gary Tully 
Hi folks,

I've just cut a second release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
This release has more than 120 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test the unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1014/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=f6eb86ee31640427d0f953847f38fcf81a71f9e1

The vote will remain open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards

Gary

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 
Turns out that I had another process running on 8080, so the tests were 
fine. I made a minor update nevertheless to use available ports instead 
of hardcoding. We should probably consolidate in a utility across all 
tests. Not something to hold the release though. Running full tests now, 
but it'll take a while.


Cheers,
Hadrian


On 01/05/2015 09:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:

Hi Gary,

I can confirm that your changes fixed the leveldb issue.
I did a full build, and there are a couple of failures in http, I will 
look at them in the morning. Looks like port port in use conflict due 
to slow shutdown from previous test (I don't think I have anything 
running on 8080). Best would be to use dynamic ports, anyway. Looks 
like it's getting really close.


Thanks,
Hadrian

On 01/05/2015 04:28 PM, Gary Tully wrote:

It seems there are two issues - a 2s session expiry and 500ms tick
leaves too much room for skipped pings and client and server mismatch
in session expiry. In the tests the single zk server stays alive there
are no dropped connections.
One of the problems i encountered seems to be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1751 and an upgrade
helps reduce
the spurious session expiry.
But to get stability - moving from the default 2s session expiry to
something like 15s is necessary. Otherwise a client may not ping in
time and the server will expiry.
I note that in 5.10 - these tests were mostly excluded via the pom, so
they would only run on linux. Recently I removed osx from the profiles
that were excluded - which may explain the diff from 5.10

On 5 January 2015 at 15:32, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:

Cancelling this vote. Let’s try to get to the bottom of these failures.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Gary Tully  
wrote:



-1 : let's get a clean bill of health on the test run.

org.apache.activemq.leveldb.test.ReplicatedLevelDBBrokerTest#testAMQ4837viaJMX 


will fail for me locally about 60% of the time, with a zk "Client
session timed out,"
I will try and find the root cause but I think we should add an
@Ignore and not hold up the release if the failures prove elusive.

On 31 December 2014 at 19:04, James Carman 


wrote:

-1

If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before 
releasing.


James

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac 

wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 
release.

This

release has
127 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be 
great

if

you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any

regressions

on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951 


You can get binary distributions here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/ 


Source archives are here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/ 


Maven2 repository is at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/ 


Source tag:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d 



Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, 
I'll

let
this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the 
chance

to

review it.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

Hi Gary,

I can confirm that your changes fixed the leveldb issue.
I did a full build, and there are a couple of failures in http, I will 
look at them in the morning. Looks like port port in use conflict due to 
slow shutdown from previous test (I don't think I have anything running 
on 8080). Best would be to use dynamic ports, anyway. Looks like it's 
getting really close.


Thanks,
Hadrian

On 01/05/2015 04:28 PM, Gary Tully wrote:

It seems there are two issues - a 2s session expiry and 500ms tick
leaves too much room for skipped pings and client and server mismatch
in session expiry. In the tests the single zk server stays alive there
are no dropped connections.
One of the problems i encountered seems to be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1751 and an upgrade
helps reduce
the spurious session expiry.
But to get stability - moving from the default 2s session expiry to
something like 15s is necessary. Otherwise a client may not ping in
time and the server will expiry.
I note that in 5.10 - these tests were mostly excluded via the pom, so
they would only run on linux. Recently I removed osx from the profiles
that were excluded - which may explain the diff from 5.10

On 5 January 2015 at 15:32, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:

Cancelling this vote. Let’s try to get to the bottom of these failures.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:


-1 : let's get a clean bill of health on the test run.

org.apache.activemq.leveldb.test.ReplicatedLevelDBBrokerTest#testAMQ4837viaJMX
will fail for me locally about 60% of the time, with a zk "Client
session timed out,"
I will try and find the root cause but I think we should add an
@Ignore and not hold up the release if the failures prove elusive.

On 31 December 2014 at 19:04, James Carman 
wrote:

-1

If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before releasing.

James

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac 

wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.

This

release has
127 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great

if

you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any

regressions

on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/

Source tag:


https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d


Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll

let

this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance

to

review it.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread Gary Tully 
It seems there are two issues - a 2s session expiry and 500ms tick
leaves too much room for skipped pings and client and server mismatch
in session expiry. In the tests the single zk server stays alive there
are no dropped connections.
One of the problems i encountered seems to be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1751 and an upgrade
helps reduce
the spurious session expiry.
But to get stability - moving from the default 2s session expiry to
something like 15s is necessary. Otherwise a client may not ping in
time and the server will expiry.
I note that in 5.10 - these tests were mostly excluded via the pom, so
they would only run on linux. Recently I removed osx from the profiles
that were excluded - which may explain the diff from 5.10

On 5 January 2015 at 15:32, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:
> Cancelling this vote. Let’s try to get to the bottom of these failures.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> --
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosa...@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:
>
>> -1 : let's get a clean bill of health on the test run.
>>
>> org.apache.activemq.leveldb.test.ReplicatedLevelDBBrokerTest#testAMQ4837viaJMX
>> will fail for me locally about 60% of the time, with a zk "Client
>> session timed out,"
>> I will try and find the root cause but I think we should add an
>> @Ignore and not hold up the release if the failures prove elusive.
>>
>> On 31 December 2014 at 19:04, James Carman 
>> wrote:
>> > -1
>> >
>> > If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before releasing.
>> >
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac 
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
>> This
>> >> release has
>> >> 127 bug fixes and improvements.
>> >>
>> >> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
>> if
>> >> you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any
>> regressions
>> >> on the platform you're using.
>> >>
>> >> The list of resolved issues is here:
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>> >>
>> >> You can get binary distributions here:
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>> >>
>> >> Source archives are here:
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>> >>
>> >> Maven2 repository is at:
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/
>> >>
>> >> Source tag:
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll
>> let
>> >> this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance
>> to
>> >> review it.
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> >>
>> >> Here's my +1
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> --
>> >> Dejan Bosanac
>> >> --
>> >> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >> dbosa...@redhat.com
>> >> Twitter: @dejanb
>> >> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
Cancelling this vote. Let’s try to get to the bottom of these failures.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Gary Tully  wrote:

> -1 : let's get a clean bill of health on the test run.
>
> org.apache.activemq.leveldb.test.ReplicatedLevelDBBrokerTest#testAMQ4837viaJMX
> will fail for me locally about 60% of the time, with a zk "Client
> session timed out,"
> I will try and find the root cause but I think we should add an
> @Ignore and not hold up the release if the failures prove elusive.
>
> On 31 December 2014 at 19:04, James Carman 
> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before releasing.
> >
> > James
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac 
> wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release.
> This
> >> release has
> >> 127 bug fixes and improvements.
> >>
> >> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great
> if
> >> you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any
> regressions
> >> on the platform you're using.
> >>
> >> The list of resolved issues is here:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
> >>
> >> You can get binary distributions here:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
> >>
> >> Source archives are here:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
> >>
> >> Maven2 repository is at:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/
> >>
> >> Source tag:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll
> let
> >> this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance
> to
> >> review it.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> Here's my +1
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> --
> >> Dejan Bosanac
> >> --
> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> dbosa...@redhat.com
> >> Twitter: @dejanb
> >> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread Gary Tully 
-1 : let's get a clean bill of health on the test run.
org.apache.activemq.leveldb.test.ReplicatedLevelDBBrokerTest#testAMQ4837viaJMX
will fail for me locally about 60% of the time, with a zk "Client
session timed out,"
I will try and find the root cause but I think we should add an
@Ignore and not hold up the release if the failures prove elusive.

On 31 December 2014 at 19:04, James Carman  wrote:
> -1
>
> If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before releasing.
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
>> release has
>> 127 bug fixes and improvements.
>>
>> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
>> you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
>> on the platform you're using.
>>
>> The list of resolved issues is here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>>
>> You can get binary distributions here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>>
>> Source archives are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>>
>> Maven2 repository is at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/
>>
>> Source tag:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll let
>> this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance to
>> review it.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>
>> Here's my +1
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> --
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> dbosa...@redhat.com
>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-05 Thread khandelwalanuj 
Hi,

+1. 
As a user of ActiveMQ, I would say, please release the new version. 
We are waiting on ActiveMQ-5.10.0 or ActiveMQ-5.11 because of couple of bug
fixes. It would be helpful if you guys can release it fast. 

Thanks,
Anuj 




--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-11-0-tp4689317p4689426.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2015-01-01 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

Happy New Year everybody.

I think the 'veto' term is quite pervasive in the release votes. 
Cut'n'paste, whatever the reason, I hope all PMC members know that when 
it comes to releases it is not actually a veto, just a negative vote 
[1]. That doesn't mean it can be taken lightly both when casting the 
vote and when deciding to move ahead despite negative votes. In addition 
to the technical reasons there are social ones to consider (the 
"community over code" part of the Apache Way).


Cheers,
Hadrian


[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html


On 12/31/2014 01:58 PM, James Carman wrote:

I would also re-word your VOTE options here.  A -1 is not a "veto",
since releases cannot be vetoed.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
release has
127 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d


Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll let
this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance to
review it.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-31 Thread James Carman 
-1

If the build does not succeed, we need to address that before releasing.

James

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
> release has
> 127 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll let
> this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance to
> review it.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> --
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosa...@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-31 Thread James Carman 
I would also re-word your VOTE options here.  A -1 is not a "veto",
since releases cannot be vetoed.

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
> release has
> 127 bug fixes and improvements.
>
> Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
> you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
> on the platform you're using.
>
> The list of resolved issues is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951
>
> You can get binary distributions here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/
>
> Source archives are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/
>
> Maven2 repository is at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/
>
> Source tag:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll let
> this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance to
> review it.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> --
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosa...@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-30 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 
Yeah, we'll see what the rest of the community says. Let's think of it 
from a user point of view.
You get a new release and the tests fail, what is your confidence in 
using it in production?


I do have the build results (and they are reproducible). I will spend 
most of the time with my family this week. I will create jiras and post 
the logs and try to see if I could do anything about them towards the 
end of the week.


I wish you all a spectacular 2015,
Hadrian


On 12/30/2014 03:35 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:

Hi Hadrian,

thanks for reviewing the release. Yeah, these leveldb tests never worked
quite well in certain environments.

https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/org.apache.activemq$activemq-leveldb-store/

I tried to fixed that in the previous days, but apparently there are still
some gremlins in there. I’m not sure we sure hold a release for this (as
those were never super-stable and are much better now), but it’s up to the
others to decide. We can consider ignoring them for now and work more in
that area for the next release.

BTW. the full stack of the error would be helpful.


Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:


-1.

Sigs look good.
Downloaded and started a full build from the source distribution.
Tests fail when run from the source distribution, see below.
Does anybody else experience the same result?

We should consider moving the source distribution to apache-activemq.
The current activemq-parent name is not the best choice.

Happy New Year,
Hadrian


[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] ActiveMQ .. SUCCESS
[1.339s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Generator  SUCCESS [2.083s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Client  SUCCESS
[1:29.718s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Legacy Support ... SUCCESS [0.961s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: JAAS .. SUCCESS
[17.388s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Broker  SUCCESS
[1:11.509s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: KahaDB Store .. SUCCESS
[58.751s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: STOMP Protocol  SUCCESS
[16:37.557s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: MQTT Protocol . SUCCESS
[12:21.155s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: JDBC Store  SUCCESS [0.214s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: LevelDB Store . FAILURE
[3:17.131s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Generic JMS Pool .. SUCCESS
[1:28.535s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool .. SUCCESS
[1.250s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA  SUCCESS
[2:15.452s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: AMQP .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Console ... SUCCESS
[0.487s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Partition Management .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Unit Tests  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Camel . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: HTTP Protocol Support . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: All JAR bundle  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: File Server ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Log4j Appender  SUCCESS [2.656s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Apache Karaf .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: RAR ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Run Jar ... SUCCESS
[0.224s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Shiro . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Runtime Configuration . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Tooling ... SUCCESS
[0.011s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Memory Usage Test Plugin .. SUCCESS [0.896s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Performance Test Plugin ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: StartUp/Stop Plugin ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: OSGi bundle ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Blueprint . SUCCESS [0.599s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Demo .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Console ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Karaf Integration Tests ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Integration Test :: Spring 3.1  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Assembly .. SKIPPED
[INFO] 

[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 

[INFO] Total time: 40:09.096s
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 29 12:30:47 EST 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 69M/472M
[INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-30 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
Hi Hadrian,

thanks for reviewing the release. Yeah, these leveldb tests never worked
quite well in certain environments.

https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/org.apache.activemq$activemq-leveldb-store/

I tried to fixed that in the previous days, but apparently there are still
some gremlins in there. I’m not sure we sure hold a release for this (as
those were never super-stable and are much better now), but it’s up to the
others to decide. We can consider ignoring them for now and work more in
that area for the next release.

BTW. the full stack of the error would be helpful.


Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea  wrote:

> -1.
>
> Sigs look good.
> Downloaded and started a full build from the source distribution.
> Tests fail when run from the source distribution, see below.
> Does anybody else experience the same result?
>
> We should consider moving the source distribution to apache-activemq.
> The current activemq-parent name is not the best choice.
>
> Happy New Year,
> Hadrian
>
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ .. SUCCESS
> [1.339s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Generator  SUCCESS [2.083s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Client  SUCCESS
> [1:29.718s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Legacy Support ... SUCCESS [0.961s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: JAAS .. SUCCESS
> [17.388s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Broker  SUCCESS
> [1:11.509s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: KahaDB Store .. SUCCESS
> [58.751s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: STOMP Protocol  SUCCESS
> [16:37.557s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: MQTT Protocol . SUCCESS
> [12:21.155s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: JDBC Store  SUCCESS [0.214s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: LevelDB Store . FAILURE
> [3:17.131s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Generic JMS Pool .. SUCCESS
> [1:28.535s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool .. SUCCESS
> [1.250s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA  SUCCESS
> [2:15.452s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring  SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: AMQP .. SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Console ... SUCCESS
> [0.487s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Partition Management .. SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Unit Tests  SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Camel . SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: HTTP Protocol Support . SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: All JAR bundle  SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: File Server ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Log4j Appender  SUCCESS [2.656s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Apache Karaf .. SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: RAR ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Run Jar ... SUCCESS
> [0.224s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Shiro . SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Runtime Configuration . SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Tooling ... SUCCESS
> [0.011s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Memory Usage Test Plugin .. SUCCESS [0.896s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Performance Test Plugin ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: StartUp/Stop Plugin ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: OSGi bundle ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Blueprint . SUCCESS [0.599s]
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Demo .. SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Console ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Karaf Integration Tests ... SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Integration Test :: Spring 3.1  SKIPPED
> [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Assembly .. SKIPPED
> [INFO] 
> 
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO] 
> 
> [INFO] Total time: 40:09.096s
> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 29 12:30:47 EST 2014
> [INFO] Final Memory: 69M/472M
> [INFO] 
> 
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-surefire-plugin:2.16:test (default-test) on project
> activemq-leveldb-store: There are test failure
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] Please refer to /home/hadrian/dev/apache/
> release/activemq-parent-5.11.0/activemq-leveldb-store/targ

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-29 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea 

-1.

Sigs look good.
Downloaded and started a full build from the source distribution.
Tests fail when run from the source distribution, see below.
Does anybody else experience the same result?

We should consider moving the source distribution to apache-activemq.
The current activemq-parent name is not the best choice.

Happy New Year,
Hadrian


[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] ActiveMQ .. SUCCESS [1.339s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Generator  SUCCESS [2.083s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Client  SUCCESS 
[1:29.718s]

[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Openwire Legacy Support ... SUCCESS [0.961s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: JAAS .. SUCCESS [17.388s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Broker  SUCCESS 
[1:11.509s]

[INFO] ActiveMQ :: KahaDB Store .. SUCCESS [58.751s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: STOMP Protocol  SUCCESS 
[16:37.557s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: MQTT Protocol . SUCCESS 
[12:21.155s]

[INFO] ActiveMQ :: JDBC Store  SUCCESS [0.214s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: LevelDB Store . FAILURE 
[3:17.131s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Generic JMS Pool .. SUCCESS 
[1:28.535s]

[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool .. SUCCESS [1.250s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA  SUCCESS 
[2:15.452s]

[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: AMQP .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Console ... SUCCESS [0.487s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Partition Management .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Unit Tests  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Camel . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: HTTP Protocol Support . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: All JAR bundle  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: File Server ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Log4j Appender  SUCCESS [2.656s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Apache Karaf .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: RAR ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Run Jar ... SUCCESS [0.224s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Shiro . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Runtime Configuration . SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Tooling ... SUCCESS [0.011s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Memory Usage Test Plugin .. SUCCESS [0.896s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Performance Test Plugin ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: StartUp/Stop Plugin ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: OSGi bundle ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Blueprint . SUCCESS [0.599s]
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Demo .. SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Web Console ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Karaf Integration Tests ... SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Integration Test :: Spring 3.1  SKIPPED
[INFO] ActiveMQ :: Assembly .. SKIPPED
[INFO] 


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 


[INFO] Total time: 40:09.096s
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 29 12:30:47 EST 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 69M/472M
[INFO] 

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.16:test (default-test) 
on project activemq-leveldb-store: There are test failure

[ERROR]
[ERROR] Please refer to 
/home/hadrian/dev/apache/release/activemq-parent-5.11.0/activemq-leveldb-store/target/surefire-reports 
for the individual test results.

[ERROR] -> [Help 1]


On 12/29/2014 09:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:

Hi folks,

I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
release has
127 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.a

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0

2014-12-29 Thread Dejan Bosanac 
Hi folks,

I've just cut a release candidate for the long-awaited 5.11.0 release. This
release has
127 bug fixes and improvements.

Could you review the artifacts and vote? Especially, it would be great if
you could test unix shell script and make sure there's no any regressions
on the platform you're using.

The list of resolved issues is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12324951

You can get binary distributions here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.11.0/

Source archives are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.11.0/

Maven2 repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1012/

Source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=48b0cf396c18216899ceb94ee57c01685104223d


Please vote to approve this release. As it's the holiday season, I'll let
this vote open for longer time than usual, so everybody get the chance to
review it.

[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)

Here's my +1

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/