[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4310) Add composite persistence adapter to support multiple storages for different destinations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13779910#comment-13779910 ] Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-4310: Issue AMQ-4744 will track adding support for nested LevelDB store in mKahaDB > Add composite persistence adapter to support multiple storages for different > destinations > - > > Key: AMQ-4310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4310 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Message Store >Affects Versions: 5.x >Reporter: SuoNayi >Assignee: Hiram Chirino > Fix For: 5.9.0 > > > Supposing we need the queue A to give us the best performance and it's > acceptable for low chance of losing messages while the other queue B provides > the most reliable message delivery and it's better it's store has no > single-point failure. > If we can assign the store of the queue A to kahadb while for the queue B is > jdbc(database cluster) it's easy to solve this problem. > In other words,different destinations can assign different store to meet > different requirements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4310) Add composite persistence adapter to support multiple storages for different destinations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13779907#comment-13779907 ] Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-4310: mKahaDB has now been generalized to support different nested store types. Currently only KahaDB is supported but LevelDB will be supported shortly too. > Add composite persistence adapter to support multiple storages for different > destinations > - > > Key: AMQ-4310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4310 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Message Store >Affects Versions: 5.x >Reporter: SuoNayi >Assignee: Hiram Chirino > Fix For: Unscheduled > > > Supposing we need the queue A to give us the best performance and it's > acceptable for low chance of losing messages while the other queue B provides > the most reliable message delivery and it's better it's store has no > single-point failure. > If we can assign the store of the queue A to kahadb while for the queue B is > jdbc(database cluster) it's easy to solve this problem. > In other words,different destinations can assign different store to meet > different requirements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
