Re: shared database master/master

2014-08-11 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi-

Try the -users list.. this is mostly for internal development discussions (ie.. 
bug fix notifications)

Thanks,
Matt

On Aug 7, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Chainbuck  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to know if this architecture is feasible. My main goal is I want to
> open only ports going out of the internal network and not communications
> initiated from DMZ.
> 
> /Scenario of an incoming message/
> 
> | D M Z|   I N T E R N A L   |
> | |  |
> --> AMQ --> storage <--- AMQ <-- system |
> | |  |
> 
> I'm thinking about putting up a shared message store with useLock set to
> disabled. (ref:
> http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html#Pluggablestoragelockers-PersistenceAdapters)
> 
> Could that work? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/shared-database-master-master-tp4684271.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



shared database master/master

2014-08-07 Thread Chainbuck
Hello,

I'd like to know if this architecture is feasible. My main goal is I want to
open only ports going out of the internal network and not communications
initiated from DMZ.

/Scenario of an incoming message/

 | D M Z|   I N T E R N A L   |
 | |  |
--> AMQ --> storage <--- AMQ <-- system |
 | |  |

I'm thinking about putting up a shared message store with useLock set to
disabled. (ref:
http://activemq.apache.org/pluggable-storage-lockers.html#Pluggablestoragelockers-PersistenceAdapters)

Could that work? 






--
View this message in context: 
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/shared-database-master-master-tp4684271.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.