Re: wireless/openwhisk

2017-05-31 Thread Ajinkya Dhamnaskar
Apoorv,

I appreciate your efforts, it gives good introduction about OpenWhisk.

Dev,

While this is being studies for distributed task execution problem, one
thing that clicks me, can OpenWhisk be considered as a potential candidate
for Airavata API and other microservices (gfac, orchestrator) around it?
Now that we are moving towards first class services like 'User Profile', I
think, OpenWhisk might have something to offer.
If you have expertise on OpenWhisk, can you please critique this?


On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Apoorv Palkar 
wrote:

> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xF_p4FUEK0rXJxC2i_
> fiBtTydAL5rcKD74PuSV9oyTo/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
> From my analysis, I think Storm && Flink are better than spark/openwhisk.
> So i created an analysis for openwhisk above. The documentation is not as
> good as the technology is new. Could serve as a problem for actual
> prototyping/development.
>
> thanks.
>



-- 
Thanks and regards,

Ajinkya Dhamnaskar
Student ID : 0003469679
Masters (CS)
+1 (812) 369- 5416


wireless/openwhisk

2017-05-31 Thread Apoorv Palkar
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xF_p4FUEK0rXJxC2i_fiBtTydAL5rcKD74PuSV9oyTo/edit?usp=sharing




>From my analysis, I think Storm && Flink are better than spark/openwhisk. So i 
>created an analysis for openwhisk above. The documentation is not as good as 
>the technology is new. Could serve as a problem for actual 
>prototyping/development.


thanks.