Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Jakob Homan]

Sent out a call to arms...

-jg


On 27 December 2017 at 10:22, Sid Anand  wrote:
> Ugh... you're right. Hmn... what about our other 2 mentors?
>
> -s
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:
>
>> Did you count 3? I only counted 2?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand  wrote:
>> >
>> > I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members).
>> Per
>> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't
>> that
>> > be sufficient?
>> >
>> > In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or
>> > still working toward it?
>> > -s
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chris Riccomini 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
>> >> might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a
>> new
>> >> RC.
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Chris,
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
>> >>> people have issues with it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Bolke.
>> >>>
>>  On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini 
>> >> wrote:
>> 
>>  Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
>> 
>>  On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>>  ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing
>> >> all
>> > the RCs.
>> >
>> > -ash
>> >
>> >> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
>> >>
>> >> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
>> >>
>> >> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
>> >> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
>> >> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
>> >> - Joy Gao (binding)
>> >> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
>> >>
>> >> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Chris
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>> >>> criccom...@apache.org
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I believe so, yes.
>> >>>
>> >>> I will proceed with release. :)
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>> bdbr...@gmail.com
>> >>>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>>  But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just
>> >> update
>> > the
>>  tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
>> 
>>  Bolke.
>> 
>>  Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini > >
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>> > criccom...@apache.org
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll
>> >> have
>> > to
>> >> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
>>  removing the
>> >> check seems like the best course of action.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>> >>> bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
>> >>>
>> >>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>> >>> ridiculous.
>> >>>
>> >>> B.
>> >>>
>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> >>>
>>  Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
>> > volgende
>> >>> geschreven:
>> 
>>  Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded
>> >> *the
>>  first
>>  time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
>> > assertion
>> >>> check
>>  > >>> setup.py#L68-L73>.
>>  Build fails on re-installs :(
>> 
>> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
>> > > >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +0.5 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is
>> mismatched,
>> > > >>> setup.py#L87>
>> > which will cause the installation (pip install or python
>> >> setup)
>> >>> to
>> >>> error
>> > out and fail.
>> > nit: mind also updating the release log "
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> >>> CHANGELOG.txt"
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>> >>> 
>> > wrot

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Sid Anand]

Ugh... you're right. Hmn... what about our other 2 mentors?

-s

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:

> Did you count 3? I only counted 2?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand  wrote:
> >
> > I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members).
> Per
> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't
> that
> > be sufficient?
> >
> > In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or
> > still working toward it?
> > -s
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chris Riccomini 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
> >> might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a
> new
> >> RC.
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Chris,
> >>>
> >>> Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
> >>> people have issues with it.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Bolke.
> >>>
>  On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
> 
>  On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>  ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
> 
> > Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing
> >> all
> > the RCs.
> >
> > -ash
> >
> >> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini 
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
> >>
> >> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
> >>
> >> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
> >> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
> >> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
> >> - Joy Gao (binding)
> >> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> >>
> >> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> >>> criccom...@apache.org
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I believe so, yes.
> >>>
> >>> I will proceed with release. :)
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just
> >> update
> > the
>  tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
> 
>  Bolke.
> 
>  Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini  >
>  wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> > criccom...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll
> >> have
> > to
> >> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
>  removing the
> >> check seems like the best course of action.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> >>> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
> >>>
> >>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
> >>> ridiculous.
> >>>
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>>
>  Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
> > volgende
> >>> geschreven:
> 
>  Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded
> >> *the
>  first
>  time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
> > assertion
> >>> check
>   >>> setup.py#L68-L73>.
>  Build fails on re-installs :(
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
> >  >
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > +0.5 (non-binding)
> >
> > Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is
> mismatched,
> >  >>> setup.py#L87>
> > which will cause the installation (pip install or python
> >> setup)
> >>> to
> >>> error
> > out and fail.
> > nit: mind also updating the release log "
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >>> CHANGELOG.txt"
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
> >>> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 binding
> >>
> >> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
>  bdbr...@gmail.com
> 
> >>
> >>> +1, binding
> >>>
> >>>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Bolke de Bruin]

Did you count 3? I only counted 2?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand  wrote:
> 
> I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members). Per
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't that
> be sufficient?
> 
> In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or
> still working toward it?
> -s
> 
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chris Riccomini 
> wrote:
> 
>> I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
>> might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a new
>> RC.
>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Chris,
>>> 
>>> Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
>>> people have issues with it.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bolke.
>>> 
 On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini 
>> wrote:
 
 Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
 
 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
 ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
 
> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing
>> all
> the RCs.
> 
> -ash
> 
>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
>> 
>> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
>> 
>> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
>> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
>> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
>> - Joy Gao (binding)
>> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
>> 
>> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>>> criccom...@apache.org
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I believe so, yes.
>>> 
>>> I will proceed with release. :)
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin >> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just
>> update
> the
 tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
 
 Bolke.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
 wrote:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> 
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccom...@apache.org
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll
>> have
> to
>> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
 removing the
>> check seems like the best course of action.
>> 
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>>> bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
>>> 
>>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>>> ridiculous.
>>> 
>>> B.
>>> 
>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>> 
 Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
> volgende
>>> geschreven:
 
 Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded
>> *the
 first
 time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
> assertion
>>> check
 >> setup.py#L68-L73>.
 Build fails on re-installs :(
 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
>  
>>> wrote:
> 
> +0.5 (non-binding)
> 
> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
> >> setup.py#L87>
> which will cause the installation (pip install or python
>> setup)
>>> to
>>> error
> out and fail.
> nit: mind also updating the release log "
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>>> CHANGELOG.txt"
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 binding
>> 
>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
 bdbr...@gmail.com
 
>> 
>>> +1, binding
>>> 
>>> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check
>> build),
> bin
 is
>> there.
>>> 
>>> Bolke
>>> 
>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>> 
 Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao 
>> het
>>> volgende
>>> geschreven:
 
 +1, binding
 
 Tha

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Sid Anand]

I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members). Per
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't that
be sufficient?

In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or
still working toward it?
-s

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chris Riccomini 
wrote:

> I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
> might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a new
> RC.
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
> > people have issues with it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bolke.
> >
> > > On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
> > > ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing
> all
> > >> the RCs.
> > >>
> > >> -ash
> > >>
> > >>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini 
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
> > >>>
> > >>> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
> > >>>
> > >>> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
> > >>> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
> > >>> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
> > >>> - Joy Gao (binding)
> > >>> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Chris
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> > criccom...@apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  I believe so, yes.
> > 
> >  I will proceed with release. :)
> > 
> >  On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin  >
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just
> update
> > >> the
> > > tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
> > >
> > > Bolke.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > >> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> > >> criccom...@apache.org
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll
> have
> > >> to
> > >>> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
> > > removing the
> > >>> check seems like the best course of action.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> > bdbr...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
> > 
> >  We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
> >  ridiculous.
> > 
> >  B.
> > 
> >  Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> > 
> > > Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
> > >> volgende
> >  geschreven:
> > >
> > > Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded
> *the
> > > first
> > > time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
> > >> assertion
> >  check
> > >  >  setup.py#L68-L73>.
> > > Build fails on re-installs :(
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
> > >>  > >>
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +0.5 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
> > >>  >  setup.py#L87>
> > >> which will cause the installation (pip install or python
> setup)
> > to
> >  error
> > >> out and fail.
> > >> nit: mind also updating the release log "
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >  CHANGELOG.txt"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
> >  
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 binding
> > >>>
> > >>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
> > > bdbr...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>>
> >  +1, binding
> > 
> >  Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check
> build),
> > >> bin
> > > is
> > >>> there.
> > 
> >  Bolke
> > 
> >  Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> > 
> > > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao 
> het
> >  volgende
> >  geschreven:
> > >
> > > +1, binding
> > >
> > > Thank you Chris!
> > >
> > > On Fri, De

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Chris Riccomini]

I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a new
RC.

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
> people have issues with it.
>
> Cheers,
> Bolke.
>
> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
> > ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all
> >> the RCs.
> >>
> >> -ash
> >>
> >>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
> >>>
> >>> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
> >>>
> >>> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
> >>> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
> >>> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
> >>> - Joy Gao (binding)
> >>> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> >>>
> >>> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccom...@apache.org
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  I believe so, yes.
> 
>  I will proceed with release. :)
> 
>  On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
>  wrote:
> 
> > But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update
> >> the
> > tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
> >
> > Bolke.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> >> criccom...@apache.org
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have
> >> to
> >>> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
> > removing the
> >>> check seems like the best course of action.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
> 
>  We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>  ridiculous.
> 
>  B.
> 
>  Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> 
> > Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
> >> volgende
>  geschreven:
> >
> > Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
> > first
> > time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
> >> assertion
>  check
> >   setup.py#L68-L73>.
> > Build fails on re-installs :(
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
> >>  >>
>  wrote:
> >>
> >> +0.5 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
> >>   setup.py#L87>
> >> which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup)
> to
>  error
> >> out and fail.
> >> nit: mind also updating the release log "
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>  CHANGELOG.txt"
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>  
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 binding
> >>>
> >>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
> > bdbr...@gmail.com
> >
> >>>
>  +1, binding
> 
>  Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build),
> >> bin
> > is
> >>> there.
> 
>  Bolke
> 
>  Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> 
> > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao  het
>  volgende
>  geschreven:
> >
> > +1, binding
> >
> > Thank you Chris!
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
> >>> criccom...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> (Last time, I hope)^2
> >>
> >> I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote
> on
> > the
>  release,
> >> which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>
> >> Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
> > .0rc8/
> >>
> >> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+inc

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Bolke de Bruin]

Chris,

Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter people 
have issues with it.

Cheers,
Bolke.

> On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini  wrote:
> 
> Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
> 
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
> ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
> 
>> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all
>> the RCs.
>> 
>> -ash
>> 
>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
>>> 
>>> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
>>> 
>>> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
>>> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
>>> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
>>> - Joy Gao (binding)
>>> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
>>> 
>>> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini >> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 I believe so, yes.
 
 I will proceed with release. :)
 
 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
 wrote:
 
> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update
>> the
> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
> 
> Bolke.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
> wrote:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>> criccom...@apache.org
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have
>> to
>>> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
> removing the
>>> check seems like the best course of action.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
 
 We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
 ridiculous.
 
 B.
 
 Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
 
> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
>> volgende
 geschreven:
> 
> Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
> first
> time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
>> assertion
 check
> .
> Build fails on re-installs :(
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
>> > 
 wrote:
>> 
>> +0.5 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
>> 
>> which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup) to
 error
>> out and fail.
>> nit: mind also updating the release log "
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
 CHANGELOG.txt"
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 binding
>>> 
>>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com
> 
>>> 
 +1, binding
 
 Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build),
>> bin
> is
>>> there.
 
 Bolke
 
 Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
 
> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao  het
 volgende
 geschreven:
> 
> +1, binding
> 
> Thank you Chris!
> 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
>>> criccom...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> (Last time, I hope)^2
>> 
>> I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote on
> the
 release,
>> which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
>> 
>> Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
> .0rc8/
>> 
>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a source
>> release
 that
>> comes with INSTALL instructions.
>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the binary
> Python
 "sdist"
>> release.
>> 
>> Public keys are available at:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/
>> 
>> The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
>> 
>> I also had to ch

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Chris Riccomini]

Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:

> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all
> the RCs.
>
> -ash
>
> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
> >
> > 5 “+1” binding votes received:
> >
> > - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
> > - Chris Riccomini (binding)
> > - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
> > - Joy Gao (binding)
> > - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> >
> > My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I believe so, yes.
> >>
> >> I will proceed with release. :)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update
> the
> >>> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
> >>>
> >>> Bolke.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
>  On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> 
>  On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccom...@apache.org
> 
>  wrote:
> 
> > Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have
> to
> > keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
> >>> removing the
> > check seems like the best course of action.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
> >>
> >> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
> >> ridiculous.
> >>
> >> B.
> >>
> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>
> >>> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het
> volgende
> >> geschreven:
> >>>
> >>> Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
> >>> first
> >>> time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
> assertion
> >> check
> >>>  >> setup.py#L68-L73>.
> >>> Build fails on re-installs :(
> >>>
>  On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
>  
> >> wrote:
> 
>  +0.5 (non-binding)
> 
>  Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
>   >> setup.py#L87>
>  which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup) to
> >> error
>  out and fail.
>  nit: mind also updating the release log "
>  https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >> CHANGELOG.txt"
> 
> 
>  On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
> >> 
>  wrote:
> 
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
> >>> bdbr...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >
> >> +1, binding
> >>
> >> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build),
> bin
> >>> is
> > there.
> >>
> >> Bolke
> >>
> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>
> >>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao  het
> >> volgende
> >> geschreven:
> >>>
> >>> +1, binding
> >>>
> >>> Thank you Chris!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
> > criccom...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hey all,
> 
>  (Last time, I hope)^2
> 
>  I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote on
> >>> the
> >> release,
>  which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
> 
>  Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
> 
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
> >>> .0rc8/
> 
>  apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a source
>  release
> >> that
>  comes with INSTALL instructions.
>  apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the binary
> >>> Python
> >> "sdist"
>  release.
> 
>  Public keys are available at:
> 
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/
> 
>  The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
> 
>  I also had to change the version number to exclude the `rc6`
> >>> string
>  as
> >> well
>  as the "+incubating" string, so it's now simply 1.9.0. This
> will
>  allow
> >> us
>  to rename the artifact without modify

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Ash Berlin-Taylor]

Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing all the 
RCs.

-ash

> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
> 
> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
> 
> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
> - Joy Gao (binding)
> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
> 
> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris
> 
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini 
> wrote:
> 
>> I believe so, yes.
>> 
>> I will proceed with release. :)
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update the
>>> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
>>> 
>>> Bolke.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
 On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
>>> wrote:
 
 https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
 
 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini >>> 
 wrote:
 
> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have to
> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
>>> removing the
> check seems like the best course of action.
> 
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> wrote:
> 
>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
>> 
>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>> ridiculous.
>> 
>> B.
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>>> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>> 
>>> Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
>>> first
>>> time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the assertion
>> check
>>> > setup.py#L68-L73>.
>>> Build fails on re-installs :(
>>> 
 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu >>> 
>> wrote:
 
 +0.5 (non-binding)
 
 Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
 > setup.py#L87>
 which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup) to
>> error
 out and fail.
 nit: mind also updating the release log "
 https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> CHANGELOG.txt"
 
 
 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>> 
 wrote:
 
> +1 binding
> 
> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
>>> bdbr...@gmail.com
>>> 
> 
>> +1, binding
>> 
>> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build), bin
>>> is
> there.
>> 
>> Bolke
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao  het
>> volgende
>> geschreven:
>>> 
>>> +1, binding
>>> 
>>> Thank you Chris!
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccom...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hey all,
 
 (Last time, I hope)^2
 
 I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote on
>>> the
>> release,
 which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
 
 Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
>>> .0rc8/
 
 apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a source
 release
>> that
 comes with INSTALL instructions.
 apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the binary
>>> Python
>> "sdist"
 release.
 
 Public keys are available at:
 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/
 
 The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
 
 I also had to change the version number to exclude the `rc6`
>>> string
 as
>> well
 as the "+incubating" string, so it's now simply 1.9.0. This will
 allow
>> us
 to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums
>> when
> we
 actually release.
 
 See JIRAs that were in 1.9.0RC7 and before (see previous VOTE
>>> email
> for
 full list).
 
 Cheers,
 Chris
 
>> 
> 
 
>> 
> 
> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

[RESULT][VOTE] Airflow 1.9.0rc8

[Chris Riccomini]

Hello,

Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.

5 “+1” binding votes received:

- Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
- Chris Riccomini (binding)
- Bolke de Bruin (binding)
- Joy Gao (binding)
- Fokko Driesprong (binding)

My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.

Cheers,
Chris

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini 
wrote:

> I believe so, yes.
>
> I will proceed with release. :)
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> wrote:
>
>> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update the
>> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
>>
>> Bolke.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have to
>> >> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
>> removing the
>> >> check seems like the best course of action.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
>> >>>
>> >>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>> >>> ridiculous.
>> >>>
>> >>> B.
>> >>>
>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> >>>
>>  Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao  het volgende
>> >>> geschreven:
>> 
>>  Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
>> first
>>  time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the assertion
>> >>> check
>>  > >>> setup.py#L68-L73>.
>>  Build fails on re-installs :(
>> 
>> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu > >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +0.5 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
>> > > >>> setup.py#L87>
>> > which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup) to
>> >>> error
>> > out and fail.
>> > nit: mind also updating the release log "
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> >>> CHANGELOG.txt"
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>> >>> 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 binding
>> >>
>> >> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
>> bdbr...@gmail.com
>> 
>> >>
>> >>> +1, binding
>> >>>
>> >>> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build), bin
>> is
>> >> there.
>> >>>
>> >>> Bolke
>> >>>
>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> >>>
>>  Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao  het
>> >>> volgende
>> >>> geschreven:
>> 
>>  +1, binding
>> 
>>  Thank you Chris!
>> 
>>  On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
>> >> criccom...@apache.org>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > (Last time, I hope)^2
>> >
>> > I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote on
>> the
>> >>> release,
>> > which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
>> >
>> > Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
>> .0rc8/
>> >
>> > apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a source
>> > release
>> >>> that
>> > comes with INSTALL instructions.
>> > apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the binary
>> Python
>> >>> "sdist"
>> > release.
>> >
>> > Public keys are available at:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/
>> >
>> > The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
>> >
>> > I also had to change the version number to exclude the `rc6`
>> string
>> > as
>> >>> well
>> > as the "+incubating" string, so it's now simply 1.9.0. This will
>> > allow
>> >>> us
>> > to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums
>> >>> when
>> >> we
>> > actually release.
>> >
>> > See JIRAs that were in 1.9.0RC7 and before (see previous VOTE
>> email
>> >> for
>> > full list).
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Chris
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>