Re: 1.7 Memory usage > 1.6.5 Memory usage

[Alexey Solofnenko]

The change you mentioned would only affect performance, not memory usage.
Have you tried to run ANT in any profiler to see where most of the memory is
allocated?

- Alexey.

On 4/18/06, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just trying to reduce the amount of temporary objects created on the
> heap to resolve this OutOfMemory issue with AppFuse, and with the 1.6.5
> source, I can reduce memory consumption by putting a guard around when
> Strings are created for logging eg:
>
> log("Copying "+fromFile+" to "+toFile, verbosity)
>
> becomes
>
> StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer("Copying ").append(fromFile).append("
> to ");
> ... (code elided)
> //not the same behaviour, but need to try  and see : don't log unless
> user wants debug output
> if (verbosity >= Project.MSG_DEBUG) {
>   log(sb.append(toFile).toString(), verbosity);
> }
>
> This helps as the strings aren't created at all unless the verbosity is
> set to DEBUG, however, in Ant 1.7, even with this change, there is an
> OutOfMemory error.  Basically some of the 1.7 tasks are consuming much
> more memory than the 1.6.5 codebase.
>
> In general though, the logging mechanism is always going to create a lot
> of temporary cruft as it stands, and this is perhaps one area where
> there could be some refactoring?
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com
home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)

1.7 Memory usage > 1.6.5 Memory usage

[Kev Jackson]

Just trying to reduce the amount of temporary objects created on the 
heap to resolve this OutOfMemory issue with AppFuse, and with the 1.6.5 
source, I can reduce memory consumption by putting a guard around when 
Strings are created for logging eg:


log("Copying "+fromFile+" to "+toFile, verbosity)

becomes

StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer("Copying ").append(fromFile).append(" 
to ");

... (code elided)
//not the same behaviour, but need to try  and see : don't log unless 
user wants debug output

if (verbosity >= Project.MSG_DEBUG) {
 log(sb.append(toFile).toString(), verbosity);
}

This helps as the strings aren't created at all unless the verbosity is 
set to DEBUG, however, in Ant 1.7, even with this change, there is an 
OutOfMemory error.  Basically some of the 1.7 tasks are consuming much 
more memory than the 1.6.5 codebase.


In general though, the logging mechanism is always going to create a lot 
of temporary cruft as it stands, and this is perhaps one area where 
there could be some refactoring?




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

# character causes problem parsing -lib paths

[Paul.Mackay]

Hello,

I have found that if I specify a -lib option with a path that contains a
hash "#" character, it cannot find the libraries. Without the #
character in the path they can be picked up fine.

This is not easily avoided in our environment, as we use Synergy for
SCM, which defaults to using # in the path when checking out projects.
This can be changed, but that is not desirable. 

Is this a known bug? Does anyone know of any workarounds?

Many thanks

paul

Re: Ant 1.7 NullPointerException AbstractFileSet and OOM error

[Kev Jackson]

Matt,

Just verified your changes have fixed the problem relating to Cargo and 
the NullPointer I was experiencing - thanks for looking into it for me.


Kev

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r395097 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java

[kevj]

Author: kevj
Date: Tue Apr 18 18:17:25 2006
New Revision: 395097

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395097&view=rev
Log:
remove extra ;

Modified:

ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java

Modified: 
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java?rev=395097&r1=395096&r2=395097&view=diff
==
--- 
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java
 (original)
+++ 
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/DotnetResource.java
 Tue Apr 18 18:17:25 2006
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@
 if (hasFilesets()) {
 for (Iterator listIter = fileSets.iterator(); listIter.hasNext();) 
{
 FileSet fs = (FileSet) listIter.next();
-;
 String baseDirectory = fs.getDir(p).toString();
 String namespace = getNamespace(); // ends with '.' or null
 DirectoryScanner ds = fs.getDirectoryScanner(p);



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ant 1.7 NullPointerException AbstractFileSet and OOM error

[Kevin Jackson]

On 4/18/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I checked out appfuse, DL'd Tomcat... then it
> wants mysql, which I just don't have time to install
> too right now.  :)  I will check in my changes anyway.

Thanks, I have all these installed as my 'day job' is
server-side/web-app java, so it wasn't a big deal for me.  I'll test
the changes this morning.

Kev

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39183] - Make source attribute of javac mandatory

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39183


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 23:26 ---
I agree with Mathias on this. Wouldn't it be preferable to make the source attrs
semimandatory, warning if unset? Maybe you will get a lot of warnings from Gump
- good. To me that just means that we are informing a lot of projects built on
Gump that they forgot to do something important - set this attr, according to
the actual source level of the project being built. Using "1.4" for a 1.5
project is obviously impossible, and using "1.5" for a 1.4 project is in some
cases possible but not reliably - it may turn reasonably common code like

  Enumeration enum = loader.getResources("foo.properties");

from a warning into an error.

To Matt re. adding verbosity to builds for users who "choose to ignore the
documentation's boldface warning" - I doubt most people ever read the manual
very carefully (or at all). They see someone using  somewhere, they copy
it, it seems to work, done. I can't imagine any case where you would
intentionally omit the 'source' attr except out of pure laziness.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the org.apache.testlet framework

[Bruce Atherton]

[X] Yes

[ ] No


Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Hello,

Do you want to remove from ant the usage of the org.apache.testlet
framework :

see this document : [1] describing the optional task.
...
[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/test.html

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of icontract based task in ant

[Bruce Atherton]

[X] Yes

[ ] No



Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Hello,

Do you want to remove from ant the usage of
icontract :
see the documentation of the optional task  icontract [1]. The link  [2]
contained in the page [3] listing the library dependencies of ant is dead.

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of Visual for Java based tasks

[Bruce Atherton]

[X] Yes

[ ] No


Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Hello,

Do you want to remove from ant the usage of Visual Age for Java :

see this document : [1]
I believe that IBM has replaced Visual Age for Java with WSAD since a
long time.
Stefan Bodewig also wrote that the Visual Age Tasks in ant cannot work
any more any way
because they require Java 1.1

  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of dependency to xslp

[Bruce Atherton]

[X] Yes

[ ] No



Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Hello,

Do you want to remove from ant the usage of xslp, a library containing an XML 
transformation engine, the site
where this transformation engine could be downloaded from no longer exists.
XSL:P : used to live at  , but the
link doesn't work any longer and we are not aware of a replacement site.

There is a bug report concerning it :
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455

The only ant class using explicitly the classes of xslp.jar is :
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/XslpLiaison.java
  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 20:15 ---
Thanks for the diagnostics. Could you stick in the  tag used. We should
make a unit test for this, regardless of the underlying cause. 

I note that ant1.7 has a forking adapter that forks rmic into a new process. I
suspect (indeed, hope) that this problem will make the error go away. Maybe we
should make the default rmic compiler for Java1.6 the forking one if -xnew is
set? We could even add a newstub attribute to say 'new stub generator' that
could be used as a trigger for this behaviour.. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 17:52 ---
Thanks for helping us be sure the problem does indeed affect 1.6.5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #18118|0   |1
is obsolete||
  Attachment #18125|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 17:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=18127)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18127&action=view)
ant -d output

OK, here is the ant -d output using ant 1.6.5

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r394979 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java

[mbenson]

Author: mbenson
Date: Tue Apr 18 09:18:05 2006
New Revision: 394979

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394979&view=rev
Log:
Use task project when filesets don't have a project, for backwards 
compatibility.

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java

Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java?rev=394979&r1=394978&r2=394979&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Delete.java Tue Apr 
18 09:18:05 2006
@@ -547,6 +547,12 @@
 
 for (int i = 0; i < filesets.size(); i++) {
 FileSet fs = (FileSet) filesets.get(i);
+if (fs.getProject() == null) {
+log("Deleting fileset with no project specified;"
++ " assuming executing project", Project.MSG_VERBOSE);
+fs = (FileSet) fs.clone();
+fs.setProject(getProject());
+}
 resourcesToDelete.add(fs);
 if (includeEmpty && fs.getDir().isDirectory()) {
   filesetDirs.add(new ReverseDirs(fs.getDir(),



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ant 1.7 NullPointerException AbstractFileSet and OOM error

[Matt Benson]

Well, I checked out appfuse, DL'd Tomcat... then it
wants mysql, which I just don't have time to install
too right now.  :)  I will check in my changes anyway.

-Matt

--- Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> >well, obviously if I broke them it's entirely
> likely
> >they won't be alone.  Probably the easiest/most BC
> >thing will be some form of checking whether
> >(Abstract?)FileSet instances have a project set and
> >using the task's project if not (I think fileset
> >handling is separate from other
> ResourceCollections,
> >so that will work... otherwise I'll clone the
> >filesets).  I'll take a look in about ten hours
> after
> >I get to work.
> >
> >-Matt
> >  
> >
> For testing purposes:
>  >>
> 
> Yes, there's a couple operations that copy around
> 500 files.  Here's
> how to reproduce the problem in AppFuse:
> 
> 1. Checkout the latest code from CVS: cvs -d
> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -P appfuse
> (you may have to
> login first, password is guest)
> 2. cd into appfuse/extras/appgen and run "ant
> test-all".
> 3. Make sure your ANT_OPTS are set to "".  When I do
> this, I get the
> following after 4 minutes:
> 
>  [copy] Copying 328 files to
> C:\Source\appfuse-appgen2
>  [copy] Copying 104 files to
> C:\Source\appfuse-appgen2\extras
> 
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\Source\appfuse\extras\appgen\build.xml:639: The
> following error
> occurred while executing this lin
> e:
> C:\Source\appfuse\extras\appgen\build.xml:546: The
> following error
> occurred while executing this lin
> e:
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> 
> Total time: 4 minutes 9 seconds
> 
> <<
> Ant 1.7 fails when trying to execute the cargo
> config, long before the 
> heap space issue (probably within ~1 min).
> Kev
> 
>
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 15:39 ---
I do find it interesting that this report is marked with Ant version 1.6.5
despite the fact that the debug output shows Ant 1.6.0.  :|

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 15:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=18125)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18125&action=view)
ant -d output

OK thanks. Here is the plain ant -d output.
Reassigning to dev.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12817] - capture of stdout/stderr in JUnit task causes out of memory exception

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12817





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 14:24 ---

At PrismTech we have been using the Sun Real Time Java JVM. We have found that
redirecting the system streams causes (somewhat unpredictable) memory faults -
throwboundaryerrors and the like when using Immortal/Scoped memory. While I
understand that Ant does not 'officially' support Mackinac we have found that by
applying the patch from comment #7 the memory faults disappear. Without this
patch  we cannot reliably run our test suites.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 13:58 ---
Hmmm... ordinarily you wouldn't use -d and -v together.  Does -d without -v
produce more output?

P.S. when your report is marked NEEDINFO, once you provide that info you should
pick Reassign to dev@ant.apache.org or it could get lost in the madness.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39338] New: - description of build.sysclasspath

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39338

   Summary: description of build.sysclasspath
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.6.5
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Documentation
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The descriptions of the System-Property build.sysclasspath in

docs/manual/running.html#sysprops

and

docs/manual/sysclasspath.html

differ extremely. If they say the same, the latter should be used in the first
place too, or linked there and in the first place the valid values should be
explicitly named.
Additionally, at the second location nowhere is mentioned which value will be
used as default if it is not defined. That should be mentioned there too.
Btw. is it really "only"? o_O If you run ant with the wrapper-scripts, a
minimalistic classpath of just ant-launcher.jar is used as classpath to start
ant. And the "normal" classpath is just passed to ant as -cp option, isn't it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the org.apache.testlet framework

[Peter Reilly]

[+1] Yes
Peter


On 4/17/06, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >[x] Yes
> >
> >[ ] No
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

AW: [VOTE] removal of Visual for Java based tasks

[Jan.Materne]

+1
Jan 

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2006 15:04
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: [VOTE] removal of Visual for Java based tasks
>
>Hello,
>
>Do you want to remove from ant the usage of Visual Age for Java :
>
>see this document : [1]
>I believe that IBM has replaced Visual Age for Java with WSAD 
>since a long time.
>Stefan Bodewig also wrote that the Visual Age Tasks in ant 
>cannot work any more any way because they require Java 1.1
>
>[ ] Yes
>
>[ ] No
>
>I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and 
>then lazy consensus from the active committers.
>
>
>Let me start with my +1.
>
>Regards,
>
>Antoine
>
>
>[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/Integration/VAJAntTool.html#tasks
>[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.ant.devel/43832
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] removal of icontract based task in ant

[Jan.Materne]

+1
Jan 

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2006 15:03
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: [VOTE] removal of icontract based task in ant
>
>Hello,
>
>Do you want to remove from ant the usage of icontract :
>see the documentation of the optional task  icontract [1]. The 
>link  [2] contained in the page [3] listing the library 
>dependencies of ant is dead.
>
>[ ] Yes
>
>[ ] No
>
>I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and 
>then lazy consensus from the active committers.
>
>
>Let me start with my +1.
>
>Regards,
>
>Antoine
>
>[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/icontract.html
>[2] http://www.reliable-systems.com/tools/
>[3] http://ant.apache.org/manual/install.html#librarydependencies
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the org.apache.testlet framework

[Jan.Materne]

+1
Jan 

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Gesendet: Freitag, 14. April 2006 15:05
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: [VOTE] removal of the test task based upon the 
>org.apache.testlet framework
>
>Hello,
>
>Do you want to remove from ant the usage of the 
>org.apache.testlet framework :
>
>see this document : [1] describing the optional task.
>
>[ ] Yes
>
>[ ] No
>
>I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and 
>then lazy consensus from the active committers.
>
>
>Let me start with my +1.
>
>Regards,
>
>Antoine
>
>[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/test.html
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] removal of dependency to xslp

[Jan.Materne]

+1
Jan 

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 15:16
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: [VOTE] removal of dependency to xslp
>
>Hello,
>
>Do you want to remove from ant the usage of xslp, a library 
>containing an XML transformation engine, the site where this 
>transformation engine could be downloaded from no longer exists.
>XSL:P : used to live at  , 
>but the link doesn't work any longer and we are not aware of a 
>replacement site.
>
>There is a bug report concerning it :
>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455
>
>The only ant class using explicitly the classes of xslp.jar is :
>src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/XslpLiaison.java
>
>
>
>[ ] Yes
>
>[ ] No
>
>I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and 
>then lazy consensus from the active committers.
>
>
>Let me start with my +1.
>
>Regards,
>
>Antoine
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] removal of Visual for Java based tasks

[Peter Reilly]

[+1] Yes,
Peter

On 4/16/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Do you want to remove from ant the usage of Visual Age for Java :
> >
> > see this document : [1]
> > I believe that IBM has replaced Visual Age for Java with WSAD since a
> > long time.
> > Stefan Bodewig also wrote that the Visual Age Tasks in ant cannot work
> > any more any way
> > because they require Java 1.1
> >
> > [ ] Yes
> >
> > [ ] No
> >
> > I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and then lazy
> > consensus from the active committers.
> >
> >
> > Let me start with my +1.
>
>   [+1 ] Yes
>
>   [ ] No
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: [VOTE] removal of icontract based task in ant

[Peter Reilly]

[+1] Yes
 Peter


On 4/16/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Do you want to remove from ant the usage of
> > icontract :
> > see the documentation of the optional task  icontract [1]. The link  [2]
> > contained in the page [3] listing the library dependencies of ant is
> dead.
> >
> > [ ] Yes
> >
> > [ ] No
> >
> > I consider this a code change, requiring  lazy approval and then lazy
> > consensus from the active committers.
> >
> >
> > Let me start with my +1.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
>
> [+1 ] Yes
>
> [ ] No
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38732] - rmic task doesn't work with -Xnew and JDK 6.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-18 08:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=18118)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18118&action=view)
ant -d -v output

What's "a full -d stack trace"? I've attached the output from ant -d -v rmic.
Do you want a stack trace? At which point should I generate one?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]