svn commit: r421167 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/antlibs/sandbox.html xdocs/antlibs/sandbox.xml

[jhm]

Author: jhm
Date: Tue Jul 11 23:48:16 2006
New Revision: 421167

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421167&view=rev
Log:
Update the sandbox homepage (needs more infos...)

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/sandbox.html
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/antlibs/sandbox.xml

Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/sandbox.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/sandbox.html?rev=421167&r1=421166&r2=421167&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/sandbox.html (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/sandbox.html Tue Jul 11 23:48:16 2006
@@ -122,8 +122,182 @@
   
   Current Sandbox Ant Libraries
 
-There are no Ant libraries in the sandbox right 
now.
-
+  
+
+GenDoc - Generate the manual for Ant Tasks from their sources
+  
+Most of the information needed for writing the 
manual is inside the sources: attributes, nested elements (especially
+inherited one). GenDoc collects these information and generates the 
manual as xml page. Following steps transform this
+xml into the final format (HTML in the first step, PDF may follow).
+  
+  
+  
+  SVN URL:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/";>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  ViewSVN:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/";>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/gendoc/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Ant compatibility:
+  
+  
+  Ant 1.7.x
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Added to sandbox:
+  
+  
+  2005-04-15
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Sponsoring Committers
+  
+  
+   
+  
+  
+  
+  
+
+HTTP - tasks for handling HTTP requests
+  
+This antlib contains tasks to make the basic HTTP 
requests: get, post, head, put, with Basicauthentication.
+  
+  
+  
+  SVN URL:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/";>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  ViewSVN:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/";>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Ant compatibility:
+  
+  
+  Ant 1.7.x
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Added to sandbox:
+  
+  
+  2006-06-27
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Sponsoring Committers
+  
+  
+
+  
+  
+  
+  
+
+VSS - Microsoft Visual SourceSafe Tasks
+  
+This antlib provides an interface to the Microsoft 
Visual SourceSafe SCM. The original tasks 
+(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.vss) have been expanded upon 
in this antlib. 
+Some fixes to issues in the original tasks have also been 
incorporated.
+  
+  
+  
+  SVN URL:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/";>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  ViewSVN:
+  
+  
+  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/";>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/vss/
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Ant compatibility:
+  
+  
+  Ant 1.7.x
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Added to sandbox:
+  
+  
+  2006-04-26  
+  
+  
+  
+  
+  Sponsoring Committers
+  
+  
+
+  
+  
+  
+
 
   
 

Modified: ant/core/trunk/xdocs/antlibs/sandbox.xml
URL: 
http

AW: Bug20209 - AntLibs - Sandbox

[Jan.Materne]

>> I going through some bug reports and found 
>>allow to put result of "get" task into a property [1] Is this 
>> adressed in the HTTP-Antlib?
>
>That'll be the destinationProperty attr.

Ok, I closed that bug with link to that antlib.


>> BTW - should the sandbox-homepage [2] be updated because of gendoc, 
>> http and vss?
>
>presumably so

Started with some infos. But there is need for more
- Sponsoring Committers
- review of the other infos


Jan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20209] - allow to put result of "get" task into a property

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20209


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-12 05:44 ---
Just a few days ago (during ApacheConEU2006) the http section was rewritten. And
according to the 1.7 philosphy to break the huge Ant code base into smaller
peaces it is an AntLib.

ATM in the sandbox
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/

But that does support the result property
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/docs/http-antlib.html
  destfile -  the file where to store the retrieved file. 
  destproperty -  the name of a property to fill with the returned content. 
  Ignored if destFile is set 



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: AW: AW: svn commit: r420305 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition: ConditionBase.java HasMethod.java

[Jan.Materne]

>Not yet. I've been really getting in to antunit in the book tho'.
>
>How do I add antunit tests to ant's own build? We also need to 
>update the task_writing_tutorial...

Yeah - thought about that  but I need to spend some time with
antunit before writing about it ;-)


Jan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Jan.Materne]

Did I understood something wrong?
I thought we had voted to drop Win98 

Jan 

>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 02:36
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7
>
>> 
>> The issue I would see is that by having a win98 batch file we are 
>> implicitly saying win98 is supported. I'd rather just see us 
>treat it 
>> the same way MS does :-)
>> 
>> Conor
>> 
>
>Just for the record:
>
>http://www.microsoft.com/windows/support/endofsupport.mspx
>
>Conor
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: svn commit: r420862 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/contributors.html xdocs/contributors.xml

[Jan.Materne]

>Heh, you used RatRose enough to write a book about it. I'd 
>keep that a secret too :)

Oh - in 2001 that was the only tool worth to called "UML-tool" (ok maybe
two or three others too).
But time changes ...

Puh  hard time ... you know  "writing a book in the summer" (and
without a notebook wich 
could run that software) ;-)


Jan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40023] New: - BUILD_JAVAC_TARGET support in 1.6

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40023

   Summary: BUILD_JAVAC_TARGET support in 1.6
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.6.5
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P2
 Component: Core tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Would it be possible to back port this support into the 1.6 branch of Ant?
  /**
 * property that provides the default value for javac's target
 * attribute.
 * @since Ant 1.7
 * Value: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 */
public static final String BUILD_JAVAC_TARGET = "ant.build.javac.target";

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||ftp://age-j-
   ||soft.com/pub/test.zip




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-12 03:50 ---
Added FTP url to file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r420305 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition: ConditionBase.java HasMethod.java

[Kev Jackson]

On 12 Jul 2006, at 03:51, Steve Loughran wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Have you written some (not committed) testcases?


Not yet. I've been really getting in to antunit in the book tho'.



I too had the antunit epiphany a couple of weeks ago when writing for  
onjava - antunit makes writing a BuildFileTest look prehistoric, it's  
*so* much sweeter working in xml (I never thought I'd say that!)


How do I add antunit tests to ant's own build? We also need to  
update the task_writing_tutorial...


Yeah updating ant tests to antunit would be good (but also a  
timesink).  I think we have to go through the docs before next  
release and tidy stuff up, I noticed a couple of grammar issues I'd  
like to clean out, but I'm sure there are more lurking.


Kev

--
"To be governed is to be watched over, inspected, spied on, directed,  
legislated..." - Pierre-Joseph Proudhon



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Conor MacNeill]

> 
> The issue I would see is that by having a win98 batch file we are
> implicitly saying win98 is supported. I'd rather just see us treat it
> the same way MS does :-)
> 
> Conor
> 

Just for the record:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/support/endofsupport.mspx

Conor

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 23:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=18592)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18592&action=view)
Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.util.FileUtils.diff

Added functions to get relative path between two files.
The default representation of the path will use '/' as a separator because
Windows understands the slash, too.
The user could choose another separator if needed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #18587|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 23:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=18591)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18591&action=view)
Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison

Changed to use whitespaces.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #18586|0   |1
is obsolete||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 23:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=18590)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18590&action=view)
Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess

Updated XSLTProcess to use the path of the processed file relative to the
baseDir.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Conor MacNeill]

Steve Loughran wrote:
> Peter Reilly wrote:
>> +1 for ant98 plan.
>>
>> Peter
>>
> 
> One of the issues here is not just the .bat file, but
> 
> -the implicit assumption that all windows platforms are on filesystem
> with a granularity of 2s, that is, FAT32. We need to assume that
> everything from Server 2003 and vista up is down to 1s granularity
> 
> -any/all outstanding win98 bugs. We could move the win98.bat file (and
> strip out win2k support there), but also state
> "win98 is not supported, because not even MS support it". And list known
> problems that arent fixed...
> 

The issue I would see is that by having a win98 batch file we are
implicitly saying win98 is supported. I'd rather just see us treat it
the same way MS does :-)

Conor

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40022] New: - junitreport task unable to use stylesheets that have an xsl:import tag

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40022

   Summary: junitreport task unable to use stylesheets that have an
xsl:import tag
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly)
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Keywords: XSLTBug
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Optional Tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


When testing the junitreport task from fresh ant build from svn, I am unable 
to use a custom stylesheet that contains an xsl:import tag.
Maybe recent change that loads the stylesheet as resource in stead of as a 
file causes this (revision 418420, Fri Jun 30).

This still worked for recent checkouts from svn.

Stylesheet fragment:

http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";
xmlns:stringutils="xalan://org.apache.tools.ant.util.StringUtils"
version="1.0">



.



error:
[junitreport] java.lang.NullPointerException
[junitreport]   at org.apache.tools.ant.types.XMLCatalog.getCatalogResolver
(XMLC
atalog.java:477)
[junitreport]   at org.apache.tools.ant.types.XMLCatalog.resolve
(XMLCatalog.java
:416)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerFacto
ryImpl.loadSource(TransformerFactoryImpl.java:1063)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.Import.parse
Contents(Import.java:71)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.Stylesheet.p
arseOwnChildren(Stylesheet.java:590)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.Stylesheet.p
arseContents(Stylesheet.java:562)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.Parser.creat
eAST(Parser.java:380)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.XSLTC.compil
e(XSLTC.java:325)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.compiler.XSLTC.compil
e(XSLTC.java:410)
[junitreport]   at 
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerFacto
ryImpl.newTemplates(TransformerFactoryImpl.java:791)
[junitreport]   at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.readTempla
tes(TraXLiaison.java:296)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40021] - junitreport does not generate html file for format noframes

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40021





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:55 ---
Typo: "june 10" has to be "july 10".

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:54 ---
wait--why does it have to have a jar, and one several MB in size at that?  You
could include the creation of such a jar in your test buildfile, as well...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40021] New: - junitreport does not generate html file for format noframes

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40021

   Summary: junitreport does not generate html file for format
noframes
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly)
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Keywords: XSLTBug
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Optional Tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


When testing the junitreport task from fresh ant build from svn, I do not get 
an html report when selecting the format noframes.
When the frames format is used, the task works. Then it creates the html files.

This still worked for a svn checkout of approx. 10 days ago.
It first failed in the checkout I did yesterday june 10.

My taskdef looks like this:

  

  
  



The ant log displays no errors:
[junitreport] Loading stylesheet jar:file:/C:/sandbox_ant/ant/ant-
trunk/dist/lib
/ant-junit.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/xsl/junit-
noframes.
xsl
[junitreport] Transform time: 687ms
[junitreport] Deleting: C:\DOCUME~1\JANCUM~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\null1771508224

But it doesn't seem to generate the report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:40 ---
I don't think it'll let you do any thing larger than 1 meg.
I tried to attach it and it said it was too big.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:35 ---
You can't attach it to this report?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:25 ---
You are absolutely right. I had written this code some months ago to see if it's
possible at all.
What I found at that time were the changes submitted.
Currently I am working on an additional function to determine the relative path
between the currently processed file and baseDir.
This should make XSLT task based project portable and OS independent (than using
getPath() or alikes).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug20209 - AntLibs - Sandbox

[Steve Loughran]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I going through some bug reports and found 
   allow to put result of "get" task into a property [1]

Is this adressed in the HTTP-Antlib?


That'll be the destinationProperty attr.



BTW - should the sandbox-homepage [2] be updated because of
gendoc, http and vss?


presumably so

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Steve Loughran]

Peter Reilly wrote:

+1 for ant98 plan.

Peter



One of the issues here is not just the .bat file, but

-the implicit assumption that all windows platforms are on filesystem 
with a granularity of 2s, that is, FAT32. We need to assume that

everything from Server 2003 and vista up is down to 1s granularity

-any/all outstanding win98 bugs. We could move the win98.bat file (and 
strip out win2k support there), but also state
"win98 is not supported, because not even MS support it". And list known 
problems that arent fixed...





On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hi,
I think like Dominique.
Regards,
Antoine
 Original-Nachricht 
Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500
Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Ant Developers List 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

> +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat.
>
> +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and
> simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's
> suggestion).
>
> --DD
>
> On 6/28/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should
> rename
> > the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible
changes
> in
> > main ant.bat?
> >
> > - Alexey.
> >
> > On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > > > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern platform,
> I'll
> > > > refrain from passing judgement :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely?
> > >
> > >
-
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com
> > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39995] - junit per-test-method fork mode

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39995





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 21:06 ---
IDEA delivers this granularity; I dont know how.

the only way I know to get junit to run a single method in a test case is to
implement the static method 

public static TestCase[] suite() 

and return an array of pre-instantiated TestCase objects. So maybe, just maybe,
something like this could be done for ant, too. On Java1.5 you could dynamically
create the subclass with the method, for java1.4 it would be trickier. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: class casting betwn build xmls

[Steve Loughran]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi All,

I have a problem with class casting. Here is the scenario -

I have an ant custom task say "mycustomA". Inside the execute method, I
create a custom obj say "customobj" of a user-defined type. I store the
"customobj" in the project reference using
getProject().addReference("key",customobj).

I using mycustomA in a "build.xml". After invoking the task mycustomA I
use ant task  with inheritRefs=true to call another
"buildsecond.xml"  Inside buildsecond.xml, I use a custom task say
"mycustomB" which tries to get the reference of the customobj using the
method getProject().getReference("key"). When I try to cast to the
"customobj" type I get a classcast exception.

But customobj.getClass().getName() prints the exact type of customobj.
But the instance of operator fails saying false. Is this any issue with
class loader ?



Unless you declare the two custom tasks in the same classloader, they 
are going to be be in separate classloaders, so not able to share datatypes.


workarounds
 -declare them in the same classloader, by giving every taskdef/typedef 
the same loaderref value

 -serialize the object and save to the project that way.
I'd go for the first option


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r420862 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/contributors.html xdocs/contributors.xml

[Steve Loughran]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: jhm
Date: Tue Jul 11 07:16:14 2006
New Revision: 420862

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420862&view=rev
Log:
The book is a little bit out of date ...

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml

Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html?rev=420862&r1=420861&r2=420862&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html Tue Jul 11 07:16:14 2006
@@ -241,10 +241,7 @@
Jan Matèrne (jhm at apache.org)
 
 Jan is consultant for OOA/D in the computer centre of the government
-of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany. He is the co-author of
-http://www.galileocomputing.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-341?";>
-Rational Rose und UML im Praxiseinsatz the first German book about
-that OOAD-tool.
+of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany.


Heh, you used RatRose enough to write a book about it. I'd keep that a 
secret too :)


-steve

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39995] - junit per-test-method fork mode

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39995


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 20:52 ---
It also seems to me that this is more in the junit ballpark than in ant's
ballpark, junit isn't offering test method isolation functionality.

1) In case a high level of isolation is needed, tests should be declared in
separate classes.

2) Although testcases should not depend on each other, test runs should be
repeatable, this implies the order should be fixed.

3) When debugging strange crashes within one testcase, I'd recommend to use a 
gui.

So unless you get one of your students to produce something that does this, 
and isn't too ugly to be included,
and works with junit 3.8 and higher,
and works with java 1.2 and higher,
and has testcases,
chances are very next to zero that something will happen.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AW: AW: svn commit: r420305 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition: ConditionBase.java HasMethod.java

[Steve Loughran]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Have you written some (not committed) testcases?


Not yet. I've been really getting in to antunit in the book tho'.

How do I add antunit tests to ant's own build? We also need to update 
the task_writing_tutorial...




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

bootclasspath and Javac.java

[William Chu]

Hello,

I am trying to set the bootclasspath variable for ant. I want to pass
the value from the command line.

In Main.java there is method called processArgs which takes the
arguments from the command line and processes them.

I see that in 
apache-ant-1.6.5/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java,
I can set the bootclasspath variable via the method
setBootclasspath().

Thus I some how need to pass the value of bootclasspath, initially
seen in processArgs(), to Javac.setBootclasspath().

Where is the Javac object instantiated in ANT? So that, once the
object is created, I can set the bootclasspath variable.

Thank you for the help!
Will

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40019] - Add shorcut regex attribute to

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40019





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 20:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=18588)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18588&action=view)
Adds regex attribute to  task


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40019] New: - Add shorcut regex attribute to

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40019

   Summary: Add shorcut regex attribute to 
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly)
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Optional Tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I think it would be convenient if  had regex attribute. Although
the same functionality can be implemented with a , using an
attribute   is shorter. I am attaching a patch that contains the following:
1) the changes in EchoProperties.java - I added setRegex(String) method, as well
a check that throws a BuildException wheh both prefix and regex attributes are
supplied
2) the unit tests for the change in 1)
3) the documentation changes in echoproperties.html - I not only added
description of the regex attribute, but also touched some parts to highlight the
connection between  and .

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|REMIND  |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 19:49 ---
Alright I tracked it down and am able to reproduce it.
I had to include a jar with the test case so my Zip file is 7 meg.
I don't have any way to post it online.
Can I email it somewhere?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 18:03 ---
I understand your need but I wonder why would you want just the name of the file
and not its full path ? or the root directory of the fileset and the relative
path of the file.

Maybe you are working with filesets which do not contain several directories ?

Regards,

Antoine

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: class casting betwn build xmls

[Jeffrey E Care]

Sounds like a classloader issue; how
are the custom types being loaded?






Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


IBM WebSphere Application
Server Development 

WAS Pyxis Lead
Release Engineer 






[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/11/2006 01:26:37
PM:

> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a problem with class casting. Here is the scenario -
> 
> I have an ant custom task say "mycustomA". Inside the execute
method, I
> create a custom obj say "customobj" of a user-defined type.
I store the
> "customobj" in the project reference using
> getProject().addReference("key",customobj).
> 
> I using mycustomA in a "build.xml". After invoking the task
mycustomA I
> use ant task  with inheritRefs=true to call another
> "buildsecond.xml"  Inside buildsecond.xml, I use a
custom task say
> "mycustomB" which tries to get the reference of the customobj
using the
> method getProject().getReference("key"). When I try to cast
to the
> "customobj" type I get a classcast exception.
> 
> But customobj.getClass().getName() prints the exact type of customobj.
> But the instance of operator fails saying false. Is this any issue
with
> class loader ?
> 
> I use java 1.5.0_06. What I am missing ?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Best regards
> Shreedhar
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 17:47 ---
(From update of attachment 18586)
This diff introduces a new attribute 'filenameparameter' for the XSLT task. If
this attribute is set a paramter with the attributes value as name will be
provided to the XSLT processor. This parameter will contain the name of the
file being processed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 17:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=18587)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18587&action=view)
Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison

The usage of the Vector as parameter container was not useful because one could
not overwrite key/value pairs easily.
The diff replaces the Vector with a Hashtable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Peter Reilly]

I suppose a problem would be to support this ant98 file.

On 7/11/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


+1 for ant98 plan.

Peter



On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I think like Dominique.
> Regards,
> Antoine
>  Original-Nachricht 
> Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500
> Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> An: Ant Developers List 
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7
>
> > +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat.
> >
> > +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and
> > simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's
> > suggestion).
> >
> > --DD
> >
> > On 6/28/06, Alexey Solofnenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should
> > rename
> > > the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible
> changes
> > in
> > > main ant.bat?
> > >
> > > - Alexey.
> > >
> > > On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > > > > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern
> platform,
> > I'll
> > > > > refrain from passing judgement :-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely?
> > > >
> > > >
> -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com
> > > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> > > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Re: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Peter Reilly]

+1 for ant98 plan.

Peter


On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi,
I think like Dominique.
Regards,
Antoine
 Original-Nachricht 
Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500
Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Ant Developers List 
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

> +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat.
>
> +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and
> simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's
> suggestion).
>
> --DD
>
> On 6/28/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should
> rename
> > the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible
changes
> in
> > main ant.bat?
> >
> > - Alexey.
> >
> > On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > > > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern platform,
> I'll
> > > > refrain from passing judgement :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely?
> > >
> > >
-
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com
> > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 17:38 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=18586)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18586&action=view) 
[edit]
> Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess
> 

This should have been the comment for
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison:
> The usage of the Vector as parameter container was not useful because one 
> could
> not overwrite key/value pairs easily.
> The diff replaces the Vector with a Hashtable.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

class casting betwn build xmls

[shreedharn]

Hi All,

I have a problem with class casting. Here is the scenario -

I have an ant custom task say "mycustomA". Inside the execute method, I
create a custom obj say "customobj" of a user-defined type. I store the
"customobj" in the project reference using
getProject().addReference("key",customobj).

I using mycustomA in a "build.xml". After invoking the task mycustomA I
use ant task  with inheritRefs=true to call another
"buildsecond.xml"  Inside buildsecond.xml, I use a custom task say
"mycustomB" which tries to get the reference of the customobj using the
method getProject().getReference("key"). When I try to cast to the
"customobj" type I get a classcast exception.

But customobj.getClass().getName() prints the exact type of customobj.
But the instance of operator fails saying false. Is this any issue with
class loader ?

I use java 1.5.0_06. What I am missing ?

Thank you,

Best regards
Shreedhar

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 17:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=18586)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18586&action=view)
Diff for org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess

The usage of the Vector as parameter container was not useful because one could
not overwrite ke/value pairs easily.
The diff replaces the Vector with a Hashtable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 16:53 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> damn, I did the same thing you did and can't reproduce it either.
> I'll see if I can narrow it down.  I don't want to post the entire huge ones.

Trust me, we don't want you to either.  Small examples ensure we can see the
trees without having to look through the forest.  Or some metaphor like that.

> 
> Shawn



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WORKSFORME  |REMIND




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 16:39 ---
damn, I did the same thing you did and can't reproduce it either.
I'll see if I can narrow it down.  I don't want to post the entire huge ones.

Shawn

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18484] - Please add parameters into

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18484


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 16:17 ---
Yes,  was created to address this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 16:16 ---
well, friend, I will humor you.  My interpretation of your original post is that
you have a top-level buildfile.  It uses the  task to call a target from
each of two buildfiles in turn.  In these sub-buildfiles, the called target
depends on a target that collects input into a property.  The property has the
same name in each.  So I have:

build.xml:

  
  


foo.xml:

  

  
  
$${x}=${x}
  


bar.xml is identical to foo.xml .

When I run 'ant' I get:

Buildfile: build.xml

getx:
[input] enter x(x,y,z)
x

x:
 [echo] ${x}=x

getx:
[input] enter x(x,y,z)
y

x:
 [echo] ${x}=y

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 1 second


So, by applying my interpretation of your original description, since in your
tone of entitlement you are unable to provide me what I ask for ME to help YOU
with YOUR problem, I am unable to reproduce your issue.  Reopen this if and when
you can provide an example.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:59 ---
My original post has everything you need for the three build files to reproduce.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:57 ---
The following two tasks are BOTH defined in BOTH build_getcode_proj1.xml AND
build_getcode_proj2.xml:
They are inside a target tag.


 
  



  

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:56 ---
You may have to slap together a self-contained example and attach to this issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:54 ---
Please double-check that:

a)  is not defined in > 1 place.
b)  is defined inside a target.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:46 ---
Read the manual again as I did before I submited this.
I don't care if any properties or property references are inherited or copied 
over.
What do you propose I do to fix this then?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:42 ---
What do you mean Jeffrey? if property 'pvcs.promotion' is set and used in the 
sub-builds only, the fact that  defaults inheritAll to true is irrelevant, 
no? Or you have something else in mind?

Reading the bug report, I thought there might be something wrong with . 
But I've never used  myself though ;-) --DD

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 15:29 ---
I think you are not fully understanding the way that the  task works;
please go back & read the manual.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15747] - change tasks (e.g. Ant) to take urls as well as files

[Matt Benson]

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 2006-07-11 09:59 ---
> Loading the buildfile from URL is difficult because
> of the basedir. That's
> discussed on the dev-list.
> 
> "include another antfile" would be done via
> . That doesnt handle URLs
> (or ResourceCollections). I think because of the
> same reasons (import sets a
> property to that directory).

Personally I think we could get away with starting
from the current basedir and
//what-have-you can resolve relative to
that.  I can't remember what the arguments are against
that, but to me this just seems like advanced (i.e.
you'd better know what you're doing) usage.  And by
allowing the brave to indulge their sense of adventure
we become vicarious heroes...

I don't know why I wrote that.  :)

-Matt


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40014] New: - have to enter valid input multiple times on second build file for input task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014

   Summary: have to enter valid input multiple times on second build
file for input task
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.6.5
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Core tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


build.xml

 


   


build_getcode_proj1.xml and build_getcode_proj2.xml have this:

 
  



  

The build.xml calls getcode in build_getcode_proj1.xml fine and the input works 
fine.

Then build.xml calls getcode in build_getcode_proj2.xml and the following 
happens:
I'm prompted and I'll enter one of the validargs and hit enter.
Nothing happens and nothing is displayed.
I'll enter one of the validargs again and hit enter and it will continue on 
normally.
I should have only had to enter a validargs value once.


I'm assuming it is remembering something from the previous build file for some 
reason.

If I had three such files I imagine on the third file I'd have to enter it 3 
times to get it to continue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40013] New: - javadoc packageset fails unless class in first first package directory

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40013

   Summary: javadoc packageset fails unless class in first first
package directory
   Product: Ant
   Version: 1.6.5
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: Core tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I only had classes in a sub package for example 
package com.myorg.mypackage


The following failed when I didn't have any class files in the base "com" 
package directory:















However I refactord a base class into the com package and everything works fine 
and it finds my classes in the com.myorg.mypackage package.

I shouldn't have to have any classes in the first package to get it to find the 
classes in the sub packages.

Shawn

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r420862 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/contributors.html xdocs/contributors.xml

[jhm]

Author: jhm
Date: Tue Jul 11 07:16:14 2006
New Revision: 420862

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420862&view=rev
Log:
The book is a little bit out of date ...

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml

Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html?rev=420862&r1=420861&r2=420862&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html Tue Jul 11 07:16:14 2006
@@ -241,10 +241,7 @@
Jan Matèrne (jhm at apache.org)
 
 Jan is consultant for OOA/D in the computer centre of the government
-of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany. He is the co-author of
-http://www.galileocomputing.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-341?";>
-Rational Rose und UML im Praxiseinsatz the first German book about
-that OOAD-tool.
+of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany.
 
 
 Peter Reilly

Modified: ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml?rev=420862&r1=420861&r2=420862&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml Tue Jul 11 07:16:14 2006
@@ -99,10 +99,7 @@
Jan Matèrne (jhm at apache.org)
 
 Jan is consultant for OOA/D in the computer centre of the government
-of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany. He is the co-author of
-http://www.galileocomputing.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-341?";>
-Rational Rose und UML im Praxiseinsatz the first German book about
-that OOAD-tool.
+of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany.
 
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r420852 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/contributors.html xdocs/contributors.xml

[jhm]

Author: jhm
Date: Tue Jul 11 07:03:31 2006
New Revision: 420852

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420852&view=rev
Log:
- names are sorted by last name
- regenerate site

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml

Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html?rev=420852&r1=420851&r2=420852&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/docs/contributors.html Tue Jul 11 07:03:31 2006
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
 
 Martijn (J.M.) Kruithof (ant at kruithof xs4all nl)
 
-Martijn Kruithof is a system engineer working with and on Java products 
+Martijn Kruithof is a system engineer working with and on Java products
 in a telecommunication network setting.
 
 
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
 of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany. He is the co-author of
 http://www.galileocomputing.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-341?";>
 Rational Rose und UML im Praxiseinsatz the first German book about
-that OOAD-tool. 
+that OOAD-tool.
 
 
 Peter Reilly
@@ -326,6 +326,9 @@
 Ant in the 1.2 days, he wrote most of NetBeans' Ant integration.
 Recently he has worked on the NetBeans 4.0 project system, based heavily
 on Ant as a build tool.
+
+
+  Kevin Jackson (foamdino at gmail.com)
 
 
Alexey Solofnenko (trelony at gmail.com)

Modified: ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml?rev=420852&r1=420851&r2=420852&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml Tue Jul 11 07:03:31 2006
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 
 Martijn (J.M.) Kruithof (ant at kruithof xs4all nl)
 
-Martijn Kruithof is a system engineer working with and on Java products 
+Martijn Kruithof is a system engineer working with and on Java products
 in a telecommunication network setting.
 
 
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
 of Northrhine Westfalia / Germany. He is the co-author of
 http://www.galileocomputing.de/katalog/buecher/titel/gp/titelID-341?";>
 Rational Rose und UML im Praxiseinsatz the first German book about
-that OOAD-tool. 
+that OOAD-tool.
 
 
 
@@ -195,10 +195,10 @@
 on Ant as a build tool.
 
 
-   Alexey Solofnenko (trelony at gmail.com)
+  Kevin Jackson (foamdino at gmail.com)
 
 
-  Kevin Jackson (foamdino at gmail.com)
+   Alexey Solofnenko (trelony at gmail.com)
 
 
   
@@ -383,4 +383,4 @@
 
 
   
-
+
\ No newline at end of file



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r420820 - /ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml

[kevj]

Author: kevj
Date: Tue Jul 11 05:36:02 2006
New Revision: 420820

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420820&view=rev
Log:
added myself to xdocs/contributors.xml

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml

Modified: ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml?rev=420820&r1=420819&r2=420820&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/xdocs/contributors.xml Tue Jul 11 05:36:02 2006
@@ -197,7 +197,9 @@
 
Alexey Solofnenko (trelony at gmail.com)
 
-
+
+  Kevin Jackson (foamdino at gmail.com)
+
 
   
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39648] - NPE in Resources.toString

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39648


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 12:14 ---
Fixed by Matt
revision 409022

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38339] - [junitreport] allow to specify different stylesheet /output filename

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 12:01 ---




and your
  ${junitreport.xsl.fo}/junit-noframes.xsl
present should do the job.


Having the filename as parameter is a duplicate of
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37759] - For Groovy, dependencies do not include antlr-[version].jar

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:54 ---
Questions to our Groovy Guys - to update or not to update? ;-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30091] - dead link for "Interactive" External Tools and Tasks

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:46 ---
sorry, forgotten to give the link ;-)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=113960346022833&w=2

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30091] - dead link for "Interactive" External Tools and Tasks

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:46 ---
As requested by Daniel that part was removed from the external page.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27148] - Windows 98 compatibility

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27148


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:39 ---
Win98 support has been dropped.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115261794927251&w=2

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Result of Vote: Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7

[Jan.Materne]

We startet a VOTE on 2006-06-27 about dropping Win98 support [1].
We had

Conor   +1
Steve   +1
Jan +1
Alexey  +0
Matt+0
Stefan  +1
Martijn +1
Kev +1
DD  +0   - better rename to ant98.bat and keep it
Bruce   +1
Antoine +0   - same as DD

which means 
  +1   7
  +0   4
  -0   0
  -1   0
and we got Lazy Consensus [2], which means

!! that vote passed !!


Jan


[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115141884812670&w=2
[2] http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26844] - Add Parameter attribute which would allow the parameter to be mutable

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26844


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:13 ---
This is against Ants philosophy. But you can use .

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25540] - echo hyperlinks

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25540


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:11 ---
 would help.


  http://ant.apache.org";>Ant-Homepage



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24837] - Availability of VB6 tasks for ant

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24837


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:09 ---
> There will probably never be vb6 tasks in ant's own cvs repository

Especially after Microsofts announcement that VB6 is not longer maintained...


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24470] - Add new timestamp properties, MSTAMP and SSTAMP

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24470


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 11:07 ---
I dont see any benefit including these if you could do it in your buildfile
using nested  tags. You could also use a presetdef for predefining 
these.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21042] - Setting XSL parameter to input filename when processed whole directory.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:59 ---
Chances would increase if you apply the patch (including testcases).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20441] - Jar War & Ear tasks - Exploded Deploy

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20441


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:55 ---
I think it's a reasonable answer.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug20209 - AntLibs - Sandbox

[Jan.Materne]

I going through some bug reports and found 
   allow to put result of "get" task into a property [1]
Is this adressed in the HTTP-Antlib?

BTW - should the sandbox-homepage [2] be updated because of
gendoc, http and vss?


Jan



[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20209
[2] http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/sandbox.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19747] - Echoproperties should not overwrite

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19747


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:46 ---
concat, echo, record doesnt do that so it would be incosistent.
If you dont want to overwrite the file,  the existing one to another name
or use a conditional target for writing.






-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19037] - The 'jar' and 'war' tasks should accept the 'srcdir' attribute

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19037


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:26 ---
I think you could handle that using a construct like


  

  

JAR archives all files the fileset would give.
FILESET asks the depend-selector for each file whether to include in the list.
DEPEND compares that file with another one.
MAPPER could map *.class to *.java.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18484] - Please add parameters into

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18484


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:16 ---
Use  with nested s.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17895] - Smarter jar task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17895


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:10 ---
No comments - so close as WONTFIX.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17317] - enhance description

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17317


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:09 ---
1)  sets properties. So having these properties in a "called" target (I
think you use  or ) you have to pass them as each other property.

2) You can set additional properties using nested  tags.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16115] - http://ant.apache.org has 28 errors preventing it from being valid html as per w3c.org

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16115





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:04 ---
*** Bug 16329 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16329] - migrate new website to xhtml1.1

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16329


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 10:04 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16115 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15747] - change tasks (e.g. Ant) to take urls as well as files

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15747





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:59 ---
Loading the buildfile from URL is difficult because of the basedir. That's
discussed on the dev-list.

"include another antfile" would be done via . That doesnt handle URLs
(or ResourceCollections). I think because of the same reasons (import sets a
property to that directory).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14553


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:52 ---
I think the -lib option should make Max happy.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10570] - more value on tag with -projecthelp

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10570


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:42 ---
Formatting is preservered since Ant 1.5.

I dont see any benefit any additional attributes, but feel free to reopen and
give further information, ideas (and patches).

Main problem (keeping formatting) is done in 1.5 (after 2002-07-08), so I'll
close as FIXED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8986] - New attributes and nested tags for WAR task

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8986


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:26 ---
I think a
  

   

should do the job and its clear enough.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8502] - Style task needs a failonerror/haltonerror attribute

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8502


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:22 ---
Failing because of an invalid input file is a major problem to me, so failing
the build is ok.

And the AC-workaround is given, no further comments after Larry, so I following
his recommendation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

[Gump Integration Build]

To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 11 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- svn-antlib-test :  Task and Type Libraries for Apache Ant


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-antlibs/svn-antlib-test/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Dependency on ant-testutil exists, no need to add for property 
ant-testutil.jar.
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-antlibs/svn-antlib-test/gump_work/build_ant-antlibs_svn-antlib-test.html
Work Name: build_ant-antlibs_svn-antlib-test (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 2 mins 41 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
-Dant-testutil.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/build/lib/ant-testutil.jar
 test 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn/build/test-classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/build/lib/ant-testutil.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dist/junit/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn/build/ant-svn-11072006.jar
-
[junit] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
[junit] at 
org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
[junit] at 
junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:32)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:361)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:809)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:648)

[junit] Testcase: testDiffWithImplicitTrunk took 43.146 sec
[junit] FAILED
[junit] null
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:27)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.assertModified(SvnTagDiffTest.java:109)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.assertDiffWithTrunk(SvnTagDiffTest.java:62)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.testDiffWithImplicitTrunk(SvnTagDiffTest.java:56)
[junit] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[junit] at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
[junit] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
[junit] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
[jun

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6266] - Ant Zip task additional parameter request

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6266


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:17 ---
Nested zipfilesets would support this.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTypes/zipfileset.html


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4066] - Ant task and classpath

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4066


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-11 09:14 ---
No arguments for over two years ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

svn commit: r420763 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html

[jhm]

Author: jhm
Date: Tue Jul 11 01:38:58 2006
New Revision: 420763

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420763&view=rev
Log:
* add  + 
* update reference to Log4J 1.2.13
* minor notes

Modified:
ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html

Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html?rev=420763&r1=420762&r2=420763&view=diff
==
--- ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html (original)
+++ ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/tutorial-HelloWorldWithAnt.html Tue Jul 11 
01:38:58 2006
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
 be in src folder. All generated files should be under build, 
and there
 splitted into several subdirectories for the individual steps: 
classes for our compiled
 files and jar for our own JAR-file.
-The later directories are created by our buildfile, so we have to create 
only the src
-directory. (Because I am working on Windows, here is the win-syntax - 
translate to your shell):
+We have to create only the src directory. (Because I am working on 
Windows, here is 
+the win-syntax - translate to your shell):
 
 
 md src
@@ -66,16 +66,17 @@
 
 
 
-Creating a jar-file is not very difficult. But creating a startable 
jar-file needs more steps: create a 
+Creating a jar-file is not very difficult. But creating a startable 
jar-file needs more steps: create a
 manifest-file containing the start class, creating the target directory and 
archiving the files.
 
-echo Main-Class: oata.HelloWorld>mf
+echo Main-Class: oata.HelloWorld>myManifest
 md build\jar
-jar cfm build\jar\HelloWorld.jar mf -C build\classes .
+jar cfm build\jar\HelloWorld.jar myManifest -C build\classes .
 java -jar build\jar\HelloWorld.jar
 
 
-
+Note: Do not have blanks around the >-sign in the echo 
Main-Class instruction because it would 
+falsify it!
 
 
 
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@
 good practise to have a "clean" target, which deletes all the generated stuff. 
Many failures could be solved just
 by a "clean build".
 
-By default Ant uses build.xml as the name for a buildfile, so our 
build.xml would be:
+By default Ant uses build.xml as the name for a buildfile, so our 
.\build.xml would be:
 
 
 
@@ -136,16 +137,16 @@
 
   
 md build\classes
-javac 
--sourcepath src 
--d build\classes 
+javac
+-sourcepath src
+-d build\classes
 src\oata\HelloWorld.java
 echo Main-Class: oata.HelloWorld>mf
 md build\jar
-jar cfm 
-build\jar\HelloWorld.jar 
-mf 
--C build\classes 
+jar cfm
+build\jar\HelloWorld.jar
+mf
+-C build\classes
 .
 
 
@@ -154,15 +155,15 @@
   
   
 
-
 
-
+
 
-
 
 
@@ -170,19 +171,20 @@
 
 
   
-  
+
 
 
-  
+
 
 
 Enhance the build file
-Now we have a working buildfile we could do some enhancements: many time 
you are referencing the 
-same directories, main-class and jar-name are hard coded, and while invocation 
you have to remember 
+Now we have a working buildfile we could do some enhancements: many time 
you are referencing the
+same directories, main-class and jar-name are hard coded, and while invocation 
you have to remember
 the right order of build steps.
 The first and second point would be addressed with properties, the 
third with a special property - an attribute
 of the -tag and the fourth problem can be solved using 
dependencies.
 
+
 
 
 
@@ -225,6 +227,7 @@
 
 
 
+
 Now it's easier, just do a ant and you will get
 
 Buildfile: build.xml
@@ -258,7 +261,7 @@
 it's from Apache ;-)
 
 We store our external libraries in a new directory lib. Log4J can 
be
-http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/1.2.9/logging-log4j-1.2.9.zip";>downloaded
 [1] from Logging's Homepage.
+http://www.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/1.2.13/logging-log4j-1.2.13.zip";>downloaded
 [1] from Logging's Homepage.
 Create the lib directory and extract the log4j-1.2.9.jar into that 
lib-directory. After that we have to modify
 our java source to use that library and our buildfile so that this library 
could be accessed during compilation and run.
 
@@ -277,7 +280,7 @@
 
 public static void main(String[] args) {
 BasicConfigurator.configure();
-logger.info("Hello World");
+logger.info("Hello World");  
// the old SysO-statement
 }
 }
 
@@ -287,7 +290,7 @@
 Don't try to run ant -