DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40152] - rmic: Ant 1.7 adds -vcompat when building iiop stubs

2006-08-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-02 18:53 ---
Steve,

  You are right.  I will work up the -unit tests for the before and after.

Powell

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40152] - rmic: Ant 1.7 adds -vcompat when building iiop stubs

2006-08-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40152





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-02 18:16 ---
I that added this. I did it because the switch to java1.5 was breaking things,
as suddenly, silently, rmic wasnt creating backwards compatible bits. You dont
find out that you've stopped creating compatible stubs when 

Now, regarding the patch

< cmd.createArgument().setValue(stubOption);
---
> if (stubVersion == null && !attributes.getIiop())
>cmd.createArgument().setValue(stubOption);

Um, what happens if stubVersion!=null? Surely we'd actualy want the stub version
people asked for to be set.

I will commit a patch that works, if it comes with
 -unit tests that fail before they are applied (antunit ones are good)
 -rmic tests that set a stub version and which don't fail when the patch goes 
in.

-steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40152] - rmic: Ant 1.7 adds -vcompat when building iiop stubs

2006-08-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40152


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VOTE ant-vss antlib promote to antlib proper

2006-08-02 Thread Martijn Kruithof 

+0 on DD/Stefans proposal (as in not able to actively help on vss)

Stefan Bodewig wrote:


On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 


So, +1 on simply removing the vss entries to optional.properties,
and provide the antlib. --DD
 


What about the optional taskdef for VSS?  If we want to release the
VSS antlib, should we remove all the old VSS code from the core?
   



I'd suggest to leave them in but print deprecation warnings for one
release of Ant.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.7.0 beta1

2006-08-02 Thread Martijn Kruithof 

Still on holidays,

Still +1

Martijn


Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:


Hello Kev,

+1

Antoine

Kev Jackson wrote:
 


After some off-list negotiations, Antoine and myself are agreeing to
be co-release managers of Ant 1.7.

I will personally build 1.7.0beta1 or pre-release and post the
distribution on people.apache.org/~kevj for testing/evaluation by
Friday next week (29th July).

This pre-release/beta will be based on svn trunk as it stands next week -

Antoine commits himself to building/releasing the next beta, and we
will make a rota afterwards (maybe not systematically alternating),
but we'll work something out.

The following issues need to be resolved until then :

  - ManifestTest (I noticed that recent changes caused this to fail,
but I haven't had time recently to look into it or report it - sorry
my bad)
  - svn antlib gump breaks (not sure if this is config issue as it
used to work fine)
  - Stuff still on the wiki [1]

Do you agree with this plan

[ ] Yes

[ ] No

---

Parallel to this, we should discuss other issues :

Whether or not we want to create an Ant 1.7 branch in SVN and when -
Antoine has mentioned that although this is stated in the release
instructions document, that some people were unhappy with branching
immediately - so this needs to be figured out.

We also need to discuss which (if any) of the antlibs will be released
at the same time as Ant 1.7.  I think that we should at least release
the svn antlib (if we can get a clean gump build!) as it's one of the
most requested features.

Also I notice that the WHATSNEW is apparently incorrect, there is
mention of a  task in it, but Steve suggested we point
people to ivy and/or maven2, so this confusion over the libraries task
(in or out) needs to be cleaned up/removed from the WHATSNEW document.

Thanks
(I'm quaking in my boots with responsibility now that I've committed
to do this :) )

Kev

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant17/Planning

--
"Man is truly free only among equally free men" - Michael Bakunin


   




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2006-08-02 Thread Gump Integration Build 
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 45 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- svn-antlib-test :  Task and Type Libraries for Apache Ant


Full details are available at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-antlibs/svn-antlib-test/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -DEBUG- Dependency on ant-testutil exists, no need to add for property 
ant-testutil.jar.
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-antlibs/svn-antlib-test/gump_work/build_ant-antlibs_svn-antlib-test.html
Work Name: build_ant-antlibs_svn-antlib-test (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 2 mins 41 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only 
-Dant-testutil.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/build/lib/ant-testutil.jar
 test 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn/build/test-classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/build/lib/ant-testutil.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/dist/junit/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant-antlibs/svn/build/ant-svn-02082006.jar
-
[junit] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
[junit] at 
org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
[junit] at 
junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:32)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:361)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:809)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:648)

[junit] Testcase: testDiffWithImplicitTrunk took 41.899 sec
[junit] FAILED
[junit] null
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:27)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.assertModified(SvnTagDiffTest.java:109)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.assertDiffWithTrunk(SvnTagDiffTest.java:62)
[junit] at 
org.apache.ant.svn.SvnTagDiffTest.testDiffWithImplicitTrunk(SvnTagDiffTest.java:56)
[junit] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[junit] at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
[junit] at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
[junit] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
[jun