This topic doesn't look like popular :) Should we consider this silence as a "no go"?
2012/7/16 Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> > explicitly binding my vote: > +1 > > Nicolas > > Le 11 juil. 2012 à 10:48, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit : > > > EasyAnt is a project based on Ant and Ivy which is in incubation under > our "sponsoring". > > > > I kind of misunderstood the "sponsoring". I was thinking that it was > implying that EasyAnt will become part of the Ant project. It doesn't > bylaw. We just cleared it out with the EasyAnt community. So let's clear it > out with this vote for the Ant PMC. > > I also thought that EasyAnt should have a classical incubation period, > doing release and growing a community. But it has no sense since if EasyAnt > is accepted as a subproject of Ant, the Ant PMC will be responsible for > EasyAnt code and releases. > > > > So if we accept EasyAnt, the code will be imported, committers added. > But releases should be voted by us. I'm the only active EasyAnt committer > which is also an Ant PMC member. This means that other Ant PMC member > should be involved so that things can roll. We have been managing that with > Ivy and IvyDE, but this is something that should have in mind while voting. > Also note that it would somehow resolve itself it some EasyAnt developer > become part of the Ant PMC, some of them have already wrote some nice > patches on Ant and Ivy :) > > > > So, should we accept EasyAnt as a subproject ? > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > -- Jean Louis Boudart Independent consultant Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/
