[VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.1 based on RC1

[Stefan Bodewig]

Hi all

I've created a release candidate for 1.10.1:

git tag: ANT_1.10.1_RC1
 on commit: 530e59d
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
  revision: 18086
Maven artifacts:
  
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1013/org/apache/ant/

This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
2017-02-05 19:30UTC.

Cheers

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.9 based on RC1

[Stefan Bodewig]

Hi all

I've created a release candidate for 1.9.9:

git tag: ANT_199_RC1
 on commit: d5bd3b4
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
  revision: 18085
Maven artifacts:
 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1012/org/apache/ant/

This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
2017-02-05 19:30UTC.

Cheers

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

[Gintautas Grigelionis]

I was hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1478 (updatesite
resolver sets ext token to empty rather than jar);
also, it seems illogical that jars directory in the cache contains jar.pack
files, whereas the actual jar files are in jars_unpacked...
anybody interested to discuss?

Gintas

2016-12-22 20:57 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis :

> Is the version number agreed upon? For IvyDE builds think the latest
> version of Ivy is 2.5.0.alpha_20161213000915
>
> Gintas
>
>
> 2016-12-15 17:53 GMT+01:00 Matt Sicker :
>
>> I'd definitely agree with the consistency principle.
>>
>> On 15 December 2016 at 01:38, Stefan Bodewig  wrote:
>>
>> > On 2016-12-14, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> >
>> > > When it comes to version numbers, I'm more concerned about following
>> > > semantic versioning than whether or not it's a major release. Bugfixes
>> > > warrant micro version updates, while new features warrant minor
>> version
>> > > updates (and backward incompatible API changes are for the major
>> > version).
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how Ivy has decided on its version numbers in the past, but
>> > for Ant we've never followed semantic versioning that strictly. In
>> > particular we've created lots of micro releases that contained new
>> > features and most of the time created minor versions when we changed JDK
>> > requirements. In a sense we've shifted semantic versioning to the right
>> > and never created major releases (and neither pure bugfix releases),
>> > maybe because Ant2 could bring up some ghosts of the far past. :-)
>> >
>> > As much as I like semantic versioning (and use it in other projects),
>> > I'd prefer to stay consistent with the way versions have been used in
>> > prior releases.
>> >
>> > Stefan
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker 
>>
>
>

Cutting new RCs

[Stefan Bodewig]

Hi all,

this is a a heads-up that I intend to cut release candidates for 1.9.9
and 1.10.1 very soon, maybe even tonight (my time, i.e. < 10h from
now). If you want to get anything in and have a chance of stopping me,
please yell.

Cheers

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org