Re: Request - Native Java "Script" Support
On 2012-09-20 18:45, Jeffrey E Care wrote: > Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 09:27:10 > AM: > >> I guess I knew that this idea wouldn't get a big hooray... >> >> If you had tried NAnt you would probably agree that in-line Java >> is cooler than custom tasks because you (can) have the entire script >> in one file. >> >> The proposal wasn't to satisfy my own needs but to serve a large base >> of Ant users who are considering jumping the ship for Maven and other >> tools. > > I doubt I would agree. > > In my experience anything sufficiently complicated that it can't be > handled by the standard tasks is going to require non-trivial custom code. > No matter what technology I'm using to implement that custom code (e.g. > javascript, java, groovy) I'm not going to want to clutter up my build.xml > with it. I'm going to want to use my regular development tools to write > that code. > > Having operated in both the Ant & Maven worlds my answer is the same: if I > need to do something custom in Ant I'm going to want to write a > full-fledged custom task instead of trying to inline it in my build.xml; > if I need to do something custom in Maven I'm going to want to write a > full-fledged mojo instead of trying to inline it in my POM. > We all do our choices. The request was simply about extending the range of those :-) Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Request - Native Java "Script" Support
On 2012-09-20 15:11, Jeffrey E Care wrote: > Anders Rundgren wrote on 09/20/2012 07:55:13 > AM: > >> I haven't tried with Groovy script and my request is really about getting >> a core feature already verified being useful in NAnt into the default Ant >> installation so you can ship build scripts to anybody (having an upgraded >> Ant NB...) without requiring yet another install. >> >> It is quite possible that I'm wrong but it seems that this would something >> like the "javac" and "java" targets combined so 90% of the code should >> already >> be in place sort of :-) >> >> IMO such a feature could extend the life of Ant considerably. Nobody can >> beat >> the power of a full-blown programming language! > > Why not just write a custom task? Jeffrey, I guess I knew that this idea wouldn't get a big hooray... If you had tried NAnt you would probably agree that in-line Java is cooler than custom tasks because you (can) have the entire script in one file. The proposal wasn't to satisfy my own needs but to serve a large base of Ant users who are considering jumping the ship for Maven and other tools. Oh well. Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Request - Native Java "Script" Support
On 2012-09-20 13:21, Vimil Saju wrote: > Hi Anders, > > Have you tried groovy script? I think groovy is completely compatible with > java. > That is any valid java code is valid groovy code too. Hi Vimil, I guess you refer to: http://groovy.codehaus.org ? I haven't tried with Groovy script and my request is really about getting a core feature already verified being useful in NAnt into the default Ant installation so you can ship build scripts to anybody (having an upgraded Ant NB...) without requiring yet another install. It is quite possible that I'm wrong but it seems that this would something like the "javac" and "java" targets combined so 90% of the code should already be in place sort of :-) IMO such a feature could extend the life of Ant considerably. Nobody can beat the power of a full-blown programming language! Regards, Anders > > > ____ > From: Anders Rundgren > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:11 AM > Subject: Request - Native Java "Script" Support > > Dear Ant-Team, > I am an avid Ant user since more than 10 years back and I'm happy to see how > it has progressed! > > Recently I have begun writing very complex build scripts and found myself > craving for a more programmatic solution which using Ant in standard > configurations means using JavaScript or writing extensions. > > In addition, I have also been using .NET tools like NAnt. > > In NAnt there is no JavaScript support but there is support for native C#. > > I find C# and Java much better for this purpose than JavaScript so my > question is really: > Would it be completely unthinkable to add Java as a scripting language? > Since Ant already presumes JDK it doesn't sound completely undoable either. > > Beanshell isn't an active project and I don't see any advantage with > Beanshell compared to native Java. > > Sincerely, > Anders Rundgren > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Request - Native Java "Script" Support
Dear Ant-Team, I am an avid Ant user since more than 10 years back and I'm happy to see how it has progressed! Recently I have begun writing very complex build scripts and found myself craving for a more programmatic solution which using Ant in standard configurations means using JavaScript or writing extensions. In addition, I have also been using .NET tools like NAnt. In NAnt there is no JavaScript support but there is support for native C#. I find C# and Java much better for this purpose than JavaScript so my question is really: Would it be completely unthinkable to add Java as a scripting language? Since Ant already presumes JDK it doesn't sound completely undoable either. Beanshell isn't an active project and I don't see any advantage with Beanshell compared to native Java. Sincerely, Anders Rundgren - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
