Re: [VOTE] ant 1.6.1

2004-01-20 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
 

Is it OK to delay 1.6.1 by a week, putting :
1.6.1 beta on Thursday, Jan 29 th
1.6.1 final  on Thursday, Feb 12th
   

You have my +1 for delaying 1.6.1 to get the bugs fixed.
One more thing on the release process.  Even if we put a planned date
into the release plan that gets accepted, we still need to have a
formal vote on the final release.  I.e. what you outline above means
that you are going to build a distribution and start a vote thread
mid-February and after it has been approved by the PMC, it becomes the
1.6.1 release.
We really need a formal vote on the distribution deliverable.
Stefan

 

Hi Stefan,
fine, I will remember to organize a new vote before the release itself.
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [VOTE] ant 1.6.1

2004-01-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Is it OK to delay 1.6.1 by a week, putting :
> 1.6.1 beta on Thursday, Jan 29 th
> 1.6.1 final  on Thursday, Feb 12th

You have my +1 for delaying 1.6.1 to get the bugs fixed.

One more thing on the release process.  Even if we put a planned date
into the release plan that gets accepted, we still need to have a
formal vote on the final release.  I.e. what you outline above means
that you are going to build a distribution and start a vote thread
mid-February and after it has been approved by the PMC, it becomes the
1.6.1 release.

We really need a formal vote on the distribution deliverable.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [VOTE] ant 1.6.1

2004-01-20 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
+1 

Jose Alberto

> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 20 January 2004 10:00
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] ant 1.6.1
> 
> 
> Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > There are 2 bug reports which I would like to process for ant 1.6.1.
> > (see footnotes)
> >
> > Is it OK to delay 1.6.1 by a week, putting :
> > 1.6.1 beta on Thursday, Jan 29 th
> > 1.6.1 final  on Thursday, Feb 12th
> >
> > Is this OK ?
> 
> +1
> Peter
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > Footnotes :
> >
> > [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 
> ClearCase
> > extensions
> > [2] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13510 
> > cvschangelog should accept branch as optional parameter
> > [3] 
> > 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&b
ug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Ant&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&newqueryname=&order=bugs.votes%20desc
 
>
> (bug reports on ant sorted by number of votes)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] ant 1.6.1

2004-01-20 Thread Peter Reilly
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:

There are 2 bug reports which I would like to process for ant 1.6.1. 
(see footnotes)

Is it OK to delay 1.6.1 by a week, putting :
1.6.1 beta on Thursday, Jan 29 th
1.6.1 final  on Thursday, Feb 12th
Is this OK ?
+1
Peter

Antoine
Footnotes :
[1] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 ClearCase 
extensions
[2] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13510 
cvschangelog should accept branch as optional parameter
[3] 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Ant&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&newqueryname=&order=bugs.votes%20desc 

(bug reports on ant sorted by number of votes)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[VOTE] ant 1.6.1

2004-01-19 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert

There are 2 bug reports which I would like to process for ant 1.6.1. 
(see footnotes)

Is it OK to delay 1.6.1 by a week, putting :
1.6.1 beta on Thursday, Jan 29 th
1.6.1 final  on Thursday, Feb 12th
Is this OK ?

Antoine
Footnotes :
[1] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 ClearCase 
extensions
[2] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13510 cvschangelog 
should accept branch as optional parameter
[3] 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Ant&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&newqueryname=&order=bugs.votes%20desc
(bug reports on ant sorted by number of votes)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]