DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 02:15 ---
I would prefer the 'evolving' approach as documented on wiki: 
Proposals/EnhancedTestReports: 
http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Proposals/EnhancedTestReports.

I think that what you try to achieve can be done by the current XML output 
format.
Sorting and grouping in the standard XSLT files has already been achieved for 
package.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

2006-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-28 17:11 ---
This issue is very popular. Any one wants to write a patch for it ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport

2003-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106

Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-10-24 15:56 ---
I have a TestCase that does something like this:

public void MyTest extends TestCase(){
public static Test suite(MyTestSuite) {
TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
suite.addTest(new MyTest(testPerformance));
suite.addTest(new MyTest(testPerformance2));
suite.addTest(new CustomDataPoolTest(testPerformance));
suite.addTest(new CustomDataPoolTest(privatePerformanceTest));
return suite;
}
public void testPerformance(){
//do something
}
public void testPerformance2(){
//do something
}
  
}

The output of the Junit Report will record:

Mytest
testPerformance
testPerformance2
testPerformance
privatePerformance



There doesn't appear to be a way to determine that the second testPerformance 
or privatePerformance tests orginated from a different TestCase class. It seems 
like the report should list the suite name instead of the TestCase Name.  For 
instance:


MyTestSuite
MyTest.testPerformance
MyTest.testPerformance2
CustomDataPoolTest.testPerformance
CustomDataPoolTest.privatePerformance

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]