DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-16 02:15 --- I would prefer the 'evolving' approach as documented on wiki: Proposals/EnhancedTestReports: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Proposals/EnhancedTestReports. I think that what you try to achieve can be done by the current XML output format. Sorting and grouping in the standard XSLT files has already been achieved for package. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-28 17:11 --- This issue is very popular. Any one wants to write a patch for it ? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24106] - Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106 Suites are not reported correctly in JUnitReport --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-24 15:56 --- I have a TestCase that does something like this: public void MyTest extends TestCase(){ public static Test suite(MyTestSuite) { TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(); suite.addTest(new MyTest(testPerformance)); suite.addTest(new MyTest(testPerformance2)); suite.addTest(new CustomDataPoolTest(testPerformance)); suite.addTest(new CustomDataPoolTest(privatePerformanceTest)); return suite; } public void testPerformance(){ //do something } public void testPerformance2(){ //do something } } The output of the Junit Report will record: Mytest testPerformance testPerformance2 testPerformance privatePerformance There doesn't appear to be a way to determine that the second testPerformance or privatePerformance tests orginated from a different TestCase class. It seems like the report should list the suite name instead of the TestCase Name. For instance: MyTestSuite MyTest.testPerformance MyTest.testPerformance2 CustomDataPoolTest.testPerformance CustomDataPoolTest.privatePerformance - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]