DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25258] - System.in closed by java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 System.in closed by java [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.6Beta |1.6.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25258] - System.in closed by java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 System.in closed by java [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Minor Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Component|Core tasks |Documentation Resolution|INVALID | Target Milestone|--- |1.6 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-08 01:46 --- Ok but that's quite surprising since this change doesn't appear to be documented explicitly. I guess it's a side effect of the new input redirection in the exec and java tasks. I'm reopening the bug to have this issue mentioned in the changelog or in the manual. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25258] - System.in closed by java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 System.in closed by java [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-08 02:27 --- Fair enough. I've documented this. Will be in the final release. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25258] - System.in closed by java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 System.in closed by java [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 22:26 --- I believe the 1.6 behaviour is correct and 1.5 was incorrect. When you use java without any form of input and the program tries to read from System.in, it *should* get -1 (i.e. EOF) since there is no input available. Blocking is not a good behaviour here since it tends to hang the build. If the process eats the CPU, I would suspect that the java program is not handling EOF situations correctly. When you say with Ant 1.5.4 the read() method blocks as expected, I have to say, this is not expected but was a bug in Ant prior top Ant 1.6 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
