DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29743] - modified selector has poor cachefile save performance
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743 modified selector has poor cachefile save performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29743] - modified selector has poor cachefile save performance
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743 modified selector has poor cachefile save performance --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-23 19:01 --- Created an attachment (id=11931) Modified select bugs 29742,29743 bugs fix, plus added support for ChecksumAlgorithm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29743] - modified selector has poor cachefile save performance
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743 modified selector has poor cachefile save performance --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-23 19:02 --- Created an attachment (id=11932) ChecksumAlgorithm class for ModifiedSelector - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29743] - modified selector has poor cachefile save performance
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29743 modified selector has poor cachefile save performance --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-23 19:14 --- [PATCH] I have created a patch that addresses the poor cachefile save performance. This patch addresses this bug, as well as bug 29742. The revised ModifiedSelector now implements the BuildListener interface. Upon configuration, it registers itself with the Project as a BuildListener. The ModifiedSelector is notified of finished BuildEvents, like taskFinished, targetFinished and buildFinished. Saving of the cachefile is now delayed until the next finished BuildEvent occurs, most likely, a taskFinished call. There is also a new attribute called delayupdate. It defaults to true to gain the new performance increase of delaying the save of the cachefile. Setting the delayupdate attribute to false allows continual cachefile updates ( like the current ModifiedSelector ). I also ran a sample population of files to note the reduction in time to cache the file changes: sample: 6596 image files averaging 31K, total size of 204 MB the cache is empty, so all files are seen as revised, this is the most extreme case to show the largest performance gain MD5 digest mode with continual update: 9 minutes, 8 seconds MD5 digest mode with delayed update:36 seconds CRC checksum mode with continual update: 7 minutes, 36 seconds CRC checksum mode with delayed update: 43 seconds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
