DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 11:54 --- Created an attachment (id=21368) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21368action=view) java.nio changes against Ant 1.7.0, in unified diff format I have modified the original NIO changes and applied them against Ant 1.7.0. These changes work with the new Resources framework. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21368|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 12:06 --- Created an attachment (id=21369) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21369action=view) java.nio changes against Ant 1.7.0, in unified diff format -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21368|java.nio changes against Ant|[faulty] java.nio changes description|1.7.0, in unified diff |against Ant 1.7.0, in |format |unified diff format -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 17:12 --- I do not think that we need to make a version of FileUtils for java 1.3, 1.4, 5, 6, 7 etc. It is far too big for that. The only difference that I can see in the patch is part of the (overlong) copyfile method - the raw file copy without filtering. This part could be extracted from FileUtils.copyFile and it could use a runtime found implemention of the most efficient RawFileCopy class for this particular JVM. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 18:37 --- Agreed Peter. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 07:54 --- (In reply to comment #13) It could be a compile-time-optional part of the runtime, something that is only delegated to when the runtime is 1.4+. Which means that we'd need an interface/facade to the operations and then an original+nio implementation, (pushed here from Antoine on the dev list ...) I've started looking into this and I can see that we need an interface of the current FileUtils class (minus static methods) and then a factory to select the implementation, and 2+ implementations, original/classic (ie what we have right now), NioFileUtils (such as this code here in this bug report) and Java6FileUtils (for all the file permission goodies). I'm not sure how to resolve the problem that *a lot* of the current code presumes a lot about FileUtils (ie that certain methods are static etc). Since we have to maintain bwc, this will probably have to mean that the interface contains definitions of all instance methods, and the original FileUtils will have to keep the static methods (as they are public) and any new implementation will have to delegate to the original for these methods. Is this a sensible strategy? Kev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 15:32 --- Can static methods just execute non-static methods on util's singleton? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-20 18:30 --- (In reply to comment #15) Can static methods just execute non-static methods on util's singleton? Definetely, We could even use the singleton / constructor as factory and turn the FileUtils into a proxy with embedded factory. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 11:36 --- It could be a compile-time-optional part of the runtime, something that is only delegated to when the runtime is 1.4+. Which means that we'd need an interface/facade to the operations and then an original+nio implementation, the default behaviour being to use nio on 1.4+, though with a switch to override that so that the original code can still be tested. This is a lot of effort; the speedup would have to be tangible. Are the any measurements, both for local and remote filesystems? There is some justification for doing such a facade, and it isnt just possible speedup -the facade could also offer access to the file permissions stuff coming in Java6.0, letting ant tasks work with permissions properly on the 6.0 platform, as and when it comes out. -steve -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 18:52 --- Created an attachment (id=17385) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17385action=view) java.nio changes against Ant 1.6.5, in unified diff format I've used the original modified source files attached to this bug and create a patch against 1.6.5 from them. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 18:53 --- Created an attachment (id=17386) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17386action=view) lazy init changes against Ant 1.6.5, in unified diff format I've used the original modified source files attached to this bug and create a patch against 1.6.5 from them. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17385|java.nio changes against Ant|[faulty] java.nio changes description|1.6.5, in unified diff |against Ant 1.6.5, in |format |unified diff format -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17385|1 |0 is patch|| Attachment #17385|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:21 --- The second patch is completely irrelevant to Ant HEAD... one might argue the second patch could be structured into Ant HEAD in more valuable ways as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:24 --- (From update of attachment 17385) Patch fails on copying large files; need to change transfer size in transferTo() call to a lower value. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17385|0 |1 is patch|| Attachment #17385|1 |0 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17385|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:27 --- Created an attachment (id=17388) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17388action=view) java.nio changes against Ant 1.6.5, in unified diff format I've used the original modified source files attached to this bug and created a patch against 1.6.5 from them. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:29 --- Can't say I disagree with Matt Benson there; but I just wanted to make sure that the original submitter's changes were both available in patch format rather than modified Java code. In all fairness, the lazy init calls patch should not be in this bug but in a feature request of its own. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17388|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=17389) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17389action=view) java.nio changes against Ant 1.6.5, in unified diff format I've used the original modified source files attached to this bug and created a patch against 1.6.5 from them. One last time, to fix transferTo() buffer size. Apologies for the attachment spam. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-11 19:47 --- (In reply to comment #5) The second patch is completely irrelevant to Ant HEAD... one might argue the second patch could be structured into Ant HEAD in more valuable ways as well. correction: the second occurrence of second should be first. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 01:53 --- java.nio are only available as part of Java 1.4+, to accept this into the trunk would mean a dependency on 1.4+ compiler to build ant - is this ok? My understanding was that we should try to preserve bwc within ant (as a tool) and for building ant itself - is this no longer a concern? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 07:35 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
java.nio are only available as part of Java 1.4+, to accept this into the
trunk
would mean a dependency on 1.4+ compiler to build ant [...]
Could probably be solved by adding to build.xml#needs.jdk1.4+ something like
filename name=${util.package}/NioFileUtils.java/
meaning if compiled on JDK 1.3 the optimization would be unavailable.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.6.2beta1 |1.6.2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30094] - Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30094 Performance enhancements using java.nio lazy calls --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-14 07:17 --- Created an attachment (id=12110) Sources and a jar containing the patch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
